Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rumor: New Lufthansa Logo For China?  
User currently offlinebestwestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 7264 posts, RR: 57
Posted (2 years 3 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 18598 times:

I understand from a reputable source that a new logo for China was approved recently. Has anyone seen it?


The world is really getting smaller these days
37 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineEricR From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1904 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 18568 times:

It is similar to the Alaska Airlines logo. However, instead of a picture of an Eskimo on the tail, there is a picture of Mao on the tail.

User currently offlineCZ346 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 95 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 18544 times:

Quoting EricR (Reply 1):
It is similar to the Alaska Airlines logo. However, instead of a picture of an Eskimo on the tail, there is a picture of Mao on the tail.

After spending a couple years in China, you just made my day.


User currently offlinejcs17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 39
Reply 3, posted (2 years 3 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 18356 times:

Quoting EricR (Reply 1):
It is similar to the Alaska Airlines logo. However, instead of a picture of an Eskimo on the tail, there is a picture of Mao on the tail.

I chuckled. Nice job.



America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
User currently offlinegardermoen From Australia, joined Jul 1999, 1522 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 17808 times:

This sounds like a bizarre concept.
Why have a logo just for one market? If they were going for a subsidiary brand, then fair enough.
The Lufthansa logo is used worlwide, and its business is built upon having this one image.
Not sure what the rationale for this is.


User currently offlinePlainplane From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 849 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (2 years 3 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 17708 times:

Sounds like maybe how KLM has its main branded aircraft and then others with "KLM Asia" without the crown?

User currently offlineghifty From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 891 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 3 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 17132 times:

Quoting gardermoen (Reply 4):

This sounds like a bizarre concept.
Why have a logo just for one market? If they were going for a subsidiary brand, then fair enough.
The Lufthansa logo is used worlwide, and its business is built upon having this one image.
Not sure what the rationale for this is.

KLM Asia, Swissair Asia, Japan Asia Airways, British Asia Airways, etc.

If I remember correctly, it has something to do with China not wanting non-Chinese carriers flying in between Chinese airports and/or between Chinese airports and Taiwan (regarded, by China, as a "rogue province"). Therefore, the above airlines had to add the "Asia" monniker and remove their respective country's flags and national symbols. Doing so made airlines such as "KLM Asia" seem like entirely new airlines to the Chinese gov't, apparently. (something like that)

I thought that sanction ended.. apparently not?  



Fly Delta Jets
User currently offlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2131 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 3 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 16777 times:

Q: UA flies to both the Mainland and Taiwan, why are they not painting their aircraft with a special livery?


John@SFO
User currently offlineClipperBerlin From Germany, joined Feb 2008, 90 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 3 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 16525 times:

Quoting legacyins (Reply 7):
If I remember correctly, it has something to do with China not wanting non-Chinese carriers flying in between Chinese airports and/or between Chinese airports and Taiwan (regarded, by China, as a "rogue province"). Therefore, the above airlines had to add the "Asia" monniker and remove their respective country's flags and national symbols. Doing so made airlines such as "KLM Asia" seem like entirely new airlines to the Chinese gov't, apparently. (something like that)

I thought that sanction ended.. apparently not?  

Exactly. Thats´s why in the past Lufthansa sent a 747-400 (D-ABTD) painted in Condors color scheme to Taiwan. But that was in den middle of the nineties. A new logo on the planes instead of the kranich does not make sense as mentioned before. Maybe just an add-on to the A380 named Peking?

ClipperBerlin


User currently offlinewarden145 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 541 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 3 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 16118 times:

Quoting legacyins (Reply 7):
Q: UA flies to both the Mainland and Taiwan, why are they not painting their aircraft with a special livery?

I don't know (and am curious as well), but I wonder if it may have something to do with flag carrier status? UA's never been an "official" flag carrier (and the U.S. has never had one, for that matter), whereas LH, KL, BA, SR, JL, etc are/were flag carriers for their respective nations.

With that said, like ghifty said, I thought that the PRC had stopped being so particular about this specific issue?



ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
User currently offlinekl911 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2003, 5259 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (2 years 3 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 15965 times:

Quoting ClipperBerlin (Reply 8):
Maybe just an add-on to the A380 named Peking?

Name another A380 'Taipei' and problem solved. ( Just make sure to send the right A380 to the right city   )


User currently offlinegatechae From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 92 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 12162 times:

Quoting warden145 (Reply 9):

Quoting legacyins (Reply 7):
Q: UA flies to both the Mainland and Taiwan, why are they not painting their aircraft with a special livery?

I don't know (and am curious as well), but I wonder if it may have something to do with flag carrier status? UA's never been an "official" flag carrier (and the U.S. has never had one, for that matter), whereas LH, KL, BA, SR, JL, etc are/were flag carriers for their respective nations.

With that said, like ghifty said, I thought that the PRC had stopped being so particular about this specific issue?

I think it probably has to do with the flag carrier issue as you said and the fact that none of the European nations (other than the Vatican IIRC) officially recognize the ROC diplomatically.



What are these?Pancakes?*gets force fed one*Oh oh, these are delectable.Good news Flappy, I've decided not to kill you!
User currently offlineCZ346 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 95 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 11769 times:

Quoting legacyins (Reply 7):

Q: UA flies to both the Mainland and Taiwan, why are they not painting their aircraft with a special livery?

Because this is only Mainland China. A lot of people don't realize just HOW different Taiwan / Macau / Hong Kong truly are to mainland China. Flying - lets say HKG to SJZ (random I know) is a heck of a lot different than flying CAN to SJZ. Yes, HKG / Macau / Taiwan are still under the Chinese rule, but they are not Mainland and by no means are governed under the same rules, regulations or even political parties.

[Edited 2012-07-28 10:55:04]

User currently onlineYLWbased From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2006, 839 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 11725 times:

Quoting EricR (Reply 1):

ROFL

YLWbased



Hong Kong is not China. Not better or worse, just different.
User currently offlineWROORD From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 962 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 10862 times:

Quoting CZ346 (Reply 12):
Because this is only Mainland China. A lot of people don't realize just HOW different Taiwan / Macau / Hong Kong truly are to mainland China. Flying - lets say HKG to SJZ (random I know) is a heck of a lot different than flying CAN to SJZ. Yes, HKG / Macau / Taiwan are still under the Chinese rule, but they are not Mainland and by no means are governed under the same rules, regulations or even political parties.

Taiwan is definitely not under PRC rule, even though they would like to think that way. US Air Force has its base in Taiwan protecting its independence and possible PRC attack. HK and Macau both still have separate government, but its governor is now approved by Beijing.
The problem PRC has with Taiwan is that Taiwan still uses Republic of China (ROC) as its official name and PRC believes that they have the right to use chinese in its name. For that reson IOC has Taiwan under Chinese Taipei in the Olympics.


User currently offlineCZ346 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 95 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 10626 times:

Quoting WROORD (Reply 14):
Taiwan is definitely not under PRC rule, even though they would like to think that way. US Air Force has its base in Taiwan protecting its independence and possible PRC attack. HK and Macau both still have separate government, but its governor is now approved by Beijing.
The problem PRC has with Taiwan is that Taiwan still uses Republic of China (ROC) as its official name and PRC believes that they have the right to use chinese in its name. For that reson IOC has Taiwan under Chinese Taipei in the Olympics.

See what I get for watching the Chinese news for a year?


User currently offlinechootie From Germany, joined May 2007, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 9057 times:

Quoting bestwestern (Thread starter):

I understand from a reputable source that a new logo for China was approved recently. Has anyone seen it?

...I would call the BS card here, and please let us know who this "reputable" source should be.

Must be a slow news day.......   



chootie
User currently offlineRara From Germany, joined Jan 2007, 2134 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 8145 times:

Quoting WROORD (Reply 14):
The problem PRC has with Taiwan is that Taiwan still uses Republic of China (ROC) as its official name and PRC believes that they have the right to use chinese in its name. For that reson IOC has Taiwan under Chinese Taipei in the Olympics.

Hm, small correction, the Mainland is actually quite happy with the name Republic of China, even though they dispute it - at least the term "China" is still in there. It's Taiwan as a country name that they get really angry about. Anything to suggest Taiwan is not a part of China anymore gets their blood boiling.   Hence the compromise Chinese Taipei.



Samson was a biblical tough guy, but his dad Samsonite was even more of a hard case.
User currently offlineghifty From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 891 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 8074 times:

Quoting WROORD (Reply 14):
For that reson IOC has Taiwan under Chinese Taipei in the Olympics.

Sort of like why Puerto Rico has it's own Olympic team? Makes sense.



Fly Delta Jets
User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5729 posts, RR: 10
Reply 19, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 7939 times:

Quoting ghifty (Reply 18):
Quoting WROORD (Reply 14):
For that reson IOC has Taiwan under Chinese Taipei in the Olympics.

Sort of like why Puerto Rico has it's own Olympic team? Makes sense.

Except Puerto Rico is completely FREE to do as it wishes and could change it status with the USA anytime it wants. Taiwan, not so much. (Many people wonder what would actually happen if they did - and no there is not a simple answer to that.)

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineWROORD From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 962 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 7600 times:

Quoting Rara (Reply 17):
Hm, small correction, the Mainland is actually quite happy with the name Republic of China, even though they dispute it - at least the term "China" is still in there. It's Taiwan as a country name that they get really angry about. Anything to suggest Taiwan is not a part of China anymore gets their blood boiling.

True - even though it means something different to each side (PRC and Taiwan).


User currently offlinebohica From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2738 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 7189 times:

Quoting legacyins (Reply 7):
Q: UA flies to both the Mainland and Taiwan, why are they not painting their aircraft with a special livery?

I may not be 100% correct but I believe that China does not want non-Chinese airlines overflying it's airspace enroute to Taiwan if that airline also serves China. Therefore an airline like KLM Asia is considered a separate airline that flies to Taiwan while KLM serves China. United does not overfly Chinese airspace to/from Taiwan, therefore it does not need a separate subfleet.


User currently offlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2131 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 7020 times:

Quoting CZ346 (Reply 12):
Because this is only Mainland China. A lot of people don't realize just HOW different Taiwan / Macau / Hong Kong truly are to mainland China.

My friend, I am quite familiar with China as I currently live in Beijing. Your answer does not really answer my question. Thank you though.



John@SFO
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 6879 times:

Quoting warden145 (Reply 9):

I thought AA was technically the USA's flag-carrier? I assume I'm wrong but I always thought they were.


User currently offlinebestwestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 7264 posts, RR: 57
Reply 24, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 6879 times:

Quoting chootie (Reply 16):

...I would call the BS card here,

Im on this site for 12 years. I have a RR of 60. This is not BS.

This is not a friend told a friend who told me rumour.



The world is really getting smaller these days
25 trex8 : There hasn't been a US military presence in Taiwan since the 70s. Active duty US military personnel are not usually even allowed to go to Taiwan in a
26 CZ346 : And I'm in CAN - my only point with it was that Taiwan -> Mainland routes are in no way shape or form the same as flights within the mainland beca
27 nws2002 : Most other countries have a designated carrier that is the national carrier of the country it represents. Sometimes they are state-owned, others are
28 bestwestern : Correct, They depart from the " International, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan" section of the airport, and full Immigration and Customs formalities are
29 legacyins : Nice, but my question is regarding why UA does not paint their aircraft in a special livery compared to the OP stating that LH is considering(?) a ne
30 bestwestern : Hey - Read the OP. I never mentioned Taiwan...
31 legacyins : Yes sir. You are correct. I did not mean to mistate you and I should listen and pay attention more carefully in the future. I should have said, as th
32 Post contains images Semaex :
33 Post contains images bestwestern : Maybe, its something like this....
34 Semaex : I'm not sure in what way you would change a Crane in order to make it look more chinese, but I like the thought of trying it out!
35 Post contains images bestwestern : None of the coca-cola logos above changes the logo - just the text. Like this Or
36 N328KF : The US has never had an official one,but Pan Am was the de facto flag carrier from the 20s to the 40s, and possibly the 50s. After that, it was wide
37 spiritair97 : This is going to seem like a stupid question, but what are the criteria for being an "official" flag carrier? Also, what benefits are there?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Routes Plan For China-Europe/N. America posted Tue Sep 11 2007 16:37:46 by B2443
Multiple New Foreign Routes For China Southern posted Sun Jul 27 2003 13:54:06 by Airmale
New Logo For Air New Zealand? posted Thu Jul 10 2008 04:34:58 by Fly2CHC
New Logo For Cairo Aviation Tu-204. posted Fri Dec 28 2007 02:56:15 by SIBILLE
AA's New Website Soliciting Support For China posted Tue Aug 22 2006 05:20:28 by 102IAHexpress
New European Code Share Routes For China Southern posted Sun Jun 25 2006 15:27:56 by 777way
New Logo For LY posted Mon Jan 23 2006 11:32:53 by Amirs
Tenth A318 For AF With "new" Logo And Titles posted Wed Nov 9 2005 11:51:25 by FlySSC
Canada/China New Bilateral Good For Harmony Air posted Wed Apr 20 2005 02:37:57 by Astral
Is This A/the New Logo For KL/AF? posted Fri Feb 4 2005 20:03:16 by HansieAMS