Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AF A380 Routes?  
User currently offlineCO764 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 153 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5889 times:

Air France currently has 8 A380 aircraft, and they have orders for 4 more. They currently have the following routes from CDG : JNB, LAX, YUL (ends 10/2012), JFK, NRT, IAD, and SIN, or a grand total of 6 destinations to be maintained.
So what does AF plan to do with 12 A380s on 6 routes?
Honestly, I could see AF doing CDG-KUL-SYD using an A380, but does anyone else have any idea of any new A380 routes that could be opened? Perhaps PEK, SFO and possibly restarting DXB?

Thanks for any info,
CO764


http://flightdiary.net/CO764.
16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5778 times:

Well they do fly to JFK where they pick on the smaller little airplanes.   

        

        

        


User currently offlineAVENSAB727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 910 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 5674 times:

IAH could be a possibility since UA will cancel the IAH-CDG route.


Always look on the bright side of Life!
User currently offlinethenoflyzone From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 2371 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 5366 times:

Quoting CO764 (Thread starter):
So what does AF plan to do with 12 A380s on 6 routes?

It might be 6 routes, but you need more than 6 planes to operate these routes. JNB and SIN, in particular, both require 2 A380's each to operate daily. Even NRT requires more than 1 A380 for a daily service, as the plane arrives back in CDG two hours after the outbound A380 leaves for NRT.

Granted YUL and SIN are not daily services, but in essence, bare minimum, you would need 8 A380's for these 6 routes.

If AF were to add KUL and PEK as A380 destinations, you would need 12 A380's for these 8 routes.

Therefore, as you can see, all that AF can do is add two more Asian destinations (11 + hours), and they will soon be maxed out with their A380 utilization.

Thenoflyzone

[Edited 2012-07-29 19:10:20]


us Air Traffic Controllers have a good record, we haven't left one up there yet !!
User currently offlineEI912 From Ireland, joined May 2012, 20 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 5187 times:

Quoting CO764 (Thread starter):
I could see AF doing CDG-KUL-SYD using an A380
Quoting AVENSAB727 (Reply 2):
IAH could be a possibility since UA will cancel the IAH-CDG route.

Unfortunately, neither of these will ever happen. SYD would need at least 2 380's to operate and would see huge competition from the Gulf 3 as well as SQ, CX etc. AF would see better returns from other destinations.
IAH would never see the demand to fill a 380, hence why UA can't even run a 767 to CDG.


User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 5167 times:

Don't forget LAX. That makes 7 routes. Coudl AF possibly ever consider going 2x daily a388s to JFK?

User currently offlinegoldorak From France, joined Sep 2006, 1829 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 4873 times:

Quoting CO764 (Thread starter):
Honestly, I could see AF doing CDG-KUL-SYD using an A380

AF does not fly today to KUL or SYD, so if they wanted to open these new routes, it would surely not be with an A380. But in any case, whatever the aircraft, there is 0.00000001% chance that they will fly again one day to SYD.

Quoting CO764 (Thread starter):
but does anyone else have any idea of any new A380 routes that could be opened? Perhaps PEK, SFO and possibly restarting DXB?

PEK and PVG are likely destinations (PVG first) but they will need to discuss heavily with Chinese authorities (remember the troubles LH had to start PVG with A380). DXB, why not. SFO : no, too much premium seats in AF current configuration of A380. ABJ has also been rumored these last months (but airport needs A380 upgrade)
Why not also a 2nd daily to JFK ? And I believe ATL could see one day an AF A380.


User currently offlineilari From Finland, joined Jul 2005, 34 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 4806 times:

Quoting goldorak (Reply 6):
And I believe ATL could see one day an AF A380

Does anyone at the moment fly A380 to ATL?


User currently offlinethegeek From Australia, joined Nov 2007, 2638 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 4800 times:

Quoting CO764 (Thread starter):
Honestly, I could see AF doing CDG-KUL-SYD using an A380

Probably not allowed by the bilateral either at more than 3/week. That's what QF are limited to into CDG, which is why they haven't flown it for a while so they say.


User currently offlinegoldorak From France, joined Sep 2006, 1829 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 4713 times:

Quoting ilari (Reply 7):
Does anyone at the moment fly A380 to ATL?

KE announced some months ago that they would go to ATL with A380 but I don't think they have started yet.


User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 939 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks ago) and read 4659 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ilari (Reply 7):
Does anyone at the moment fly A380 to ATL?

My opinion AF and KE are the only airlines in the world that could justify sending the A380 into ATL... only those two could make it work with the aid of Delta


User currently offlineTeamInTheSky From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 534 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4415 times:

Quoting goldorak (Reply 9):
KE announced some months ago that they would go to ATL with A380 but I don't think they have started yet.

It has not started. I believe that it was announced to start at some point in 2013. However, others might know of a more specific date. I believe they are still upgrading the taxiways for the plane currently.

I am flying AF to Singapore in September and would love for them to go daily as I am currently booked on 777's which shows every seat taken both directions. (I know the seat map can be an innacurate judge, but normally there are far more seats open on long-haul even if they are blocking a couple out)



Since 2010: DL, KL, AF, WX, IG, FR , FL, U2, AK, BA, OK, UX, VS, VN, K6
User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7402 posts, RR: 57
Reply 12, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3459 times:

Quoting CO764 (Thread starter):
Honestly, I could see AF doing CDG-KUL-SYD using an A380, but does anyone else have any idea of any new A380 routes that could be opened? Perhaps PEK, SFO and possibly restarting DXB?

No European airline is planing to return to SYD and certainly not AF.
KUL (as well as DPS) is planned by AF, but as a "leisure" and seasonal destination, and in continuation of the CDG-BKK flight.

SFO & DXB : no way. Both were very temporary destinations, chosen more and before any reason because they were "convenient" for an A380 service during a short period.

PVG (as well as PEK) will be started as soon as the dispute between China and the E.U will be solved.
HKG is also expected sooner or later.

ABJ was expected for W12/13 but is now abandoned due to "technical" problems (Handling in ABJ and operations difficulties in case of diversion ).

GIG is planned for next winter and is currently the most serious candidate to become the next AF A380 destination.
(CDG-GIG will be then reduced from 2 x Daily A332 + B744 to 1 x Daily A380).

ATL being DL's HUB # 1, Frequencies are preferred over capacity so I doubt AF will send its A380 there ...

[Edited 2012-07-30 12:49:20]

User currently offlineAFCDGPTP From France, joined Dec 2007, 119 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3323 times:

ATL is not a route doing well with P class ... We used to have 772 with P class : most of the time 0 pax on P; now we put the 772 with no P (35J/W/Y)

The AF 380 does not do too good on CDG-SIN at all : SQ,EK, EY are often cheaper and offer very nice service; I doubt AF will leave it on this route

PVG PEK HKG & GRU are more likely the routes which will be served by the A380; indeed those routes have double daily services and offer P class


User currently offlineTeamInTheSky From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 534 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3323 times:

I understand that AF isn't in the best financial position, but does anyone care to speculate whether they might top up their A380 order to say 20 or even just 1 or 2?


Since 2010: DL, KL, AF, WX, IG, FR , FL, U2, AK, BA, OK, UX, VS, VN, K6
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24796 posts, RR: 22
Reply 15, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3285 times:

Quoting TeamInTheSky (Reply 11):
I am flying AF to Singapore in September and would love for them to go daily as I am currently booked on 777's which shows every seat taken both directions.

Hope it's not Y class on a cramped 10-abreast AF 777. There are many much more comfortable Y class routes to SIN than AF (or anyone else with 10-abreast on 777s). The A380 is MUCH better.


User currently offlineTeamInTheSky From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 534 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3175 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 15):
Hope it's not Y class on a cramped 10-abreast AF 777. There are many much more comfortable Y class routes to SIN than AF (or anyone else with 10-abreast on 777s). The A380 is MUCH better.

Regrettably it is on my dime, so yes it is in the back. However, we normally wait for the premium voyager to go on sale. Worse comes to worse we sit in the back 7 across section. Not great, but not as bad as some I have been on!



Since 2010: DL, KL, AF, WX, IG, FR , FL, U2, AK, BA, OK, UX, VS, VN, K6
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AF's A380 CDG-LAX Is Airborne posted Mon May 28 2012 04:56:13 by g500
AF A380 CDG-LAX-CDG Service? posted Tue May 22 2012 09:37:51 by ghifty
VS's Potential A380 Routes? posted Sun May 13 2012 21:53:37 by United Airline
AF A380 To YYZ Yesterday Feb. 24 posted Fri Feb 24 2012 23:34:11 by FlySSC
Any Chance Of Seeing An AF A380 At SXM? posted Sat Jan 28 2012 03:18:13 by aircanada014
A380 Routes For China Southern posted Sat Sep 10 2011 13:30:50 by IL96M
AF A380 Back On CDG-NRT posted Mon Sep 5 2011 07:26:50 by FlySSC
A380 Routes From April 1 posted Mon Jan 10 2011 18:48:19 by ikramerica
Minor Ground Collision In CDG Including AF A380 posted Sat Oct 30 2010 09:14:17 by reifel
AF A380 07/10 At YUL posted Mon Oct 4 2010 15:50:21 by Aeolus