Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Qantaslink Versus Virgin Australia  
User currently offlinedkramer7 From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 157 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3365 times:

With both Qantas and Virgin Australia announcing new inflight entertainment options to be rolled out over the next year -


- how is Qantaslink to keep up with Virgin if there are no (as yet to be announced) inflight entertainment upgrades?

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlinen729pa From UK - England, joined Jan 2011, 599 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3053 times:

I can't imagine much in a Q400, the 717s perhaps but then they're not technically QF's aircraft are they so not sure if National Jet Systems, Cobham and Sunstate could do much without significant investment from QF . Just IMO. It will be interesting to see, as I always try and take in a QFL flight when I'm down that way.

User currently offlineskyhawkmatthew From Australia, joined Oct 2005, 307 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2820 times:

Well, on many routes the Q400s are paired with Virgin (Skywest) ATRs, for which I haven't heard of any entertainment options – so I expect the regional arms will stay as they are as mainline gets the tablets and whatever else. The legs just aren't long enough to justify it; the window for using devices on a leg such as SYD-CBR or SYD-PQQ is 20 minutes or less.

Qantas - The Spirit of Australia.
User currently offlinestrangr From Australia, joined Apr 2012, 110 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2773 times:

Quoting dkramer7 (Thread starter):
how is Qantaslink to keep up with Virgin if there are no (as yet to be announced) inflight entertainment upgrades?

do you really need this sort of stuff on a Q400, the only way you will see an increase of this sort on the QFlink segmants would be if they are to major locations that would require a 737+ to fly to site.

i really doubt any effort will be made by qantaslink to keep up with this. let the big boys fight it out.

User currently offlineqf002 From Australia, joined Jul 2011, 3389 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (3 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2518 times:

If anything, WIFI is the way forward for QFLink IMO. Especially for routes like SYD-CBR, where there is a lot of commerce and government traffic which will gradually insist on these services being offered, even if the flight is only 26-28 minutes airtime.

That said, I don't think it's a massive priority. I agree that the 717's would probably need to be handled first.

Quoting n729pa (Reply 1):

QF directly owns (or leases) all of QFLink's aircraft -- the operation of these is then contracted out to the subsidiaries. All but Cobham (aka National Jet) are wholly owned QF subsidiaries...

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Virgin Australia Orders 23 Boeing 737 MAX Jets posted Thu Jul 5 2012 00:52:40 by ZKOJH
Virgin Australia A330 Diverted To ADL. Why? (21/5) posted Mon May 21 2012 05:20:34 by CXfirst
Future Of Virgin Australia 73G posted Wed May 16 2012 17:14:38 by joffie
Virgin Australia: No Plans To Join Star Alliance, posted Thu Apr 5 2012 23:28:47 by ZKOJH
Virgin Australia 1H Profit Rises, Splits Company posted Fri Feb 24 2012 18:55:25 by RpKs
Etihad Wants Branson Stake In Virgin Australia posted Fri Feb 10 2012 05:19:06 by cbrboy
Virgin Australia IATA Codes posted Thu Jan 26 2012 14:59:55 by wrldtvlr
Tahiti Seeks Virgin Australia Investment posted Mon Jan 23 2012 18:38:43 by mercure1
What Is A Virgin Australia 777 Doing At T5 At LAX? posted Sun Jan 1 2012 02:41:22 by kaitak744
Virgin Australia/Singapore Air, Alliance Approved posted Wed Nov 30 2011 19:41:31 by BMIFlyer