Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
No More -800's For WN?  
User currently offlinegen2stew From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 96 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 17118 times:

While on a WN flight I overheard a conversation between a few pilots and cabin crew that the -800 is not working out as planned and that WN had deferred future deliveries to the -MAX. Any truth to this?


I don't know why blessings wear disguises. If I were a blessing, I'd run around nude!
50 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1018 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 16819 times:

Lol! No. Some were deferred due to saving money but they are still coming.


My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 16409 times:

I know that I don't work for WN, but I did chat with a pilot during my layover in BWI a few weeks ago and he said the exact opposite. He said that WN all the NG aircraft, including the -800. He said the -800 was working out better than they had expected. Granted the crews aren't always the most informed, this guy seemed very knowledgeable.

User currently onlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13264 posts, RR: 100
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 16005 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 1):
Lol!

My first response.

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 2):
He said the -800 was working out better than they had expected. Granted the crews aren't always the most informed, this guy seemed very knowledgeable.

All indications are that the 738 is working for WN. If anything, I expect WN to slow growth by retiring 733s when they are due to heavy maintenance.

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineAtrude777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5694 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 15897 times:

To Sum up here...

Quoting gen2stew (Thread starter):
-800 is not working out as planned

Not True...

Quoting gen2stew (Thread starter):
WN had deferred future deliveries to the -MAX

True...but for different reasons.

usflyguy pretty much got it down correctly.

WN's plan was indeed to take as many -800's as they could within a year, starting with I believe the count was around 34. However due to the cost within WN (not so much -800's cost), WN needed to defer the deliveries to help save some money and control the companies cost. They have a target in mind they want to bring in before WN can consider expanding/growing without cutting a single route or station.

By deferring the -800's, WN has slowed down the -300 retirement, I believe the -500's are still leaving at a rate but I am not sure how fast. (As lightsaber guessed correctly)

WN plans to keep the fleet quite stagnant, by getting rid of the 717's, halting the -300 retirement and slowing down the -800 deliveries there won't be too much aircraft fleet growth in terms of numbers.

As many have noticed and said over and over, WN's cost is not just high, but also rising, and WN is acting very quickly and reacting in a way to increase revenue in every way possible to control the high cost going on at the company.

Alex



Good things come to those who wait, better things come to those who go AFTER it!
User currently offlinestrfyr51 From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 1304 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 15427 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

rigning in costs is a no brainer. WN is going the responsible route as they really have nobody that they need to compete with. They are in a Niche of their own and nobody is going to usurp them anytime soon

User currently offlinefrontierflyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 216 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14996 times:

Anything that can lower CASM and increase revenue will work.

User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25772 posts, RR: 50
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 14291 times:

Per their earnings call from two weeks ago, they were quite upbeat about the 738.

Southwest Post Q2 Profit - $228mil (by LAXintl Jul 19 2012 in Civil Aviation)

More specifically they said:

Newly introduced 737-800s producing results, contributing to the bottom line. Will have 34 on property by end of 2012.

and

2013 no fleet growth, slight ASM increase as 737-700/800s with extra seats arrive and 717s depart.

Sounds like the -800 is doing fine, and more are on the way...



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 14240 times:

What are the chances we will EVER see a 717 in WN colors? I know they're leaving soon, but it would be nice to have something other than a 737 in WN colors.

User currently offlineSXDFC From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 2389 posts, RR: 22
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 14237 times:

Quoting Atrude777 (Reply 4):
I believe the -500's are still leaving at a rate but I am not sure how fast.

So far there are 4 -500s that have been retired, with one more due for retirement in October.

I am sure somebody else pointed this out, but if you see any plane in the WN fleet that doesn't have winglets, odds are it wont be in the fleet much longer..

[Edited 2012-08-06 09:35:39]


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlinekgaiflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 4301 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 14186 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting gen2stew (Thread starter):
I overheard a conversation between a few pilots and cabin crew that the -800 is not working out as planned

Maybe not as planned to Hawaii, but they're going out of BWI full-up.

And if they put one on IAD-MDW, it would be full-up   


User currently offlinecargolex From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1275 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 14015 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 8):
What are the chances we will EVER see a 717 in WN colors?

With the deal for them to leave done, essentially zero.

But if you want to see another aircraft in (admittedly older) Southwest colors, there are photos of the small number of 727s WN operated in 1979 and later in the 1980s.


User currently offlineouboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4606 posts, RR: 23
Reply 12, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 13968 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 8):
What are the chances we will EVER see a 717 in WN colors?

Umm about 0.0000000000000000000000001% at this point.  


User currently offlineSXDFC From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 2389 posts, RR: 22
Reply 13, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 13724 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 8):
What are the chances we will EVER see a 717 in WN colors? I
http://www.aimhigherjets.com/Boeing-...thwest-Airlines-Model-p/swa717.htm

That's about it..



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlinetoltommy From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3297 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 13247 times:

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 3):
If anything, I expect WN to slow growth by retiring 733s when they are due to heavy maintenance.

I agree, but can only slow so much since they've committed to replacing the 717 1 to 1. By agreeing to do that, they've made it hard to trim any excess capacity like DL and UA were able to do in their mergers.

Quoting strfyr51 (Reply 5):
WN is going the responsible route as they really have nobody that they need to compete with. They are in a Niche of their own and nobody is going to usurp them anytime soon

But they do compete with the legacy carriers now. They changed the business model away from peripheral airport and now serve business centers direct. Plus their labor costs are now among the highest in the domestic industry. They need more -800's to lower costs.


User currently offline737tdi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 899 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 12417 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting toltommy (Reply 14):
But they do compete with the legacy carriers now. They changed the business model away from peripheral airport and now serve business centers direct. Plus their labor costs are now among the highest in the domestic industry. They need more -800's to lower costs.




Now how the heck do you know that? Not picking on you. I just here this alot on here. How does one determine the cost of employees at a company? What if I do twice the work of another airlines employee? Does that make my hourly wage 50% less? Look at the number of employees at WN and compare that with the norm. of other airlines. WN's labor costs per the number of aircraft is well below the other airlines. They now pay some of the best wages to retain and recruit the best they can get. JMO.


User currently offlinePHLBOS From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 7533 posts, RR: 24
Reply 16, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 12416 times:

Quoting SXDFC (Reply 13):
Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 8):
What are the chances we will EVER see a 717 in WN colors? I
http://www.aimhigherjets.com/Boeing-...thwest-Airlines-Model-p/swa717.htm

That's about it..

Reminds me of when Flight Miniatures went ahead and offered a FL 73G model in the old (1997) colors (of which I purchased) when it turned out later that FL launched their first 73G in their current (then-new) scheme.

Too bad, Flight Miniatures doesn't do similar w/the WN 717; it'd be a lot cheaper to purchase than the one offered by Aim Higher Jets.



"TransEastern! You'll feel like you've never left the ground because we treat you like dirt!" SNL Parady ad circa 1981
User currently offlineRevo1059 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 137 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 11818 times:

Quoting ouboy79 (Reply 12):
Umm about 0.0000000000000000000000001% at this point.

So yer sayin theres a chance!!!!! (a classic movie)


User currently offlineQANTAS747-438 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1973 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 11692 times:

Quoting gen2stew (Thread starter):
While on a WN flight I overheard a conversation between a few pilots and cabin crew

..Well there's your first problem.

Quoting gen2stew (Thread starter):
that the -800 is not working out as planned

My opinion is that this is the first time that WN has had a "sensitive" airplane with regards to weight and balance. The -700 is stubby and wide. In normal operation, I don't think you can make it so tail heavy that it touches the ground. The -800 might be able to, so you have to be careful. Also, it's a heavier plane that we are used to so landing in MDW and such has caused some weight issues at the departure station. The -800 is a fantastic airplane, but I think that employees thought it would be the end all be all of airplanes and that it'll lift and do anything you give it. When in reality, this is normal operation for nearly every other airline out there.

I also think that it's very popular to hate the -800 at WN. WN doesn't do change well so when it happens, people tend to freak out. I often hear people say, "Oh, I cant stand the -800!" and so I ask why they hate it. Hardly anyone has been able to give me a reason as to why they "hate" it. They usually just stand there and say, "uhhh, umm, it's an -800!" Ok, but what about the plane is so bad? "Ummm, uhhhh.... it's longer!" Yeah, ok....

Quoting kgaiflyer (Reply 10):
And if they put one on IAD-MDW, it would be full-up

It's currently flown LAX-LAS and it is 175. Not 174.... 175. We have always joked that we could put an -800 on the LAX-LAS route and it would be full too. Well, the Company sure showed us.



My posts/replies are strictly my opinion and not that of any company, organization, or Southwest Airlines.
User currently offlinePanAm788 From United States of America, joined Sep 2008, 292 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 11465 times:

Quoting 737tdi (Reply 15):

There's a difference between cost of labor and efficiency of labor. Where labor can be numerically differentiated, ie in gate agents or rampers, efficiency comes into play when we talk about "cost of labor". For example, it is better to have two happy rampers who make $55,000 a year and work as hard as three disgruntled rampers who make $40,000 year (I'm making all these numbers up by the way). The cost of labor may appear higher for the airline who pays its rampers $55,000 a year, but in reality, it's saving money because it's workers try harder.

But when labor cannot be numerically differentiated, efficiency isn't included. The FAA requires X crewmembers to operate a 737-800. WN has X crewmembers, DL has X crewmembers, and so on. If WN pays its employees higher, they might be nicer to the customers, but they are overall doing the same job as the lesser paid crewmembers on other airlines. Thus the cost of labor is higher for WN due to higher wages in some instances.



You know nothing Jon Snow
User currently offlineNWAROOSTER From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1107 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 11407 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 8):
What are the chances we will EVER see a 717 in WN colors? I know they're leaving soon, but it would be nice to have something other than a 737 in WN colors.
Quoting ouboy79 (Reply 12):
Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 8):
What are the chances we will EVER see a 717 in WN colors?

Umm about 0.0000000000000000000000001% at this point.  

Southwest id going to pay to have the 717s painted in Delta Airlines colors.
Why would Southwest paint an aircraft twice?   


User currently offlinechrisair From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 2133 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 11016 times:

Quoting gen2stew (Thread starter):
While on a WN flight I overheard a conversation between a few pilots and cabin crew that the -800 is not working out as planned and that WN had deferred future deliveries to the -MAX.

Well, since pilots are the most informed people at the company, and the FAs are the second most, this must be true...

 
Quoting QANTAS747-438 (Reply 18):
It's currently flown LAX-LAS and it is 175. Not 174.... 175. We have always joked that we could put an -800 on the LAX-LAS route and it would be full too. Well, the Company sure showed us.

I sat next to a few WN FAs on a PHX parking lot bus who were complaining about the 738s. Apparently a lot of employees are non-reving on them "just to fly the -800." They were upset since they had to do non-rev on a multi-stop flight home since "there were too many non-revs flying for no reason" on the 738.


User currently offlinejreuschl From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 549 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 10675 times:

Quoting chrisair (Reply 21):
non-reving on them "just to fly the -800."

Sounds like they could all be airliners.net members   I think all of us on here would book a flight based on aircraft type. But that's for another tread...


User currently offline737tdi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 899 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 10006 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PanAm788 (Reply 19):
The FAA requires X crewmembers to operate a 737-800. WN has X crewmembers




I agree with most of your points. Alls I'm saying is that WN uses/employees a much smaller work force for the number of flights/aircraft.

As far as the FAA requiring a certain number of crew members, remember this is only the number required to physically operate the aircraft with passengers. They have no such number regarding mechs., cleaners, ramp agents, ops. agents, etc.. An airline can run as lean as they want as long as all is done correctly.


User currently offlinerising From United States of America, joined May 2010, 277 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 9089 times:

Didn't they only install two lavs on the 800's, like on the 700's. How is that working out?


If it doesn't make sense, it's because it's not true.
User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1018 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 9244 times:

Quoting rising (Reply 24):

No. 3 lavs.



My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
User currently offlinerising From United States of America, joined May 2010, 277 posts, RR: 1
Reply 26, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 9280 times:

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 25):

Is it one in the front and two in the rear? (I am glad to hear that by the way I always thought it was just 2, from a prior thread. Cross-country on a 700 usually has a line the whole way I couldn't imagine on an 800!)



If it doesn't make sense, it's because it's not true.
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12158 posts, RR: 51
Reply 27, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 9279 times:

Quoting gen2stew (Thread starter):
a few pilots and cabin crew that the -800 is not working out as planned and that WN had deferred future deliveries to the -MAX.

You do know all of WN's B-737MAX orders are for the B-737-8MAX, they are the launch customer for the type. I don't think anyone has ordered the B-737-7MAX yet.

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 8):
but it would be nice to have something other than a 737 in WN colors.

WN flew 3 or 4 B-727-200s from about 1972 to about 1985 or so. They started out with just 3 B-737-200s in 1971, I think.


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 28, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 9269 times:

Quoting rising (Reply 26):

IMHO, using a -700 on a transcon is pretty silly for this one reason. If an airline really insists to use a -700 on such a route, add another Lav.



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlinealggag From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 98 posts, RR: 0
Reply 29, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 9149 times:

I really don't see how -800s wouldn't be working out. It's no secret that WN's fares have gone up quite a bit and load factors are also higher than ever and it's not uncommon to see flights totally sold in advance making it impossible to buy a full fare ticket even if you wanted to. On top of that, isn't the cost to operate a -800 supposedly very similar to the -700?

User currently onlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13264 posts, RR: 100
Reply 30, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 8811 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting toltommy (Reply 14):
I agree, but can only slow so much since they've committed to replacing the 717 1 to 1. By agreeing to do that, they've made it hard to trim any excess capacity like DL and UA were able to do in their mergers.

Agreed. But once they have a single crew and single aircraft, WN will be very flexible and that should prime them for future growth.

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 27):
I don't think anyone has ordered the B-737-7MAX yet.

I'm not aware of any order. In fact, orders for the A319NEO are very sparse too. I've posted before how each engine upgrade on the 737 family has 'up-gauged' the preferential size.

At first it was the 732.
Then with an engine upgrade it was the 733 (not the 732 sized 735).
Then with the NG, which had a wing and engine upgrade, the most popular size has been the 738 (not the 73G at the 733 size).

The MAX will undoubtedly make the 739 length far more popular. The question is, will the 738 or 739 be the most popular? In other words, the 73G is fated to become the next 736. Who would loan money on that airframe? WN will probably have little choice once interest rates are included.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 28):
IMHO, using a -700 on a transcon is pretty silly for this one reason.

Its silly on CASM. Turn time no longer applies as a major cost variable on TCON flights. Most of those should be 738s.

Quoting alggag (Reply 29):
it's not uncommon to see flights totally sold in advance making it impossible to buy a full fare ticket even if you wanted to.

Really? That is poor yield management in a very classy fashion.   

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineCaspian27 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 382 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 8724 times:

Quoting chrisair (Reply 21):
I sat next to a few WN FAs on a PHX parking lot bus who were complaining about the 738s. Apparently a lot of employees are non-reving on them "just to fly the -800." They were upset since they had to do non-rev on a multi-stop flight home since "there were too many non-revs flying for no reason" on the 738.

I'd bet it's because there were more open seats. Pretty simple logic, when you're nonrevving you have to go where the seats are.



Meanwhile, somewhere 35,000 ft above your head...
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 32, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 8578 times:

Quoting Caspian27 (Reply 31):

I have to agree. Non-revving on the sole reason it's a 738 and a new plane type, but you're right..... Go where the sears are. FA's shouldn't be complaining about the non-revs. It's like crying over spilt milk, IMO.



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineQANTAS747-438 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1973 posts, RR: 2
Reply 33, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 8383 times:

Quoting chrisair (Reply 21):
I sat next to a few WN FAs on a PHX parking lot bus who were complaining about the 738s. Apparently a lot of employees are non-reving on them "just to fly the -800." They were upset since they had to do non-rev on a multi-stop flight home since "there were too many non-revs flying for no reason" on the 738.

So??? Hows that the -800s fault? And why can't non-FA employees fly just to fly... it IS the Freedom to Fly, no? Welcome to the world of Non-reving. Sounds to me that the FAs are just mad because flights are full. FAs are not owed a seat anymore than another NRV Employee.



My posts/replies are strictly my opinion and not that of any company, organization, or Southwest Airlines.
User currently offlineAU795 From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 13 posts, RR: 0
Reply 34, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 7495 times:

Any Southwest employee (ramp, hdq, csa) can sit in the extra cabin jumpseats. On the -800 there are two additional jumpseats in the rear galley. It can be very difficult to work back there and get the carts pulled out and set up if you have two additional jumpseaters as they can not move, even stand up as long as the seatbelt sign is on. Personally, I like the aircraft, but I can see why people complain if the flight is full and they have 2 non-reving jumpseaters in the back.

User currently offlinearffguy From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 35, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 7082 times:

I recently flew on the -800 from Vegas to Chicago. It was OK except it seemed to take forever to load everyone on board. With longer flights you had better bring your own IFE though!


Time to spare, go by air.
User currently offlineouboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4606 posts, RR: 23
Reply 36, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 6753 times:

Quoting Revo1059 (Reply 17):
So yer sayin theres a chance!!!!! (a classic movie)

Everything is always subject to change until it is actually done...especially in this industry. LOL


User currently offlineHiflyeras From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 990 posts, RR: 2
Reply 37, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 6614 times:

Quoting AU795 (Reply 34):
It can be very difficult to work back there and get the carts pulled out and set up if you have two additional jumpseaters as they can not move, even stand up as long as the seatbelt sign is on.

Are you saying that WN is finally joining the 21st century and installed CARTS on the -800's?


User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 38, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 6508 times:

Quoting Hiflyeras (Reply 37):

I like that there are no carts. Since they only bring a few drinks out at a time, not only does the absense of the cart make the plane feel less-claustrophobic, it makess it seem classier. Would you rather see the F/A carrying a tray like a waitor/waitress, or somebody pushing a bulky, ugly big metal cart, pulling drinks and snacks out of random doors and hatches? It makes it seem a little more personal, as well. This is one of the reasons I love flying WN. Jame with B6.


User currently offlineAU795 From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 13 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 6369 times:

Quoting Hiflyeras (Reply 37):

Yes, we are using half carts on the -800's. Each FA works off their own half cart. Trays are being tested for short flights, but as of now FA's are suppose to use the carts on all flight regardless of length. Did PHX-SNA (blocked at 1 hour 10min.) with 175 and the carts worked fine. People just don't like change.


User currently offlinehOmsaR From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1189 posts, RR: 0
Reply 40, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 6312 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 27):
WN flew 3 or 4 B-727-200s from about 1972 to about 1985 or so.

I didn't think their 727s lasted 13 years. I thought it was a very short-term deal, like a year or two tops. IIRC, they did operate 727s on two separate occasions, though.



I was raised by a cup of coffee.
User currently offlineDeltaL1011man From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 9556 posts, RR: 14
Reply 41, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5624 times:

Quoting NWAROOSTER (Reply 20):
Delta Airlines colors.

Air Lines

Quoting 737tdi (Reply 23):
As far as the FAA requiring a certain number of crew members, remember this is only the number required to physically operate the aircraft with passengers. They have no such number regarding mechs., cleaners, ramp agents, ops. agents, etc.. An airline can run as lean as they want as long as all is done correctly.

yep only for Cabin crew.

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 30):
At first it was the 732.
Then with an engine upgrade it was the 733 (not the 732 sized 735).
Then with the NG, which had a wing and engine upgrade, the most popular size has been the 738 (not the 73G at the 733 size).

and my bet is the 739MAX will be the most popular.



yep.
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4838 posts, RR: 26
Reply 42, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5351 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting QANTAS747-438 (Reply 18):
Quoting gen2stew (Thread starter):that the -800 is not working out as planned
My opinion is that this is the first time that WN has had a "sensitive" airplane with regards to weight and balance. The -700 is stubby and wide. In normal operation, I don't think you can make it so tail heavy that it touches the ground. The -800 might be able to, so you have to be careful.

One things is certain, the company didn't do all their homewok before adding the -800 to the fleet and a few operational headaches have occured as a result. You're right, they figured it would be as simple as the other types in the fleet. They almost learned the hard way that if you don't offload/load the aircraft in a specific forward/aft sequence, the tail will tip. I work with a few people who have prior experience loading 737-800s at other airlines and they were familiar with the proper loading procedures. When being trained locally on the 737-800, the question was raised. I even asked about it here! But management had not heard about the potential problem and shrugged it off. A month later, we have a memo advising us of new loading procedures.  
Quoting QANTAS747-438 (Reply 18):
I also think that it's very popular to hate the -800 at WN. WN doesn't do change well so when it happens, people tend to freak out. I often hear people say, "Oh, I cant stand the -800!" and so I ask why they hate it. Hardly anyone has been able to give me a reason as to why they "hate" it. They usually just stand there and say, "uhhh, umm, it's an -800!" Ok, but what about the plane is so bad? "Ummm, uhhhh.... it's longer!" Yeah, ok....

In general, I think most employees are excited and curious about the 737-800s. The only group I find a lot of opposition is the ramp who have been freaking out about the extra workload and staffing. They need more hands working these flights but the company refuses to negotiate.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineJONC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 126 posts, RR: 0
Reply 43, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 4291 times:

Quoting chrisair (Reply 21):
I sat next to a few WN FAs on a PHX parking lot bus who were complaining about the 738s. Apparently a lot of employees are non-reving on them "just to fly the -800." They were upset since they had to do non-rev on a multi-stop flight home since "there were too many non-revs flying for no reason" on the 738.

hmmm. . .fas complaing about employees non reving for no reason. . .lol. . .who cares, im tempted to nrsa now just to tick an fa off!

making my listing now. . .


User currently offlinePHLBOS From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 7533 posts, RR: 24
Reply 44, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4135 times:

Quoting hOmsaR (Reply 40):
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 27):
WN flew 3 or 4 B-727-200s from about 1972 to about 1985 or so.

I didn't think their 727s lasted 13 years. I thought it was a very short-term deal, like a year or two tops. IIRC, they did operate 727s on two separate occasions, though.

WN first flew the 727-200 in 1979, not 1972. The occassion lasted only about a year. They flew the type again a few years later.

Let's not forget that when WN aquired Muse Air in the mid-80s; they did briefly fly DC-9s and MD-80s under the Transtar brand.



"TransEastern! You'll feel like you've never left the ground because we treat you like dirt!" SNL Parady ad circa 1981
User currently offlineCaspian27 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 382 posts, RR: 0
Reply 45, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3859 times:

Quoting AU795 (Reply 34):
Any Southwest employee (ramp, hdq, csa) can sit in the extra cabin jumpseats. On the -800 there are two additional jumpseats in the rear galley. It can be very difficult to work back there and get the carts pulled out and set up if you have two additional jumpseaters as they can not move, even stand up as long as the seatbelt sign is on. Personally, I like the aircraft, but I can see why people complain if the flight is full and they have 2 non-reving jumpseaters in the back.

I bet those FA's won't complain so much when they are nonrevving and it comes down to either being in those jumpseats themselves, or not making it on a flight...



Meanwhile, somewhere 35,000 ft above your head...
User currently offlineNWAROOSTER From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1107 posts, RR: 3
Reply 46, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3816 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting DeltaL1011man (Reply 41):
Quoting NWAROOSTER (Reply 20):
Delta Airlines colors.

Air Lines

NIT PICKER. Got anything better to do KIDO......   


User currently offlineSkyTeamTriStar From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 394 posts, RR: 0
Reply 47, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3267 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 8):
What are the chances we will EVER see a 717 in WN colors? I know they're leaving soon, but it would be nice to have something other than a 737 in WN colors.

It would be very cool to see a 717 in WN colors but just like DL never repainted their TriStars into the flowing fabric scheme back then. Bummer, I know!


User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1018 posts, RR: 0
Reply 48, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3228 times:

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 42):
They need more hands working these flights but the company refuses to negotiate

Just like the union has refused to negotiate with the company on certain things... it's a two way street.

Quoting JONC777 (Reply 43):
hmmm. . .fas complaing about employees non reving for no reason. . .lol. . .who cares, im tempted to nrsa now just to tick an fa off!


Don't waste your time or energy, the flight attendants don't care. I'm sure whoever heard that fa's were getting pissed, more than likely heard it from a non-fa. But if it's true, DH'ing FA's could start taking the jumpseat to keep non-revs off of them, then you wouldn't be able to get on weather it's to travel or just to do it tick off a FA.



My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
User currently offline737tanker From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 272 posts, RR: 0
Reply 49, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2971 times:

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 48):
DH'ing FA's could start taking the jumpseat to keep non-revs off of them

At WN the F/As do not get priority when it comes to the cabin jumpseats, it is 1st come 1st serve. If there are any scheduled DH'ing F/As on a flight they are all guaranteed a passenger seat and are nt required to ride the cabin jumpseat..


User currently offlinegizmonc From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 309 posts, RR: 0
Reply 50, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2931 times:

Cabin jumpseat on SWA is first come first serve, sign up is one hour prior to flight departure. However there are several limitations. FYI if a FA needs to fly due to DH he/she will be booked via crew scheduling.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
No More *A Themed A/c For SQ? posted Wed May 5 2010 17:47:11 by Coal
No More GE For TUI 787s? posted Thu Dec 31 2009 21:32:31 by PM
Why No More Life For UA 757? posted Sun Nov 8 2009 22:34:10 by VC10er
No Paper Schedules For WN posted Wed Jul 15 2009 08:45:02 by Psa188
No More Pets For AC posted Sat Jun 23 2007 03:02:29 by Boeingluvr
No More Commercial For US Military War Dead posted Sat Apr 7 2007 03:54:44 by LTBEWR
Alitalia: No More Skirts For Its F/A (funny) posted Fri Nov 10 2006 11:27:17 by Wingedarrow
No More Funding For Scottish Long Haul Flights posted Sun Sep 10 2006 21:42:58 by Humberside
No More Elko For Casino Express posted Sat Dec 3 2005 18:50:23 by FlyingTexan
No More Names For Mexicana Planes? posted Tue Apr 19 2005 14:29:14 by Udo