Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Officials: AUS Needs Expansion To Meet Mega Growth  
User currently offlineLoneStarMike From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 3811 posts, RR: 34
Posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2601 times:

From YNN (Time Warner Cable's local news station in Austin)

Officials say ABIA needs expansion to meet mega growth
August 7, 2012


Quote:
The Austin-Bergstrom International Airport is only 13 years old, but airport managers say it's nearing capacity.

Last year, ABIA handled nearly 9.1 million passengers, and it’s only built to handle 11 million. While the Federal Aviation Administration estimates the airport will surpass capacity by 2018, ABIA officials say that could happen in just two years.

If approved by the City Council, the work would start next September and be completed by June 2015.

The video accompanying the story is a lot more informative than the article.

And this was from last week from The Austin American Statesman:

Pending improvements at Bergstrom: steel barriers, new road from cellphone waiting area, repaving
July 31, 2012


Quote:
Austin-Bergstrom International Airport, now more than a dozen years old, would get more secure entrances and exits, a smoother drive and a new cellphone waiting area under almost $5 million in contracts that the Austin City Council will consider Thursday.

(City Council approved it and this work should start this September.)

Also, AUS released it's June Activity Report today.

Austin-Bergstrom International Airport
Aviation Activity Report
Calendar Year 2012 vs 2011


June saw 844,994 total passengers, (up 3.67% from last year) and this figure included 5,452 international passengers.

June Y-T-D traffic is 4,591,402 total passengers (up 3.98% from last year.) Of those, 6,231 were international passengers.

LoneStarMike

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinejsnww81 From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2017 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2415 times:

Probably not a bad idea. The current AUS terminal is nice and reasonably functional, but it wasn't really designed in a way that facilitates easy expansion. Gates can be added easily enough but the landside is configured in sort of a difficult way and the security checkpoints back up into the ticket lobby very quickly.

User currently offlineB6JFKH81 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2873 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2363 times:

Awesome, awesome news. I happen to love AUS and the crew my airline has down there. If there was a way for me to transfer down there within my department I would do it in a heartbeat (there or BNA too). I hope that B6 expands down there in the future!!!


"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12884 posts, RR: 100
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2146 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Expansion?!? Dorthy, we're not in California anymore.   

Seriously, it looks like they are hitting the major bottlenecks. With two runways, I'm assuming airside expansion is way off the radar... (as it should be).

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlinescutfarcus From United States of America, joined May 2000, 389 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2102 times:

Hope they can get the rail system extended.... last time at SXSW I waited 45 minutes for a cab!

User currently offlineHmelawyer From United States of America, joined May 2011, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1378 times:

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 3):
With two runways, I'm assuming airside expansion is way off the radar... (as it should be).

You are correct. They are fine on the airside to at least double current volume, especially having recently increased RON space to accommodate that shortfall. While given the lag time to get a project approved completed, they need to get started on gates that is not an immediate problem. (In fact, there are three full service gates + 1 commuter gate that are vacant).

As a frequent traveler from Austin, I can attest that the immediate crunch and the area that they are already way behind the curve on is security processing. There are currently 3 security clearance areas, but the west area has a much lower volume, so more accurately it is 2.5. They need to get the east fill-in project completed with that east security clearance area ASAP. Also wouldn't hurt to see if some minor renovations could increase the capacity of the current areas.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
FSD Officials To Meet With American At Dallas posted Tue Oct 23 2007 18:43:34 by Airbusaddict
Boeing Needs A 7E7 Order Rush To Meet Year-end Tar posted Wed Oct 20 2004 22:43:56 by Nyc777
Skyteam To Meet Garuda In Jakarta 11/23 To Sign MOA posted Fri Nov 19 2010 12:42:19 by seamefly
WN Pilots, FAs To Meet On 738 Fleet posted Thu Sep 2 2010 01:35:09 by bjorn14
Airports Offer Free Flights To Meet Quota. CKB posted Thu May 13 2010 10:53:49 by MainRunway
BDL Officials Turned Down DL To CDG On Subsidies posted Tue Dec 8 2009 07:52:06 by Sectflyer
Etihad To Pause Capacity Growth In 2010/11 posted Mon May 4 2009 14:20:16 by SQ_EK_freak
Wings Air (US) Expansion To The Bahamas. posted Sat Mar 14 2009 20:17:57 by MtnWest1979
Purpose Of KLM Kitchen Expansion To BKK posted Tue Feb 17 2009 20:48:00 by Malaysia
FI-Race To Meet A380 Delivery Target Will Be Close posted Sun Nov 30 2008 12:17:57 by Astuteman