Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ANZ To Move To Tom Bradley Terminal At LAX  
User currently offlineKLAXAirport From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 152 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 6207 times:

Air New Zealand has been selected to design and manage the new Star Alliance lounge at the all new Tom Bradley International Terminal at LAX. This means that the airline will move to TBIT from Terminal 2 starting in May of 2013. Good news for ANZ and as a passenger I would much prefer to fly out of the new TBIT then the old Terminal 2.

Cheers,
KLAXAirport   

[Edited 2012-08-08 03:46:27]

[Edited 2012-08-08 03:47:51]

[Edited 2012-08-08 04:41:29]

26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8376 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 6128 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Terminal 2 has worked well for ANZ, expecially with connections from Air Canada which uses the same terminal. The TBIT is served by several Star alliance arlines but many of those are Asian based airline which will provide next to zero connections to ANZ at LAX, they connect with ANZ in Asia. The three airlines providing connections to ANZ at LAX are United, LH and Air Canada. OF those only LH uses the TBIT.

User currently offlineKLAXAirport From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 152 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 6106 times:

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 1):

I don't know if you have even to LAX, but Terminal 2 is not that good compared to what the new TBIT is going to be like. However, you do have a point, AC probably has more people connecting to ANZ than LH.

Cheers,
KLAXAirport   

[Edited 2012-08-08 04:22:56]

[Edited 2012-08-08 04:23:53]

User currently offlineAussieItaliano From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 442 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 6090 times:

As a London-based flyer who uses NZ 1/2 to LAX, I welcome this change. Terminal 2 US Customs has taken up to 2 hours due to the volume of passengers arriving at the same time. It makes LHR look easy!


LHR - The Capital of the World
User currently offlineqf002 From Australia, joined Jul 2011, 2987 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 6090 times:

Some comments from NZ regarding the new lounge can be found here -- http://www.ausbt.com.au/new-star-all...-lounge-at-lax-to-open-in-may-2013

Good news IMO.


User currently offlineGCT64 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 1398 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 5953 times:

Quoting AussieItaliano (Reply 3):
Terminal 2 US Customs has taken up to 2 hours due to the volume of passengers arriving at the same time. It makes LHR look easy!

You are very right about LAX making LHR look slick and easy - but recent experience of the TBIT suggests that 2 hours queues for immigration and customs are normal there too. Hopefully the rebuild of the TBIT will speed this up, but I am not optimistic that this will be the case.
Recently my solution has been to clear immigration elsewhere (e.g. YYZ) and arrive in LA as a domestic pax.



Flown in: A30B,A306,A310,A319,A320,A321,A332,A333,A343,A346,A388,BA11,BU31,B190, B461,B462,(..51 types..),VC10,WESX
User currently offlineAussieItaliano From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 442 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 5818 times:

Quoting GCT64 (Reply 5):
Recently my solution has been to clear immigration elsewhere (e.g. YYZ) and arrive in LA as a domestic pax.

It's so interesting that you say that. On my last trip to LA, I did exactly that (AC LHR-YYZ-LAX) and loved it! US Customs took 5 minutes as opposed to 2 hours. But that really says something about LAX when people prefer connecting somewhere else over flying there non-stop because the Customs queues are so long. I really hope that they get this sorted out with the new TBIT, but like you said, it's probably not likely. Although, my experience arriving at TBIT has usually been noticeably quicker than Terminal 2. I wonder if anyone is going to take NZ's place at Terminal 2.



LHR - The Capital of the World
User currently offlineGCT64 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 1398 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5593 times:

Quoting AussieItaliano (Reply 6):
On my last trip to LA, I did exactly that (AC LHR-YYZ-LAX) and loved it! US Customs took 5 minutes as opposed to 2 hours.

That's my preferred routing. It is also has benefits on the return: You can do a full day's work in Socal, have dinner with your colleagues and then catch a late night red-eye to YYZ* connecting to the day time flight to LHR. Get into LHR around 9pm, go home and go straight to bed. It's about the only way I don't get jetlag when travelling SoCal to the UK.

*using BOS and JFK can also work but they are less good on the way out



Flown in: A30B,A306,A310,A319,A320,A321,A332,A333,A343,A346,A388,BA11,BU31,B190, B461,B462,(..51 types..),VC10,WESX
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25416 posts, RR: 49
Reply 8, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5566 times:

Yes info was posted in last months NZ thread
New Zealand Aviation Thread Part 117 (by cchan Jul 7 2012 in Civil Aviation)

Move had been in works for over 6-months.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinehhslax2 From Bahrain, joined Jan 2012, 127 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5116 times:

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 1):
Terminal 2 has worked well for ANZ, expecially with connections from Air Canada which uses the same terminal. The TBIT is served by several Star alliance arlines but many of those are Asian based airline which will provide next to zero connections to ANZ at LAX, they connect with ANZ in Asia. The three airlines providing connections to ANZ at LAX are United, LH and Air Canada. OF those only LH uses the TBIT.

I don't see this as an issue. You still have to go through security again, just with a longer walk. Even going through customs and immigration on UA at LAX, the walk to a connecting UA flight can be a good distance with all the winding corridors and different terminals.


User currently offlinesunrisevalley From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 4990 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5066 times:

All persons who are eligible for a NEXUS card should have one. It makes transit at US and Canadian border points and airports so quick.
If you are like me, the color of my eyes does not permit an iris scan so I must go through the line that handles the crew. That is usually pretty quick.


User currently offlinedeltaflyertoo From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1653 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5020 times:

Quoting GCT64 (Reply 5):
You are very right about LAX making LHR look slick and easy - but recent experience of the TBIT suggests that 2 hours queues for immigration and customs are normal there too. Hopefully the rebuild of the TBIT will speed this up, but I am not optimistic that this will be the case.

Just a suggestion for next time any of you come to LAX and looking to minimize immigration time, perhaps select a US based carrier. I always fly to UK on either BA or VS from LAX and often I'm very out numbered by non AMericans-so at LHR I don't have to go in same line as the Europeans and vice versa on the return. I would suspect the US carriers are more US citizen heavy and therefore the non US citizen lines at LAX maybe shorter....now w/ a caveat to all this, I personally wouldn't be caught dead on a US carrier to Europe and alas could see why many of you would not go for this option either, but again flying VS or BA its served me well when it came to immigration (NEVER 2 hours but I could see it was going to be for my fellow European pax).


User currently offlineMortyman From Norway, joined Aug 2006, 3941 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5009 times:

Bradley International Terminal at LAX

Is this where Air Tahiti Nui has flown from in the last few years ? I think I remember I had to go to a different terminal from an Air New Zealand flight to an Air Tahiti Nui flight back in 2010. I am pretty sure it was Bradley International Terminal ...


User currently offlineKLAXAirport From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 152 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 4900 times:

Quoting Mortyman (Reply 12):
Is this where Air Tahiti Nui has flown from in the last few years ?

Yes sir.

Cheers,
KLAXAirport   


User currently offlineMortyman From Norway, joined Aug 2006, 3941 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4742 times:

Quoting KLAXAirport (Reply 13):
Yes sir.

Thanx for the feedback  


User currently offlineAF Cabin Crew From French Polynesia, joined Sep 1999, 1040 posts, RR: 33
Reply 15, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4409 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Ia Orana all !

Who is going to be left at T2 if NZ and AF/KL move to TBIT in the next couple of years...



Ia Maitai to tatou tere !
User currently offlinedeltaflyertoo From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1653 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4285 times:

Quoting AF Cabin Crew (Reply 15):
Who is going to be left at T2 if NZ and AF/KL move to TBIT in the next couple of years..

Good question. So that will leave Virgin Atlantic, TACA, Volaris and Hawaiian. There will definitely be some extra capacity there if someone wants to move in. Might be a good fit for Virgin Australia then they would be right next door to Virgin America flights.


User currently offlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2077 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 4247 times:

Quoting deltaflyertoo (Reply 16):
So that will leave Virgin Atlantic, TACA, Volaris and Hawaiian.

Off LAX current website:

Terminal 2
Aero Mexico
Air Canada
Air China
Air France
Air New Zealand
Alitalia
Aviacsa
Avianca
Hawaiian Airlines
KLM
LASCA
Sun Country
TACA
Virgin Atlantic
Volaris
WestJet

Quoting deltaflyertoo (Reply 16):
Might be a good fit for Virgin Australia then they would be right next door to Virgin America flights.

VA and VX already operate out of T3.



John@SFO
User currently offlineslinky09 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2009, 839 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4153 times:

Quoting legacyins (Reply 17):
VA and VX already operate out of T3.

With the caveat that VA arrives into the Delta terminal because T3 does not have immigration and customs (I understand). There are rumours circulating but none substantiated that Virgin will build a lounge at T2 or T3, which might indicate all Virgin international flights arriving into T3 and possibly departing from T2. It would be good to have that alignment for transfers etc.


User currently offlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2077 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4114 times:

Quoting slinky09 (Reply 18):
which might indicate all Virgin international flights arriving into T3 and possibly departing from T2. It would be good to have that alignment for transfers etc.

would it not be the other way around, arrive in T2 (customs and Immigration) and depart from T3, VX,VS?



John@SFO
User currently offlineslinky09 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2009, 839 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4009 times:

Quoting legacyins (Reply 19):
would it not be the other way around, arrive in T2 (customs and Immigration) and depart from T3, VX,VS?

Doh! You are correct, I'm mixing up the numbering.


User currently offlinejumpjets From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2012, 825 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3919 times:

I once arrived at LAX with gifts for friends a couple of which turned out to fall into the category of agricultural products. We had to go through a separate channel, had our goodies confiscated and were out of the airport in no time. For the loss of maybe £5 worth of stuff it was a great way to jump the horrendous queue.

User currently offlineKLAXAirport From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 152 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3823 times:

Quoting jumpjets (Reply 21):
For the loss of maybe $7.81 worth of stuff it was a great way to jump the horrendous queue.

But it is still not worth it.

Cheers,
KLAXAirport   

[Edited 2012-08-09 07:24:39]

User currently offlinetayser From Australia, joined Mar 2008, 1131 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3770 times:

Sweet, my bank's going to have ATMs at LAX airport!

sorry, couldn't resist.  


User currently onlinezkncj From New Zealand, joined Nov 2005, 541 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3564 times:

Quoting deltaflyertoo (Reply 16):
Might be a good fit for Virgin Australia then they would be right next door to Virgin America flights.

Virgin Australia is 25% owned by Air New Zealand, with that interest growing in the years to come I can see them moving to TBIT along with NZ.


25 kiwiandrew : If Virgin Aus keep their current arrangment with DL on North American routes I can't see them moving to TBIT.
26 qf002 : That really depends on how the relationship develops. If the current situation continues, then VA is far better off staying put -- there is no real a
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
WN On Track To Be #1 Carrier At LAX By Nov posted Sun Jul 27 2008 08:48:57 by LoneStarMike
VX To AA Connection At LAX posted Mon Feb 4 2008 16:18:39 by SkyTeam7488
What Happen To AI Today At LAX? (1-1-07) posted Tue Jan 2 2007 03:08:46 by Kaitak744
What Will Happen To AA 767 At LAX? posted Wed Sep 20 2006 15:38:08 by AAFan
RUMOR: AS To Change Terminals At LAX? posted Fri Sep 15 2006 05:45:17 by AirplaneBoy
What Will Happen To American Eagle At LAX? posted Sun Sep 3 2006 08:12:17 by Trvlr
Back To Back TWA At LAX Vid posted Sun Aug 20 2006 06:59:07 by SJC-Alien
How Do Pax Get To These Gates At LAX? posted Thu Aug 25 2005 15:04:11 by B747-4U3
Things To Do/spotting At LAX posted Fri Dec 19 2003 01:44:01 by Qantasclub
What Will Happen To SkyWest Brasilias At Lax? posted Fri Sep 29 2000 05:36:27 by Jmc1975