When I worked the ramp at BWI, we had a 737 do the same thing. The F/As smelled smoke and thought there was a fire. Turned out it was just the APU cold starting. (There's a term for this but I can't remember it) Someone correct me f I'm wrong. That nose cone is starting to look like our Saabs.
My opinions do not represent the opinions of my company. They are solely the opinion of the poster.
USAFDO From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 443 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3031 times:
Was this a real aircraft evacuation? Or was it some journalists who wrote a story inappropriately using official industry airline lingo.
To the poster of the thread....I see you have posted over 1/2 of a thousand posts on airlliners.net... why put a post on here of an aircraft parked at the gate, but use indistry lingo that implies the had an emergency "evacuation" from an inexperienced journalists ?
?? I posted the story about a plane that was evactuated. Whether it was at the gate or not, is was still evacuated and could have been a much more serious situation if it had been handled differently. I don't get what your objection to my posting of this story is?
And by the way.it was a real evacuation. Where I got it does not post bogus stories.
MikeCT From United States of America, joined May 2008, 138 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1741 times:
Quoting USAFDO (Reply 6): To the poster of the thread....I see you have posted over 1/2 of a thousand posts on airlliners.net... why put a post on here of an aircraft parked at the gate, but use indistry lingo that implies the had an emergency "evacuation" from an inexperienced journalists ?
I'll defend spiritair here. The subject line is very succinct. It simply states a United 757 was evacuated at SEA, and that is exactly what happened. Whether it was evacuated via the slides or the jet bridge, there was still report of a fire and it was still evacuated.