Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Doesn't The 744 Work For The U.S.?  
User currently offlineUal747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1423 times:

If you take a look at the majority of US airlines, AA, DL, CO, TWA, they have all bought the 747, but have all been ready to get rid of it. The only airlines it has worked for are NW and UA. If you take the EU and compare it to the US, it is roughly the same size, but almost every major carrier provides 747 service somewhere. BA, KLM, AF, LH, Olympic (for a while), Iberia, Alitalia, Swissair. They even fly a lot of these to the US, but if you look at US airlines, particularly the flights going to Europe, they are all 777's or smaller. What's the deal? Is it because the US airlines provide more direct service, thus not needing a 744-sized aircraft?

On the same page, if you look at the flights going to Asia from the US, a lot of them are being downgraded to 777's. However, all of the Asian majors are sending in their 744's to the US. But, aside from UA and NW, there isn't much direct service to Asia, i.e. point to point. So what's the deal with US airlines and the 747 not working for them, but for everyone else in the world?

UAL747

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4453 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1372 times:

You pretty much answered your own question. UA and NW are the only US airlines that have extensive Asian routes. That is the reason why both of those airlines opearte 747-400s in large amounts. While AA, CO, and DL do operate to Asia, it is not in the same frequency as UA or NW. Therefore the capacity issue does not play as large of a factor as it does for United and Northwest.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineFlyingAirlines From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1350 times:

Continental just opened new service from Newark to Tokyo using 777s. I do find it strange that we don't use as many 747s as Europe does. I remember going on 747s with TWA. It would be nice if US airlines would get some 747s back.

User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5480 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1301 times:

I remember several years ago, American was seriously thinking about ordering a few 747-400s if they got the ORD-NRT slot. At that time, it was awarded to United. American later got an ORD-NRT slot, but opted not to order the 744.
I think if Continental, Delta, and/or American all had extensive Asian networks, you might see some 747s in their fleets. Right now, They don't have the extensive Asian network United or Northwest has. I think American may order a few eventually because they currently have 3 asian destinations(Tokyo, Osaka, Taipei) and some unconfirmed rumours have said Kuala Lumpur, Beijing, and maybe even Hong Kong. I have just heard by mouth about Beijing, and Hong Kong by mouth, and AA has an office in Kuala Lumpur so that might say something. I think that if any US airline were to really get big in Asia, you might see some 747s with American flags by the rear wings.
rgds,
blink182



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineUal747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1291 times:

I hope to god AA would order the 744, probably not too likely as of now, but I agree with you Blink, that if they expanded into Asia, they will need the capacity. Also, I would almost bet that AA's next Asian destination will be Hong Kong. Looking forward to that.

UAL747


User currently offlineAirbus380 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1283 times:

All of those airlines bought -100 and -200 except for UA which bought the -400. The Classis 747s are old. Most airlines retired them when they were about to get 777 orders in. Most airlines these days are going for the widebody twins. The 747 won't be around much longer in the USA unless Boeing gets to work on the 747X design. GOD SPEED THE 747.

380


User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6659 posts, RR: 22
Reply 6, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1259 times:

If AA were looking for an aircraft 744 size , wouldnt a 773 LR order be more likely?

User currently offline777D From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 300 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1236 times:

why the 744 when the 777-200 or 777-300 would work just as well?

User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3803 posts, RR: 29
Reply 8, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1188 times:

U.S. and Canadian airlines have increasingly turned to ETOPS twins for flights across the Atlantic due to economics and the changing nature of routes between North America and Europe.

When one compares the route maps of 20 and 10 years ago with today's, the trend toward point-to-point services that link more cities on the two continents directly, bypassing the traditional Eastern gateway cities of North America, is very apparent. Also, with the advent of long range twins and the A340, non-stop services have replaced one- or two-stop same-plane services that were common in the past. Another enhanced feature made possible by aircraft like the 757, 767, 777, 330 and 340 is daily service on routes that were once served 3-5 times weekly when 747s ruled the routes across the pond.

European airlines have increasingly followed the same trend as their U.S. and Canadian counterparts in flying more non-stop trans-Atlantic services with more ETOPS twins or A340s more often.


User currently offlineSouthRebels From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1174 times:

You said flights are being downgraded to 777's. I do not consider the 777 a downgrade. Sure, 747's are a marvelous aircraft, but actually they are less comfortable then 777's. Take UA for example, their 767's, 777's, and Airbuses have a seat width of 18", compared to their 747's whose is 17". Now, on paper an inch isnt a big deal. However, when you fly these aircraft you notice a big difference.

User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1174 times:

As agressive as CO is about expansion, and with Bethune's insider ties at Boeing, I don't find it out of the question to see 747-400s in CO colors within the next few years.

The question is will they be new builds or picked up on the after market...the first -400s are over ten years old now, and you gotta figure at least a few will be put up for sale once fresh A380s start chugging off the line,


User currently offlineJiml1126 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1144 times:

UA got their 744 work for the US domestic route.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Doesn't The 'SP' Moniker Get Used Anymore posted Tue Dec 20 2005 11:44:06 by RB211-524H
Why Doesn't The FAA Like Combi Aircraft posted Wed Oct 22 2003 20:49:58 by RockyRacoon
Why Doesn't AA Have 'Economy Plus' On The 777s? posted Sat Dec 9 2006 20:58:13 by Gh123
Why Doesn't NZ Re-enter The SYD-LAX Market? posted Sun Nov 12 2006 05:06:12 by ZKNBX
Why Doesn't UA Fly To The Mexican Resort Areas? posted Mon Jan 12 2004 23:55:55 by ElectraBob
Why Doesn't MEA Consider The A330-300? posted Sun Jan 11 2004 19:14:30 by GoMEA
Why Does The 744 Wing Curve Down At The Ends? posted Thu Jun 12 2003 06:08:53 by Ual747
Why Doesn't Qantas Order The A340-500/600? posted Wed Apr 17 2002 23:39:53 by American 767
Why Arent PIA Interested In The 744 Combi posted Thu Dec 13 2001 15:59:24 by Airmale
Why Is The 747 Also Called The 744? posted Wed Jan 10 2001 00:07:18 by Timbo