Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Recent AF Go-around At SXM Due To Trop Storm Isaac  
User currently offlinebakersdozen From Canada, joined Nov 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 10987 times:

Did a search for SXM but nothing came up.

See the below link for a cool recent video of a go-around at SXM of an AF 340. Looks like a hard crosswind landing that they decided to abort.

You'll have to ignore the exaggeration and hyperbol in the comments/title (as in most Youtube videos) though. At the time it was a tropical storm and not a hurricane.... and I'm not sure how it is "extremely" late as I suppose any abort prior to touchdown is on time  

A shame there is no HD version of the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJaR4azw6NM

23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRoseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9635 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 10939 times:

That is very late to initiate a go around.

With no ILS and only 7,500 ft of runway, that's a tough approach in bad weather for any widebody. I'm not surprised to see a go around.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlinebakersdozen From Canada, joined Nov 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 10517 times:

It's interesting to see how slow it climbs  

User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8267 posts, RR: 23
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 10480 times:

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 1):
With no ILS and only 7,500 ft of runway, that's a tough approach in bad weather for any widebody. I'm not surprised to see a go around.

While likely a visual approach considering the good visibility, 7500 feet is certainly challenging in those kind of winds. He had a pretty good crab angle going there for a while, and it looks like they got a decent sink as they crossed over land. Would be fun to watch, though, that's for sure! Then again, there isn't much of a beach there to enjoy...



This Website Censors Me
User currently offlinealphaomega From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 577 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 10050 times:

Interesting to see the waves coming up against the rocks - I'm so used to having the lounge chairs from the bar in the sand, even at high tide (yes I know it was due to a tropical storm, just interesting to see Maho beach covered lol).

Quoting bakersdozen (Reply 2):
It's interesting to see how slow it climbs

HA!


User currently offlinebueb0g From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2010, 642 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 9166 times:

Quoting bakersdozen (Reply 2):

It's interesting to see how slow it climbs  

Obviously this is in jest, but the climb performance there isn't actually too bad... And of course, it climbs very nicely with an engine out, which is the important part, and especially useful for SXM!



Roger roger, what's our vector, victor?
User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3073 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 8523 times:

Did the divert to somewhere else?

User currently offlineBA747400 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 428 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 7741 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 6):

Doesn't appear so; there's a link in the video description to the second (and sucessful) landing, about 15 minutes later.


User currently offlinethrufru From Marshall Islands, joined Feb 2009, 224 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7171 times:

Don't forget, that even after the pilot initiates a go-around, it's not unusual for the aircraft to lose a significant amount of altitude. This looked like a normal approach to land and a standard decision to go-around. Nothing really out of the ordinary.

User currently offlineUALWN From Andorra, joined Jun 2009, 2790 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 6159 times:

I've been in a couple of go arounds. One of them, due to strong cross-winds at BCN when coming in from FRA on a LH A320, was initiated once we were already over the runway, not more than a couple of seconds before the expected touch down. I didn't find it abnormal.


AT7/111/146/Avro/CRJ/CR9/EMB/ERJ/E75/F50/100/L15/DC9/D10/M8X/717/727/737/747/757/767/777/AB6/310/319/320/321/330/340/380
User currently offlineCambridgeFlyer1 From UK - England, joined Jun 2012, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 6100 times:

Quoting bakersdozen (Reply 2):

Haha! Back with the a343 power jokes  


User currently offlineflylku From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 808 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 5336 times:

Is it just me or does it appear that he is carrying a tad bit more airspeed in the second video?


...are we there yet?
User currently offlinexdlx From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 652 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 4757 times:

Quoting BA747400 (Reply 7):

just enough time for a change of underwear!


User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 26975 posts, RR: 57
Reply 13, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 4672 times:

Quoting alphaomega (Reply 4):

Interesting to see the waves coming up against the rocks - I'm so used to having the lounge chairs from the bar in the sand, even at high tide (yes I know it was due to a tropical storm, just interesting to see Maho beach covered lol).

Sure is  

Must have been some experience for those watching .


User currently offlinemoumou8891 From France, joined Dec 2005, 9 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3607 times:

Here is the HD version

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWDOkmiJdHI&feature=g-upl


User currently offlinemoose135 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2322 posts, RR: 10
Reply 15, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3415 times:

Quoting bakersdozen (Reply 2):
It's interesting to see how slow it climbs

They don't climb - they get into ground effect, and rely on the curvature of the Earth to do the rest. 



KC-135 - Passing gas and taking names!
User currently offlineLV From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 2005 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3369 times:

Quoting thrufru (Reply 8):
Don't forget, that even after the pilot initiates a go-around, it's not unusual for the aircraft to lose a significant amount of altitude. This looked like a normal approach to land and a standard decision to go-around. Nothing really out of the ordinary

Here is a video of an NK A319 that did a go around at LAS a few weeks ago. You can see it still lose some altitude even after the engines spool up.

http://youtu.be/VpgmzyhmHxA


User currently onlineAR385 From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 6203 posts, RR: 30
Reply 17, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3350 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Well, isn´t it SOP on go-arounds to not retract the gear until you have confirmed a Positive Rate of Climb? I assume this video illustrates why.


MGGS
User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4917 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3284 times:

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 1):

Very late indeed and could've been a costly decision too... Remember the incident in Canada during a storm and aircraft ended up crash landing jumping the runway and into an embankment...

EK413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7412 posts, RR: 57
Reply 19, posted (2 years 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3034 times:

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 1):
That is very late to initiate a go around.
Quoting EK413 (Reply 18):
Very late indeed and could've been a costly decision too...

 

There is no "late Go Around" ... A late Go Around is the one that is not performed and the plane crashes ...
A Go Around can be performed even after the wheels touch the Rwy (happened to me at JFK last September).

By Definition, a Go Around is always "late" !!!!


User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4917 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (2 years 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2918 times:

Quoting FlySSC (Reply 19):

What is the cutoff for a go-around if that be the case...

EK413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineMaverick623 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 5638 posts, RR: 6
Reply 21, posted (2 years 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2888 times:

Quoting EK413 (Reply 18):
Very late indeed and could've been a costly decision too... Remember the incident in Canada during a storm and aircraft ended up crash landing jumping the runway and into an embankment...

That airplane never attempted a go-around.



"PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4917 posts, RR: 4
Reply 22, posted (2 years 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2825 times:

Quoting Maverick623 (Reply 21):

& what is the cutoff to execute a go-around...?

EK413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlinezeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 9097 posts, RR: 75
Reply 23, posted (2 years 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2786 times:

Quoting bakersdozen (Thread starter):

Looks like they were landing with a tailwind.

Quoting EK413 (Reply 20):

Selecting reverse thrust.



We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Double Go-Around At SFO posted Mon Sep 26 2011 12:43:13 by js
"Exciting" Go Around At IAH, 9/16 posted Fri Sep 16 2011 17:57:20 by traindoc
Video: Virgin Atlantic A346 Go-Around At Boston posted Mon Jul 19 2010 05:43:20 by reggaebird
ATP Grounded At EMA Due To Ash Damage? posted Wed May 19 2010 18:23:26 by KFlyer
FL Go Around At MKE 3/8/2010 posted Mon Mar 8 2010 13:33:18 by legacytravel
UA Emergency Landing At BUF Due To Smoke In Lav. posted Fri Mar 5 2010 15:54:58 by KBUF
Plane Skids Off The Runway At TIJ Due To Rain/wind posted Thu Jan 21 2010 18:23:50 by Marcus
Cancellations & Delays At CDG Due To Snowfalls posted Mon Feb 2 2009 00:14:29 by FlySSC
Question Re: Pax Stranded At FRA Due To LH Strike posted Sun Jul 27 2008 22:01:12 by Boeing747_600
Small Plane Go Around At EDI Today. Quick Question posted Sat May 17 2008 11:50:26 by Sandyb123