Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Nasty Trick Turns US Flight Back To PHL.  
User currently offlinespiritair97 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 13998 times:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-...-philly-after-possible-prank-call/

Apparently somebody called in a tip that somebody onthe flight was carrying a suspicious substance, which was untrue. Flight 1267 had to turn back to PHL after taking off for, and flying one third of the way across Pennsylvania, towards DFW.

People are getting downrit cruel with their pranks lately.

29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinecombatshadow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 13901 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Was just reading about this. I suppose the passenger has someone that doesn't like him!

User currently offlinespiritair97 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 13774 times:

Quoting combatshadow (Reply 1):

LOL I know!


User currently offlineAR385 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 13654 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting combatshadow (Reply 1):
Was just reading about this. I suppose the passenger has someone that doesn't like him!

The good thing thing is that usually they catch these people, so it´s just a matter of time. I wonder how many charges that person is going to face.


User currently offlinecrj900lr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 13622 times:

From what I heard it was his ex-girlfriend that called it in.

User currently offlinePHX787 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 13563 times:

Quoting crj900lr (Reply 4):
From what I heard it was his ex-girlfriend that called it in.

dumb broad  

I wonder what happened to the PAX..... and what will happen to the ex....would she get charged for interfering with a flight?


User currently offlinespiritair97 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 13405 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 5):

She probably will.

Quoting crj900lr (Reply 4):

Alright, I've had some nasty breakups, but NONE where the gorl got so mad she made a Federal Case out of it...literraly at least!


User currently offlinerfields5421 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 13380 times:

Now it gets really curious.

The man who was the 'apparent hoax victim' was arrested upon his arrival at DFW Airport this evening.

DFW-Airport-168858156.html" target="_blank">http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/Appar...ival-at-DFW-Airport-168858156.html

Quote:
D/FW AIRPORT - Chris N. Shell, 29, was arrested by D/FW Airport Police Thursday night in Terminal E as he arrived on a 6:10 p.m. U.S. Airways flight from Philadelphia, said David Magana, airport spokesman.

Shell faces more than one warrant from more than one municipality, Magana added, but he would not reveal what the warrants are for or which agencies issued them.

They’ll be included on the police report tomorrow, Magana said.

.......

Philadelphia police Chief Joseph Sullivan said it was eventually discovered the man was a victim of a "pretty nasty trick." ABC News has reported Shell's ex girlfriend is believed to have called authorities to say he had liquid explosives on the plane.


User currently offlinePHX787 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 13340 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 7):
The man who was the 'apparent hoax victim' was arrested upon his arrival at DFW Airport this evening.
Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 7):
D/FW AIRPORT - Chris N. Shell, 29, was arrested by D/FW Airport Police Thursday night in Terminal E as he arrived on a 6:10 p.m. U.S. Airways flight from Philadelphia, said David Magana, airport spokesman.

Shell faces more than one warrant from more than one municipality, Magana added, but he would not reveal what the warrants are for or which agencies issued them.

They’ll be included on the police report tomorrow, Magana said.

I bet this was all precautionary. I don't think they knew at the time that the ex was pulling a fast one.


User currently offlinerfields5421 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 12340 times:

Turns out that the gentleman who was subject to the hoax call has some outstanding minor drug charges warrants. When his name became public, the officers recognized the name and met him at the plane with handcuffs before escorting him to the Collin County lockup.

User currently offlinecombatshadow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 12230 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hmmm. Possibility that the call-in wasn't a hoax? Maybe the -ex thought he really would have some substance on him.

User currently offlinecmf From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 11721 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Thread starter):
People are getting downrit cruel with their pranks lately.

  
There are many ways to describe this, but prank is not one of them.


User currently offlineMaverick623 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 11549 times:

Quoting combatshadow (Reply 10):
Hmmm. Possibility that the call-in wasn't a hoax?

Slim to none is too optimistic of an assessment.

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 5):
would she get charged for interfering with a flight?

Now it sounds like it was the ex's new boyfriend who called it in, although it sounds like they were both in on it.

Possible charges range from filing a false report, all the way up to making terrorist threats. Precedence has it that if they plead guilty, they'll get a felony charge and ~6 months prison time.


User currently offlinepeanuts From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 11480 times:

Only 69 pax on board???

US needs AA on this route...obviously.   


User currently offlineflyingturtle From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 9696 times:

Quoting combatshadow (Reply 1):
Was just reading about this. I suppose the passenger has someone that doesn't like him!

In the 1940ies and 1950ies, some flights were actually brought down by disgruntled husbands and relatives: http://planecrashinfo.com/unusual.htm


David


User currently offlinePHX787 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 8657 times:

http://avherald.com/h?article=45576774&opt=0

Looks like he was released and rebooked to texas?

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/A...7/history/20120906/1139Z/KPHL/KDFW


User currently offlineferminbrif From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 6508 times:

Only a phone call and the airborne flight was brought back to Philadelphia after it had already flown a third of the way across Pennsylvania to realized it was a pretty nasty trick…..??? that’s unbelievable but true.
It seems to me that FBI, police and the airlines just don’t trust airport controls and authorities because were unable to detect somebody carrying a dangerous substance. So, they had to decide to turn the aircraft around …..
Maybe someday somebody calls to say: there´s a pax in a flight “0000” bound to “somewhere” carrying a nuke and all planes will be turned around…….


User currently offlineTbone354 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 6133 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Who was that said one person cannot make a difference? One person made one phone call and disrupted hundreds of people's lives. Maybe thousands if you include ATC, FBI, police, family members, friends, media, even here, on and on and on... Me thinks someone will pay dearly. Beam me up. Speaking of that this is Star Trek's 46 th anniversary!

User currently offlineRWA380 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4902 times:

Quoting Maverick623 (Reply 12):
Now it sounds like it was the ex's new boyfriend who called it in, although it sounds like they were both in on it

This what I have pieced together from reading the net, plus watching BBC, CNN, CBS, news. The current B.F. called from a pay phone (so they knew it was wrong and would likely be tracked, I bet he wore gloves and a disguise), the girlfriend was in the know about what he did. This was supposed to basically get the ex B.F."rubber gloved" during security, but he was already in the plane enroute when this happened.

The guy who was the victim of this crime, apparently put some compromising pictures of his ex G.F. on his Facebook page or some other social site. He was wrong for doing the posting of the pictures, which is why when you play, play at your home, it's illegal for others to tape you in your home, it's not illegal for them to tape you in their home. Anyway, nothing he did, warranted this kind of act, the guy responsible will learn a very, very valuable lesson, you waste too much time thinking this shit up, rather than forgiving and moving on.

I believe if they have been arrested, and will be charged with a number of federal crimes, not worth sacrificing your freedom to get back at someone who did you wrong in some less offensive way. They should both face the most time in prison as possible, as well as have to pay for the cost of the turn-around plus associated costs.

I have never understood why, when people break up, they check the others Facebook page constantly and get mad at the things contained in their profile. If you break up, it's over. Be cool about it and live your lives independently.


User currently offlineZKOJH From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4857 times:

very lame to do this, do people not learn anything?! but then saying that, here in China the last 2 weeks we have multi hoax's to the airlines mainly bombs on board, people don't understand what will happen. here it's a min of 5 years prison and a fine.

User currently offlineBC77008 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4712 times:

Quoting RWA380 (Reply 18):
which is why when you play, play at your home, it's illegal for others to tape you in your home, it's not illegal for them to tape you in their home

But then we would all be at home playing with ourselves, and that gets boring after a while...

The girlfriend sounds like she just goes from one man to another and apparently convinced her new boyfriend to do something very foolish. I hope these two pay the price. An aircraft diversion is a costly event.


User currently offlineAesma From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4543 times:

How can his warrants only pop up when someone calls and not when he bought the ticket ?

User currently offlineBC77008 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4470 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 21):
How can his warrants only pop up when someone calls and not when he bought the ticket ?

Only minor drug charges, that won't put him on a terrorist watch list.


User currently offlinelonghauler From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4401 times:

They say, "Hell hath no fury .... "

We have this happen sometime to aircrew. An ex who feels somewhat wronged (whether they actually are is irrelevant and no one's business but their own) .... but they call Customs to say the aircrew is a drug mule, then they call the airline say the aircrew is an alcoholic and drinks and flies, then they email all his/her working crew and say he is a dangerous pilot, etc etc etc.

It seems it never occurs to the ex, that there are consequences for their actions!

(Nor hell a fury, like a woman scorn'd)


User currently offlineRWA380 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 4012 times:

Quoting BC77008 (Reply 20):
But then we would all be at home playing with ourselves, and that gets boring after a while

Just ask everyones favorite celebrity, the one who made being famous unpopular, Kim Kardashian! She ended up on the net, because she got her freak on at someone elses place, amateur mistake, which is why she couldn't get control of that little movie she made with Mr Random Stranger Guy.....(EG)   


25 rfields5421 : His warrants did not pop up. A police officer recognized the name from new reports - checked with the outstanding warrants database - and discovered
26 EK413 : I understand the authorities ain't taking any chance regardless of it being a hoax but was it really necessary to turn the aircraft around to the air
27 copter808 : They will usually go to the most "practical" airport, after considering all the options. I don't know exactly where they were when they turned around
28 rfields5421 : Returning to a major US Airways hub, especially the origin airport, makes the inconvenience much less for passengers. Going into a smaller, closer ai
29 EK413 : Cheers... Thanks for the detailed responses and that certainly makes perfect sense on the air turn back to the airport of origin... EK413
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Files Objections To PHL Expansion posted Thu Feb 23 2012 05:37:07 by PHLBOS
Delta Flight 1016 To PHL Evacuated At ATL posted Sat Nov 7 2009 13:46:29 by RW170
US Flight 1500 SAN - PHL Today posted Mon Aug 4 2008 19:25:56 by UAL-Fan
US Flight 921 To Sangster posted Fri Jan 5 2007 03:40:19 by Clrd2go
US 767 Back To PIT? posted Thu Mar 23 2006 12:18:04 by PITA333
US Airways Back To Chapter 11? posted Sun Feb 22 2004 08:50:10 by CRFLY
Continental Micronesia Flight Turns Back To GUM posted Fri Oct 14 2005 01:08:08 by GuamVICE
Delta SFO-NRT Flight Turns Back To SFO. posted Sat Apr 7 2001 04:44:56 by BA
3 Flight Diverted Back To LAX Tonight posted Fri May 25 2012 23:42:39 by MDW22L31C
US Airways & Others Now Opposed To PHL Expansion posted Mon Jan 9 2012 06:46:13 by PHLBOS