AirOne From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 607 posts, RR: 2 Posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1948 times:
I was just wondering if it has ever happened in commercial aviation where a pilot is involved in a crash and stil flys for that airline or another. Even if it wasn't the pilots fault would they fire him? For example SQ006 may have been mainly ATC fault or the American plane that overan the Little Rock runway, when the pilot had been flying for over 24 hours. If they survive, are their careers done for?
Blackened From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1884 times:
Do you remember that Ethiopian 767 crashing into the water somewhere east of Africa. Terrorists forced the pilot to fly to Australia but they ran out of fuel of course. The captain tried his best and "landed" on the water. He survived as well as some other people. I saw him in an interview and he said he was doing his job again (I hope I can remember correctly but I think so). The crash wasn't the pilot's fault BTW.
Jiml1126 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1870 times:
TPE's ATC contributes a factor to SQ006 crash.
But if when the report released in December, and shows that it's TPE's problem, I hope SQ006's pilots can fly once again. (They are innocent IF the report show that SIA don't have to be responsible for the crash)
Cedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 7903 posts, RR: 54
Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1824 times:
It is almost impossible to get a decent flying job after a crash, unless you're Al Haynes. One problem is that if they are ever involved in another incident or accident, the press would use the pilot's past in a headline - "Pilot crashes again". Not to mention pax confidence if it gets out, second incident or not. Remember the airline are loaning a pilot $100m worth of aircraft, they want to know it's in safe hands. And so does their insurance company. A commercial pilot for a half decent airline in the west if not everywhere has to have a spotless license.
BTW it is crazy to think the SQ pilot will fly again. They tuned into the localizer and the PFD cleared showed an offset. Plus the F/O tried to bring this to the captain's attention. Plus it wasn't the right runway, and it's not as though those pilots hadn't been there before.
fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
Jwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1735 times:
there is no reason indeed other than PR and lawyers. If that pilot is ever in another incident (no matter what the cause) the vultures will be sueing the airline for all it's worth because of their letting a pilot they know is not safe fly (and a jury will go for that, having read the tabloids and not reliable sources).
Airsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 35
Reply 8, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1697 times:
Can you spell U-N-F-A-I-R D-I-S-S-M-I-S-S-A-L L-A-W-S-U-I-T?
If a pilot makes no mistake, you can´t fire or ground him, full stop.
I know of two examples here in Germany: The F/O of the Hapag-Lloyd A310 that crashed in VIE last year is still flying - he was smart enough to properlky document his dissent with the Captain´s decision not to land earlier; the other one is the surviving Lufthansa pilot of the 1993 Warsaw crash (A320) - he continued to fly for LH for a few years before he voluntarily retired for personal reasons.