Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DL 114 Divert Back To ATL From BOS Area On 9/9/12  
User currently offlinesuseJ772 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 820 posts, RR: 1
Posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2901 times:

I took DL 114 from ATL to BCN on the 8th. Hopped in flightaware to check the details and noticed DL 114 on the 9th got all the way to Boston and then came back. Anybody have any details? http://es.flightaware.com/live/fligh...4/history/20120909/2120Z/KATL/KATL

Just to throw it out there it was an A330. I kid I kid. Just teasing all those people since the AF crash who think the 330s are the verge of falling out of the sky.


Currently at PIE, requesting FWA >> >>
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRoseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9666 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2772 times:

They went down to 20,000ft for the entire flight back to Atlanta. I have to assume that they lost a Pack or something that would force them down to 20,000ft. You can't fly ETOPS on 1 pack, but you can fly over land.


If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlinesuseJ772 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 820 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2608 times:

Interesting. Strange they diverted to ATL instead of JFK. Also interesting that they circled in Atlanta. Would think 4 hours would burn enough fuel to land right away.


Currently at PIE, requesting FWA >> >>
User currently offlinewingnutmn From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 645 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2502 times:

Descend down to FL200 was probably to burn fuel but could no go lower due to DC airspace. Most likely the plane was needed back in ATL to cover another rotation after mx was completed or because ATL had the replacement airplane or crew.

Wingnut



Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing! It's a bonus if you can fly the plane again!!
User currently onlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6793 posts, RR: 32
Reply 4, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2461 times:

Quoting suseJ772 (Reply 2):
Strange they diverted to ATL instead of JFK. Also interesting that they circled in Atlanta. Would think 4 hours would burn enough fuel to land right away.

Well, if they needed to burn fuel anyway, they might as well divert to ATL since it's probably easier to find a replacement aircraft and get the maintenance work done there.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DL Late Evening Flights To ATL posted Sun Jun 24 2007 17:53:34 by TLHFLA
Delta To Add 6th Flight To ATL From MDT posted Tue May 1 2007 22:59:58 by Buddys747
New Service To LIS From BOS? posted Thu Nov 2 2006 04:02:56 by BoeingBus
DL Adds Mainline Back To ICT posted Sun Oct 8 2006 00:29:30 by DL763DFW
DL At ISP; Down To 2 ATL Flights Daily posted Tue Aug 15 2006 00:29:59 by Ramerinianair
Finally... Service To China From BOS... posted Mon Jan 2 2006 20:04:01 by BoeingBus
How Are DL's Flights 16/17 To And From MAA Doing? posted Thu Sep 8 2005 20:21:39 by Jr
Getting To LHR From Euston Station On Sunday? posted Tue Aug 2 2005 15:12:56 by Comorin
PHX Gets Redeye Back To ATL In June! posted Sun Mar 20 2005 04:00:32 by AV8AJET
Diversions To PIT From DC Area? posted Thu Dec 23 2004 20:47:02 by KingGeo3