Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Southern Air Accident In Anchorage  
User currently offlinejourdan747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 219 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 15422 times:

Anybody have any info on the Southern Air accident in anchorage? Runway 7L still closed as of 2pm local.

28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineWingtips56 From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 322 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 15423 times:

From the Associated Press:

ANCHORAGE, Alaska— A jumbo cargo jet blew out most of its tires while making an emergency landing in Anchorage.

The Anchorage Daily News says the jet was operating only on backup power when it landed early Tuesday at Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport.

Airport officials say the Southern Air Boeing 747 was headed from the Lower 48 to Asia when the plane's four main power generators quit working. Airport business manager Trudy Wassel says two backup generators kicked on, but they do not power a mechanism that keeps the jet's tires from skidding.

The flight crew was forced to use manual brakes that had no anti-skid, and 14 of the jet's 18 tires blew out. The plane landed at about 2 a.m. Nobody was injured.



Worked for WestAir, Apollo Airways, Desert Pacific, Western, AirCal and American Airlines
User currently offlineYukon880 From United States of America, joined Sep 2011, 137 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 15275 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

An incident perhaps?
Though "accident" is far more sensational. Thankfully, that is not the case here today!



Pratt & Whitney, In thrust we trust!
User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6110 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 15167 times:

I'm guessing the power bus had a fault, not the 4 generators at the same time.


New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlineGentFromAlaska From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 2926 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 14927 times:

Here's the Anchorage Daily News article. http://www.adn.com/2012/09/11/262045...anchorage-runway-closed-after.html

ANC runway 7L remained closed through noon Tuesday.



Man can be taken from Alaska. Alaska can never be taken from the man.
User currently offlineAF1624 From France, joined Jul 2006, 644 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 12650 times:

Does that mean that automatically, when the Anti-skid is INOP, the pilots can't control braking pressure correctly and therefore necessarily blow the tires ?


Cheers
User currently offlineMountainFlyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 473 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 12191 times:

Quoting Yukon880 (Reply 2):
An incident perhaps?
Though "accident" is far more sensational. Thankfully, that is not the case here today!

I don't think the OP was intending on being exact on the FAA definitions, but you are correct. Damage to landing gear, wheels, tires, and brakes are specifically excluded from the definition of "substantial damage" needed to qualify as an "accident" in FAA and NTSB terms unless there was serious injury or death. As you said, thankfully, none of that occurred here.

How often have all four main generators failed?



SA-227; B1900; Q200; Q400; CRJ-2,7,9; 717; 727-2; 737-3,4,5,7,8,9; 747-2; 757-2,3; 767-3,4; MD-90; A319, 320; DC-9; DC-1
User currently offlinemy235 From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 90 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 12137 times:

Quoting AF1624 (Reply 5):
the pilots can't control braking pressure correctly and therefore necessarily blow the tires ?

Maybe they just wanted to STOP. I was on the ramp at PDX a few weeks ago and a 767 came in with the spoilers inop. The guys just hammered on the brakes and they were smoking like crazy.


User currently offlineokie From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2853 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 11931 times:

Quoting MountainFlyer (Reply 6):
How often have all four main generators failed?

I suspect that it will be an issue of something over looked in the QRH or its execution.

It was not too long ago an AA 57 or 67 landed at ORD on battery power from an oversight.

Okie


User currently offlinejourdan747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 219 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 8572 times:

Runway 7L was closed in ANC for about 15 hours due to the Southern Air aircraft being stuck. Does the airline have to pay a fine if they close a runway for that long?

User currently offlinetb727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1549 posts, RR: 8
Reply 10, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 8391 times:

Quoting okie (Reply 8):
I suspect that it will be an issue of something over looked in the QRH or its execution.

That's kinda what I was thinking when I saw that. You never know though but that's what I would bet on.



Too lazy to work, too scared to steal!
User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7345 posts, RR: 32
Reply 11, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 7910 times:

Quoting jourdan747 (Reply 9):
Does the airline have to pay a fine if they close a runway for that long?

Such a requirement by the airport would be very bad for business. Airlines would avoid the airport.

I'm sure Southern lost as much, likely more, money with an inop aircraft than ANC did with a minor runway closure - with two other open runways.


User currently offlineCitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2368 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 7655 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 3):
I'm guessing the power bus had a fault, not the 4 generators at the same time.
Incident: Southern Air B742 near Anchorage on Sep 11th 2012, failure of all generators on board

A Southern Air Boeing 747-200 freighter, registration N783SA performing flight 9S-9783 (dep Sep 10th) from Miami,FL to Anchorage,AK (USA), had been enroute at FL400 and was in the initial descent towards Anchorage approximately 23 minutes prior to touch down when all four generators on board failed leaving the aircraft just with battery back up electric power. The loss of electricity also meant communication between aircraft and ATC was lost, other aircraft flying in the area however managed to relay transmissions from the aircraft to ATC and vice versa, ATC requested those relaying aircraft to inform the 742 crew they were cleared for a visual approach to runway 07L and cleared to land. About 10 minutes later, approximately 13 minutes prior to estimated touch down, direct communication was restored after the crew managed to get a APU running. The crew requested a long final to get the aircraft configured and opted for an ILS approach to runway 07L. The aircraft touched down safely, but blew all but two main and body gear tyres on the roll out due to the failure of the anti skid system and non-availability of thrust reversers and came to a stop disabled on the runway reporting blown tyres and hot brakes. Emergency services on stand by for the arrival immediately responded and cooled the brakes.
The runway was closed for about 12 hours as result until the 14 tyres were replaced, the aircraft was towed off the runway and the runway had been cleaned.
The NTSB opened an investigation into the occurrence reporting the aircraft suffered a complete electrical failure, the crew was flying on battery power only and nearly depleted the batteries. The NTSB is looking into what caused the failure of all four generators.
The airport reported the crew managed to get a backup generator online, but this did not power the anti-skid system.
The onward leg to Seoul (South Korea) was cancelled.


http://www.avherald.com/h?article=455c3629&opt=6400



Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
User currently offlineokie From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2853 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6699 times:

Quoting Wingtips56 (Reply 1):
The flight crew was forced to use manual brakes that had no anti-skid, and 14 of the jet's 18 tires blew out

I know ANC is not without Mx but finding 14 wheel/tire assemblies in a short period of time would seem to be a major task along with having to change that many.
Makes you wonder if they had to fly some in or if they could replace a few at certain positions on the gear and tug the aircraft slowly off the runway until they got a full complement?

07L is 10,600ft x 150ft, sounds like in the excitement they were maybe a little over anxious on the brakes but I was not there. I would suspect with systems failing around you in the best solution is to get it on the ground and to a stop.

Okie


User currently onlineSSTeve From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 629 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6149 times:

I wonder if a replacement plane picked up some tires on the way.

User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5639 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 5726 times:

Quoting okie (Reply 13):
I know ANC is not without Mx but finding 14 wheel/tire assemblies in a short period of time would seem to be a major task along with having to change that many.

More 747's pass through ANC each day than any other airport on this continent.
We have three major MX contract providers, and parts borrowing between international carriers is fairly common.
Finding tires should not be an issue.

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 11):
I'm sure Southern lost as much, likely more, money with an inop aircraft than ANC did with a minor runway closure - with two other open runways.

You mean ONE other open runway; 7R/25L was already closed for work! At least, it was when I left work Saturday night.


User currently offlinequalitydr From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 4809 times:

Simultaneous failure of four similar systems, designed to operate independently? Not statistically likely at all. Need to look at whatever is truly common to the four, be it something in the power system (bus? others?) or the operations and procedures.

What is the reasoning for four similar generators onboard? Do they normally power specific portions of the plane? Are some kept in idle readiness? And as point of clarification, are these the generators that are one-per-engine? I'm not involved in commercial aviation, so I'm not even sure where these generators are located...



All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure. -- Mark Twain
User currently offlineflightsimer From United States of America, joined Aug 2009, 513 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4654 times:

Ok, here is a stupid question, but why would an electrical failure of the generators cause the plane to lose reverse thrust?

I sort of assumed those would be mechanical driven, not electrical.



Commercial Pilot- SEL, MEL, Instrument
User currently offlinetb727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1549 posts, RR: 8
Reply 18, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4230 times:

Quoting flightsimer (Reply 17):
I sort of assumed those would be mechanical driven, not electrical.

Haha, no, they would never work if they were purely mechanical, also too heavy. Everything is at least electrically controlled, in times of reduced load, certain busses that are deemed non-essential(Check Essential!) are designed to be shed in order to keep the shiny side up until you get on the ground. Typically when you get down to batteries, on brand new batteries, you can maybe get 25 minutes out of them before you are in the dark.



Too lazy to work, too scared to steal!
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5639 posts, RR: 11
Reply 19, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4159 times:

Quoting flightsimer (Reply 17):

Ok, here is a stupid question, but why would an electrical failure of the generators cause the plane to lose reverse thrust?

I sort of assumed those would be mechanical driven, not electrical.

The 747 classic reversers are actually pneumatic- driven. But there is an electric switch in the throttle quadrant that opens the air valve to the drive units upon selection of reverse thrust. Clearly, in this situation, the bus powering those switches wasn't live.

Quoting tb727 (Reply 18):
Typically when you get down to batteries, on brand new batteries, you can maybe get 25 minutes out of them before you are in the dark.

The federal regulation is 30 minutes, and the FAA doesn't give a damn whether your battery is brand new. 30 minutes or bust.


User currently offlinena From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10365 posts, RR: 11
Reply 20, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4111 times:

I would recommend to correct the thread title. This is not about an accident. This is an incident.

User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31573 posts, RR: 57
Reply 21, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4085 times:

Agree change the Title to read "Incident".....I read the title & thought "Damn"........


Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineCX Flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6533 posts, RR: 55
Reply 22, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4013 times:

Quoting qualitydr (Reply 16):
Simultaneous failure of four similar systems, designed to operate independently? Not statistically likely at all. Need to look at whatever is truly common to the four, be it something in the power system (bus? others?) or the operations and procedures.

What is the reasoning for four similar generators onboard? Do they normally power specific portions of the plane? Are some kept in idle readiness? And as point of clarification, are these the generators that are one-per-engine? I'm not involved in commercial aviation, so I'm not even sure where these generators are located...

We had a flight quite a few years ago that lost all four generators. Apparently, (and I stand to be corrected), on a 747 when an engine failure occurs (or a generator failure), the system take a millisecond and takes all 3 remaining generators offline then back online as the system reconfigures to the 3 generators powering the aircraft. We had an aircraft where the generators failed to return online as the controller which reconfigures the power supply also failed at that moment, leaving the battery the only source of power.


User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6110 posts, RR: 9
Reply 23, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3960 times:

And yes we're talking about the generators in each engine.


New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlinestrandedinbgm From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 349 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 3774 times:

Interesting - Nothing listed on Av Herald.


It's 737s, 747s and 380s. Not 737's, 747's and 380's. Learn to use the apostrophe for crying out loud.
25 Post contains links ANCsupercub : http://avherald.com/h?article=455c3629&opt=0
26 Yukon880 : On the Classics, is this the case regardless of the engine maker? Just curious.
27 Post contains links 747classic : I have some doubts about the starting of the APU and using one (or even 2) generators as stated in the Aviation Herald article. In most 747 classic ai
28 tb727 : Well that's true but the only way you are gonna find out is run it down on standby in a real situation. In the sim, in my experience, if you aren't o
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air Canada In Anchorage posted Tue Sep 18 2007 19:14:44 by Jourdan747
Southern Air Transport In BNA posted Thu Dec 11 2003 22:29:43 by EMBQA
CI A340 Accident In Anchorage posted Sat Jan 26 2002 05:53:32 by Jiml1126
Both Southern Air 742F's In HKG 12/8/00 posted Sun Aug 13 2000 15:18:55 by N754PR
Another Accident In Romania - Blue Air @ Bacau posted Wed Jan 9 2008 11:18:10 by Vio
Nature Air. New Accident In Costa Rica posted Wed Jan 11 2006 15:19:51 by TACAA320
Old Air Tran 737-200 Accident In ATL posted Sun Aug 29 2004 05:27:17 by Reltney
Have Any Of You Ever Been In An Air Accident? posted Mon Nov 10 2003 17:37:54 by 7774EVER
Jataya Air In Anchorage posted Thu Jan 18 2001 20:34:03 by Woodsboy
Atlas Air B747 In Kbos posted Wed Aug 29 2012 17:03:15 by jcarv