Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Hainan Airlines To Cancun In 2013!  
User currently offlineXA744 From Mexico, joined Mar 2004, 734 posts, RR: 3
Posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 12453 times:

Well, just found this article, when reading the electronic edition of the Cancun paper "Novedades" ( sorry, spanish only http://sipse.com/noticias/174534-anu...an-vuelo-directo-china-cancun.html

It is mentioned that authorities from the Chinese province of Hainan, recently visited the Mexican Caribbean resort of Cancun to meet with local authorities. The top topic was to discuss the feasibility of commencing directs flights by Hainan Airlines, during the third quarter of 2013, between Beijing and Cancun. No further details were given, but it is mentioned in the article, that HU would be using 787-8s to run the proposed new service.

Lots of talking in the past, in regards to flights from China to Mexico by a Chinese carrier. Nothing has materialized just yet. At his time, Aeromexico remains the only airline providing direct links between the two countries ( MEX-PVG v v ).

Best regards


No matter how you fly...just never get your wings clipped !
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinethenoflyzone From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 2252 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 12370 times:

Quoting XA744 (Thread starter):
The top topic was to discuss the feasibility of commencing directs flights by Hainan Airlines, during the third quarter of 2013, between Beijing and Cancun
PEK-CUN, a 12,817 km VFR route.... That would be a first!

Even a one stop via say, MEX, would make little sense.

Thenoflyzone

[Edited 2012-09-13 07:33:19]


us Air Traffic Controllers have a good record, we haven't left one up there yet !!
User currently offline777222LR From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 131 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 12249 times:

LOL, perhaps with almost FULL government subsidy....

BTW, the only logical stopping point would either be in Canada or the US, and I doubt any of that will happen. I'm not sure a flight could take off from MEX and fly nonstop to PEK, giving altitude at MEX.


User currently offlinesw733 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6265 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 12027 times:

Quoting 777222LR (Reply 2):
LOL, perhaps with almost FULL government subsidy....

There was a fascinating article in the last Economist about countries and cities trying to court the Chinese tourist markets. Apparently, Chinese tourists spend a ton more money than most others, and are becoming a very, VERY important demographic in the travel business. Not saying there would be a full government subsidy, of course, but Cancun trying hard to attract Chinese tourists would not be a crazy thing.


User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 894 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 11996 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I see Hainan airlies starting services to Mexico City with the 787 in the next two or three years, and I think they would be succesfull there.

I don't know about Cancun, might be better to code-share it through MEX


User currently offlinewedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5830 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 11676 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

At one time, HU had expressed interest in tagging their SEA service with MEX...along with KE.

User currently offlinethenoflyzone From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 2252 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 11411 times:

Longest non-stop flight CUN has is the UN B744 from DME. And that is 10,067 km. (they use a 352 seat B744)

SU also flies SVO-CUN, which is 10,003 km, but they use an A332 with 241 seats. That's 30% less revenue, albeit with a more fuel efficient airframe.

Interesting if someone knows how these airlines are doing into CUN.

All of this being said, i fail to see how a tiny little B788 with 215 seats will perform profitably on such a long and thin segment that is PEK-CUN.

Thenoflyzone

[Edited 2012-09-13 12:56:21]


us Air Traffic Controllers have a good record, we haven't left one up there yet !!
User currently offlineXA744 From Mexico, joined Mar 2004, 734 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 10914 times:

Quoting g500 (Reply 4):
see Hainan airlies starting services to Mexico City with the 787 in the next two or three years, and I think they would be succesfull there.

I don't know about Cancun, might be better to code-share it through MEX

I concur !!!

Quoting thenoflyzone (Reply 6):
All of this being said, i fail to see how a tiny little B788 with 215 seats will perform profitably on such a long and thin segment that is PEK-CUN.

You are very right here. Like g500 mentioned, It would be more feasible to code share, a possible servicee to CUN, ex MEX with Aeromexico.

Best regards



No matter how you fly...just never get your wings clipped !
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 18683 posts, RR: 58
Reply 8, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 10694 times:

Quoting thenoflyzone (Reply 6):
All of this being said, i fail to see how a tiny little B788 with 215 seats will perform profitably on such a long and thin segment that is PEK-CUN.

Well, the 788 was designed for long, thin routes...


User currently offlineAngMoh From Singapore, joined Nov 2011, 448 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 8915 times:

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 8):
Well, the 788 was designed for long, thin routes...

Yes, but to fly businessmen on premium fares, not tourists on cheap tickets.


User currently offlineBobloblaw From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1446 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 7428 times:

Quoting g500 (Reply 4):
I don't know about Cancun, might be better to code-share it through MEX

My guess is the Chinese would want to fly nonstop to their destination and spend as little time as possible making connections after a ULH flight in a strange and foreign nation that is suseptible to crime.


User currently offlinebohica From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2627 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 7120 times:

I am looking at my calendar. Today is NOT April 1.

Quoting 777222LR (Reply 2):
the only logical stopping point would either be in Canada or the US,

Could they even get 5th freedom rights between USA/Canada and Mexico? That's the only way they would have a chance to succeed on such a route, and I'm not giving that much of a chance either.


User currently offlinePA110 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1979 posts, RR: 24
Reply 12, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days ago) and read 7032 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

If true, this route would be even more poorly conceived than MH's KUL-LAX-MEX route. It's amazing that in this day in age, there are airlines who completely lose their minds on absurd routes.


It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
User currently offlineLV From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 1913 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5630 times:

My first reaction was this just proves the US needs to streamline it's visa process for Chinese citizens.

User currently onlinetimpdx From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 474 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5602 times:

Or just behave like so many other parts of the world with a normal transit process sans the need for a visa, just change planes at LAX like I can go from LA to BKK via Beijing Without a China Visa.

[Edited 2012-09-13 22:29:34]

User currently offlineXA744 From Mexico, joined Mar 2004, 734 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3003 times:

Quoting PA110 (Reply 12):
If true, this route would be even more poorly conceived than MH's KUL-LAX-MEX route. It's amazing that in this day in age, there are airlines who completely lose their minds on absurd routes.

Well, believe it or not, MH's fifth freedom sectors LAX-MEX-LAX, were averaging 90 PLF, when traffic rights were removed from the airline by the Mexivan government, back in 1998.

Yes, as absurd as it may sound to you !!!

Best regards



No matter how you fly...just never get your wings clipped !
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New International Service To IAH In 2013? posted Tue Jul 17 2012 19:39:33 by AVENSAB727
Emirates To DTW In 2013? posted Fri Jun 15 2012 10:47:04 by dtwmtx330
Korongo Airlines To Start In April posted Fri Feb 17 2012 23:57:20 by Jalap
Western Airlines To Florida In The Late 1970s. posted Mon Feb 6 2012 09:24:03 by doulasc
New Airlines To YYC In The Near Future? posted Fri Feb 3 2012 00:01:50 by Boeingorbust
VX To SJC In 2013? posted Fri Oct 28 2011 10:31:39 by psa188
American Airlines To Try 'in-flight Happy Hour' posted Fri Nov 19 2010 06:53:32 by EricR
Alitalia To AirFrance In 2013? posted Wed Nov 3 2010 13:02:29 by AZA330
Hainan Airlines To Start Beijing-Toronto posted Sat Jul 31 2010 13:21:44 by MSYYZ
Hainan Airlines To Buy Boeing & Airbus Planes posted Wed Apr 29 2009 21:51:06 by Cartenz