Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Infraero: No Agreement With US For Slots At GRU  
User currently onlineC010T3 From Brazil, joined Jul 2006, 3708 posts, RR: 19
Posted (2 years 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2014 times:

On today's (14/09/2012) Valor Econômico, there is an article about the recent objection of US Airways against Gol's exemption renewal for the US market applied before the DOT. US Aiways objects the renewal on the grounds that Brazilian authorities are blocking its CLT-GRU service by not denying them slots.
US Airways tried the same thing with TAM a couple of months ago, but wasn't successful since the DOT was not convinced by US Airways' arguments.

Questioned by the journalists, Infraero stated clearly that there was never an agreement with US Airways. Furthermore, it explained that the slot allocation was not dependent on the airport's new operator. According to Infraero, US Airways was offered the time frame between 11h30 and 13h25, but the airline refused to accept it. The Brazilian ANAC also added that the time in which US Airways would like to operate is highly coveted and is currently unavailable.

If we consider Infraero's statement, we could say that US Airways has lied three times to the DOT in order to stall and not have to return any frequencies. The flexibility of the CLT-GRU frequencies to be used at GIG was based on the assumption that US Airways was having problems with the slots, but in reality it seems that US Airways was not willing to accept less coveted slots. Both motions of objection in 2012 were also based on that argument. If the allegation is false, it is plausible to conclude that US Airways was trying to distract the DOT with fireworks, so that it wouldn't realize that its frequencies have gone dormant.

Article (subscription only):
http://www.valor.com.br/empresas/282...s-airways-tenta-barrar-gol-nos-eua

First mention of the alleged agreement:
http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=DOT-OST-2010-0183-0008

Gol's application docket:
http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketD...SR;rpp=25;po=0;D=DOT-OST-2010-0072

TAM's application docket:
http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketD...SR;rpp=25;po=0;D=DOT-OST-2012-0089

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Australia Seeks "Open Skies" Agreement With US posted Thu Aug 10 2006 08:21:19 by Biddleonia007
AFA Reaches Tentative Agreement With US Airways posted Thu Dec 16 2004 21:21:50 by KITH
The Battle For Slots At DCA posted Thu Dec 26 2002 18:47:27 by FlyPNS1
EasyJet Applies For Slots At BRU posted Wed Nov 21 2001 12:15:20 by Lj
Question On UA/US/AA Slots At LGA posted Wed Jan 10 2001 20:06:55 by ORD
No CRJ900's For US Airways - For Now At Least posted Mon Aug 14 2006 21:19:33 by Planemaker
Malev Has Swapped Slots At LHR For LGW With BA posted Tue Jun 6 2006 16:24:38 by Richardw
Ex US Airways DC-9 At JNB With No Nose Cone posted Tue Nov 1 2005 20:00:12 by Varig_dc10
Gol Applies For MIA-CCS-GRU With DOT posted Mon Mar 12 2012 12:14:49 by MAH4546
Will US Airways Stay At LGW For Good? posted Sun Feb 26 2012 13:15:53 by LGWflyer