Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ntsb Issues Recommendations RE: GEnx Failures  
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6428 posts, RR: 3
Posted (2 years 2 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 8900 times:

So here's the scoop:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...L1E8KEMFZ20120914?type=marketsNews

The NTSB is recommending that the FAA issue an Airworthiness Directive that requires a one time inspection (via an ultrasound test method developed by GE) of all GEnx engines in service. Reportedly, about 50% of them have already received this inspection. They also recommend a recurring inspection at regular intervals of the part implicated in the failures.


Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7847 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 8894 times:

(methinks this belongs in tech ops)

What's causing this cracking? Poor construction, or just wear and tear?

If it's the construction I think GE should be liable to replace that part with something more durable. (unless it's something more serious)



我思うゆえに我あり。(Jap. 'I think, therefore I am.')
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6428 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 8876 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 1):
If it's the construction I think GE should be liable to replace that part with something more durable. (unless it's something more serious)

According to the article, GE has already addressed the issue with a change to their manufacturing process, but this obviously won't cover engines already in service  



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineatcsundevil From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 1219 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 8396 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 1):
If it's the construction I think GE should be liable to replace that part with something more durable. (unless it's something more serious)

There's no need to replace something that's doing its job. I'm not familiar with this particular situation, but generally when a manufacturer issues a service bulletin recommending certain or more frequent inspections (sometimes followed up with an AD), it doesn't mean the component is faulty...they're just asking the mechanics to check more frequently that the component is working properly. If they've introduced a fix on newer models but the component is still doing its job and doesn't pose a safety risk on the older models, there's no justification for the expense and down-time to replace the component. If the component needed replacement, the company would have indicated as such to avoid potential litigation and the FAA would issue an AD to replace the part either immediately or within a timeline.


User currently offlinemffoda From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1101 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 8375 times:

The other thread has this info already... Do we really need this thread also?


So here is the latest form NTSB on FG on this matter.

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...enx-powered-787-and-747-8s-376525/


"The recommendations issued by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) offer the clearest explanation yet for the rash of zero- or low-time GEnx engine failures since 28 July.

The NTSB letter sent to the Federal Aviation Administration also reveals that an analysis of the fan midshaft fractures do not point to metal fatigue as a likely cause. The fan midshaft connects the low pressure turbine to the fan and booster stages at the forward end of the engine.

Instead, the cracks in the critical engine component are "typical of environmentally assisted cracking of certain high strength alloys such as that used on the GEnx [fan midshaft]", the NTSB letter says. The NTSB is continuing to investigate what is triggering the environmentally assisted cracking. According to GE, such metals crack as a result of galvanic corrosion caused by a moist environment with the presence of hydrogen.

A potential trigger of the galvanic corrision could have been revealed earlier this week. In a statement issued by GE on 11 September, the company said it has changed the coating process for the fan midshaft on the production line as a result of the engine failures. GE says today that the new coating process changes the dry film applied to the midshaft, and replaces the lubricant used when a retaining nut is clamped to the midshaft.

The NTSB's letter to the FAA indicates all three engine failures discovered to date could be linked to the same cause"



harder than woodpecker lips...
User currently offlineN737AA From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 270 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3246 times:

Quoting atcsundevil (Reply 3):
There's no need to replace something that's doing its job. I'm not familiar with this particular situation, but generally when a manufacturer issues a service bulletin recommending certain or more frequent inspections (sometimes followed up with an AD), it doesn't mean the component is faulty...they're just asking the mechanics to check more frequently that the component is working properly. If they've introduced a fix on newer models but the component is still doing its job and doesn't pose a safety risk on the older models, there's no justification for the expense and down-time to replace the component. If the component needed replacement, the company would have indicated as such to avoid potential litigation and the FAA would issue an AD to replace the part either immediately or within a timeline.

AD's are safety related....so your theory is wrong. Typically on a new product such as this the first release of the AD will include inspection criteria to allow OEM time to develop a termination procedure which usually involves replacement of the part.

N737AA


User currently offlinemffoda From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1101 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2904 times:

Here's the latest form Reuters on the FAA's position...


"FAA won't issue emergency directive on Boeing jets, GE engines

WASHINGTON, Sept 19 | Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:57am IST
(Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration said Wednesday it would stop short of issuing an emergency directive on recently identified problems in General Electric engines on a pair of Boeing Co jet models, sticking instead to more routine safety notices.

An emergency directive could have meant temporary groundings of the GE-powered Boeing 787 and 747-8 jets, for instance, or other significant limits on fleet operations that now may be less likely."


http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/0...oeing-ge-faa-idINL1E8KJBXS20120919



harder than woodpecker lips...
User currently offline135mech From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 412 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2588 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting mffoda (Reply 4):
The other thread has this info already... Do we really need this thread also?

What other thread? Airliners.net? Or the flightglobal link? If there is an a.net one, that you know of, post a link.

[Edited 2012-09-20 10:52:38]

User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31220 posts, RR: 85
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2459 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting 135mech (Reply 7):
What other thread? Airliners.net? Or the flightglobal link? If there is an a.net one, that you know of, post a link.
747-8 Uncontained Engine Failure? (by tp1040 Sep 13 2012 in Civil Aviation)

and

Official 747-8 Flight Tracking & Production Part 9 (by wilco737 Jun 27 2012 in Civil Aviation)


User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6428 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2358 times:

Quoting mffoda (Reply 4):
The other thread has this info already... Do we really need this thread also?

I thought I would open it so that we could talk about the GEnx problems, apart from the 787 and 747-8 airframes. Otherwise, you have to be both a 787 and a 747-8 fanatic to keep abreast of the issue  



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offline135mech From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 412 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 months 6 hours ago) and read 2024 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Stitch (Reply 8):
Quoting 135mech (Reply 7):
What other thread? Airliners.net? Or the flightglobal link? If there is an a.net one, that you know of, post a link.
747-8 Uncontained Engine Failure? (by tp1040 Sep 13 2012 in Civil Aviation)

and

Official 747-8 Flight Tracking & Production Part 9 (by wilco737 Jun 27 2012 in Civil Aviation)

Great, thanks! I wasn't going to assume which he meant, since there wasn't a link attached at the time.

 


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ntsb Issues Probable Cause In Fossett Crash posted Thu Jul 9 2009 12:38:24 by OPNLguy
Ntsb Issues Scathing Report On Air Sunshine Crash posted Fri Oct 15 2004 07:03:30 by 727LOVER
Transport Minister Issues Statement Re: Air Canada posted Thu May 20 2004 00:27:13 by CanadaEH
Ntsb Safety Recommendations On A300 posted Tue Aug 20 2002 22:44:55 by 777236ER
The A330 And GEnx/Trent1000 Re-engine? posted Thu May 15 2008 08:00:00 by EA772LR
GEnx Certification Issues? posted Thu Feb 21 2008 00:43:07 by Sirtoby
FAA Issues Proposed Special Condition Re 787 posted Mon Apr 9 2007 22:03:49 by Amicus
What Did The Industry Do Re Capton Wiring Issues? posted Sun Feb 19 2006 07:40:03 by Jetfuel
Do You Believe Ntsb Re TWA 800 posted Wed May 14 2003 10:45:24 by Rotate
Will AA Re-open Any Focus Cities After Exiting BK? posted Thu Sep 13 2012 12:25:20 by TWA85