Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Will We See An Expanded AA-AS Relationship?  
User currently offlineseatback From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 774 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 1 month 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3087 times:

Delta's been pretty aggressive with marketing their Alaska Air relationship, much more so than AA.

Without AA's restrictive scope clause, will we see AA follow Delta's similar aggressive Alaska strategy?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJetAmericaS80 From United States of America, joined Sep 2012, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3055 times:

This will be very interested to see, but I am not sure there are many more potential markets for them to expand in outside of LAX. AS already serves ORD, DFW, (dropped MIA), and probably will not serve JFK unless they choose to serve it alongside EWR, which seems unlikely as AS has very little slack in the fleet at the moment. I'm not really sure how much more expanded the codeshare can become (outside of rebuilding and codesharing from AA's defunct SJC hub).

JetA



The Best Buy in the Sky, Treat yourself to Jet America!
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7931 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2983 times:

I think the ball is in AA's court. AS has great west coast feed, I think it would be up to AA to add some more international LAX routes. AS serving ORD and DFW can only go so far... a AA/AS partnership at LAX like DL/AS's partnership at SEA would be much better for AA, assuming they can support these routes (LAX isn't the easiest market to be in compared to a less competitive SEA with DL/AS dominating.)

I could even see DL trying to get in to the LAX action and make a similar operation with AS there. That is way easier said than done, and AA (or UA) would not let that happen without a fight, and DL has been trying to build up LAX for years, so we'll see



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineB377 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 1 month 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2895 times:

This is what AA told the Bankruptcy court about AS code-gsharing in their Section 1113 Term Sheet Modification to meet the courts approval:


"Taking the Court’s observations into account, American has modified its initial
Section 1113 Term Sheet proposal and materially circumscribed the circumstances under which
it would be permitted to engage in code-sharing, fully addressing the Court’s concern. In material
part, American’s new proposal would:"

"Permit code-sharing on Alaska Airlines but prohibit American from placing its
code on Alaska flights between Hawaii and Dallas-Fort Worth, Los Angeles, San
Francisco, and Chicago O’Hare."

Their implemented TA shows that they intend to code-share on all AS flights, except for the DFW/ORD/LAX/SAN-Hawaii routes that they agreed to prohibit code-shares.

So the answer to the OP question, there will be a substantial increase to code-sharing with AS.


User currently offlineseatback From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 774 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 1 month 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2475 times:

Quoting B377 (Reply 3):
So the answer to the OP question, there will be a substantial increase to code-sharing with AS.

So it sounds like this will be the chief driver of AA's growth at LAX.


User currently offlinecrAAzy From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 799 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 1 month 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2333 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting B377 (Reply 3):
Their implemented TA shows that they intend to code-share on all AS flights, except for the DFW/ORD/LAX/SAN-Hawaii routes that they agreed to prohibit code-shares.

Permission does not necessarily equal intent.

There are still a lot of variables at play including the closure of the LAX Eagle base, increased ability to contract out flying to regional carriers, possible merger with US Airways, A319s coming online within the next year, etc.


User currently offlinerwsea From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3108 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (2 years 1 month 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2280 times:

The idea of AS connecting feed at LAX is overblown ... the only destinations with enough frequency to reliably feed a hub would be SEA, PDX, and YVR. Connections might be possible from DCA or ANC, but the flights are only once daily (and ANC is seasonal). The rest of the network consists of leisure markets in Mexico. QX offers a few more destinations, but again these are mainly niche services to resorts/tourist markets.

Assume for a minute that AA wanted to rely on AS to support a TPAC network from LAX... Connections from SEA/PDX/YVR would be very much out of the way and better options already exist from those cities. No other substantial feed would be offered. In other words, if AA wants to feed a TPAC network at LAX, AS will not be the lynchpin that it has been for DL in SEA for example.


User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7931 posts, RR: 52
Reply 7, posted (2 years 1 month 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2062 times:

Quoting rwsea (Reply 6):
In other words, if AA wants to feed a TPAC network at LAX, AS will not be the lynchpin that it has been for DL in SEA for example.

It can go both ways and grow over time. AA could add LAX-(insert Asian route here) and AS, being more efficient and loved by passengers, could start adding LAX-domestic routes. It starts working out well, so AA adds another route, then AA, etc.

I'm wondering where DL would be in all this. They are (IIRC) weaker than AA in LAX but they've been trying to make LAX work for a while, and they are well established with AS @ SEA. I don't see DL letting AA just build up LAX with AS without a fight (whether or not they are successful is another story)



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlinehiflyeras From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 989 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (2 years 1 month 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1781 times:

Airline CEO egos being what they are, I'm surprised no one has made a big play for LAX in quite some time. The big players used to be UA, WA and TW. These days it's so fractured....UA, AA, DL, WN are the big dogs with US, AS and VX secondary players.

I don't think that DL really has any say in whatever relationship AA and AS wish to pursue. LAX is such an interesting puzzle...a monster of a city with no dominant carrier. I think they're all constrained by the facility and being penned in to their individual terminals. AS's new Terminal 6 looks fantastic and has so much synergy with DL in LAX...but AA operates a ramp shuttle to T4 for AS/AA connections. Pretty seamless, making AS/AA and AS/DL connections fairly painless.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
When Will We See An A380 In Alliance Livery? posted Fri Jan 13 2012 02:25:27 by MCO2BRS
When Will We See The Impulse 717's As Qantas? posted Thu May 24 2001 08:17:01 by QANTASforever
When Will We See AA's New 77w? posted Thu Jul 5 2012 20:19:57 by aacun
Will We See AS On SLC Routes Now? posted Wed May 2 2007 00:04:24 by Clickhappy
Shall We See An AA DC-9 Soon? posted Wed May 16 2001 03:32:57 by Amtran727
When Will We See More Room On AA 777s posted Mon Apr 2 2001 04:52:49 by FlyVirgin744
Will We See Multi-stop Itineraries Return? posted Mon Jul 23 2012 23:16:05 by AirAfreak
Will We See A Civ C-17 After All? posted Tue Jan 24 2012 13:37:53 by LHCVG
Will We See Transatlantic RJs In The Future? posted Thu Dec 8 2011 12:26:29 by 747400sp
When Will We See A Plane Like Concorde Again? posted Fri Oct 14 2011 12:44:37 by LGWflyer