Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SAS Ends Bangkok - After 63-years  
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25369 posts, RR: 49
Posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 24260 times:

A while back we heard stories the airline continued to lose money in BKK, but now it appears it will be cutting the route entirely effective with the summer 2013 schedule.

Last CPH-BKK flight operates on April 7th after continual service to the Thai capital since 1949.

Aircraft from the cancelled route will be used to launch SFO next April.

SAS blames the routes leisure orientation and highly competitive market place for the cut.

Story:
http://www.businesstravel.fr/2012091...vol-vers-bangkok-apres-63-ans.html


Interesting to note BKK was SAS first Far-East destination, and SAS was instrumental in the creation of Thai Airways, which even shared the SAS livery for many years.


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
66 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineStratacruiser From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 24065 times:

Presumably they will still code share with fellow *A member TG.

Dave


User currently offlineHELyes From Finland, joined Oct 2010, 939 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 23989 times:

Not good news for the Nordic passengers, less choices. Good news for the Gulf carries flying to CPH especially. Finnair must be pleased, they still fly 2x daily to BKK in winter season, daily in summer.

[Edited 2012-09-18 10:47:38]

User currently offlineEBGflyer From Denmark, joined Sep 2006, 1007 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 23923 times:

According to check-in.dk SAS will only seasonally close the route to BKK as traffic to Asia in the summer months are weaker. Instead they will focus on North America in the summer season.

Article in Danish:
http://www.check-in.dk/newselement.cfm?nNewsArticleID=67434



Future flights: CPH-BKK-MNL; MNL-GUM-TKK-PNI-KSA-KWA-MAJ-HNL-LAX
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25369 posts, RR: 49
Reply 4, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 23577 times:

Times are certainly tough in the industry.

I guess with everyone and their brother selling Europe-BKK tickets, a high cost operation like SAS struggles. Look even AF has to juggle its BKK ops and recently LH mentioned it was having issues.

But good timing for Norwegian. They can add a BKK-CPH link also now.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1823 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 23487 times:

I rather fly Thai from ARN than ARN-CPH-BKK with SAS and the 744s fly a bit faster than the A340s.. SAS has an idiotic routing IMO and probably lose a bit by this too.

User currently offlineLondonCity From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2008, 1494 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 22990 times:

The news story appears to have been changed to reflect the fact that SAS is converting a year-round service to a seasonal operation.

http://www.businesstraveller.com/new...o-axe-bangkok-route-after-63-years

Nevertheless the fact that SAS cannot survive all year round on such a popular route suggests that it cannot compete with its high cost structure. It's up against TG out of Oslo/Stockholm/Copenhagen and, of course, the emerging Gulf airlines who are now tapping the Scandinavian market.

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 4):
I guess with everyone and their brother selling Europe-BKK tickets, a high cost operation like SAS struggles. Look even AF has to juggle its BKK ops and recently LH mentioned it was having issues.

AF converted its CDG-BKK service into a leisure route using a high density 77W. Air Berlin axed its TXL-BKK service and now feeds its BKK passengers onto EY at AUH. You are correct about LH which said publicly several months ago that it was reviewing the future of its BKK service.


User currently offlineIrishAyes From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 2188 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 22917 times:

I was sad to see this announcement as well, but...

Quoting LondonCity (Reply 6):

The news story appears to have been changed to reflect the fact that SAS is converting a year-round service to a seasonal operation.

...this piece of news softens the blow a bit.

I remember reading about the daily 767 that SK operated into BKK back when I used to collect the UA timetables as a kid growing up in the 90's.

It appears that SK operates roughly one third of the market share on CPHBKK while TG controls the other two thirds.



next flights: jfk-icn, icn-hkg-bkk-cdg, cdg-phl-msp
User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2191 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 22885 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Would it help if SAS reconfigures the A343 to, say, 300 seats, 25J and 275Y? The rumour mill in Scandinavia says most J seats are filled with upgrades and ID-travelers anyway to BKK, so why not get more revenue by selling more Y seats?

They would have to dedicate 2-3 aircraft for this, but it might be worth it?



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25369 posts, RR: 49
Reply 9, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 22813 times:

Quoting LondonCity (Reply 6):
The news story appears to have been changed to reflect the fact that SAS is converting a year-round service to a seasonal operation.

Thanks for that, but I do wonder if its more meant to simply buy time for SAS to figure out what to do.

I saw a news story that said BKK has been unprofitable for SAS for over 7-years now.


Anyhow here is a bit more detail on the routes poor performance --

"Copenhagen – Bangkok is a route with a decidedly lower share of business travelers compared to other travelers, when seen in comparison with most other destinations. During the summer months in particular, profitability is higher on the North American destinations than on the Bangkok-route," Simon Pauck Hansen, VP Partners & Intercontinental Network with SAS, explains.

http://www.scandasia.com/viewNews.php?coun_code=dk&news_id=11174

Essentially SAS can take that A340 and go do something with it that produces a better return.

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 8):
Would it help if SAS reconfigures the A343 to, say, 300 seats, 25J and 275Y?

I'm not sure SAS wants to create a sub-fleet, but the market is indeed a heavily leisure one. I see Air France now uses its 472 seat 77W COI version with mere 14 business class seats to BKK now.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineLondonCity From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2008, 1494 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 22757 times:

Quoting IrishAyes (Reply 7):
It appears that SK operates roughly one third of the market share on CPHBKK while TG controls the other two thirds.

I presume you are referring to non-stop/direct flight traffic ? I ask, because there are many indirect carriers who tap the Scandinavian market for transfer traffic. Examples include: AF, AY, BA, KL, LH and LX besides Gulf carriers such as EK and QR. Most passengers flying to BKK are on leisure trips so they are happy to change planes if it means a lower price for their ticket.

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 8):
The rumour mill in Scandinavia says most J seats are filled with upgrades and ID-travelers anyway to BKK, so why not get more revenue by selling more Y seats?

This is the approach adopted by AF ex-CDG. Before this summer it operated a daily B777-200 service with 35 business and 250 economy seats. But starting last May, AF converted the route into a three times a week service operated by a B77W which is configured with 14 business and a whopping 458 seats in economy class (configured 10-abreast).

It meant the nunmber of business class seats offered by AF on CDG-BKK dropped from 35 a day to 42 a week.


User currently offlinekyrone From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 126 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 22614 times:

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 8):
Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 8):

Would it help if SAS reconfigures the A343 to, say, 300 seats, 25J and 275Y? The rumour mill in Scandinavia says most J seats are filled with upgrades and ID-travelers anyway to BKK, so why not get more revenue by selling more Y seats?

They would have to dedicate 2-3 aircraft for this, but it might be worth it?

That would detract from the flexibility of their long haul fleet if they needed to swap out aircraft due to tech or another issue. And if the A/C was full in Business and Extra, that'd be 40 sum people you'd have to down grade if you did use the BKK aircraft on another route.. which would be a customer service nightmare for many!


User currently offlineWROORD From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 956 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 22078 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
SAS blames the routes leisure orientation and highly competitive market place for the cut.

You mean all those men flying to 'play golf' in BKK do not want to pay premium bucks for their tickets?
I think that part of the problem is that SAS has a mediocre service and cannot compete with Thai, Qatar or Emirates.


User currently offlinelawair From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 201 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 20336 times:

Besides the Gulf carrier competition, TG is also gaining some traction with its nonstop ARN/CPH-HKT flights, which I imagine could hurt the SK flight somewhat. It also means TG is adding a couple more flights a week from BKK to CPH/ARN for the return trip.

User currently offlinedanielkandi From Denmark, joined exactly 2 years ago today! , 61 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 20161 times:

Quoting WROORD (Reply 12):

Lack of service is a major part of the problem. I always end up talking to older couples flying. More and more are starting to realise that SAS isn't the only carrier in the world. And I mean dumb tourists/1-2yearly asia-flyers with no membership to any alliance. They all say Thai, Turkish and Singapore if we end up talking service. I myself, although not willing to pay 3000GBP for Business Class, am willing to pay for Comfort on KLM, as it is cheap, with little, but enough changes to make you sit better. On SAS, the premium seats are ridiculously overprized, for what they offer. On TK, the food is business standard in Comfort, plus fair prices (don't get started on TK wages being low) SAS premium is sometimes DOUBLE the TK price, with no upsides, besides maybe the smile that most SAS-crew are still able to give, where some TK FA's are like "-.-". Recently ordered 3 longhaulflights to Asia. All on TK. Routing that SAS didn't have or only offered bad codeshares on. Danes are tourist-like, but at least they now know that Singapore and Thai are airlines to go to for service. KLM being in AAL now too, makes it even harder for SAS. I spoke with an SAS worker in AAL, and she said they could see the change Clearly. Alot of longhaul disappearing to AMS.

SAS never having the bloody routes themselves, mean you have to get to Munich or Frankfurt. Munich is ok, but Frankfurt is a nightmare. SAS themselves are to blame. I woulda loved to have lived and flown back in the 70's and 80's to see what SAS was like, before it came to this state they are at now..... Like someone suggested, Norwegian can start doing more sas-hate in future campaigns. A "bye-latehansa" style commercial wouldn't be too arrogant for Mr. Kjos to consider. Especially after looking through their magazine with SAS-group targeted in the graphs for cO2 emissions... "SAS stepped away. We gladly take over!" ...  



Flown on : md80, md95, Avro RJ85/100, Q400, Atr42/72, a319/320/321, a332/a333, a343/346, b733 and up, 757, 747, 767 and
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25311 posts, RR: 22
Reply 15, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 20134 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
Interesting to note BKK was SAS first Far-East destination, and SAS was instrumental in the creation of Thai Airways, which even shared the SAS livery for many years.

I believe SAS was also the first western European carrier to obtain permission to overfly the Soviet Union on flights from CPH to BKK in 1967 using the DC-8-62 with a stop at Tashkent, Uzbekistan. It was branded the Trans-Asian Express and significantly cut the travel time compared to the traditional multi-stop routes then via the Middle East and India etc.

The flight had a tag-on BKK-SIN. SIN newspaper item below re the inaugural.
http://newspapers.nl.sg/Digitised/Ar...cle/straitstimes19671103.2.34.aspx

[Edited 2012-09-18 17:40:58]

[Edited 2012-09-18 17:42:01]

User currently offlineCXfirst From Norway, joined Jan 2007, 3068 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 18991 times:

This really tells a lot about SK operations. If they cannot even make BKK profitable, with the huge amount of Scandinavians going to BKK each year (there is a reason DY have this as one of their first intercontinental routes), then there is definitely something wrong at SK.....

-CXfirst



From Norway, live in Australia
User currently offlineSQSFO From United States of America, joined Sep 2012, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 17942 times:

I think now ever than before SK, will need the government to step in and limit the number of flights awarded to the Gulf Carriers. The nordic countries have proven to be quite socialistic, lets see how they will deal with foreign air competition

User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25369 posts, RR: 49
Reply 18, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 17407 times:

Quoting SQSFO (Reply 17):
The nordic countries have proven to be quite socialistic, lets see how they will deal with foreign air competition

Not in aviation policy. Especially Sweden which has been hands off, and openly stated they would not pour money into saving SK.

Ultimately, the problem does not lie with the Gulf carriers - they simply have built a better mouse trap, but with the inefficiency of SK.
If EK was never around, the Asian carriers and some European competitors like TK still would be running circles around a bloated inefficient SK.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineAF185 From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2012, 259 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 17232 times:

Quoting CXfirst (Reply 16):
This really tells a lot about SK operations. If they cannot even make BKK profitable, with the huge amount of Scandinavians going to BKK each year (there is a reason DY have this as one of their first intercontinental routes), then there is definitely something wrong at SK.....

It might be a sign, but loads and destination popularity don't always result into profitable operations.
AF's planes to BKK were almost always full, but yields due to a highly competitive environment and money oriented customers we very low. In fact, BKK was hardly profitable for AF despite the loads, hence the decision to reduce frequencies.
Moreover was not unusual to find 30-40 company tickets pax per flight, it makes it difficult to make cash out of such a flight.

Therefore, I wouldn't judge SK's overall performance solely on the BKK route cut decision.


User currently offlinedanielkandi From Denmark, joined exactly 2 years ago today! , 61 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 17087 times:

Well it's quite clear that other airlines, not only KLM, are seeing that SAS is struckling, and therefore tries to capitalise on it. I always wondered, if the combined number of inhabitants in Denmark, Norway and Sweden had something to do with the lack of profit. That all 3-4 nordic countries combined don't have enough business/work-travellers, compared to NL or Germany. They've GOT to make it attractive for foreigners to actually "detour" through Copenhagen. A bit like a detour to Istanbul. It's gotta be worth it. Often go Asia, and the TK stopover is worth it. Plus the lounges in IST are nice. Besides SAS' own problems, there are alot of things in Copenhagen Airport that needs addressing. Seating is bad most of the places outside café's etc... Going longhaul to NYC etc. the C-finger almost always have closed gates. You can walk in there, but often get told off for "breaching safety" or interferring (my a**) I just wanna sit down and relax. . Near impossible. Schipol has a little of the same problem, but if you have loungeaccess its tolerable. And try finding a power-outlet along any wall in CPH, you will play detective till you fly.... Besides that, no really good decent priced places to eat. IF you are willing to pay overprice/danish prices, for a good steak/primecuts of all kinds, M.A.S.H. Restaurant has everything from your typical lunchoffer-steak for 20 odd euro's , and well over 80 euro for other cuts. Besides that, all CPH has to offer is the unique danish hotdog... Not really worth a detour is it ?


Flown on : md80, md95, Avro RJ85/100, Q400, Atr42/72, a319/320/321, a332/a333, a343/346, b733 and up, 757, 747, 767 and
User currently offlineKiwiRob From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 7378 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 15423 times:

Quoting danielkandi (Reply 20):
IF you are willing to pay overprice/danish prices, for a good steak/primecuts of all kinds, M.A.S.H. Restaurant has everything from your typical lunchoffer-steak for 20 odd euro's , and well over 80 euro for other cuts.

I've always thought CPH had good food choices at very reasonable prices, certainly better and cheaper than OSL, with more choice than FRA and ARN but with similar prices.


User currently offlineSASDC8 From Norway, joined Mar 2006, 756 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 15320 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting sweair (Reply 5):
I rather fly Thai from ARN than ARN-CPH-BKK with SAS and the 744s fly a bit faster than the A340s.. SAS has an idiotic routing IMO and probably lose a bit by this too

Are you talking financially or from a passenger point of view. From a passenger perspective the routing in excellent with night flights in both directions, but financially it cant't be good to keep the 340 on the ground for 10 hours + in BKK.

Quoting CXfirst (Reply 16):
If they cannot even make BKK profitable, with the huge amount of Scandinavians going to BKK each year (there is a reason DY have this as one of their first intercontinental routes

What? BKK is a low yield tourist destination with almost no business travel (perhaps 25-30%) and low cargo volume. SK will return there in the winter season when they can make more money at BKK than on their US flights. AF and LH also cuts capacity to BKK, and in my mind BKK is hard destination to make money on year-round.

That said I am sure that SK will continue to struggle in direct competition with LCC like DY and the Gulf carriers.

Cheers



2-3-2 is NOT a premium configuration
User currently offlinebestwestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 7152 posts, RR: 57
Reply 23, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 14845 times:

With Thailand seen as a risky new business destination due to the instability of the government, many companies are looking elsewhere, and flying elsewhere. What is left is inbound tourism, which is very low yielding. Thai has a strangle hold on this thanks to island connections.

AF, AB and SK have now made major changes to their schedules and LH have highlighted BKK as one of their very worst performing destinations. BA have also dropped their onward service to SYD from BKK, so BKK is really struggling.

The Thai 747s are a risky adventure - some in excellent condition, some very poor indeed.



The world is really getting smaller these days
User currently offlineSKAirbus From Norway, joined Oct 2007, 1737 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 13676 times:

Maybe SAS fly to the wrong destination in Thailand. Most Scandinavians holiday in and around Phuket meaning that any flight to BKK will require transfer to HKT. It will probably be best if they let TG deal with this route and offer a codeshare. Who knows, maybe the frequency will be increased to CPH now and CPH could even be a candidate for the TG A380 in the future.

Also, didn't SK try ARN - BKK and failed miserably? I think CPH is the only airport it could work from for them but as mentioned above, their aircraft are maybe to J intensive to make a profit.



Next Flights: LHR-OSL (319-BA), OSL-LHR (319-BA), LHR-CPH (320-BA), VXO-BMA (S20-TF), ARN-CPH (738-SK), CPH-LHR (320-BA)
User currently offlineEBGflyer From Denmark, joined Sep 2006, 1007 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 13736 times:

Quoting SKAirbus (Reply 24):
Maybe SAS fly to the wrong destination in Thailand. Most Scandinavians holiday in and around Phuket meaning that any flight to BKK will require transfer to HKT. It will probably be best if they let TG deal with this route and offer a codeshare. Who knows, maybe the frequency will be increased to CPH now and CPH could even be a candidate for the TG A380 in the future.

Absolutely not. In that case there would be absolutely no demand for business class. SK does have quite a few connecting pax as well, so I think that would not work at all. HKT bound pax is probably even lower yield than BKK.

Quoting SKAirbus (Reply 24):
Also, didn't SK try ARN - BKK and failed miserably? I think CPH is the only airport it could work from for them but as mentioned above, their aircraft are maybe to J intensive to make a profit.

Yes, only a few years back they flew 3 weekly ARN-BKK. AFAIK it was only seasonal and lasted 1 or 2 seasons.



Future flights: CPH-BKK-MNL; MNL-GUM-TKK-PNI-KSA-KWA-MAJ-HNL-LAX
User currently offlinepvjin From Finland, joined Mar 2012, 1260 posts, RR: 3
Reply 26, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 12613 times:

Quoting SKAirbus (Reply 24):
Maybe SAS fly to the wrong destination in Thailand. Most Scandinavians holiday in and around Phuket meaning that any flight to BKK will require transfer to HKT. It will probably be best if they let TG deal with this route and offer a codeshare. Who knows, maybe the frequency will be increased to CPH now and CPH could even be a candidate for the TG A380 in the future.

Bangkok has way better connections to other popular destinations in Thailand than Phuket has.

I think increasing amount of tourists are going to some other destinations than Phuket as it has become pretty unoriginal place and doesn't have particularly good looking nature either when compared to other nearby places.



"A rational army would run away"
User currently offlineHELyes From Finland, joined Oct 2010, 939 posts, RR: 1
Reply 27, posted (1 year 12 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 12854 times:

Quoting SQSFO (Reply 17):
The nordic countries have proven to be quite socialistic, lets see how they will deal with foreign air competition

The Nordic air space is free for the competition, but the market is relatively small comparing to densely populated Central/Southern-Europe.

Generally speaking, the Nordic countries have managed to combine "socialism" and economic competitiveness. The latest Global Competitiveness Index from WEF ranks Finland (3.) and Sweden (4.) higher than USA (7.). Norway and Denmark are doing well too.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/glance...itiveness-index-wef-091305518.html

[Edited 2012-09-19 04:31:00]

User currently offlineMAS777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2935 posts, RR: 6
Reply 28, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 11628 times:

News reports in Malaysia suggest that the governments of Sweden and Malaysia are hoping to re-establish direct air links between the two countries..

I expect with this latest news - the chances of seeing SAS at KUL is now virtually nil.

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v6/newsgeneral.php?id=695026


User currently offlineohsopc From Thailand, joined Jul 2006, 108 posts, RR: 0
Reply 29, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 10646 times:

Quoting bestwestern (Reply 23):
AF, AB and SK have now made major changes to their schedules and LH have highlighted BKK as one of their very worst performing destinations. BA have also dropped their onward service to SYD from BKK, so BKK is really struggling.

I think BKK is really struggling only for European carriers. It seems to me that TG and the Middle East airlines are doing very well at the expense of the European carriers.

For example, while both AF and SK are struggling on their BKK routes, TG has been adding frequency to both routes (CDG 9x weekly - from 7x a few years back, and CPH/ARN - added frequency CPH/ARN-HKT as well as OSL). The Paris route is also going to be one of TG's first A380 routes, so therefore there is obviously demand on this route.


User currently offlineLondonCity From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2008, 1494 posts, RR: 0
Reply 30, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 10541 times:

Quoting ohsopc (Reply 29):
It seems to me that TG and the Middle East airlines are doing very well at the expense of the European carriers.

I don't believe TG is doing so well out of LHR. It's using smaller planes than before so it would suggest TG is not finding the same demand as before.

The UK is a tricky market for TG because the Gulf carriers depart from so many airports both in London (LHR + LGW) and the regions. Clearly, it's easier (and possibly cheaper) for a Scottish passenger to take EK from GLA to BKK via DXB than to fly south with BA into LHR and change planes.

It's interesting to note that BKK (from AUH) is EY's busiest route. In 2011, EY flew 500,000 passengers between AUH and BKK. I wonder how many of these passengers started their journeys in Europe ?


http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/articl...aims+record+passenger+numbers.html


User currently offlinenethkt From Thailand, joined Apr 2001, 1086 posts, RR: 3
Reply 31, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 9809 times:

Quoting LondonCity (Reply 30):
I don't believe TG is doing so well out of LHR. It's using smaller planes than before so it would suggest TG is not finding the same demand as before.

This is due to the fact that A340-600 cockpit crew were complaining about the limited routing they had.
So B747 cockpit crew get Sydney while A346 cockpit crew get London in return.
This doesn't mean TG is performing better on SYD rather than LHR hence 744 goes SYD and 346 goes LHR.
TG is all about internal political. Still wonder why they are still making millions of profit each year!



Let's just blame it on yields.
User currently offlinedanielkandi From Denmark, joined exactly 2 years ago today! , 61 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 9596 times:

Quoting KiwiRob (Reply 21):

They are starting to make changes, slowly but surely. Another huge problem is the passport checkpoint when going out of Schengen. If you get there at 10-11 midday where SAS and a few others have longhaul going out, I find it weird when the bordercops know this, that they only put out 2 men doing that job... massive lines.

But then again I haven't been much to ARN or Oslo so I can't make a comparison, other than that I noticed the prices... I completely forgot Café Copenhagen, and the new nordic gourmét place besides MASH, the breakfast at CPH cafe is nice, but i have yet to try the gourmet one.

On a serious note though, the AF rewamp mentioned in another thread, makes me think, that the nordic hospitality is alright, and usually more positive than the AF crew. So it should actually be SAS that did this restructuring of cabin... It would win me over as a FF'er if they did a good job. But I guess the finances aren't there  



Flown on : md80, md95, Avro RJ85/100, Q400, Atr42/72, a319/320/321, a332/a333, a343/346, b733 and up, 757, 747, 767 and
User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12558 posts, RR: 25
Reply 33, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 9441 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
SAS blames the routes leisure orientation and highly competitive market place for the cut.

Nicely worded and even accurate, since most of the times sex is a leisure activity.

As for the competitive market place, blokes would rather spend their cash once they get there.



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlinesomething From United Kingdom, joined May 2011, 1633 posts, RR: 21
Reply 34, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 8913 times:

Quoting LondonCity (Reply 30):
I don't believe TG is doing so well out of LHR. It's using smaller planes than before so it would suggest TG is not finding the same demand as before.

They're soon bringing the A388 there mate.

Quoting ohsopc (Reply 29):
It seems to me that TG and the Middle East airlines are doing very well at the expense of the European carriers.

I'm glad for Thai then.

Quoting nethkt (Reply 31):
TG is all about internal political.

I have heard a lot of these type of stories. But who knows, maybe that's ironically their secret. They don't focus on the numbers only, have happier staff which reflects in better service and results in happier customers.

On a tangential note.. you say the A340 crew complained about being limited in their rosters. Does Thai have a dedicated A346 crew, or do they also operate the A333 and the old A345?



..sick of it. -K. Pilkington.
User currently offlineKiwiRob From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 7378 posts, RR: 5
Reply 35, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 8740 times:

Quoting danielkandi (Reply 32):
Another huge problem is the passport checkpoint when going out of Schengen.

I've never really noticed it as a big problem, I fly through CPH to Russia often.

Quoting danielkandi (Reply 32):
I completely forgot Café Copenhagen, and the new nordic gourmét place besides MASH, the breakfast at CPH cafe is nice, but i have yet to try the gourmet one.

I often eat at the Chinese noddle bar, the foods ok, it's cheap and quick, or the Italian pasta bar beside it, also cheap and quick then head into the SAS lounge for the comfy seats and free drinks. The SAS lounge coud do with a revamp, it's falling behind what other *lounges offer.


User currently offlineWROORD From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 956 posts, RR: 0
Reply 36, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 8297 times:

Quoting SASDC8 (Reply 22):
BKK is a low yield tourist destination with almost no business travel (perhaps 25-30%) and low cargo volume

True BKK was business 10-20 years ago, now everyone is going to TPE, KUL or PVG. I have not heard or read of any business opening a branch there.

Quoting SKAirbus (Reply 24):
Maybe SAS fly to the wrong destination in Thailand. Most Scandinavians holiday in and around Phuket meaning that any flight to BKK will require transfer to HKT

Possibly, however they do not want to be considered as the pure leisure carrier, even though in many respects their service is more like LCC.


User currently offlinenethkt From Thailand, joined Apr 2001, 1086 posts, RR: 3
Reply 37, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 8088 times:

Quoting something (Reply 34):
On a tangential note.. you say the A340 crew complained about being limited in their rosters. Does Thai have a dedicated A346 crew, or do they also operate the A333 and the old A345?

330's cockpit crew stays with 330s and 340's cockpit crew stays with 340-600, 340-500.
Since 340-500s are retired from the fleet, no more LAX, HND, 340 cockpit crew is left with choice of ZRH, SYD, MXP (before LHR goes 346).
And it has been so long that the B747 cockpit crew last had a trip over Australia, so they need to go there!
A great deal is made, 340's cockpit crew gets LHR and B747's get to visit Australia! Great move!!

But well, did I mention anything about load factor? Well, let Sales/Marketing/Resv do their works!!



Let's just blame it on yields.
User currently offlineg2scandinavia From Norway, joined Jun 2010, 535 posts, RR: 1
Reply 38, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 7849 times:

Quoting MAS777 (Reply 28):
News reports in Malaysia suggest that the governments of Sweden and Malaysia are hoping to re-establish direct air links between the two countries..

I expect with this latest news - the chances of seeing SAS at KUL is now virtually nil.

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v6/ne...95026

Don't forget Norwegian. They will probably have KUL on their future short list from ARN.


User currently offlineCPHFF From Sweden, joined Aug 2011, 143 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 7639 times:

Quoting danielkandi (Reply 14):
On SAS, the premium seats are ridiculously overprized, for what they offer.

You are absolutely correct, Flew Economy Extra on their 343 last year, and I was really disappointed with what I got for the almost double price of a regular Y ticket. Being 6.4" (190cm), legroom is more inportant than seat width. Also, the IFE box on the floow took about 20% of the space in the seat in fron of me. Hard to move my feet around..........
A 70 - 100% premium over Y-class fares, it's a rip-off! I think most passengers are business travelers that are not allowed by their Company to fly Business Class (IMHO)



But, I think it is smart of SK to try another destination if BKK is not profitable. It makes perfekt business sense. I'm sceptical if SFO is the the right choice for US West Coast - CPH. How ever, with such a small fleet of long-haul aircraft, they have to utililise them where they can make the most revenue AND spend the most time in the air = earning money.

Also, I believe that a lot Charter/Holiday packages sold from Sweden/Denmark are booked on Thai, not SK.



Detroit is bankrupt. Don't forget to thank UAW folks!
User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1823 posts, RR: 0
Reply 40, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 7555 times:

Kastrup stinks if you dont need to eat or drink, there is nowhere to sit down, I never had that problem on ARN.

I know many swedes hate going via CPH, if there is an option people want to go straight from ARN to their destination.


User currently offlineSKAirbus From Norway, joined Oct 2007, 1737 posts, RR: 1
Reply 41, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 7288 times:

Quoting sweair (Reply 40):
Kastrup stinks if you dont need to eat or drink, there is nowhere to sit down, I never had that problem on ARN.

I know many swedes hate going via CPH, if there is an option people want to go straight from ARN to their destination.

CPH's redeeeming feature is that queuing for security is a lot less than ARN and luggage arrives much faster. I really hate travelling through ARN because it is a place of stress for me. The main security check at Terminal 5 is always undermanned and the queues are ridiculous. Luggage always takes an age (at least 15 minutes) and staff there are very rude.



Next Flights: LHR-OSL (319-BA), OSL-LHR (319-BA), LHR-CPH (320-BA), VXO-BMA (S20-TF), ARN-CPH (738-SK), CPH-LHR (320-BA)
User currently offlinedanielkandi From Denmark, joined exactly 2 years ago today! , 61 posts, RR: 0
Reply 42, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 6874 times:

Quoting SKAirbus (Reply 41):
CPH's redeeeming feature is that queuing for security is a lot less than ARN and luggage arrives much faster. I really hate travelling through ARN because it is a place of stress for me. The main security check at Terminal 5 is always undermanned and the queues are ridiculous. Luggage always takes an age (at least 15 minutes) and staff there are very rude.

Indeed, forgot that positive about CPH... I was once from Singapore back to CPH, the passport control was a mere 5 minutes. After that, took me 2 minutes to enter out and be at the baggage area, and bags were there, mine included, in less than 10 minutes! :O One thing they fail at, is never knowing whether or not an Oddsize item gets on the belt, or comes in by hand. Meaning you scramble around sometimes, i bring snookercuecases (not allowed in cabin) .

Quoting CPHFF (Reply 39):
You are absolutely correct, Flew Economy Extra on their 343 last year, and I was really disappointed with what I got for the almost double price of a regular Y ticket. Being 6.4" (190cm), legroom is more inportant than seat width. Also, the IFE box on the floow took about 20% of the space in the seat in fron of me. Hard to move my feet around..........
A 70 - 100% premium over Y-class fares, it's a rip-off! I think most passengers are business travelers that are not allowed by their Company to fly Business Class (IMHO)

Im glad you agree. Also, on shorthaul, they could at LEAST do like KLM, block the seat next to you for privacy if you actually paid for a business ticket in one of their a320's in row one. But no... I am new to all these forums, but i'm still a good thinker. And like u say, SFO might not be the right choice. On KLM the flight seems full almost. 2-3 business seats in the bubble were not taken. In general, it's really about what people expect NOT to get on the airline. If KLM flew direct from CPH to SFO on a 747, SAS wouldn't win me over. Even though I also hate the 773 with 10 abreast, they still probably wouldn't. Sad fact. They aren't desirable.... ps. I got an upgrade on TK from Mumbai to Istanbul on TK. It was their 333, instead of the old 332 serving it before, meaning I got to try the fladbeds. Found it very comfy tbh.... Slept alot of the 6-7 hr flight. Again showing how great their product is. Besides the odd dodgy pilot of theirs...

***EDIT***

Having said that. I would never take the Norwegian flight instead of SAS to BKK. Poor seats when its released I think. Probably way worse than the LH and SAS new upcoming slimseats, which were surprisingly comfy. But Norwegian to BKK, having to pay for drinks and food ? nahh...

[Edited 2012-09-20 16:41:46]


Flown on : md80, md95, Avro RJ85/100, Q400, Atr42/72, a319/320/321, a332/a333, a343/346, b733 and up, 757, 747, 767 and
User currently offlineSKAirbus From Norway, joined Oct 2007, 1737 posts, RR: 1
Reply 43, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 6588 times:

Quoting danielkandi (Reply 42):
Having said that. I would never take the Norwegian flight instead of SAS to BKK. Poor seats when its released I think. Probably way worse than the LH and SAS new upcoming slimseats, which were surprisingly comfy. But Norwegian to BKK, having to pay for drinks and food ? nahh...

I wouldn't fly SAS long haul nonstop. Despite free meals you are restricted to just two alcoholic drinks and SAS are just a horrible airline.



Next Flights: LHR-OSL (319-BA), OSL-LHR (319-BA), LHR-CPH (320-BA), VXO-BMA (S20-TF), ARN-CPH (738-SK), CPH-LHR (320-BA)
User currently offlinenethkt From Thailand, joined Apr 2001, 1086 posts, RR: 3
Reply 44, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 6541 times:

Scandinavia to KUL on a premium airlines, seriously? I think you guys are way too overhyped about it.
Government can support airlines bla bla but in the end it's about passenger!
ARN-KUL, CPH-KUL, I don't see that coming at least in the next 10 years.
Not to forget Qatar, Emirates, KLM, Thai, Singapore etc for the already high-competition for this route.

If BKK and SIN can't survive non-stop from Scandinavia, KUL is never going to make it.



Let's just blame it on yields.
User currently offlinesomeone83 From Norway, joined Sep 2006, 3387 posts, RR: 3
Reply 45, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 6470 times:

Quoting danielkandi (Reply 42):
Also, on shorthaul, they could at LEAST do like KLM, block the seat next to you for privacy if you actually paid for a business ticket in one of their a320's in row one

SAS do block the middle seats in business class (althopugh noted they don't offer business calss on all routes)

Quoting SKAirbus (Reply 43):
Despite free meals you are restricted to just two alcoholic drinks and SAS are just a horrible airline.

Actually it three, although your not restricted, you just have to pay for them.

I do however find it ironic that you won't fly SAS since you have to pay for alcohol after drink nr2 or 3......but you still choose to fly with Ryanair. How many free drinks do you get there?


User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1823 posts, RR: 0
Reply 46, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 6436 times:

It seems even most Scandinavians aren't even that thrilled about SAS, only employees seem to still have any faith in them  

User currently offlineSKAirbus From Norway, joined Oct 2007, 1737 posts, RR: 1
Reply 47, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 6383 times:

Quoting someone83 (Reply 45):
I do however find it ironic that you won't fly SAS since you have to pay for alcohol after drink nr2 or 3......but you still choose to fly with Ryanair. How many free drinks do you get there?

You get what you pay for with Ryanair and that was due to a last minute trip I had to make to Norway.

With SAS you pay for a premium airline but get LCC service, especially on short haul flights. That doesn't seem fair to me, especially if you are a code share customer from say Lufthansa or SIA.



Next Flights: LHR-OSL (319-BA), OSL-LHR (319-BA), LHR-CPH (320-BA), VXO-BMA (S20-TF), ARN-CPH (738-SK), CPH-LHR (320-BA)
User currently offlinesomeone83 From Norway, joined Sep 2006, 3387 posts, RR: 3
Reply 48, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 6372 times:

Quoting SKAirbus (Reply 47):
SAS you pay for a premium airline but get LCC service, especially on short haul flights

That is quite debatable, the only difference between SAS and Lufthansa (as an example) on shorthaul is really the buy-on-board...and consider the amount of crap food I have got on Lufthansa recently, is much prefere SK's buy-on-board where i can choose what to order. So then it all comes down to free drinks or not....and that's is not really what diffrentiate LCC-service or not, in my oppinion.


User currently offlineEBGflyer From Denmark, joined Sep 2006, 1007 posts, RR: 0
Reply 49, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 6343 times:

Quoting someone83 (Reply 48):
So then it all comes down to free drinks or not....and that's is not really what diffrentiate LCC-service or not, in my oppinion.

True. At least SK gives you complimentary water, tea and coffee now. What makes SK great for me is their reliability and high frequencies on many routes. When a LCC establishes what they call a new route, it's usually not an option for me if they fly once or twice weekly.

And when things go wrong, which they are bound to do once in a while, SAS usually handles issues in a professional and not least flexible manner. Would you get rerouted on a different airline if your flight on FR gets heavily delayed? Don't think so. SAS and their partners have a great network and for me it's not worth the inconvenience that I risk taking if I book on a LCC.

[Edited 2012-09-21 04:11:24]

[Edited 2012-09-21 04:11:54]


Future flights: CPH-BKK-MNL; MNL-GUM-TKK-PNI-KSA-KWA-MAJ-HNL-LAX
User currently offlinesomeone83 From Norway, joined Sep 2006, 3387 posts, RR: 3
Reply 50, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 6316 times:

Quoting SKAirbus (Reply 47):
SAS you pay for a premium airline but get LCC service, especially on short haul flights

That is quite debatable, the only difference between SAS and Lufthansa (as an example) on shorthaul is really the buy-on-board...and consider the amount of crap food I have got on Lufthansa recently, is much prefere SK's buy-on-board where i can choose what to order. So then it all comes down to free drinks or not....and that's is not really what diffrentiate LCC-service or not, in my oppinion.


User currently offlinenethkt From Thailand, joined Apr 2001, 1086 posts, RR: 3
Reply 51, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 6145 times:

Quoting SKAirbus (Reply 47):
You get what you pay for with Ryanair and that was due to a last minute trip I had to make to Norway.

With SAS you pay for a premium airline but get LCC service, especially on short haul flights. That doesn't seem fair to me, especially if you are a code share customer from say Lufthansa or SIA.

I can tell you all my intra-Europe SAS flights are darn cheap. As cheap as low-cost carries' and I don't have to fly to smaller out-of-nowhere airports. And I can book just one-way!
Luckily I am a *A gold, so there are even lounges for me.
I don't get what I pay for, I've got a lot more than what I've paid for.....well, good for me!  



Let's just blame it on yields.
User currently offlinebjorn14 From Norway, joined Feb 2010, 3448 posts, RR: 2
Reply 52, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 6014 times:

Quoting Revelation (Reply 33):
since most of the times sex is a leisure activity.

Well not in BKK.   



"I want to know the voice of God the rest is just details" --A. Einstein
User currently offlineCPHFF From Sweden, joined Aug 2011, 143 posts, RR: 0
Reply 53, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 5994 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
you are restricted to just two alcoholic drinks and SAS are just a horrible airline.

You must have pissed the cabin crew off, I got 4 Bloody Marys (free) flying ATH-CPH last spring in Y ......

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
SAS do block the middle seats in business class

Except for OSL-CPH 



Detroit is bankrupt. Don't forget to thank UAW folks!
User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1823 posts, RR: 0
Reply 54, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5910 times:

Why even drink alcohol in that dry climate in a cabin, at or below 10% humidity, it wont help the jet lag at all. Humans like between 40 and 60% best.

User currently offlinesomeone83 From Norway, joined Sep 2006, 3387 posts, RR: 3
Reply 55, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5511 times:

Quoting CPHFF (Reply 53):
Except for OSL-CPH

SAS doesn't offer business class cabin intra-Scandinavia. Only Economy and Economy Extra.....and yes, I know you can buy "business class" tickets, but this has more to do with the rules regarding flexibility

And consider how full those flight are with poeple in Y+, there is no way possible to block of seats as they need the capacity


User currently offlineplanewasted From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 521 posts, RR: 0
Reply 56, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5427 times:

Closing BKK would be wise. SK can't compete on cost with the charter airlines and should focus on business destinations, like Shanghai.

Am I the only one who like SAS? I fly to China a lot and prefer them over Air China. Sure, you get unlimited beer and wine on Air China, disgusting Chinese brands that taste like ****, but NO liquor...
And I always get some extra for free if I ask nicely on SAS.
And when I have had the luck to fly business class on SAS I have been impressed. Sure, the hardware is not the best but the service is nice and personal. And I always arrive hungover because of all the nice drinks.  Smile
SAS new policy that you always get bonus 100% points when flying SAS metal, even on discount tickes, means I now get huge amount of points when flying SAS longhaul a lot. One trip is often enough for an upgrade to economy extra.

It also feels like they are improving the Europe service now. When I flew domestic in Denmark a few days ago there where free juice, coffee and other stuff at boarding, too short flight to serve anything.

And yeah, I love the MD-80. I always sit in the back and listen to the wonderful engine noise.  

[Edited 2012-09-22 02:56:45]

User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39884 posts, RR: 74
Reply 57, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4469 times:

Funny, I moved from San Francisco to Bangkok. I guess SAS doesn't like me.

Hard to imagine SAS having difficulty on their flights to BKK considering the large Scandinavian population that visits and many that have a 2nd. home here in Thailand.

Quoting something (Reply 34):
the old A345?

Since when did a 7 year old aircraft with low cycles become "old"?



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25369 posts, RR: 49
Reply 58, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4047 times:

Quoting Superfly (Reply 57):
Hard to imagine SAS having difficulty on their flights to BKK considering the large Scandinavian population that visits and many that have a 2nd. home here in Thailand.

Thats the problem.

While large, its primarily a leisure market. SAS says BKK generates relative low premium traffic, so with its high cost base, and collecting low tourist fares is a bad mix for the carrier. Air France had the same problem, while Lufthansa also recently also complained about its BKK performance.

Thailand is more apt for Scandinavian charter operator, or LCC such as Norwegian that have lower cost base.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinesimonisjf From South Africa, joined Sep 2012, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 59, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3990 times:

This is so sad! Malaysia Airlines also stopped flying to South Africa recently. They have also been flying here from KUL for ages!


@simonisjf is where I am at. I love thunderstorms, but only from the ground!
User currently offlineHELyes From Finland, joined Oct 2010, 939 posts, RR: 1
Reply 60, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3899 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 58):
While large, its primarily a leisure market. SAS says BKK generates relative low premium traffic, so with its high cost base, and collecting low tourist fares is a bad mix for the carrier. Air France had the same problem, while Lufthansa also recently also complained about its BKK performance.

Thailand is more apt for Scandinavian charter operator, or LCC such as Norwegian that have lower cost base.

It seems Bangkok works for Finnair, they keep on serving BKK 2x daily in winter. One reason is they also carry package holiday customers on their scheduled flights.

[Edited 2012-09-25 12:43:01]

User currently offlineanstar From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 5244 posts, RR: 6
Reply 61, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3823 times:

Quoting nethkt (Reply 37):

330's cockpit crew stays with 330s and 340's cockpit crew stays with 340-600, 340-500.

I believe Virgin Atlantic are one of the few airlines that mixfleet 330 and 340 flight crews.

Quoting nethkt (Reply 37):
And it has been so long that the B747 cockpit crew last had a trip over Australia, so they need to go there!
A great deal is made, 340's cockpit crew gets LHR and B747's get to visit Australia! Great move!!

So their operational planning is based on where flight crews get to visit? No wonder they are loosing cash!


User currently offlinegoldorak From France, joined Sep 2006, 1843 posts, RR: 4
Reply 62, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3761 times:

Quoting anstar (Reply 61):
I believe Virgin Atlantic are one of the few airlines that mixfleet 330 and 340 flight crews.r

AF also.


User currently offlineaviateur From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1352 posts, RR: 11
Reply 63, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3643 times:

Wow, this is somewhat startling when you consider the long-time connections between SAS and Thai -- and the connections between Thailand and Denmark in general. There are a lot of Thais in Denmark, and lots of Danes visit Thailand. Not enough premium pax, I guess.

PS



Patrick Smith is an airline pilot, air travel columnist and author
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25369 posts, RR: 49
Reply 64, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2943 times:

By chance saw a paper story about continued growth and success of Gulf carriers, and had quote from VP of Intercontinental network at SAS about this BKK route.

He said BKK was producing the lowest yields of any longhaul route flown by SAS with very few business passengers particularly during summer months. So even with 60-years history SAS could not sustain the route after years of continued losses, and he blamed much of the decline on the massive increase in capacity and low fare offerings in Europe by Gulf carriers.

He further stated in his view, as legacy European carriers continue to suffer under high costs and declining yields, Bangkok is a awaking sign for the potential in continued reduction in the number markets carriers like SAS viably serve in the face of mounting competition.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinekyrone From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 126 posts, RR: 0
Reply 65, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2834 times:

And how do they plan to turn things around in the face of such competition?

How can they differentiate their product and pull ahead?

Do they still intend to open up SFO??


User currently offlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2077 posts, RR: 0
Reply 66, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2788 times:

Quoting kyrone (Reply 65):
Do they still intend to open up SFO??

Yes. April 8, 2013.



John@SFO
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
SAS To Open Intl Service At BMA After 41 Years posted Thu Apr 17 2003 19:45:48 by SAS_A330-300
SAA Cancel Cape Town London After 20 Years posted Tue Jun 5 2012 08:50:57 by cv990coronado
Former Wunala Dreaming Retired After 23 Years posted Sat Apr 28 2012 06:35:27 by na
Air Algerie 747, After 28 Years, The Pics... posted Thu Nov 17 2011 04:39:41 by DID747
Thai End Athens Service After 36 Years posted Wed Nov 16 2011 01:45:12 by 777way
Libyan 747s, After 30 Years, The Pics.. posted Wed Nov 16 2011 00:27:49 by DID747
Sata Caravelle 10R Wreckage Found After 34 Years posted Tue Oct 25 2011 15:44:14 by pliersinsight
EgyptAir Will Return To Baghdad After 20 Years posted Sun Dec 19 2010 06:42:26 by MSYYZ
AF Comes To Cambodia After 35 Years posted Thu Oct 21 2010 03:08:03 by kevin
Iran - Egypt Agree On Air Service After 31 Years posted Sun Oct 3 2010 17:08:17 by LAXintl
AF Comes To Cambodia After 35 Years posted Thu Oct 21 2010 03:08:03 by kevin