Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
United 787 #3904 To IAH  
User currently offlineCALTECH From Poland, joined May 2007, 2197 posts, RR: 25
Posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 38248 times:

United Airline's first 787 is on it's way to IAH this morning. Scheduled arrival at 09:48 AM.

[Edited 2012-09-22 06:27:23]


UNITED We Stand
207 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16825 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 38298 times:

Quoting CALTECH (Thread starter):
United Airline's first 787 is on it's way to IAH this morning.

Wow, when did the delivery take place yesterday or this Morning.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineCALTECH From Poland, joined May 2007, 2197 posts, RR: 25
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 38281 times:

She left BFI today. She is aloft. And Flying. It is showing as a non-revenue test flight. Actual delivery ceremony in IAH ?

[Edited 2012-09-22 06:30:56]


UNITED We Stand
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16825 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 38219 times:

I don't see anything on Flightaware.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineaeroblogger From India, joined Dec 2011, 1363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 38143 times:

Not showing on FlightAware...


Airports 2012: IXE HYD DEL BLR BOM CCU KNU KTM BKK SIN ICN LAX BUR SFO PHX IAH ORD EWR PHL PVD BOS FRA MUC IST
User currently offlineORDBOSEWR From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 426 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 38119 times:

Can an airline block a flight on flightaware, like the government can?

User currently offlineCALTECH From Poland, joined May 2007, 2197 posts, RR: 25
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 38030 times:

Remember, this is a non-revenue flight. Believe she is flying as a test or ferry flight. #6864.


UNITED We Stand
User currently offlineORDBOSEWR From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 426 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 38001 times:

united.com does show 6864 from BFI to IAH with the arrival times listed above.

Technically it does not show BFI as the origin, but then under the weather for the airports involved it displays BFI.

the status says 'on schedule' but it should have an estimated arrival time if it is in the air, but I am sure that united could block this if they wish.


User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5737 posts, RR: 48
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 37945 times:

Got a couple of sources telling me that delivery did indeed take place and the airplane should arrive at IAH by 10AM CDT. Sounds like delivery ceremony will be in Houston.


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1813 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 37930 times:

They tricked even the most active followers   If the ceremony is at IAH they certainly would want to keep this flight quiet if possible.

User currently offlinesrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 37865 times:

Quoting CALTECH (Reply 6):
Remember, this is a non-revenue flight. Believe she is flying as a test or ferry flight. #6864.

There are some other airline ferry/delivery flights showing up on Flightaware out of BFI this morning (Aerolineas Argentina and Xiamen Air both have 738s departing BFI this morning.). The last instance of UAL6864 being used is Sept. 15 for an LAX-SFO flight with a 772. The fact that this ferry flight isn't showing up on Flightaware is interesting and makes you wonder if perhaps it's flying under some other flight number or UA had the flight number or registration blocked.

Flightaware is showing three 787 flights, two from JAL and one from ANA:

http://flightaware.com/live/aircrafttype/B788

Quoting ORDBOSEWR (Reply 5):
Can an airline block a flight on flightaware, like the government can?

Yes. Plenty of private a/c have their registrations blocked, so an airline can just as easily request a similar sort of blocking of a flight number or a/c registration even on a temporary basis (Many private jet fractional operators are classified as airlines.). It's probably not done as often since airlines typically use a block of flight numbers for ferry/test flights.


User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2692 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 37674 times:

Awesome news for a Saturday morning... my daughter is dancing to the Rhapsody in Blue that I am blasting right now!

Congrats to all at United and Boeing!


User currently offlinehiflyer From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2167 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 37623 times:

FYI friend of mine says the internal UA system shows the flt sked but does not show the aircraft flying...mebbe a data error???

User currently offlineCALTECH From Poland, joined May 2007, 2197 posts, RR: 25
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 36798 times:

It was a tip from Chicago Ops, the schedule at 09:48 IAH time is wrong. Trying to get more info.


UNITED We Stand
User currently offlineTWA772LR From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 1774 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 36254 times:

My United app actually shows some seats in Y+ are occupied. Maybe a glitch.


Go coogs! \n//
User currently offlineaeroblogger From India, joined Dec 2011, 1363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 36013 times:

Quoting TWA772LR (Reply 14):
My United app actually shows some seats in Y+ are occupied. Maybe a glitch.

Those are the default blocked seats...



Airports 2012: IXE HYD DEL BLR BOM CCU KNU KTM BKK SIN ICN LAX BUR SFO PHX IAH ORD EWR PHL PVD BOS FRA MUC IST
User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2692 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 35571 times:

Is there no A-Netters in IAH to confirm that the 787 has landed and then disappeared into a hanger?

User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5737 posts, RR: 48
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 35563 times:

ZA288 is still in Seattle and should depart later today or tomorrow morning. Apparently it's getting some sort of custom software load.


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineAVENSAB727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 913 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 33804 times:

Looks like the UA 787 will be delivered to IAH!


Always look on the bright side of Life!
User currently offlineflight152 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 3389 posts, RR: 6
Reply 19, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 33643 times:

Quoting AVENSAB727 (Reply 18):
Looks like the UA 787 will be delivered to IAH!

What gave that away? This entire thread?


User currently offlineAVENSAB727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 913 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 33575 times:

Looks like it. Looks like the rumors that is was gonna be either SFO or ORD are now false!


Always look on the bright side of Life!
User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5737 posts, RR: 48
Reply 21, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 33468 times:

No delivery today. Apparently no C-1 flight has even taken place. That still has to be done as well as some other training and marketing matters. Delivery towards the end of the week possibly.


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1813 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 33462 times:

Was it Continental or UA that ordered these frames?

User currently offlineCONTACREW From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 424 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 33442 times:

Quoting sweair (Reply 22):

Was it Continental or UA that ordered these frames?

This is a Continental ordered aircraft.



Flight Attendants prepare doors for departure, cross check verify straps standby for all call
User currently offlinen797mx From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 196 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 33354 times:

Quoting sweair (Reply 22):

IIRC, these should be United orders because I believe that CO converted their orders to the 787-9. I don't remember if it was all of them though.



Clear skies and strong tail winds.
User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1813 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 34131 times:

So delivery should be at former Continental hub?

User currently offlineCONTACREW From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 424 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 34170 times:

Quoting n797mx (Reply 24):
IIRC, these should be United orders because I believe that CO converted their orders to the 787-9. I don't remember if it was all of them though.

Nope it's a CO ordered aircraft. The UA ordered ones won't be coming online until around 2016 or so.



Flight Attendants prepare doors for departure, cross check verify straps standby for all call
User currently offlineRoseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9511 posts, RR: 52
Reply 27, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 35485 times:

Technically the delivery flight was on Friday PAE-BFI. BFI-IAH is a non revenue flight operating for UA. Rarely do airlines do this since usually the plane flies directly from PAE.

Quoting NYC777 (Reply 21):
No delivery today. Apparently no C-1 flight has even taken place. That still has to be done as well as some other training and marketing matters. Delivery towards the end of the week possibly.

Are you looking at a different plane?



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineco772 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 25 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 35194 times:

Quoting flight152 (Reply 19):
What gave that away? This entire thread?

  

Quoting sweair (Reply 25):
So delivery should be at former Continental hub?

I have no inside information but it would make sense as the 787 is a sCO order, crewed by a sCO crew, based out of IAH (an sCO hub). Wouldn't surprise me if it went to ORD though.

I was at IAH around 1pm... I didn't see it at Terminal E or around the hangers off of Will Clayton Pkwy. Did get to see a few 772's and 764's  


User currently offlineAVENSAB727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 913 posts, RR: 1
Reply 29, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 34676 times:

Quoting co772 (Reply 28):

I was beginning to think it was going to be delivered to ORD, but IAH makes more sense since it is a sCO order.



Always look on the bright side of Life!
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16825 posts, RR: 51
Reply 30, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 34552 times:

I remember with CO their 777s #1 and #2 were delivered the same day, #1 flew to IAH and #2 to EWR. I went to EWR that night to see the new CO 777 and could not miss that huge tail towering over all the 737s. I remember looking from the gate at all the ground crew surrounding the aircraft checking it out. Their first revenue flights were the following day, EWR-MCO and IAH-LAX.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16825 posts, RR: 51
Reply 31, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 34551 times:

Quoting n797mx (Reply 24):
IIRC, these should be United orders because I believe that CO converted their orders to the 787-9. I don't remember if it was all of them though.

CO originally ordered 25 787-8s, just as UA did. However CO later converted 14 of their 25 787-8s to 787-9s, the aircraft we are waiting to be delivered is the first of the 11 787-8 orders from CO. After that I don't know which will be next the sCO 787-9s or the sUA 787-8s.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineRoseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9511 posts, RR: 52
Reply 32, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 34036 times:

Quoting AVENSAB727 (Reply 29):

I was beginning to think it was going to be delivered to ORD, but IAH makes more sense since it is a sCO order.

UA typically had new airplanes deliver to SFO not ORD.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1813 posts, RR: 0
Reply 33, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 33993 times:

Hard to imagine Boeing and UA being fro the same roots once in history.

User currently offlineAVENSAB727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 913 posts, RR: 1
Reply 34, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 33928 times:

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 32):

Thanks for correcting me, could this mean that IAH could replace SFO for deliveries in the future?



Always look on the bright side of Life!
User currently offlinedrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5162 posts, RR: 8
Reply 35, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 33397 times:

Quoting AVENSAB727 (Reply 34):
Thanks for correcting me, could this mean that IAH could replace SFO for deliveries in the future?

I wouldn't say that. SMB is and will be very important in the future of this airline.



Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineSonomaFlyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1711 posts, RR: 0
Reply 36, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 33486 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Again, there is no merger of the pilot contracts. Because of that, these sCO initial orders will be flown by sCO pilots from an sCO hub. CO was the first U.S. based carrier to place a 787 order and that base was always going to be at IAH. This is just follow through.

Once the pilot unions become one, there may be different delivery points for new a/c. For now, these sCO 787's will start by flying from BFI to IAH.


User currently offlineTWA772LR From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 1774 posts, RR: 1
Reply 37, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 32352 times:

Quoting sweair (Reply 33):

Hard to imagine Boeing and UA being fro the same roots once in history.

And CO since it was Varney who founded both of them, UA and CO that is.



Go coogs! \n//
User currently offlinestrfyr51 From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 1099 posts, RR: 1
Reply 38, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 25119 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting sweair (Reply 33):

For that matter both UAL and CAL spramg from the same roots. Walter Varney, Varney Airlines and Varney Speedlines
1930 (UAL) 1936 (CAL)


User currently offlinejmhayes From United States of America, joined May 2007, 12 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 22797 times:

Just filed a flightplan to Grant Co ...

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL7708


User currently offlineCALTECH From Poland, joined May 2007, 2197 posts, RR: 25
Reply 40, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 22751 times:

Okay, there was a issue yesterday, no crew was assigned to the flight all day. It was premature to say she was in the air. Took a tip and did not completely verify it. My bad. Today, she is scheduled to depart BFI at 8PM PDT with a IAH arrival of 1:48 AM. A flight crew is assigned.
Wonder on arrival if they will take her to a hangar or leave her at a gate. Trip # is ferry flight 6869, will be watching with anticipation.




UNITED We Stand
User currently offlinejmhayes From United States of America, joined May 2007, 12 posts, RR: 0
Reply 41, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 22507 times:

Flight to Moses Lake just completed; Flightaware didn't show it as having taken off, but tracked on ADS-B.

[Edited 2012-09-23 11:50:01]

User currently offlinegigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 42, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 21676 times:

Quoting AVENSAB727 (Reply 20):
Looks like it. Looks like the rumors that is was gonna be either SFO or ORD are now false!

There were no rumors that it was going to anywhere but IAH.

NS


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 43, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 21590 times:

So, what's the status now. It's 9:12pm DEN time.


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 44, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 21573 times:

UAL686 is shown on flightaware as a 763 from HNL to HKG. Any reason it isn't showing the 787 ferry flight?

User currently offlineAVENSAB727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 913 posts, RR: 1
Reply 45, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 21546 times:

Quoting gigneil (Reply 42):

I did hear them, but not from this site.



Always look on the bright side of Life!
User currently offlineCONTACREW From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 424 posts, RR: 0
Reply 46, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 21493 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 44):
UAL686 is shown on flightaware as a 763 from HNL to HKG. Any reason it isn't showing the 787 ferry flight?

That flight is a ferry flight to HKG for the 763 to undergo mod to 2-cabin international version with Flatbed seats, AVOD etc.



Flight Attendants prepare doors for departure, cross check verify straps standby for all call
User currently offlinegigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 47, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 21505 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 44):
UAL686 is shown on flightaware as a 763 from HNL to HKG. Any reason it isn't showing the 787 ferry flight?

...because its a different flight?  

NS


User currently offlineCALMSP From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3924 posts, RR: 7
Reply 48, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 20889 times:

flight cancelled last night.

another run to Moses is scheduled for today.

[Edited 2012-09-24 05:48:54]


okay, I'm waiting for the rich to spread the wealth around to me. Please mail your checks to my house.
User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2072 posts, RR: 4
Reply 49, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 20239 times:

Internal Boeing News say the plane was delivered to over the weekend. But the flight to Houston is not planned till later in the week.

Don't know any more details.

bt



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlineGEG2RAP From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 848 posts, RR: 0
Reply 50, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 20116 times:

oh you guys just don't know which airport to look for http://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL7708

The bird is here in Moses Lake 


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 51, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 19822 times:

Quoting GEG2RAP (Reply 50):

On Flightaware, you can just type in the tail number to find where the plane is.



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlinefrosty328 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 19 posts, RR: 0
Reply 52, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 18889 times:

According to our internal company website, the first 787, N20904 will arrive in IAH on Friday September 28th. There are no details yet about the ETA in IAH.

User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6346 posts, RR: 3
Reply 53, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 18802 times:

Love to know why it has remained in Washington so long after "delivery"...and a wierd delivery flight it was (PAE to BFI).


Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlinedrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5162 posts, RR: 8
Reply 54, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 18706 times:

Quoting frosty328 (Reply 52):
According to our internal company website, the first 787, N20904 will arrive in IAH on Friday September 28th. There are no details yet about the ETA in IAH.

Rumor from one of the guys on the ground at IAH is early AM Fri...of course subject to change.



Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlinefrosty328 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 19 posts, RR: 0
Reply 55, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 18629 times:

Quoting drerx7 (Reply 54):

Love to know why it has remained in Washington so long after "delivery"...and a wierd delivery flight it was (PAE to BFI).

According to the company, the crews are doing training flights between Moses Lake and Boeing Field. The training flights are the final part of the process in achieving certification for revenue operation.


User currently offlineWestern727 From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 743 posts, RR: 4
Reply 56, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 18536 times:

If Flightaware is to be believed, it's making a flight today from BFI to the skies above MSP and then back to BFI. I wonder what the rationale behind the routing is. A way to taunt DL?

Before someone jumps on me...yes, that was a joke.  



Jack @ AUS
User currently offlinetjwgrr From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2425 posts, RR: 3
Reply 57, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 18573 times:

Quoting Western727 (Reply 56):
If Flightaware is to be believed, it's making a flight today from BFI to the skies above MSP and then back to BFI. I wonder what the rationale behind the routing is. A way to taunt DL?

"Minneapolis tower, United 7708 heavy requesting a flyby."

Controller: "Negative, 7708 heavy, the pattern is full."

http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj143/dburrigh/Fans/Fans%20In%20Movies/TopGun_HunterEmerson.jpg

[Edited 2012-09-26 09:43:37]


Direct KNOBS, maintain 2700' until established on the localizer, cleared ILS runway 26 left approach.
User currently offlineWestern727 From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 743 posts, RR: 4
Reply 58, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 18426 times:

Quoting tjwgrr (Reply 57):
Controller: "Negative, 7708 heavy, the pattern is full."

  

+1



Jack @ AUS
User currently offlineRDH3E From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 1619 posts, RR: 3
Reply 59, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 18198 times:

Quoting sweair (Reply 33):
Hard to imagine Boeing and UA being fro the same roots once in history.

Yep, until they were forced to divest! Very much an incestuous industry.

Quoting frosty328 (Reply 55):
According to the company, the crews are doing training flights between Moses Lake and Boeing Field. The training flights are the final part of the process in achieving certification for revenue operation.

It was said that they are more effective for training at Moses Lake because of less air traffic congestion and less traffic on the ground. Word is we now have ~70 pilots certified on the aircraft and are just working to get them real stick time.


User currently offlineCOEWR787 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 336 posts, RR: 3
Reply 60, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 18128 times:

Quoting TWA772LR (Reply 37):
Quoting sweair (Reply 33):

Hard to imagine Boeing and UA being fro the same roots once in history.

And CO since it was Varney who founded both of them, UA and CO that is.

Add to that United Technologies (Pratt and Whitney, Sikorsky)


User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6346 posts, RR: 3
Reply 61, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 18125 times:

Quoting frosty328 (Reply 55):
According to the company, the crews are doing training flights between Moses Lake and Boeing Field. The training flights are the final part of the process in achieving certification for revenue operation.

Wonder why they didn't fly home first, though. Not like Texas has plenty of Moses Lake like airports  



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineWestern727 From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 743 posts, RR: 4
Reply 62, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 18046 times:

Quoting RDH3E (Reply 59):
It was said that they are more effective for training at Moses Lake because of less air traffic congestion and less traffic on the ground.

MWH also has ideal weather, being in the desert of eastern Washington. I grew up going regularly from home in Seattle to nearby Ephrata (grandparents lived there) and the weather was almost always perfect for flying. I have fond memories of watching the JL 747s when they operated their training base out of MWH.

Quoting KELPkid (Reply 61):
Wonder why they didn't fly home first, though. Not like Texas has plenty of Moses Lake like airports

True...I imagine it's because the UA pilots are being trained by Boeing crews.



Jack @ AUS
User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2072 posts, RR: 4
Reply 63, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 18053 times:

Quoting KELPkid (Reply 61):
Not like Texas has plenty of Moses Lake like airports

Nah, you don't get hills in Texas like you do here. Each round trip between Seattle and Moses Lake give you a couple of spectacular fly by's of O'l Rainier. Although the haze kind of ruin the view as of late.

bt



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlinerotating14 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 617 posts, RR: 0
Reply 64, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 18089 times:

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...-in-flights-around-seattle-376968/

Quote:
Cockpit crews have previously only had classes and simulator training on the aircraft, according to an employee newsletter.

"Although United's 787 simulator is very realistic, there's simply no substitute for being able to fly the aircraft," said captain Dave Lundy, 787 fleet standards manager at the airline.

The aircraft will be based in Houston and fly on limited domestic routes from 4 November and international routes from 4 December.

This would sum up the best reason why she hasn't left to IAH, yet, makes the most sense to me at least.


User currently offlineUnited1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5930 posts, RR: 9
Reply 65, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 17407 times:

Quoting rotating14 (Reply 64):
This would sum up the best reason why she hasn't left to IAH, yet, makes the most sense to me at least.

Indeed...looks like she did a quick familiarization flight today.

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL7708



Semper Fi - PowerPoint makes us stupid.
User currently offlineordramper98 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 101 posts, RR: 0
Reply 66, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 17353 times:

According to flightaware, she's stil flying (3 1/2 hours so far).

User currently offlineordramper98 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 101 posts, RR: 0
Reply 67, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 17342 times:

I don't know if the altitude graph is correct, but off the coast they were flying very low. If the flight level on there is correct, they were flying between 2,000 and 900 feet for about 17 minutes.

User currently offlinedrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5162 posts, RR: 8
Reply 68, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 17217 times:

4PM Friday 9/28 IAH arrival is the latest.


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlinePlanesNTrains From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 5456 posts, RR: 29
Reply 69, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 17228 times:

Just flew over Auburn en route to BFI with a Boeing chase plane alongside it. Beautiful - nice gentle arc over my house. I'm out running my garden train, messing around on the new iPad, and she comes breezing by. Great evening in Auburn.  

-Dave



Next Trip: SEA-ABQ-SEA on Alaska
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 70, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 17153 times:

Delete this post please as it didn't load correctly.

[Edited 2012-09-27 19:24:44]


Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 71, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 17210 times:

Quoting drerx7 (Reply 68):
4PM Friday 9/28 IAH arrival is the latest.



The pilots that will bring it into IAH are very very old so that is pretty late in the day for them!  

My bet is the updated time for arrival at IAH will be somewhere in the 1330 CDT area.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineUA767400 From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 72, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 17111 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 71):

It will not be that early. UA has confirmed they will be arriving around 4PM.


User currently offlineaeroblogger From India, joined Dec 2011, 1363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 73, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 17109 times:

Quoting UA767400 (Reply 72):
It will not be that early. UA has confirmed they will be arriving around 4PM.

My info might be outdated, but the email I got yesterday from someone at Boeing said that the aircraft is expected at IAH between 1-2PM local for a 4PM special ceremony.

[Edited 2012-09-27 19:52:49]


Airports 2012: IXE HYD DEL BLR BOM CCU KNU KTM BKK SIN ICN LAX BUR SFO PHX IAH ORD EWR PHL PVD BOS FRA MUC IST
User currently offlineiahcsr From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 3408 posts, RR: 42
Reply 74, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week ago) and read 16827 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Last word I had is will op as 7708 ETA 1600-ish. It will go directly to the hanger.. No terminal viewing 


Working very hard to Fly Right....
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 75, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 16630 times:

Quoting iahcsr (Reply 74):
Last word I had is will op as 7708 ETA 1600-ish.

Yep, my intel this morning was out of BFI at 1000 PDT and arrive IAH 1600 CDT.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineUnited1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5930 posts, RR: 9
Reply 76, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 16418 times:

Looks like a flight plan has been filed....UAs first Dreamliner should be en route to IAH in a little over two hours.

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL7708



Semper Fi - PowerPoint makes us stupid.
User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2692 posts, RR: 1
Reply 77, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 16402 times:

Quoting PlanesNTrains (Reply 69):
I'm out running my garden train

Does your garden train set have an airport?

Quoting iahcsr (Reply 74):
Last word I had is will op as 7708 ETA 1600-ish. It will go directly to the hanger.. No terminal viewing

Is there going to be an official ceremony at some point?


User currently offlineCONTACREW From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 424 posts, RR: 0
Reply 78, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 16250 times:

And the first 787 is on it's way  

7708/28SEP
P BFI/OUT 941A E00.19 ☨
P BFI/OFF 958A
P IAH/ETA 420P E05.00
D HDQ/FERRY FLIGHT ETA 420P

SKED BFI ORIG 1000A GTD **** SHIP 3904
IAH 920P TERM GTA ****



Flight Attendants prepare doors for departure, cross check verify straps standby for all call
User currently offlineCONTACREW From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 424 posts, RR: 0
Reply 79, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 16235 times:

This is what a friend of mine sent me.

UNITED AIRLINES’ FIRST 787 DREAMLINER ARRIVES IN HOUSTON

United Airlines – the North American launch customer for the Boeing 787 – is flying its first 787 from Boeing Field in Seattle to the airline’s Houston hub. The aircraft is the first of five new Dreamliners the airline expects to receive this year from its total order for 50 of the aircraft. United took ownership of its first 787on Saturday.


WHEN:​​​Friday, Sept. 28, 2012
​​​4:00 p.m.
​​​Media must arrive by 3:30 p.m. for escort to tarmac viewing area
​​​
WHERE:​​Bush Intercontinental Airport
​​4849 Wright Road
​​Meet security escort in the parking lot across the street from Hangar E
​​​
VISUALS:​​787 runway landing
​​Water cannon salute
​​Photo op with the aircraft following arrival
​​787 pilot interviews

WHO:​​Capt. Dave Lundy and Capt. Niels Olufsen, United 787 pilots
​​Houston-based United uniformed employees



Flight Attendants prepare doors for departure, cross check verify straps standby for all call
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 80, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 16090 times:

Quoting CONTACREW (Reply 79):
WHEN:​​​Friday, Sept. 28, 2012
​​​4:00 p.m.
​​​Media must arrive by 3:30 p.m. for escort to tarmac viewing area


Guess they're going to be slowing down some or expect to extend the route in order to make that 1600 CDT arrival time. The live data I just looked at had them at FL410 moving over the ground at 511 KTS, arriving IAH at 1533 CDT without making any modifications to the flight plan or speed.

United website still has them arriving at 1620 CDT, so at this point still a crap shoot for the actual arrival time.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6346 posts, RR: 3
Reply 81, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 15998 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 80):
Guess they're going to be slowing down some or expect to extend the route in order to make that 1600 CDT arrival time. The live data I just looked at had them at FL410 moving over the ground at 511 KTS, arriving IAH at 1533 CDT without making any modifications to the flight plan or speed.

United website still has them arriving at 1620 CDT, so at this point still a crap shoot for the actual arrival time.

You gonna be on duty and have the honors of controlling the first UA 787 in Houston's airspace?  



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 82, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 16006 times:

Quoting KELPkid (Reply 81):
You gonna be on duty and have the honors of controlling the first UA 787 in Houston's airspace?


I wish.....but unfortunately the crusty ole guys flying needed some extra rest and couldn't get here before the end of my duty day. 

Oh well, it will be around the area next week and for weeks to come.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineUnited1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5930 posts, RR: 9
Reply 83, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 15836 times:

Quoting CONTACREW (Reply 79):
UNITED AIRLINES’ FIRST 787 DREAMLINER ARRIVES IN HOUSTON

Just about to cross into Texas...whats the weather look like in IAH right now?



Semper Fi - PowerPoint makes us stupid.
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6346 posts, RR: 3
Reply 84, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 15828 times:

Wow, definitely some weather issues over the Lone Star State today... (looking at the radar returns on FlightAware!).


Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6346 posts, RR: 3
Reply 85, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 15876 times:

Any idea about the whoop-de-do over Colorado? Is there an Air Force Academy grad in the pointy end that wanted a flyby? Or a Flight-aware bug?  


Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineco772 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 25 posts, RR: 0
Reply 86, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 15768 times:

Most likely will be landing in some scattered thundershowers.

User currently offlineco772 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 25 posts, RR: 0
Reply 87, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 15755 times:

Quoting KELPkid (Reply 85):

Might have been to time the arrival w/ the specified arrival time...?


User currently offlineCALPSAFltSkeds From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 2589 posts, RR: 9
Reply 88, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 15780 times:

According to FlightAware it was a 9 minute 360 degree circle (left turn) at FL410 that circled PUB (Pueblo CO), miles south of DEN and COS. Anyone on board from PUB?

User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6346 posts, RR: 3
Reply 89, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 15729 times:

Quoting CALPSAFltSkeds (Reply 88):
According to FlightAware it was a 9 minute 360 degree circle (left turn) at FL410 that circled PUB (Pueblo CO), miles south of DEN and COS. Anyone on board from PUB?

Dunno, but the people on the ground in PUB certainly couldn't make it out very well at FL410  



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineUnited1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5930 posts, RR: 9
Reply 90, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 15615 times:

Quoting KELPkid (Reply 89):
Quoting CALPSAFltSkeds (Reply 88):
According to FlightAware it was a 9 minute 360 degree circle (left turn) at FL410 that circled PUB (Pueblo CO), miles south of DEN and COS. Anyone on board from PUB?

Dunno, but the people on the ground in PUB certainly couldn't make it out very well at FL410  

Looks like they are making another loop...wonder if its for weather or simply to slow down a bit.



Semper Fi - PowerPoint makes us stupid.
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6346 posts, RR: 3
Reply 91, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 15639 times:

Quoting United1 (Reply 90):
Looks like they are making another loop...wonder if its for weather or simply to slow down a bit.

Doesn't look like it. It might just be vectoring for arrival or weather. They have already descended from cruise...but maybe a flyby is in store at IAH  



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineaeroblogger From India, joined Dec 2011, 1363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 92, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 15626 times:

The loops are to slow down to ensure that the flight will arrive after the journalists do.


Airports 2012: IXE HYD DEL BLR BOM CCU KNU KTM BKK SIN ICN LAX BUR SFO PHX IAH ORD EWR PHL PVD BOS FRA MUC IST
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 93, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 15561 times:

Any A.netters on he ground at IAH right now??


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineco772 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 25 posts, RR: 0
Reply 94, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 15643 times:

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 93):

Just flew over my house... should be on the ground by now. Sorry for the terrible iPhone pic... much better in person
  



User currently offlineUnited1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5930 posts, RR: 9
Reply 95, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 15645 times:

Touchdown  

+1 788 Dreamliner....



Semper Fi - PowerPoint makes us stupid.
User currently offlineUnited1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5930 posts, RR: 9
Reply 96, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 15265 times:

Video of the first one landing in IAH....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olxMkoEcgfM



Semper Fi - PowerPoint makes us stupid.
User currently offlineadxmatt From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 950 posts, RR: 2
Reply 97, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 15062 times:

Quoting KELPkid (Reply 85):
Any idea about the whoop-de-do over Colorado
Quoting co772 (Reply 87):
Might have been to time the arrival w/ the specified arrival time...?

That is correct.... Didn't want to get to IAH early due to the press events.

Quoting CALTECH (Reply 6):
she is flying as a test or ferry flight. #6864.

The 6000 series flight numbers were set up strictly for ACARS testing. Make sure flight plans and weight and balance uploaded correctly.

A/C will get induction in IAH over the next week and then a series of non-revenue "proving runs" will take place. All proving run flights will have the same flight number. They will include domestic as well as "Polar" flying. Proving runs will exceed 100 hours.


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16825 posts, RR: 51
Reply 98, posted (1 year 10 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 14665 times:

Lots' of photos from the Houston Airports System:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/houstonairports/sets/72157631646113389/



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineiahcsr From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 3408 posts, RR: 42
Reply 99, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 13314 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Ship 0904/3904 is planned to make first flight in 11 days tomorrow 10Sep IAH EWR IAH as UA7708.


Working very hard to Fly Right....
User currently offlineDeltal1011man From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 9297 posts, RR: 14
Reply 100, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 13266 times:

Quoting sweair (Reply 25):

Its going to IAH because thats where UAL picked to do the 787 work. Could have easily been SFO. (and i expect SFO will be doing 787 work soon.)

Quoting co772 (Reply 28):

I have no inside information but it would make sense as the 787 is a sCO order, crewed by a sCO crew, based out of IAH (an sCO hub). Wouldn't surprise me if it went to ORD though

why ORD? eh... you have to remember its more about MX. UA has, AFAIK, always sent new plane to SMB for its intro. to the fleet. Its not about where the CEO sits.....

Quoting AVENSAB727 (Reply 34):

maybe. maybe not. All that depends on where UA wants to do its intro checks. IIRC CO sends its 737s to MCO for intro checks. (a little odd they don't do it all at one place)

Quoting drerx7 (Reply 35):

but it may not be the place for new inductions. IAH was, IIRC, picked by UAL to be the first to gear up for 787 work. I' a little surprised its not SMB though.

Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 36):
Again, there is no merger of the pilot contracts. Because of that, these sCO initial orders will be flown by sCO pilots from an sCO hub. CO was the first U.S. based carrier to place a 787 order and that base was always going to be at IAH. This is just follow through.

.....I don't think that the CO contract say anything about induction checks and such. I have a hard time believing that CO's pilots contract tell the company where it can/can't do MX. (I also don't believe the pilot contract says it much be based from a CO hub.....I'm sure it must be staffed by CO pilots but that will be about it.)



yep.
User currently onlineThe777Man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 6503 posts, RR: 55
Reply 101, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 13234 times:

I heard it's going to LAX on Friday 12 October.

The777Man



Need a Boeing 777 Firing Order....Further to fly....CI, MU, LX and LH 777s
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 102, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 13309 times:

Quoting The777Man (Reply 101):
I heard it's going to LAX on Friday 12 October.

Yep, or at least that is currently what the UA flight status page is showing, out of IAH at 0900 CDT to LAX at 1040 PDT.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineORDBOSEWR From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 426 posts, RR: 0
Reply 103, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 13207 times:

Quoting iahcsr (Reply 99):

Ship 0904/3904 is planned to make first flight in 11 days tomorrow 10Sep IAH EWR IAH as UA7708.

This is hilarious. If you go to united.com and search flight status for 7708.
It has the flight delayed 3hrs, awaiting inbound aircraft....

I love it. If that is not funny I don't what is.

It also shows, 9 people checked in for the flight.

[Edited 2012-10-10 05:36:28]

User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6346 posts, RR: 3
Reply 104, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 12957 times:

So has it really just been sitting around at IAH since its delivery flight? I would have expected some crew familiarization runs within Texas...  


Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineDL WIDGET HEAD From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2086 posts, RR: 5
Reply 105, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 12873 times:

I'd like to nonrev on this plane on Monday Oct 15th. Anybody know if it's flying on that day and the routes?

User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2692 posts, RR: 1
Reply 106, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 12853 times:

Quoting iahcsr (Reply 99):
Ship 0904/3904 is planned to make first flight in 11 days tomorrow 10Sep IAH EWR IAH as UA7708.

Is this a revenue flight?


User currently offlineaeroblogger From India, joined Dec 2011, 1363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 107, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 12772 times:

Quoting United787 (Reply 106):
Is this a revenue flight?

First revenue flight is 11/4



Airports 2012: IXE HYD DEL BLR BOM CCU KNU KTM BKK SIN ICN LAX BUR SFO PHX IAH ORD EWR PHL PVD BOS FRA MUC IST
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 108, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 12745 times:

Quoting United787 (Reply 106):
Is this a revenue flight?

No, all proving runs at this point.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlinestrfyr51 From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 1099 posts, RR: 1
Reply 109, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 12769 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting United787 (Reply 106):

No the proving runs aren't even done yet, The FAA should be in the office this week for the start Lucky for ME I'm off until Friday.. Proving Runs are hectic for everybody because they usually involve an Audit for everybody IN Maintenance Control and possibly Dispatch. Though I'm sure the S-CO guys are ready. the S-UA guys won't do this until the -9 comes.
I've yet to see any Maintenance manuals for the airplane since access is by password only


User currently offlineBoeing12345 From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 112 posts, RR: 0
Reply 110, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 12660 times:

Quoting strfyr51 (Reply 109):
I've yet to see any Maintenance manuals for the airplane since access is by password only

Guess you don't have access to eDocs then.


User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4105 posts, RR: 5
Reply 111, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 12503 times:

3904 is also planned to fly IAH-ORD on Thursday 11Oct.

User currently onlineThe777Man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 6503 posts, RR: 55
Reply 112, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 12351 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 102):
Yep, or at least that is currently what the UA flight status page is showing, out of IAH at 0900 CDT to LAX at 1040 PDT.

Thanks for the info on the time which I realize could change.

The777Man



Need a Boeing 777 Firing Order....Further to fly....CI, MU, LX and LH 777s
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 113, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 12359 times:

Quoting The777Man (Reply 112):
Thanks for the info on the time which I realize could change.


Oh yeah, like for today it was scheduled out of IAH at 0900 CDT for EWR and it's still at IAH sitting at 1410 CDT.   



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineiahcsr From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 3408 posts, RR: 42
Reply 114, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 12289 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

it's out of the gate, not off yet   


Working very hard to Fly Right....
User currently onlineThe777Man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 6503 posts, RR: 55
Reply 115, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 12232 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 113):
Oh yeah, like for today it was scheduled out of IAH at 0900 CDT for EWR and it's still at IAH sitting at 1410 CDT.

Well, I could always see it at work, if it's running late..... 

The777Man



Need a Boeing 777 Firing Order....Further to fly....CI, MU, LX and LH 777s
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6346 posts, RR: 3
Reply 116, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 12174 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 113):
Oh yeah, like for today it was scheduled out of IAH at 0900 CDT for EWR and it's still at IAH sitting at 1410 CDT.

Where are you getting the info? Plugging either N20904 or UAL7708 into Flight-Aware shows nothing...    Oh yeah, you've probably seen the flight strip   What are they filing as?



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlinecal764 From United States of America, joined May 2008, 376 posts, RR: 0
Reply 117, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 12154 times:

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL7708
United 7708 in the air an hour ago bound for EWR..or so it says



1. Fly to Win 2. Fund Future 3. Reliability 4. Work Together CO: Work Hard, Fly Right...
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 118, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 12141 times:

Quoting The777Man (Reply 115):
Where are you getting the info? Plugging either N20904 or UAL7708 into Flight-Aware shows nothing


From the UA website flight status page. They kept it surprisingly up to date as the push times changed. Nut flightaware, you're better than that!!  
Quoting iahcsr (Reply 114):
it's out of the gate, not off yet


They got involved in a runway swap from west to east flow, and for some reason (5 stinkin runways) known only those people in the tall building with the windows can explain, things got backed up, UAL7708 was in that stuff.

[Edited 2012-10-10 13:39:03]


Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineHypoxik From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 50 posts, RR: 0
Reply 119, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 12002 times:

So is it turning to IAH tonight? Can't find anything on Flyingtogether about the ORD run.


California Native. KIWA, PHOG, KEWR, KIAH, KLAX, KIAH, KEWR, KORD
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 120, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 11904 times:

Quoting Hypoxik (Reply 119):
So is it turning to IAH tonight? Can't find anything on Flyingtogether about the ORD run.



Guys, check the UA website and flight status, type in the flight number of 7708 and it provides probably the best available information other than from an employees site. While I am not a big fan of the UA site it has proven to be spot on so far.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineUA767400 From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 121, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 11817 times:

Quoting Hypoxik (Reply 119):
So is it turning to IAH tonight? Can't find anything on Flyingtogether about the ORD run.

It is on its way to IAH right now.

Tomorrow morning, it will fly to IAH-ORD-DEN-IAH tomorrow all under UA7708. The UA site is doing a great job tracking it.


User currently offlineCODC10 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2397 posts, RR: 6
Reply 122, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 11708 times:

I saw it land today around dusk at EWR. Gorgeous airplane. The LED nav/anti-collision/landing lights are very distinctive.

User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 123, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 11616 times:

Quoting CODC10 (Reply 122):
The LED nav/anti-collision/landing lights are very distinctive.



They sure are. A beautiful airplane and oh so quiet on takeoff!



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2692 posts, RR: 1
Reply 124, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 11631 times:

Will this be the first time a 787 comes to ORD? I will definately watch for that one, hopefully it lands on 28 so I can see it fly over Lincoln Park!

User currently offlineCcrlR From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 2233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 125, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 11615 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting United787 (Reply 124):
Will this be the first time a 787 comes to ORD? I will definately watch for that one, hopefully it lands on 28 so I can see it fly over Lincoln Park!

No. Boeing brought the 787 over back in March for UA. I hope they use Runway 28. I will see if I can get some shots tomorrow. Depends on where they land too.



"He was right, it is a screaming metal deathtrap!"-Cosmo (from the Fairly Oddparents)
User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2692 posts, RR: 1
Reply 126, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 11222 times:

Over Central Illinois now and flights appear to be landing from the East!

User currently offlineUA767400 From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 127, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 11070 times:

Rumor has it, there is an issue which may delay the first couple 787 flights. Does anybody have any info?

User currently offlinestrfyr51 From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 1099 posts, RR: 1
Reply 128, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 10918 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting UA767400 (Reply 127):

The Proving Runs are not yet complete. we still have the International section to complete to Europe and Asia. The FAA has been in the Office all week and they seem to be pretty Tough, I'm not involved in the proving runs but the guys who ARE?? They're Sweating! The FEDS are pinning their ears back. There's a damn LOT more to this airplane than a pretty paint scheme. I thought much of it was going to be new Technology. I was wrong. Damn near ALL of it is new technology,
right down to the most mundane thing as the Portable Oxygen Bottles. This airplane is a TRUE "Game Changer" It's efficiencies are tremendous! Not One system on this airplane is like the B777,B767 or B747-400. The old ways of thinking and troubleshooting will not Work on this airplane Nearly everything is self verifiable, Nearly every system is down loadable for faults and health monitoring. I am Impressed!!


User currently offlinetallguy14 From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 228 posts, RR: 0
Reply 129, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 10801 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I also heard a rumor from a friend at CO/UA that there won't be three 787s ready in time for the three inaugural flights on Nov 4th. We bought tickets on the IAHORD inaugural. Say it ain't so!

User currently offlineORDBOSEWR From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 426 posts, RR: 0
Reply 130, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 10626 times:

Quoting tallguy14 (Reply 129):

I also heard a rumor from a friend at CO/UA that there won't be three 787s ready in time for the three inaugural flights on Nov 4th. We bought tickets on the IAHORD inaugural. Say it ain't so!

UA is scheduled to have 2 planes on property by 11/4. All flights are planned for that. They plan on having 4 by end of the year.

The last update I saw had deliveries planned as follows:
Sep - 1
Oct - 1
Nov - 1
Dec - 1


User currently offlinemax550 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 1148 posts, RR: 0
Reply 131, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 10550 times:

Quoting tallguy14 (Reply 129):
I also heard a rumor from a friend at CO/UA that there won't be three 787s ready in time for the three inaugural flights on Nov 4th. We bought tickets on the IAHORD inaugural. Say it ain't so!

I was under the impression they'll only need two aircraft for those first flights. One to do IAH-ORD-IAH-LAX-IAH and one for IAH-EWR-IAH-LAX-IAH.
United said they won't be receiving their third and fourth 787 until November when they put out the initial schedules.
https://hub.united.com/en-us/News/Company-Operations/Pages/united-787-dreamliner-domestic-routes.aspx


User currently offlineaeroblogger From India, joined Dec 2011, 1363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 132, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 10248 times:

NRT flight tomorrow is cancelled.

I'm getting very concerned about UA's ability to make the 11/4 inauguration date.



Airports 2012: IXE HYD DEL BLR BOM CCU KNU KTM BKK SIN ICN LAX BUR SFO PHX IAH ORD EWR PHL PVD BOS FRA MUC IST
User currently offlineco772 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 25 posts, RR: 0
Reply 133, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 10086 times:

Quoting aeroblogger (Reply 132):
NRT flight tomorrow is cancelled.

Does anyone have any idea as to why they cancelled both the AMS and NRT flights. Also, It was supposed to fly to SFO after the diversion to DEN but instead flew back to IAH and hasn't left the ground since.


User currently offlineiahcsr From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 3408 posts, RR: 42
Reply 134, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 9783 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Last I heard NRT is now set for the 21st

[Edited 2012-10-18 00:50:57]


Working very hard to Fly Right....
User currently offlinehiflyer From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2167 posts, RR: 3
Reply 135, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 9572 times:

This aircraft has not flown for several days...been sitting in Houston from what I am reading. Now...it is a complicated new design aircraft going thru FAA proving runs but the dang FAA has been involved with this aircraft since the begining. No new ground now....this design is now several years old....and has been in service in/out of US airports for months. Seems to me the only difference is UA involvement now.....and all of a sudden UA is now speechless....interesting.

User currently offlineUA767400 From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 136, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 9434 times:

Quoting hiflyer (Reply 135):

It is not all Uniteds fault. It is different when a US carrier operates a new aircraft vs a foreign carrier flying an aircraft to a US airport


User currently offlinestrfyr51 From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 1099 posts, RR: 1
Reply 137, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 9350 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting hiflyer (Reply 135):

What would you have UAL management SAY?? I've been at work while the FAA sat 2 feet from me "Grilling" the Maintenance controller. what I perceive is irrelevant but Were I senior management? I might have taken the proving runs in a different direction and NOT have thought it was going to be a "cake walk". At United (Pre Merger) we had the 777's and 747's over a month before we started the proving runs. They went into EVERY station where they were going to fly to and we accomplished Practice 'A' checks and in some cases simulated Engine Changes to make damn sure everybody had a good working knowledge of the airplane. I didn't see that this time , BUT our S-co counterparts are running this show and tend to do things their OWN way. Whether I agree or Disagree is of little matter, BUT. I suspect they'll be changing thing up just a little going forward and get EVERYBODY involved. Which up to now they haven't.
But? You live and Learn.


User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4105 posts, RR: 5
Reply 138, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 9254 times:

Quoting strfyr51 (Reply 137):
I suspect they'll be changing thing up just a little going forward and get EVERYBODY involved. Which up to now they haven't.
But? You live and Learn.

Had CO ever introduced a new type in the US? UA has a lot of history with this (727, 737, DC-10, 767, 777, maybe more), you'd think they might have used this extensive experience to understand what to expect. So I'm hesitant to believe that management is (solely) to blame. This airplane is significantly different from anything else flying today besides the fact that it's a tube with wings and engines.


User currently offlinegigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 139, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 9037 times:

Quoting strfyr51 (Reply 137):
They went into EVERY station where they were going to fly to and we accomplished Practice 'A' checks and in some cases simulated Engine Changes to make damn sure everybody had a good working knowledge of the airplane. I didn't see that this time

They have to do that with this plane as well, and its pretty well documented on Flying Together all those steps are being and will be taken.

NS


User currently offlinehiflyer From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2167 posts, RR: 3
Reply 140, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 8927 times:

Quoting strfyr51 (Reply 137):
Which up to now they haven't

Thanks stryfr51.....so UA did the initial on the 777 in the US as most recent.. Think CO (or DL?) may have done the 764 but that was more a variation on type rather than a whole new design like the 777 or 787. The aircraft was supposed to go to AMS and NRT round trip this week and both canceled so suspect plans are being redone from what was originally publicized.


User currently offlineCaptainstefan From United States of America, joined May 2007, 426 posts, RR: 0
Reply 141, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 8804 times:

I've heard through the grapevine that it will be in Atlanta (!!!) on Saturday between 1000-1900 local time... Can anyone confirm this?


Long Live the Tulip!
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5732 posts, RR: 11
Reply 142, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 8603 times:

Quoting FriendlySkies (Reply 138):
Had CO ever introduced a new type in the US? UA has a lot of history with this (727, 737, DC-10, 767, 777, maybe more)

I'm not really sure how relevant "past experience" is, when you're talking about introducing a 727 and a 737 forty years ago, a DC-10 and a 767 thirty years ago, and a 777 almost twenty years ago.
Most of those people probably don't even still work for UA.

I don't think we can blame CO management's "lack of experience introducing Boeing aircraft to service" for slow-running startup stuff.
Besides, Eastern was one of the startup carriers/launch customers for the Airbus A300, L-1011, and DC-10, and we all know that Eastern-->Continental-->United, so using FriendlySkies's logic, there should be some experience there.


User currently offlineUA767400 From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 143, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 8563 times:

Quoting Captainstefan (Reply 141):

It is supposed to head to EWR....unless it diverts, you won't see it.


User currently offlineiahcsr From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 3408 posts, RR: 42
Reply 144, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 7971 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

0904 flew IAH IAD IAh today...
Nothing posted for tomorrow..
IAH SFO IAH on Monday... Maybe...



Working very hard to Fly Right....
User currently offlinefactsonly From Montserrat, joined Aug 2012, 818 posts, RR: 0
Reply 145, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 7451 times:

UA plans its first Transatlantic B787 flight on 25 Oct 2012 IAH AMS With paying pax.

User currently offlinedrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5162 posts, RR: 8
Reply 146, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 7398 times:

Quoting factsonly (Reply 145):
UA plans its first Transatlantic B787 flight on 25 Oct 2012 IAH AMS With paying pax.

Is this confirmed?



Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineCONTACREW From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 424 posts, RR: 0
Reply 147, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 7384 times:

I don't think it's flying to AMS with paying pax. As its doing a proving run to AMS tonight and won't be back in IAH until Friday.


Flight Attendants prepare doors for departure, cross check verify straps standby for all call
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 148, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 7209 times:

Quoting factsonly (Reply 145):
With paying pax.



Who are these paying pax, FAA? Proving runs have yet to be finished and they have yet to fly it internationally so paying pax is most likely incorrect.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5732 posts, RR: 11
Reply 149, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 7084 times:

Quoting factsonly (Reply 145):

UA plans its first Transatlantic B787 flight on 25 Oct 2012 IAH AMS With paying pax.

You've pulled this out of your... nose.
Revenue flights start November 4, and they're on DOMESTIC runs.
AMS is, indeed, to be the first international trip, but you're mistaken as to the timeline.
Unless there's been some development in the FAA that we don't know about...
...Especially given that the plane has, apparently, yet to leave the country successfully.


User currently offlinefactsonly From Montserrat, joined Aug 2012, 818 posts, RR: 0
Reply 150, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 7063 times:

Quoting AA737-823 (Reply 149):
You've pulled this out of your... nose.
Revenue flights start November 4, and they're on DOMESTIC runs.
AMS is, indeed, to be the first international trip, but you're mistaken as to the timeline.
Unless there's been some development in the FAA that we don't know about...
...Especially given that the plane has, apparently, yet to leave the country successfully.



Well, well......not quite out of my nose ....but from www.united.com


United Flight 7708
Status: On Schedule
DEPARTS:
City: Houston, TX (IAH - Intercontinental)
Gate: C-14
Check-in Terminal:
Scheduled Time: 19:00
Scheduled Date: Wed., 24 Oct., 2012
Estimated Time: 19:00
Estimated Date: Wed., 24 Oct., 2012

ARRIVES:
City: Amsterdam, Netherlands (AMS)
Gate:
Terminal:
Scheduled Time: 11:30
Scheduled Date: Thu., 25 Oct., 2012
Estimated Time: 11:30
Estimated Date: Thu., 25 Oct., 2012

Aircraft: Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner aircraft #3904
Where is this aircraft coming from? San Francisco, CA (SFO), Flight 7708 Check Status
Weather conditions: IAH, AMS


User currently offlineCODC10 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2397 posts, RR: 6
Reply 151, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 7044 times:

Quoting factsonly (Reply 150):

That's a proving flight.

The 'facts' are that United is not yet authorized by the FAA to operate the 787 in commercial service, that is, with revenue passengers.  


User currently offlineCO772 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 25 posts, RR: 0
Reply 152, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 7128 times:

United.com shows it retuning AMS-IAH on Friday 10/26/12. Definitely a proving run w/out paying pax both directions. Hopefully it won't be canceled like the trips to AMS & NRT earlier in the month.

United Flight 7708
Departure Date: Fri., Oct. 26, 2012
Status: On Schedule

Departs:
Amsterdam, NL (AMS)
Scheduled: 9:00 AM
Estimated: 9:00 AM
Terminal:
Gate: NOT YET ASSIGNED
Arrives:
Houston, TX (IAH)
Scheduled: 12:30 PM
Estimated: 12:30 PM
Terminal:
Gate: NOT YET ASSIGNED

Aircraft: Boeing 787 | #3904


User currently offlinedrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5162 posts, RR: 8
Reply 153, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 6991 times:

Quoting factsonly (Reply 150):
Well, well......not quite out of my nose ....but from www.united.com

  
Proving runs. No revenue passengers - united.com places alot of 'odd' sections on the flight status page that are charters or non-revenue runs. Even the 787 delivery flight was on united.com.



Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 154, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 6936 times:

Quoting factsonly (Reply 145):

UA plans its first Transatlantic B787 flight on 25 Oct 2012 IAH AMS With paying pax.


No, it's not. We can't fly the 787 with paying pax yet. We are still in the proving runs phase. What you saw was probably just a flifo status on UA.com.

Putting pax on proving runs would fail our certification.



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 155, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6733 times:

Quoting factsonly (Reply 150):
Well, well......not quite out of my nose



Just the fact!!!! The information you have is from the website which has had from the delivery flight shown where the airplane is next going. UAL7708 is the proving run flight number for United, just because it's listed on the website for UAL means nothing.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 156, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6728 times:

When is Dreamliner #2 supposed to arrive? Is it on the assembly line yet?


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlinesonomaflyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1711 posts, RR: 0
Reply 157, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 6659 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Dreamliner #2 for UA has already taken its B-1 (first flight). It has one or two more Boeing flights then one or two flights by UA crews before delivery.

Aircraft 3 and 4 are awaiting their first flights. Aircraft #5 will be built in the first quarter of next year.

From post 145 of the 787 Production/Delivery thread:

Next Up (Tentative - Subject to Change):
L/N 74 - CC-BBB - 10/xx/2012 - LA #2
L/N 75 - ET-AOS - 10/28/2012 - ET #3
L/N 63 - JA816A - 10/xx/2012 - NH #16
L/N 77 - N26906 - 10/xx/2012 - UA #2

[Edited 2012-10-24 20:00:03]

User currently offlineiahcsr From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 3408 posts, RR: 42
Reply 158, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 6505 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The second delivery, ship 0906, is actually the sixth UA built. The other four have rework to be done first. Deliveries 3 and 4 are currently ships 0902 then 0905.


Working very hard to Fly Right....
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5732 posts, RR: 11
Reply 159, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 6442 times:

Quoting factsonly (Reply 150):


Well, well......not quite out of my nose ....but from www.united.com


United Flight 7708
Status: On Schedule
DEPARTS:
City: Houston, TX (IAH - Intercontinental)
Gate: C-14
Check-in Terminal:
Scheduled Time: 19:00
Scheduled Date: Wed., 24 Oct., 2012
Estimated Time: 19:00
Estimated Date: Wed., 24 Oct., 2012

ARRIVES:
City: Amsterdam, Netherlands (AMS)
Gate:
Terminal:
Scheduled Time: 11:30
Scheduled Date: Thu., 25 Oct., 2012
Estimated Time: 11:30
Estimated Date: Thu., 25 Oct., 2012

Aircraft: Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner aircraft #3904
Where is this aircraft coming from? San Francisco, CA (SFO), Flight 7708 Check Status
Weather conditions: IAH, AMS

Did you not bother to read ANY of the other posts which informed you that you were mistaken?
Hopefully, you'll take the time to read those posts which have been written since you continued in your error... Easy mistake, and I see how you made it, but the truth is that UA is NOT flying pax on 7708. If you'd been following this thread (oh, the joys of the scroll wheel), you'd notice that just about every UA 787 proving flight has used flight number 7708 thus far.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 156):
When is Dreamliner #2 supposed to arrive? Is it on the assembly line yet?

Actually, five UA aircraft are fully constructed; sadly, many require extensive rework, though they're coming along.

Quoting sonomaflyer (Reply 157):
Aircraft 3 and 4 are awaiting their first flights. Aircraft #5 will be built in the first quarter of next year.

Yep, yep!
See the all things 787 website for a very detailed status of 787 assembly, rework, and delivery.
102 787's built... 31 delivered. Sigh.


User currently offlinemax550 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 1148 posts, RR: 0
Reply 160, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 6305 times:

Quoting sonomaflyer (Reply 157):
Dreamliner #2 for UA has already taken its B-1 (first flight). It has one or two more Boeing flights then one or two flights by UA crews before delivery.

Anyone know if they'll have it in time to do the inaugural flights on 11/4? How much time will UA need to have it for before they can put it into revenue service?


User currently offlineaeroblogger From India, joined Dec 2011, 1363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 161, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 6150 times:

Quoting max550 (Reply 160):
Anyone know if they'll have it in time to do the inaugural flights on 11/4? How much time will UA need to have it for before they can put it into revenue service?

As long as delivery takes place by the end of the month, UA has a decent chance at getting the aircraft into service in time.



Airports 2012: IXE HYD DEL BLR BOM CCU KNU KTM BKK SIN ICN LAX BUR SFO PHX IAH ORD EWR PHL PVD BOS FRA MUC IST
User currently offlineORDBOSEWR From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 426 posts, RR: 0
Reply 162, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 6070 times:

Quoting aeroblogger (Reply 161):
As long as delivery takes place by the end of the month, UA has a decent chance at getting the aircraft into service in time.

It is unlikely that happens.
Frankly, I think as long as #2 gets on property by Nov 3rd they will be fine, but the bigger problem will be all of the proving flight (hours) that still need to be done with #1.
They have to do a trip to NRT in the next 5 days after the plane returns from AMS.....


User currently offlinedrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5162 posts, RR: 8
Reply 163, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 6009 times:

Are there any special bids in place for cabin and flight crew for the first revenue flights?


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineua767400 From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 164, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 5885 times:

Quoting ORDBOSEWR (Reply 162):
Frankly, I think as long as #2 gets on property by Nov 3rd they will be fine, but the bigger problem will be all of the proving flight (hours) that still need to be done with #1.
They have to do a trip to NRT in the next 5 days after the plane returns from AMS.....

No, the aircraft has to be on property before 11/3 in order for the IAH-EWR-IAH-SFO-IAH flights to work. Whenever a new aircraft is delivered, there are many things that engineers and mechanics have to do to prepare it for revenue service.

United has openly confirmed (despite the rumors) they are on for all 11/4 flights (pending no maintenance issues arise before then and no weather problems).

3904 will return to IAH tomorrow (10/26), and it is off to NRT on 10/27. It should flyn NRT-IAH on Monday (10/29). I believe NRT-IAH is the last proving run that it has to complete for it to become certified.


User currently onlinemalaysia From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 3334 posts, RR: 0
Reply 165, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 5826 times:

Quoting ua767400 (Reply 164):
No, the aircraft has to be on property before 11/3 in order for the IAH-EWR-IAH-SFO-IAH flights to work. Whenever a new aircraft is delivered, there are many things that engineers and mechanics have to do to prepare it for revenue service.

But I am also seeing IAH-ORD-IAH-LAX-IAH service in the system that week with the 788 not IAH-EWR-IAH-SFO-IAH or am I missing something, or second 788 delivery will be used to fly the other segments?

[Edited 2012-10-25 21:51:41]


There Are Those Who Believe That There May Yet Be Other Airlines Who Even Now Fight To Survive Beyond The Heavens
User currently offlineua767400 From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 166, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 5807 times:

Quoting malaysia (Reply 165):
But I am also seeing IAH-ORD-IAH-LAX-IAH service in the system that week with the 788 not IAH-EWR-IAH-SFO-IAH or am I missing something, or second 788 delivery will be used to fly the other segments?

Yes, it is in the system, but IF the second 787 is not ready in time, the IAH-ORD-IAH route will go as planned.


User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5732 posts, RR: 11
Reply 167, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 5708 times:

Quoting ua767400 (Reply 166):
Yes, it is in the system, but IF the second 787 is not ready in time, the IAH-ORD-IAH route will go as planned.

Any word on LAX on the 5th? That's the only one I care about!!! LOL.


User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3946 posts, RR: 18
Reply 168, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 5707 times:

Maybe something wrong with the plane. Just requested descent and diversion to Keflavik with Shanwick on HF.  Wow!

eta: typo

[Edited 2012-10-26 03:29:11]

User currently offlineiahcsr From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 3408 posts, RR: 42
Reply 169, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 5676 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Could also be an FAA test .. Or the real thing...


Working very hard to Fly Right....
User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3946 posts, RR: 18
Reply 170, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5676 times:

Descending from 390 to 370, re-route from present position to 60n24w then direct KEF. At 61n call Iceland on 127.85.

User currently offlineua767400 From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 171, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5617 times:

Quoting RobK (Reply 168):

More than likely a test by the FAA


User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3946 posts, RR: 18
Reply 172, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5622 times:

Shanwick selcalled him back and asked if he was intending to land at KEF. Flight was extremely weak for me but I believe he said he would be. All seems a bit odd to me. Surely if it was an "FAA test" then they'd just file to KEF from wherever they've come from in the first place, not suddenly request a descent and diversion off their NAT track half way across the pond. I bet the boys at Prestwick had a few choice words for them as they tried to thread them a route across all the other NAT traffic on the parallel tracks for seemingly no good reason at all.

[Edited 2012-10-26 04:22:34]

User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 173, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5597 times:

Quoting RobK (Reply 172):
Surely if it was an "FAA test" then they'd just file to KEF from wherever they've come from in the first place, not suddenly request a descent and diversion off their NAT track half way across the pond


The FAA is looking at all facets of a diversion, so filing to KEF would certainly not check off those boxes the FAA need to verify for certification.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlinedrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5162 posts, RR: 8
Reply 174, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5497 times:

Quoting RobK (Reply 172):
Surely if it was an "FAA test" then they'd just file to KEF from wherever they've come from in the first place, not suddenly request a descent and diversion off their NAT track half way across the pond. I bet the boys at Prestwick had a few choice words for them as they tried to thread them a route across all the other NAT traffic on the parallel tracks for seemingly no good reason at all.

It absolutely is an FAA test. Same thing happened all last week with WN and its proving runs to SJU, the FAA had them divert to other airports in the Caribbean.



Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineCONTACREW From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 424 posts, RR: 0
Reply 175, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5358 times:

Looks like the 787 operating IAH - CLE, IAH - IAD one time service, as well as the inaugural IAH - EWR, IAH - SFO have been scrapped and replaced with either 762 or 764 aircraft.

Planned one-time 787 service on Houston - Cleveland (10NOV12) and Houston - Washington Dulles (17NOV12) will be cancelled and replaced by 767-200ER.

Several planned 787 service in Nov and Dec 2012 also see 762 or 764 operating instead on random dates, including 04NOV12 inaugural on IAH EWR and IAH SFO swapped to 767-400ER.



Flight Attendants prepare doors for departure, cross check verify straps standby for all call