Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Major Upgrades May Be Coming To MDW  
User currently offlineKarlB737 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3105 posts, RR: 10
Posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 9364 times:

A report has surfaced that indicates that some rather expensive improvements may be coming to Chicago Midway Airport. The information first surfaced in the Chicago Sun-Times and then from WBBM. The cost is estimated at 1.1 Billion dollars for these unmentioned improvements. For whatever reason neither article provides the information as to what these improvements might be.

Most everyone here at A-Net is fully aware of the limited real estate at MDW. It also hasn't been that long since the entire passenger terminal was replaced. Given this price tag could it be that the reason that the actual "improvements" are kept secret is because it may have something to do with potential acquisition of some surrounding real estate.

Maybe someone in our large forum has some insight as to what is being proposed. I have included links to both reports below.


Courtesy: WBBM

Major Upgrades May Be Coming To Midway Airport

"The city says the plan is aimed at ensuring that Midway continues to “grow and remain competitive,” the Sun-Times reported. The exact nature of the proposed improvements was not spelled out."

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/09/...s-may-be-coming-to-midway-airport/


Courtesy: Chicago Sun-Times

1.1B Midway Improvements Promised Under New ‘Use Agreement’

http://www.suntimes.com/business/151...mised-under-new-use-agreement.html

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMexicana757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3042 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 9156 times:

Quoting KarlB737 (Thread starter):

Very interesting news.    Many possibilities of what that $1.1 billion could do to improve MDW. I guess the rumor of new terminal can go back on the table. Extension of runways and taxiways to be able to have airlines fly bigger aircraft and have airlines like WN fly to further destinations without weight restrictions on flights. Which means more international destinations... Looks like CDA is going to try and make MDW be more attractive to more airlines.

Would like to know more details on what the proposed improvements will be.   


User currently onlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15745 posts, RR: 27
Reply 2, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 9140 times:

As with every major improvement project for Chicago, I'll believe it when I see it.


Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlinen6238p From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 508 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 9094 times:

I made a thread a few months ago and someone else did even more recent mentioning the sudden clearing out of tenants in the southwest corner of the airport south of 4R. Maybe our suspicions then have something to do with this.


To actively root against anybody is just low, and I hope karma comes back at you with a vengeance
User currently offlineordjoe From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 708 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 9033 times:

The terminal is not that old and perfectly fine. This seems like a waste, we have capacity at ORD and still expanding ORD, the city, nor the state, nor the feds have a bil to piss away. If I were to guess though if this is a billion expansion, they are going to buy some houses to make room.

User currently offlineBeardown91737 From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 542 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 8960 times:

I don't know Emanuel, but up through Richie D, the Mayor was a South Sider (except Byrne) and the big players in the council were South Siders as well. So I tend to believe stories about money going to MDW, especially with the jobs to be generated in City Hall's favorite part of town.

There still is a problem with limited real estate, so maybe we will see Cicero & 63rd tunneled under a runway extension. Would $1.1B do that (with Chicago work rules). The terminal has lots of free space everywhere that WN isn't. They did a great job with that reconfiguration, unlike the moronic reduction of seating capacity at Soldier Field.



135 hrs PIC (mostly PA-28) - not current. Landings at MDW, PIA, JAN.
User currently offlineckfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5239 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 8636 times:

The only upgrade that has been discussed over the last ten years is putting another bridge or two over Cicero Avenue, connecting the terminal and the concourses. The single skybridge means only 1 security checkpoint, which often backs up. If you think about it, Terminal 3 at ORD has 5 checkpoints (one at G, one at L, the two main checkpoints, and the elite/first class checkpoint). So, only at very, very busy times does security get backed up.

User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5824 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 8453 times:

That's quite a wad of cash; the total cost for Dallas Love Field to DEMOLISH and REBUILD the terminal is under $600 million.
So, having flown through MDW last month, I'm having a hard time seeing where I'd personally spend $1.1 billion.
I CAN see, as ckfred said, an additional connector bridge; TSA screening there was very crowded, on a Tuesday afternoon, no less!


User currently offlineEWRandMDW From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 416 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 8404 times:

MDW is my airport of choice in Chicago. Last time I was there was less than a month ago. One thing I know is happening is the parking deck on 55th St. west of Cicero is being greatly expanded. There's also been recent discussion of adding more int'l arrivals gates, perhaps by moving Int'l Arrivals to a separate location.

Then there's serious talk of extending the Orange Line L (check CTA website for details) south from the current terminal at Midway to the Ford City area. The city would have to acquire a good chunk of land for open cut or tunnel and elevated structures. Since one boundary of the airport is only a block away across Cicero Ave, perhaps that road can be once more relocated and the airport moved east. There probably won't be enough room for a runway extension, but there will be room for another terminal concourse.


User currently offlinejcwr56 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 502 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 8322 times:

The key word is "upgrades"...everyone knows how terrible the layout of the checkpoint is, so this is one area that will probably be addressed right from the start.

$1.1B sounds like a lot of money but it's over 15 years and lets look at the cost of inflation eating away at that amount. It's amazing how the work rules here in Chicago will not get you as much for the dollar as other places.

Still, good news for the southside folks.

Here's a link of bids for both ORD and MDW, so as time goes on you'll see where the monies are being spent.

http://www.ohare.com/BusinessInformation/BidAlerts/Default.aspx


User currently offlinemodernart From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 8287 times:

Why don't they build a "Polderbahn" type of runway along and south of W 65th with a connecting taxiway along Cicero?** Of course that would cost at least $5B. Looks to be a mix of vacant land and industrial warehouses.

** Of course I'm only being facetious as I realize that would never happen.


User currently offlinecosyr From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 394 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 6176 times:

I think it would cost more than 1 billion, but could they rework some roads (maybe into tunnels) and extend another 1000 feet to the Northeast corner of the property? It looks like parking lots and warehouse space. Any business would have their pricetag, unlike residents in the houses around all other sides of the property.

User currently offlineMexicana757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3042 posts, RR: 28
Reply 12, posted (1 year 12 months 4 hours ago) and read 3224 times:

Quoting jcwr56 (Reply 9):

The key word is "upgrades"...everyone knows how terrible the layout of the checkpoint is, so this is one area that will probably be addressed right from the start.

I too think this will be one of the first things to be done. Widening the bridge is needed.

Quoting EWRandMDW (Reply 8):
Since one boundary of the airport is only a block away across Cicero Ave, perhaps that road can be once more relocated and the airport moved east. There probably won't be enough room for a runway extension, but there will be room for another terminal concourse.

Shifting Cicero Ave east is probably cheaper than digging a tunnel. If that were to happen I too see room for an extension of either Concourse C or building a new one where the current A4A/B gates are at.

Quoting cosyr (Reply 11):
I think it would cost more than 1 billion, but could they rework some roads (maybe into tunnels) and extend another 1000 feet to the Northeast corner of the property? It looks like parking lots and warehouse space. Any business would have their pricetag, unlike residents in the houses around all other sides of the property.

Probably the best way to extend the runways if CDA has that in the plans. As you said not many houses in the northeast area of the airport. Extending both runways 4R/22L and 4L/22R one can be used for landings and the other for takeoffs. Maybe extend 4R/22L up to 7000 feet and 4L/22R between 6300 and 6500 feet. Of course that would mean shifting both Cicero Ave and 55th Street.

Looking forward to reading what CDA's intentions are in the MDW upgrades.


User currently offlineglbltrvlr From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 732 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 12 months 3 hours ago) and read 3195 times:

Quoting Mexicana757 (Reply 12):
Shifting Cicero Ave east is probably cheaper than digging a tunnel.

I can't see a major shift east with the rail and Ell tracks in the way unless. If you take a look at Google Earth, for $1B you could buy out all the houses on the West, South and bit of the East. They are kind of in a no-mans zone between the airport and industrial areas anyway. The airport would then be bounded on the North and South by 65th and Archer. Finish shifting the south bit of Cicero to the east gets rid of the S turn in the middle and makes room for a small runway extension.


User currently offlinejustplanenutz From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 525 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (1 year 12 months 2 hours ago) and read 3096 times:

Close runway 13L/31R and you can also extend the existing concourses pretty cheaply.

User currently offlinedeltadc9 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 2844 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (1 year 12 months 2 hours ago) and read 3054 times:

For that kind of money you think they could make the ultimate improvement, getting it out of that south side area.


Dont take life too seriously because you will never get out of it alive - Bugs Bunny
User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6764 posts, RR: 32
Reply 16, posted (1 year 12 months ago) and read 2941 times:

Quoting KarlB737 (Thread starter):
Given this price tag could it be that the reason that the actual "improvements" are kept secret is because it may have something to do with potential acquisition of some surrounding real estate.

I think that's the only conclusion which makes sense here. There's not much logic in expanding the terminal since commercial service at MDW will ultimately be limited more by runway capacity than it is by terminal space. The terminal has 43 gates but MDW's AAR is only 32/hour under VMC. The terminal has empty gates so the need for expansion isn't currently there.

Perhaps the plan would be to tunnel 55th and Cicero, take the parking lots, and extend the 4-22's to enhance the airfield capacity. Would it be necessary to move 4L-22R northwest if they wanted to use one for takeoffs and one for landings?


User currently offlinebarney captain From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 966 posts, RR: 12
Reply 17, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2735 times:

"As WBBM Newsradio’s Bob Conway reports, a minimum of $1.1 billion in capital improvements are included under the use agreement proposed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel, according to a Chicago Sun-Times report.

The improvement projects would be paid for by the airlines that operate Midway. They would take up to 15 years, and would clear the way for the carriers to share $22-million in airport revenue."



So $1.1 BILLION in "improvements" is paid for by the "the airlines" so they can then SHARE $22 million.

Awesome. Only a politician would see that as a sound business decision.

Hey why not, let's saddle "the airlines" with even more financial burden. Unbelievable.



...from the Banana Republic....
User currently offlinejcwr56 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 502 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2652 times:

Here's a quote....."The proposal also would lock in participating airlines to pay a total of at least $1.1 billion for ongoing construction projects, including the development of a consolidated car rental area, and future ones such as runway renovations and upgraded security screening stations for passengers, Andolino told aldermen."

User currently offlineneveragain From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2539 times:

The majority of the capital investment at MDW highlighted by Mayor Emmanuel at yesterday's Chicago City Council meeting appears to be fairly standard maintenance and asset renewal/replacement expenditures. Of the $1.1 billion cited in the Mayor's statement, $400 million has been received majority-in-interest approval in accordance with the terms of the lease (see Exhibit N within Exhibit A of the document presented at the city council meeting). Major items on the list and a rough categorization as follows:

$175 million -- residentail sound insulation and noise mitigation (environmental)
$90 million -- rental car facility (expansionary)
$17 million -- property acquisition

Additionally, there are several pavement maintenance, rehabilitiation, and replacement projects and many miscellaneous maintenance and asset replacement projects. Presumably there are several expansionary projects in the yet-to-be-defined $700 million that is forecast over the period for which the lease is valid (01 January 2013 - 31 December 2027) that would include rumored security checkpoint expansion.

While $1.1 billion sounds like a very large sum, the age and condition of the terminal facilities at many airports in the USA will require substantial investments to renew and rehabilitate expensive and unexciting elements of infrastructure, such as terminal mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems and airfield pavements. What seems like a lot of money may only include a few "interesting and exciting" expansion projects, particularly for the many airports nationwide where growth has disappeared.

The lease agreements are publicly available as part of the official record of the city council meeting, along with the agenda, public notice, and (in time) meeting minutes.


User currently offlineMexicana757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3042 posts, RR: 28
Reply 20, posted (1 year 11 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2361 times:

Quoting neveragain (Reply 19):
$17 million -- property acquisition

Wonder what land they are purchasing and for what purpose...   


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
JAL May Be Forced To Drop All European And US Flts posted Fri Apr 2 2010 06:26:40 by FFlyerWorld
BAA May Be Forced To Sell TWO London Airports! posted Fri Aug 15 2008 23:20:22 by Kaitak
BAA May Be Forced To Sell One London Airport posted Tue Aug 12 2008 11:57:28 by Kaitak
Travel Company: Frontier Airlines May Be Forced To Close posted Fri Jul 4 2008 01:21:10 by Caribbean484
BAA May Be Forced To Sell One Or More Airports posted Tue Apr 22 2008 05:24:26 by Smeg
Bankruptcy: Alitalia May Be Next To Go posted Fri Apr 11 2008 10:34:18 by VikingA346
10 A320s For Spring Air (may Be Up To 20) posted Fri Dec 22 2006 06:38:01 by Jimyvr
Mehadrin Airline May Be Launched To Counter El Al posted Tue Dec 12 2006 06:42:43 by Jimyvr
New Airline Restrictions May Be Here To Stay posted Fri Aug 11 2006 19:35:25 by TACAA320
AI May Be Asked To Renegotiate Its Boeing Order posted Thu Dec 15 2005 10:57:11 by UALMMFlyer