Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Swiss To Folllow Lufthansa Low Cost Strategy?  
User currently offlinenyswiss From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 38 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 10637 times:

I'm curious to hear whether Swiss will follow Lufthansa's strategy and be part part of the new model for Lufthansa's low cost approach for Europe ?

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinerunway23 From US Minor Outlying Islands, joined Jan 2005, 2179 posts, RR: 36
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 10607 times:

Quoting nyswiss (Thread starter):

I'm curious to hear whether Swiss will follow Lufthansa's strategy and be part part of the new model for Lufthansa's low cost approach for Europe ?

No they won't. There is enough high yield traffic between ZRH, GVA (and to a lesser extent BSL) to maintain two class products.

The Edelweiss brand already looks after vacation and lower yield traffic.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24760 posts, RR: 22
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 10522 times:

LX had a terrible experience soon after they were created when they switched to a buy-on-board product in Y class within Europe in an effort to cut costs and return to profitability (they were losing money heavily then).

It was universally hated by customers, especially the very large number of passengers connecting to/from longhaul international flights. It was totally contrary to the high-quality image LX was trying to portray in the wake of the demise of very high quality Swissair, and the overall image of Switzerland as offering high standards of service. I highly doubt LX will repeat that mistake.


User currently onlineseansasLCY From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2007, 839 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 10491 times:

The RJ100 fleet are already operated by "Swiss European Air Lines" which has a different contract. Maybe they could use this arm?

User currently offlineab1247 From Switzerland, joined Mar 2005, 27 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 10409 times:

In a way, LX will expand its lower-cost wing by the fact that it will replace the RJ100 and the A319 with the new CSeries. By doing this, they will effectively push the A319 traffic into their lower-cost contract with Swiss European Airlines, growing that share of Swiss European from 20 aircraft to 30 (as well as shedding some wet-lease agreements with Helvetic).

They're doing this very quietly, but I think that it will in the end help to reduce costs on the medium/low yield sector quite significantly. SWISS does not do short-term contract crews per their work contracts, so you will not see this anytime soon.

@seansasLCY: I hope that LH will not force LX to make this mistake again...


User currently offlineautothrust From Switzerland, joined Jun 2006, 1587 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 8990 times:

Quoting nyswiss (Thread starter):
be part part of the new model for Lufthansa's low cost approach for Europe ?

They do already. The service has decreased dramatically. I've flown Swissair and Swiss from 1986 until now.

My last flight with LX was horrible and not for a cheap price. Next time i will eventually take the car.



“Faliure is not an option.”
User currently offlineglidepath73 From Germany, joined Mar 2005, 1020 posts, RR: 45
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 8852 times:

I hope LX keeps just the actual standard, despite the possible upcoming stronger downturn in the aviation industry.
It is still better than lot's of other cabin products around the world.
LX actual product, in combination with the very attractive ZRH hub is a cash cow for the LH group. They should not try to make things better in LH's view (it woud only get cheaper and worse in this case).

Greetz,
Patrick



Aviation! That rocks...
User currently offlineIndianicWorld From Australia, joined Jun 2001, 2901 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 8252 times:

Quoting autothrust (Reply 5):
They do already. The service has decreased dramatically. I've flown Swissair and Swiss from 1986 until now.

My last flight with LX was horrible and not for a cheap price. Next time i will eventually take the car.

Welcome to the world of modern day aviation  

Its no different to nearly every other carrier out there.


User currently offlinetmcn From Belgium, joined Jan 2009, 27 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5907 times:

I wouldn't say LH is low cost. Try AF, IB or the real low cost airlines, in my opinion LH short-haul is still one of the better products.

User currently offlineLHCVG From United States of America, joined May 2009, 1541 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5532 times:

Quoting glidepath73 (Reply 6):

I don't get the impression LX is necessarily under the axe for wholesale changes. To me, LH's statements are simply reflective of the reality that a massive global airline has to achieve some cost savings. That seems very much like what we see here in the U.S.: much as we like to gripe about poor service quality on U.S. carriers, I don't see how they could offer world-leading service on every single route everywhere given the highly variable profitability of various routes. Same goes for longhaul F - notice how LH is moving in the direction of the remaining 3-class U.S. airlines, where only certain routes will see 3-class from here on out.

Now back to LX: since they are more a niche, luxury carrier (not a mass-market airline flying everywhere, and they try to maintain a higher level of quality even if that means higher fares), I think they can support a less "efficient" operation in the minds of LH management. Sure, there will be some re-alignments and savings, such as C-series planes replacing some small mainline aircraft, but as the "luxury" carrier within LH group, they are probably safer overall because they aren't chasing every last pax and are more apt to cherry-pick routes.


User currently offlineSandroZRH From Switzerland, joined Feb 2007, 3427 posts, RR: 50
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day ago) and read 5197 times:

Quoting seansasLCY (Reply 3):
The RJ100 fleet are already operated by "Swiss European Air Lines" which has a different contract. Maybe they could use this arm?

Not possible. Our contract limits the amount of seats Swiss European is allowed to offer per plane. Even the CSeries will have to be re-negotiated.


User currently offlinerunway23 From US Minor Outlying Islands, joined Jan 2005, 2179 posts, RR: 36
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day ago) and read 4709 times:

Quoting SandroZRH (Reply 10):
Not possible. Our contract limits the amount of seats Swiss European is allowed to offer per plane. Even the CSeries will have to be re-negotiated.

In any case if LX do dump 319s for CS100s, they will be forced to add additional 320s (at least 7 to make up for the lost 319s in the short haul Airbus fleet).

Therefore if Swiss European goes from a fleet of 20 aircraft to one of 30 (which it seems would be the case), I am sure LX mainline union will want at least 10 to 15 new Airbus 320s or 321s, or some additional widebodies.

How LX will find enough staff to crew these new planes is another question.


User currently offlinelaca773 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 4002 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 22 hours ago) and read 3830 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I don't see LX going with LH's non-hub LC strategy. LX's market is much, much smaller than LH's in terms of domestic routes served. Further, when LX attempted to operate with a BOB, and etc., their loyal customers, FFs were very disenchanted by it. Obviously, that experiment was deemed a failure and quickly disposed of.

User currently offlineSemaex From Germany, joined Nov 2009, 823 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 19 hours ago) and read 2677 times:

Quoting SandroZRH (Reply 10):
Not possible. Our contract limits the amount of seats Swiss European is allowed to offer per plane. Even the CSeries will have to be re-negotiated.

Are you sure? I remember LH and CLH in talks about the maximum seats a "regional" subsidiary can offer, but the terms were re-negotiated in CLHs favour (as can be seen with the introduction of the Embraers).


On topic: I think the OP may be mixing up the SCORE-program (in which Swiss definitely takes part in) with the rumours around "direct4U", which is aiming at the LCCs and namely 4U and EW, where LX better stays an untouched holy grail, because neither their product nor their numbers justify putting them in the low cost corner.

[Edited 2012-09-24 12:26:55]


// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24760 posts, RR: 22
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 18 hours ago) and read 2515 times:

Quoting LHCVG (Reply 9):
Now back to LX: since they are more a niche, luxury carrier (not a mass-market airline flying everywhere, and they try to maintain a higher level of quality even if that means higher fares),

That's not really accurate, especially within Europe where their Y class product is no better than their major non-LCC competitors (leaving aside a couple of major carriers like SAS and Iberia that are buy-on-board). LX fares are also often just as low as other carriers. Many of their longhaul routes also depend heavily on 6th freedom connecting traffic via ZRH, just like KL via AMS. Those fares are often much lower than their O&D fares to/from Switzerland.

Even in Switzerland, few passengers are willing to pay a premium to fly LX. Price is the major factor these days which is why EasyJet is now by far the largest operator at GVA with about 40% of the traffic, far ahead of LX which only accounts for about 15% of GVA passengers.


User currently offlineLHCVG From United States of America, joined May 2009, 1541 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 17 hours ago) and read 2489 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 14):

I'll admit the LX intra-Europe stuff I don't know about, but my point is that LX is clearly a little brother to LH in terms of scale that selectively chooses which markets (at least longhaul ones) to serve. Operationally, that helps a lot because when you're not serving every possible destination for connectivity reasons, by definition you'll have much less pressure to keep costs strictly in line. That's why I made an analogy between LH and major U.S. carriers - the sheer number of destinations and routes served is far too large to have a unified product, and there will inevitably be some marginal routes. You need to make up that difference somewhere when you can't as easily bow out of a given market entirely.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
All Nippon Airways To Start Asian Low Cost Carrier posted Tue Mar 25 2008 18:12:25 by SINGAPORE_AIR
Emirates To Manage New Low -Cost Carrier posted Tue Mar 18 2008 11:28:55 by Beaucaire
US To India: New Low Cost Carrier posted Fri Jun 16 2006 06:25:16 by Aseem
Hansi, Lufthansa's Low Cost Offspring posted Wed Nov 12 2003 22:49:21 by Heavierthanair
Midwest Airlines To Make Its Low-cost Debut posted Wed May 28 2003 05:34:00 by Tekelberry
KLM Announces New Low-Cost Strategy... posted Wed Oct 30 2002 09:08:47 by Singapore_Air
Info On Delta's Low-Cost Strategy posted Fri Aug 9 2002 16:54:46 by Jrlander
Selvaggio To Head New Low-cost Initiative At Delta posted Thu Aug 8 2002 18:51:05 by B747-437B
Deutsche BA’s Low-Cost Strategy Bears Fruit posted Wed Jul 17 2002 10:33:43 by BestWestern
KLM Cuts Fares To Compete With Low-Cost Airlines posted Mon Jul 8 2002 19:46:43 by Singapore_Air