Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ryanair In Trouble In Norway  
User currently offlineSKAirbus From Norway, joined Oct 2007, 1738 posts, RR: 1
Posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 13587 times:

According to NRK, a Hungarian supervisor who worked for Ryanair at Rygge is suing the company for unfair dismissal.

He was accused of manipulating sales onboard and for having one day's unauthorised absence by the airline.

Although the contracts state that Irish law applies when it comes to employment law, the case is going to be heard by a court in Moss (near Rygge) and that the case will be decided according to Norwegian employment law.

A quote by a person who works with employment law in Norway states:

"Ryanair has always claimed that they can just contract away from the laws in any country the employees work in. This has been rejected by the Norwegian judicial authority as long as they live and work in Norway".

Although this particular case is somewhat insignificant in terms of the individual it can have big consequences for Ryanair's operations in Norway as no doubt MOL will throw his toys out of the pram and make all sorts of threats if he actually has to treat his employees with any kind of respect and fairness.

According to the article, Ryanair closed down a base in France after being forced to issue staff with French employment contracts. Unlike Ireland, France and Norway have very strict employment laws.

Could this case have far-reaching implications for their operations in Norway, if Norwegian authorities force Ryanair to handle its employees under Norwegian employment laws?

Article (in Norwegian):

http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/ostfold/1.8334623


Next Flights: LHR-OSL (319-BA), OSL-LHR (319-BA), LHR-CPH (320-BA), VXO-BMA (S20-TF), ARN-CPH (738-SK), CPH-LHR (320-BA)
19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineacelanzarote From Spain, joined Nov 2005, 831 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 13494 times:

If Ryanair loose, it may end up facing other cases in other Counties...be interesting to see how this plays out....


from the Island with sun and great photo's.. Why not visit Lanzarote
User currently offlinevfw614 From Germany, joined Dec 2001, 4003 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 13296 times:

Isn't the question of what law is applicable to a contract in cross-border scenarios not covered by European law?

User currently offlinesmws From Estonia, joined Jun 2012, 66 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 13026 times:

Quoting acelanzarote (Reply 1):
If Ryanair loose, it may end up facing other cases in other Counties...be interesting to see how this plays out....

I doubt Ryanair will lose the case. If the courts don't dismiss the case themselves, I can see Ryanair acting very fast to settle the matter out of court as quickly as possible. Just to avoid a precedent which could, in the future, be used against them in similar matters.


User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14026 posts, RR: 62
Reply 4, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 12817 times:

Quoting SKAirbus (Thread starter):

"Ryanair has always claimed that they can just contract away from the laws in any country the employees work in. This has been rejected by the Norwegian judicial authority as long as they live and work in Norway".

Some years ago they lost a lawsuit in Belgium (it was about the one year probation period FR has, and during which employees can be fired without notice and compensation, versus the 6 months maximum permitted by Belgian law).
Belgian labour court stated that, as long as trhe persons are working and based in Belgium, Belgian law applies.

IIRC, they also lost a lawsuit in Italy, where FR staff formed a union as per Italian law.This is a union site, therefore not impartial, but it gives some ideas:
http://www.itfglobal.org/campaigns/ryan-be-fair.cfm


User currently offlineSKAirbus From Norway, joined Oct 2007, 1738 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 12335 times:

Quoting smws (Reply 3):
I doubt Ryanair will lose the case. If the courts don't dismiss the case themselves, I can see Ryanair acting very fast to settle the matter out of court as quickly as possible. Just to avoid a precedent which could, in the future, be used against them in similar matters.

Remember that employment law in Norway is very orientated towards the employee and even if he/she breached his/her employment contract, if it is contradictory to what is common practice in Norway, then they could still lose.



Next Flights: LHR-OSL (319-BA), OSL-LHR (319-BA), LHR-CPH (320-BA), VXO-BMA (S20-TF), ARN-CPH (738-SK), CPH-LHR (320-BA)
User currently offlineFoxRomeo From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2011, 16 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 10428 times:

Manipulating onboard sales? In other words, stealing... and he's trying to say it's unfair dismissal?

User currently offlinechumley From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 124 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 9552 times:

Quoting vfw614 (Reply 2):
Isn't the question of what law is applicable to a contract in cross-border scenarios not covered by European law?

Norway is not a member of the EU and is not bound by "European Law"


User currently offlineWROORD From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 956 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day ago) and read 8666 times:

I wouldn't worry too much. FR has issues with almost every country about something, but they need to fly to make their profit. I would say they will keep going like nothing ever happened.

User currently offlineSKAirbus From Norway, joined Oct 2007, 1738 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (1 year 12 months 14 hours ago) and read 4508 times:

Quoting FoxRomeo (Reply 6):
Manipulating onboard sales? In other words, stealing... and he's trying to say it's unfair dismissal?

Well if it was day light robbery there would be no grounds for a tribunal in any country, but I think the issue you here is that he/she was accused without there being any concrete proof. Obviously that is acceptable under Irish law. Anyway, watch this space; will be interesting to see how it all pans out.



Next Flights: LHR-OSL (319-BA), OSL-LHR (319-BA), LHR-CPH (320-BA), VXO-BMA (S20-TF), ARN-CPH (738-SK), CPH-LHR (320-BA)
User currently offlineLOWS From Austria, joined Oct 2011, 1157 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (1 year 12 months 13 hours ago) and read 4251 times:

Quoting chumley (Reply 7):
Norway is not a member of the EU and is not bound by "European Law"

No, but it is bound by European Law as a member of the European Free Trade Area and the internal market. That's why FR can base planes in Norway, or fly anywhere within the EU/EFTA from Norway.


User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9393 posts, RR: 29
Reply 11, posted (1 year 12 months 12 hours ago) and read 4012 times:

Quoting LOWS (Reply 10):
o, but it is bound by European Law as a member of the European Free Trade Area and the internal market. That's why FR can base planes in Norway, or fly anywhere within the EU/EFTA from Norway.

Switzerland takes part in that as well, however has a completely different customs regime.

Meaning that the air agreement between the EU and Iceland/Norway/Switzerland will not automatically transfer / make applicable labor laws as well.

It sounds nice that companies can do business in other EU countries but there's still a lot to observe, tax wise, labor laws, etc. The judges may rule different for ground staff than air crews.



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineSomeone83 From Norway, joined Sep 2006, 3390 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (1 year 12 months 12 hours ago) and read 3937 times:

Quoting vfw614 (Reply 2):
Isn't the question of what law is applicable to a contract in cross-border scenarios not covered by European law?

At least the Norwegian court seems to conclude that a contract for person living and working on Norwegian soil must follow Norwegian law, thus why they have decided to process this case.


User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14026 posts, RR: 62
Reply 13, posted (1 year 12 months 12 hours ago) and read 3900 times:

Quoting Someone83 (Reply 12):
Quoting vfw614 (Reply 2):
Isn't the question of what law is applicable to a contract in cross-border scenarios not covered by European law?

At least the Norwegian court seems to conclude that a contract for person living and working on Norwegian soil must follow Norwegian law, thus why they have decided to process this case.

Though if the guy has been caught stealing, Norwegian law or not, he still will get the sack. But the case sets another precedent that FR must obey local laws (even if the law in this case agrees with them) and that they are not a law upon themselves.


User currently offlineSomeone83 From Norway, joined Sep 2006, 3390 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (1 year 12 months 11 hours ago) and read 3836 times:

Quoting MD11Engineer (Reply 13):
Though if the guy has been caught stealing, Norwegian law or not, he still will get the sack

Off course, and it might even be that he was rightfully sacked. As you say, the case in itself is a minor thing, but it sets an important precedent  


User currently offlineLOWS From Austria, joined Oct 2011, 1157 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 12 months 11 hours ago) and read 3813 times:

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 11):
It sounds nice that companies can do business in other EU countries but there's still a lot to observe, tax wise, labor laws, etc. The judges may rule different for ground staff than air crews.

Of course. But if FR were to set up in VIE, for example, they would be bound by Austrian labour law. Just as I would expect them to be in any other EU country. They shouldn't be allowed to try and skirt around the law.


User currently offlineLN-KGL From Norway, joined Sep 1999, 1039 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (1 year 12 months 11 hours ago) and read 3809 times:

For those of you unfamilar with what EU, EFTA and EEA is, I suggest you take a look at this Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Economic_Area

User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9393 posts, RR: 29
Reply 17, posted (1 year 12 months 11 hours ago) and read 3772 times:

Quoting LOWS (Reply 15):
Of course. But if FR were to set up in VIE,

The thing is, they do not "set-up" usually but hide behind handling agents. Was this guy really working for Ryanair itself and is there a local company called "Ryanaor Norway" or a branch office of the Irish firm?

We discussd oin the other thrad that there is reallyno legal adress for FR other than their shabby HQ at Dublin Airport.

Now, we might have here a Hungarian who worked for an Irish company in Norway that officially does not exist in Norway.

BTW, this explains why FR does not serve Switzerland, they would have to establish a corporation chartered under Swiss law. EZY did that.



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14026 posts, RR: 62
Reply 18, posted (1 year 12 months 10 hours ago) and read 3672 times:

Deleted

Filler

Filler

[Edited 2012-09-26 05:03:33]

User currently offlinePoianaMarco From Denmark, joined Jan 2012, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 12 months 9 hours ago) and read 3528 times:

I personally dont see why they have to make such a big drama out of this small thing. Taking in concideration that FR are having WAY to serious problems/complains than this ''poor'' hungarian member just trying to make a few quid in plus, just beacuse the salary s**** and he descides to ´´steal´´ whatsoever.. I mean really, how low could you get?


The secret behind a good working day is happy guests and to know that you have been giving 110% and not just 100 of seri
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ryanair Advertising In TV-series? posted Fri Mar 20 2009 10:33:21 by LH4116
Ryanair Interested In Up To 300 A320 NEOs posted Mon Oct 4 2010 16:55:37 by keesje
Ryanair Interested In Using Carlisle Airport? posted Wed Mar 11 2009 01:30:23 by Gkirk
Ryanair Back In The Market For A 300-plane Order posted Wed Sep 8 2010 09:12:32 by joost
Ryanair Advertising In TV-series? posted Fri Mar 20 2009 10:33:21 by LH4116
Ryanair 737 In Emergency Diversion To Limoges posted Mon Aug 25 2008 22:19:09 by Kaitak
Ryanair Interested In Using Carlisle Airport? posted Wed Mar 11 2009 01:30:23 by Gkirk
Ryanair Interested In AZ's MXP Slots posted Tue Sep 4 2007 17:31:53 by Nycfly75
Ryanair 737 In Emergency Diversion To Limoges posted Mon Aug 25 2008 22:19:09 by Kaitak
Ryanair Incident In Cracow.. posted Tue Aug 28 2007 12:25:57 by Beaucaire
Ryanair Interested In AZ's MXP Slots posted Tue Sep 4 2007 17:31:53 by Nycfly75
Ryanair Incident In Cracow.. posted Tue Aug 28 2007 12:25:57 by Beaucaire
Ryanair In Trouble Over Environmental Claims posted Wed Jul 18 2007 17:42:41 by Revo
Ryanair In Trouble Over Environmental Claims posted Wed Jul 18 2007 17:42:41 by Revo
Mkt Rumor - Ryanair Interested In Air Berlin posted Thu Jul 5 2007 13:48:04 by N1786b
Mkt Rumor - Ryanair Interested In Air Berlin posted Thu Jul 5 2007 13:48:04 by N1786b
Ryanair Landed In TSF Without Left Nosewheel posted Mon Jun 25 2007 23:02:49 by Airblue
Ryanair Landed In TSF Without Left Nosewheel posted Mon Jun 25 2007 23:02:49 by Airblue