Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
International Expansion Plans At SEA  
User currently offlineflybynight From Norway, joined Jul 2003, 1005 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3082 times:

UA used to have more international flights from SEA ( London for example).

I would love to see more direct flights from SEA. Seattle is obviously a destination city (well in the summer) and an important financial center (Boeing, Microsoft, Starbucks, etc).

I am still PO'ed at SK for pulling out a few years ago ( I understand why), but it seems like the following areas could be potential targets for SEA:

- South America
- Australia
- Hong Kong
- various European cities not currently served


Of course AS is the only airline with a true hub at SEA, and as much as I would love to see AS fly 787's around the World, I doubt that will happen anytime soon!!  

Anyone know of expansion plans beyond the recent flight to the Middle East? Or possible logical directs flight from SEA?


Heia Norge!
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineaznmadsci From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 3655 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2901 times:

Quoting flybynight (Thread starter):
Anyone know of expansion plans beyond the recent flight to the Middle East? Or possible logical directs flight from SEA?

DL seems to be the one making the most noise for expanding their international ops out of SEA.

How is NH doing with the 772 into SEA? Is the upcoming 788 right-sizing the flight? Also how is the FI flight? Is it a Summer-seasonal flight or a year-round flight?



The journey of life is not based on the accomplishments, but the experience.
User currently offlinehiflyeras From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 916 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2873 times:

Quoting flybynight (Thread starter):
as much as I would love to see AS fly 787's around the World, I doubt that will happen anytime soon!!

Weird that we both keep having the same dream!   Would love to see AS start service to LHR, NRT, CPH...if only they had the a/c to do it. Where else would you like to see them go?


User currently offlineRoseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9465 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2723 times:

I assume you are more referring to long haul outside of Canada and Mexico. GDL and MEX are possibilities if the market strengthens.

PVG on DL is a rumor that's been floating around. HKG is a possibility as well, but probably to a lesser degree.

I'm curious if there is any opportunity in Europe. AKL might be a possibility with Air New Zealand. QF can't make anything other than LAX work, so I doubt QF would be in SEA.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineflybynight From Norway, joined Jul 2003, 1005 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2491 times:

Quoting hiflyeras (Reply 2):
Also how is the FI flight? Is it a Summer-seasonal flight or a year-round flight?

It flies all year.

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 3):
Weird that we both keep having the same dream! Would love to see AS start service to LHR, NRT, CPH...if only they had the a/c to do it. Where else would you like to see them go?

I guess with all the partner airlines it is unlikely.
I would think AS would be served well to Japan and Hong Kong at least. I would also think Costa Rica and other locations in Central America.
Europe - definitely London!
NA - Toronto and Detroit.



Heia Norge!
User currently offlinehiflyeras From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 916 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2437 times:

Quoting flybynight (Reply 4):
I guess with all the partner airlines it is unlikely.
I would think AS would be served well to Japan and Hong Kong at least. I would also think Costa Rica and other locations in Central America.
Europe - definitely London!
NA - Toronto and Detroit.

With the DL partnership it makes it hard not to step on any toes...internationally they fly to pretty much anywhere that is practical out of SEA (HKG withstanding). That said I think you'll see SEA-DTW sooner than later.


User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 2954 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2414 times:

Quoting hiflyeras (Reply 5):
That said I think you'll see SEA-DTW sooner than later.

The realistic international destinations that I could see AS starting from SEA would be GDL, MEX and YYZ maybe. Maybe QX could consider a few smaller destinations like Comox and Regina, etc.

I don't see AS changing their successful business model to add 787s, as much as we'd all like to see it.

Is DTW coming before RDU, SLC, OKC, PIT, CVG, MEM, TPA and BWI?  


User currently offlineER757 From Cayman Islands, joined May 2005, 2484 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2336 times:

Quoting flybynight (Thread starter):
- various European cities not currently served

A lot of the major European cities are already served: LHR, FRA, CDG, AMS - KEF is part of Europe too, no? - SK pulled out of SEA leaving somewhere in the Scandanavian countries open for the taking I guess. Large population in the SEA area but SK couldn't make it work so maybe not that many traveling there? Or was SK's fare structure too high? I don't know. I can't really see really prime European destination to be added to the above mix.

Quoting aznmadsci (Reply 1):
How is NH doing with the 772 into SEA?

A nit-pick here, it's a 77W til the 787 takes over next week, not a 772.


User currently offlinenomorerjs From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 439 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2307 times:

South America, probably not going to happen. Look at LAX and SFO and see the minimal service there (and they have more Asia traffic and O&D - not major to deep South America to begin with).
Asia, definately opportunities.
Australia / New Zealand / Oceania, probably not going to happen.
Europe, geography hinders SEA. Carriers will route via LHR, JFK, and ORD.

Seattle is a great town and has great substitute NFL scab referees, but that doesn't fill a flight to GRU, MXP, or AKL.


User currently offlineaznmadsci From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 3655 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2244 times:

Quoting ER757 (Reply 7):
it's a 77W til the 787

I wasn't quite sure if it was a 77W or 772. Thanks.



The journey of life is not based on the accomplishments, but the experience.
User currently offlineflybynight From Norway, joined Jul 2003, 1005 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 2167 times:

Quoting nomorerjs (Reply 8):
Seattle is a great town and has great substitute NFL scab referees, but that doesn't fill a flight to GRU, MXP, or AKL

Haha, hats off for the best reply (and jab!!) at the Seahawks game..LOL   

I will admit the Seahawks got away with one!!

As for SK - the flight to CPH was usually full (a great airport to transfer from). Very popular flight to Europe. There was an issue with cargo that primarily pulled SK out of SEA. Rotten shame, especially since I am from Norway.



Heia Norge!
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30424 posts, RR: 84
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 2142 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting flybynight (Reply 10):
I will admit the Seahawks got away with one!!

As a SEA native, I consider it payback for the games we were robbed by bad calls - including Super Bowl XL.  


User currently offlinesydscott From Australia, joined Oct 2003, 2905 posts, RR: 20
Reply 12, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2010 times:

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 3):
QF can't make anything other than LAX work, so I doubt QF would be in SEA.


*cough* JFK, *cough* DFW. I'd say that QF is more than happy to keep codesharing with Alaska to Seattle though.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
EK Announces Big Expansion Plans At ITB Berlin posted Tue Mar 16 2010 06:54:25 by SQ_EK_freak
Expansion Plans At HKG? posted Sat Sep 19 2009 12:10:48 by Superhub
Future Route Expansion Plans At PVD Airport... posted Tue Mar 23 2004 03:46:39 by John
Expansion Plans At Eppley posted Thu Feb 14 2002 20:53:09 by Rj777
D/FW Airport Plans For International Expansion posted Tue Jul 17 2012 14:06:36 by GEsubsea
Denver International Airport (DEN) Expansion Plans posted Sun Feb 27 2005 02:55:11 by BA
What Happened To NW's Asian Expansion At Sea? posted Fri Nov 3 2000 00:47:17 by Mason
CLT 2015 Expansion Plans posted Mon Sep 24 2012 11:13:02 by CV880
Is Nigeria Key To Ethiopian Expansion Plans? posted Mon Sep 17 2012 16:40:40 by Alibo5NGN
SeaPort's Plans At PDX? posted Tue Sep 11 2012 13:15:22 by ANA787