Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SNA-Hawaii Services, Possibly WN  
User currently offlineKLAXAirport From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 152 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3469 times:

John Wayne airport has called upon all the airlines that operate into SNA and asked if any airline is interested in operating to Hawaii from SNA. Southwest is possibly interested in this route with their brand new 737-800 ETOPS configured aircraft.

Read the Article:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/southwest-372553-hawaii-jwa.html

Cheers,
KLAXAirport   

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3160 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3457 times:

I thought the 737-800 would have to take uneconomical weight restrictions (e.g. empty seats) out of SNA to Hawaii. Otherwise, AS might already have tried it. The 73G can do it, but neither AS or WN will have these ETOPS equipped.

Will WN be okay with blocking off 20-30 seats westbound?


User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 1444 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3457 times:

I think it is very likely that LAX is added, not sure about SNA though.

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 1):
Will WN be okay with blocking off 20-30 seats westbound?

Probably not which is why I don't think this will happen.

[Edited 2012-09-27 17:05:47]


You will either love or hate the airline industry. If you love it, it will get in your blood and it will never leave.
User currently offlinekgaiflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 4301 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3380 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 1):
I thought the 737-800 would have to take uneconomical weight restrictions (e.g. empty seats) out of SNA to Hawaii. Otherwise, AS might already have tried it. The 73G can do it, but neither AS or WN will have these ETOPS equipped.

Will WN be okay with blocking off 20-30 seats westbound?

AirNav.com shows SNA to have two parallel runways. The longer of the two (1L/19R) is 5701 ft with a displaced threshold for landing. The other (1R/19L) is 2887 feet.

Considering SNA's rather extreme, NIMBY-inspired, noise abatement procedures, I can't see any 737 series plane getting off the ground at maximum fuel and load factor.   


User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5472 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (2 years 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3373 times:

FYI, this subject did get some discussion in this current thread:

SWA Flight Attendants Approve Hawaii (by hiloboy1 Sep 21 2012 in Civil Aviation)

bb


User currently offlineJetAmericaS80 From United States of America, joined Sep 2012, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3278 times:

I don't see AS bothering with this unless there is some sort of subsidy from SNA to help cover the losses from the weight restrictions. Even with subsidies, AS may not even bother. Look at Adak service. They planned on dropping it, even with the subsidy. I am sure once there is a reasonable (notice I say REASONABLE) offer from another carrier, I'm sure Adak will be gone. So even though LA-Hawaii seems like a large gap in Alaska's Hawaii expansion, I think they have made it very clear that the market is simply too crowded and is unlikely to happen anytime soon. Plus, SAN is more than capable of serving the Alaska's SoCal-Hawaii needs!  

JetA



The Best Buy in the Sky, Treat yourself to Jet America!
User currently offlinetsnamm From United States of America, joined May 2005, 629 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3206 times:

How long ago did CO/UA pull out of this route? I believe they also went to OGG or another destination in Hawaii...I don't think it was daily.

User currently offlinekkephart13 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (2 years 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3130 times:

I could see LAX, SAN, and OAK and PHX being the opening WN cities to Hawaii. I wish it would happen, but unless SNA lengthens their runways and lifts some restrictions, i don't see Hawaii in their futures.

User currently offlineTomassjc From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 886 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (2 years 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3076 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting kkephart13 (Reply 7):
I wish it would happen, but unless SNA lengthens their runways and lifts some restrictions, i don't see Hawaii in their futures

that would be a tough one, with the 55 on one end and the 405 on the other end!



When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your eyes turned skyward -Leonardo DaVinci
User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5472 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (2 years 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2939 times:

Quoting JetAmericaS80 (Reply 5):
I don't see AS bothering with this unless there is some sort of subsidy from SNA to help cover the losses from the weight restrictions. Even with subsidies, AS may not even bother

Well, we know that AS hasn't done anything with the route in the last few years (while growing Hawaii big time) so I would think it unlikely that they would, even it some $$ were offered by the local government.

Quoting JetAmericaS80 (Reply 5):
Plus, SAN is more than capable of serving the Alaska's SoCal-Hawaii needs!

I hope even more-so in the not-too-distant future...  

bb


User currently offlineTommyBoy From United States of America, joined May 2000, 154 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2925 times:

Quoting Tomassjc (Reply 8):

Not to be picky, but it's the 73 that's on one end with the 405 on the other end...


User currently offlineTomassjc From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 886 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2853 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting TommyBoy (Reply 10):
Not to be picky, but it's the 73 that's on one end with the 405 on the other end...

No worries, it's been awhile since I lived behind the Orange Curtain.

Tommy in SJC



When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your eyes turned skyward -Leonardo DaVinci
User currently offlineTomassjc From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 886 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2851 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting TommyBoy (Reply 10):
Not to be picky, but it's the 73 that's on one end with the 405 on the other end...

Sorry! It's been awhile since I lived down that way.

Tommy in SJC



When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your eyes turned skyward -Leonardo DaVinci
User currently offlinegmcc From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 190 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2850 times:

Quoting kgaiflyer (Reply 3):
Considering SNA's rather extreme, NIMBY-inspired, noise abatement procedures, I can't see any 737 series plane getting off the ground at maximum fuel and load factor.


AQ did run the 737-700 from SNA to OGG before they went under and from what I have hear it was profitable. Perhaps if AS fleet of 737-700, which they seem to run into SNA on a regular basis, shrinks to that the only run them into SNA maybe they might consider getting them ETOPS. That is a long shot.

Quoting TommyBoy (Reply 10):
73 that's on one end with the 405 on the other end.

The 73 is below ground level so the main runway could be extended over it, however, given that Newport Beach, aka NIMBY town, was given the say on extending the runway that is not going to happen any time soon.


User currently offlineTWA772LR From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 2195 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2813 times:

I guess its AQ that can only make Hawaii to SNA successful. And they are belly up. I flew on CO's OGG-SNA once, it was an awesome redeye, but near empty. I'm certain they made a loss on it


Go coogs! \n//
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26610 posts, RR: 75
Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2473 times:

Quoting kkephart13 (Reply 7):
I wish it would happen, but unless SNA lengthens their runways and lifts some restrictions

None of that will happen. SNA should have been replaced by El Toro years ago, but NIMBY's killed that.

Quoting gmcc (Reply 13):
AQ did run the 737-700 from SNA to OGG before they went under and from what I have hear it was profitable.

Yep. It was pretty much the only trans-oceanic they did that was.

Quoting TWA772LR (Reply 14):
I flew on CO's OGG-SNA once, it was an awesome redeye, but near empty. I'm certain they made a loss on it

Because of a single experience? CO wasn't exactly a fan of non-hub mainline routes.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
WN Route Speculation To And From Hawaii posted Sun May 6 2012 08:56:07 by southwest737500
When Did AA Start Services To Hawaii? posted Fri Jan 6 2012 06:12:26 by pecoua
WN Announces 2nd Round Of EWR Services posted Wed Dec 15 2010 10:13:03 by atrude777
SNA Depatures Do WN Pilots Do Anything Differently posted Fri May 29 2009 10:51:49 by BURules
747 Services From Mainland To Hawaii? posted Tue Feb 24 2009 23:53:56 by EGLboi
Reduced Services To Hawaii posted Tue Oct 7 2008 18:44:48 by LAXdude1023
Rumor: WN To Hawaii? posted Sat May 24 2008 10:35:45 by UA2162
WN 733 At SNA Tonight posted Sat Dec 16 2006 10:23:20 by SWAFA27
WN PHX-SNA Schedule Change posted Thu Feb 23 2006 18:36:01 by RedFlyer
WN Adds New Flight In SNA posted Thu Feb 23 2006 16:47:22 by Wnsocal