Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Foreign Ownership In VS Question  
User currently offlinedeltaflyertoo From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1637 posts, RR: 1
Posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1865 times:

Is there any treaty/law, etc in the UK that would prohibit VS being wholly owned 100% by a foreign interest (say a company in the US, etc). I ask cause their route system (as of now I know its changing) is 100% UK to foreign destinations (vs having an extensive euro network like BA).

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineadg737800 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2008, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1772 times:

There's nothing in UK law to stop complete foreign ownership of VS or any other UK airline as far as I'm aware. The main problem would probably come from some of VS's route authorities. I imagine this could be worked around, just like it seems to have been at KLM, Swiss etc.


Next flights: LCY-EDI-LCY (BA Cityflyer)
User currently offlineSheridan125 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2012, 25 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1754 times:

EU laws require that any airline registered in the EU is majority owned within the EU. Almost all of the Air Services Agreements within which VS operates require "substantial ownership and effective control " to be within UK. So there is absolutely no way that VS or any other EU airline can be more than 49.9% owned outside the EU. There are rare exceptions granted to non-EU airlines when the first EU airline liberalisation came into effect in 1987. I think the only one remaining with this "grandfather approval" is Monarch which is owned entirely in Switzerland.

User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8434 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1748 times:

Quoting adg737800 (Reply 1):
There's nothing in UK law to stop complete foreign ownership of VS or any other UK airline as far as I'm aware. The main problem would probably come from some of VS's route authorities. I imagine this could be worked around, just like it seems to have been at KLM, Swiss etc.

But the EU would block it.


User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7256 posts, RR: 17
Reply 4, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1570 times:

No airline can fly any international route covered by a bilateral air services agreement unless it is at least 50.1 per cent owned by one of the signatories to that agreement. However I believe an EU based airline operating an international route where one of the signatories is the EU is only required to have a minimum of 50.1 per cent EU ownership.

Multi-national airline conglomerates, AF/KL, IAG and Lufthansa Group address these restrictions in their complex corporate structures. So, for example, International Consolidated Airlines Group (IAG) is a Spanish based corporation. When formed it was majority owned (55 per cent) by the former shareholders of British Airways plc. In turn British Airways plc had been majority owned by British individuals and financial institutions. However it had a substantial foreign (mainly American) ownership that was in excess of 40 per cent.

IAG owns 100 per cent of the economic rights of British Airways. However it only owns 49.9 per cent of the British Airways B shares. 50.1 per cent of these shares in which operational control of BA is vested, are owned by a private British registered company.

This structure is illustrated in Slide 63 of a presentation by Willie Walsh (then CEO of British Airways, now CEO of IAG) that can be viewed here:

http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_.../01_ID_2010_Full_presentations.pdf

Because of these restrictions airlines like LH and BA before their merger into the current conglomerates used to monitor foreign ownership of their shares. They published the level of that ownership in their Annual Report. Their Articles of Association gave them the authority to force foreign owners that had bought shares so that the 49.1 per cent barrier was broken to sell sufficient shares to take foreign ownership below that barrier.

I do not know whether the same applies to the likes of IAG but believe that since IAG does not have operational control over BA or IB that this is no longer a requirement.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24075 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1322 times:

Quoting VV701 (Reply 4):
No airline can fly any international route covered by a bilateral air services agreement unless it is at least 50.1 per cent owned by one of the signatories to that agreement.

When LH ownership of LX first reached 50% (now 100%), the Swiss government had to renegotiate all their bilaterals to avoid losing their traffic rights.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Foreign Ownership (49% Cap) In Qantas posted Tue Dec 15 2009 18:58:09 by Cartenz
Foreign Ownership Here In The US posted Tue Aug 13 2002 21:00:42 by KL808
Higher Foreign Ownership Levels In Canada? posted Thu Oct 25 2001 16:37:46 by Mcdougald
India To Allow 49% Foreign Investment In Airlines posted Fri Sep 14 2012 06:51:13 by comorin
Singapore Airlines History In NZ (question) posted Sat Nov 26 2011 23:05:43 by 28L28L
Iran Air - Fuel Bans In Europe Question posted Sun Jan 2 2011 05:32:49 by Yirina77
UA At HKG In 1988 Question. posted Mon Nov 8 2010 06:47:16 by United_fan
VN History In Australia (question) posted Tue Nov 2 2010 09:36:44 by 28L28L
Employees Of Foreign Airlines In The US. posted Thu Sep 9 2010 16:42:45 by Yflyer
Airline Foreign Ownership Issues posted Sat Aug 14 2010 10:50:54 by virginblue4