Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
California Pacific Given Till Feb 2013 To Start-up  
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24888 posts, RR: 46
Posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 8833 times:

Some might recall that the DOT had issued a notice that California Pacific Airlines was required to start up operations by August 25, 2012 or have its authority revoked. ( California Pacific Asks DOT For Start-up Extension (by LAXintl Aug 8 2012 in Civil Aviation) )

Well, CP Air applied with the DOT for a 1-year extension of this start up deadline, and yesterday the DOT responded by giving CP Air till February 25, 2013 to commence service.

In its pleadings, CP Air had stated it continues to work with the FAA on achieving its operating certificate, and also continues down the path of securing $30-50mil in required funding from institutional investors.

In the DOT response, the department noted that its not common practice to grant extensions and the carrier must now meet departments fitness criteria and commence operations by February 25, 2013.
If CP seeks any further delays, it must do so atleast 45-days prior to the this extension deadline.


OST-2010-0126


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineclrd4t8koff From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 225 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 8629 times:

I'm not one to judge anybody and I admire people who go after their dream, but why would anyone think the US market would need yet another airline, and they would be anymore successful than the slew that's failed before them?   

User currently offlinediverdave From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 321 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 8542 times:

Quoting clrd4t8koff (Reply 1):
I'm not one to judge anybody and I admire people who go after their dream, but why would anyone think the US market would need yet another airline, and they would be anymore successful than the slew that's failed before them?

That would be a great question for Sir Branson and the investors in VX.  

More seriously, CP Air wants to operate unserved direct routes from a small airport in a populous area. There could be a niche market there.

If they are needing to raise $30 to $50 million in today's financial climate, that's going to be a challenge. And they have five months to get it done.

David


User currently offlineLHCVG From United States of America, joined May 2009, 1546 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 8526 times:

Quoting diverdave (Reply 2):

I agree - I am very much a skeptic of start-up airlines here, but in this case they MAY have an untapped niche. I think the game's up if they get any meaningful competition, but it could be fun for a while.


User currently offlinecedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8060 posts, RR: 54
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 8452 times:

I thought they were much closer than this. The aircraft is painted and delivered, is it not? I remember the airline's high-fiving thread about the delivery / open day. My Facebook page was spammed by all my SoCal spotter friends posting pics from their walk-through of the aircraft.

I agree the niche could work, lots of money and a very mobile population in Carlsbad. Then again United Express to San Fran or Delta Connection to Salt Lake and they're toast - frequent flier miles, global connections, and - cos it's that important - frequent flier miles again.

And just to get this off my chest, I think it's a dumb name. Eight syllables before you even get to Airlines or Air or whatever it is. But what irks me is how redundant it is. Pacific? Well, what else would it be, California Atlantic? California Arabian Sea? It's like saying "PIN number" or "ATM machine" - which is called RAS Syndrome (Redundant Acronym Syndrome Syndrome) btw. What's wrong with CalAir or Pacific Airlines? California Pacific Airlines is like a fake airline name from a disaster movie. No one would name a real airline with such a laborious tongue-twister of a name. Well let's hope it doesn't turn out to be a disaster movie for it's investors, or the next lot, which we hope will get it into the air at last.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAS_syndrome



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlinerampart From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 3109 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 8381 times:

Quoting cedarjet (Reply 4):
And just to get this off my chest, I think it's a dumb name. Eight syllables before you even get to Airlines or Air or whatever it is. But what irks me is how redundant it is. Pacific? Well, what else would it be, California Atlantic? California Arabian Sea? It's like saying "PIN number" or "ATM machine" - which is called RAS Syndrome (Redundant Acronym Syndrome Syndrome) btw. What's wrong with CalAir or Pacific Airlines? California Pacific Airlines is like a fake airline name from a disaster movie. No one would name a real airline with such a laborious tongue-twister of a name.

Good grief, what a rant!
Canadian Pacific? Canadian North? Cathay Pacific? British Mediterranean? Air Atlanta Icelandic? Pacific Coastal? All but BMed fit into the Department of Redundancy Department, but big deal! I personally like those kinds of names, harkens back to old descriptive railroad names, like Colorado and Southern, Burlington Northern, Lehigh and Hudson.

-Rampart


User currently offlinemtnwest1979 From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 2434 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 8323 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Well , the name indicates the two areas hey want to serve: California, and a bit larger Pacific area of North America ( Baja, Arizona, future to PNW maybe). Whereas your examples ( California Atlantic, etc) would be for an LAX-BOS line for example. So I do not see a redundancy here.
I always was a fan of the Pacific Cal Air name from early '80s. Ill-conceived idea, but liked the name.



"If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
User currently offlinehhslax2 From Bahrain, joined Jan 2012, 122 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 8311 times:

Quoting diverdave (Reply 2):
More seriously, CP Air wants to operate unserved direct routes from a small airport in a populous area. There could be a niche market there.

Many people in north San Diego county prefer CLD to SAN. I'm flying into CLD from BAH later this month. The terminal at CLD is better than the UA pier in terminal 1 at SAN.


User currently offlineridgid727 From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 1112 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 8139 times:

Quoting LHCVG (Reply 3):
And just to get this off my chest, I think it's a dumb name

Many would wager that "cedarjet" is a dumb name too, although they don't let it bother them publicly.
Many airlines have names assocaited with the area they are from or are operating service from.


User currently offlinediverdave From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 321 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days ago) and read 7978 times:

Quoting rampart (Reply 5):
Good grief, what a rant!
Canadian Pacific? Canadian North? Cathay Pacific? British Mediterranean? Air Atlanta Icelandic? Pacific Coastal? All but BMed fit into the Department of Redundancy Department, but big deal! I personally like those kinds of names, harkens back to old descriptive railroad names, like Colorado and Southern, Burlington Northern, Lehigh and Hudson.

Don't forget Pacific Southwest Airlines and their Super Smile.  http://www.jetpsa.com/radio/COS81.mp3

David

[Edited 2012-10-02 16:37:20]

[Edited 2012-10-02 16:39:28]

User currently offlinemariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25012 posts, RR: 85
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days ago) and read 7948 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
In its pleadings, CP Air had stated it continues to work with the FAA on achieving its operating certificate, and also continues down the path of securing $30-50mil in required funding from institutional investors.

I'm a bit confused, I don't understand the legalities here. I understand the money side, but if CP Air does not have its operating certificate from the FAA yet, how can the DOT insist that they fly?

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlinePlanesNTrains From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 5456 posts, RR: 29
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 7705 times:

California Pacific is long? Lol. Try Great Northern Pacific & Burlington Lines, which fortunately was tossed in favor of Burlington Northern.  

I don't think this bodes well for them. How many airlines get planes painted but never inaugurate service?

-Dave



Next Trip: SEA-ABQ-SEA on Alaska
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7233 posts, RR: 17
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 7640 times:

I'm interested to see our in-house CP Air member's opinion on this.

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
In its pleadings, CP Air had stated it continues to work with the FAA on achieving its operating certificate, and also continues down the path of securing $30-50mil in required funding from institutional investors.

What's taking so long for them? What seems to be the issue?

Quoting LHCVG (Reply 3):
I agree - I am very much a skeptic of start-up airlines here, but in this case they MAY have an untapped niche. I think the game's up if they get any meaningful competition, but it could be fun for a while.

Yeah once they even get started up too, their service isn't used well and because of the costs and lack of fliers, they end up going under eventually.



One of the FB admins for PHX Spotters. "Zach the Expat!"
User currently offlineridgid727 From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 1112 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 7616 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 12):

Yeah once they even get started up too, their service isn't used well and because of the costs and lack of fliers, they end up going under eventually.

or become an express or connection carrier for smeone else.


User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24888 posts, RR: 46
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 7531 times:

Quoting mariner (Reply 10):
I'm a bit confused, I don't understand the legalities here. I understand the money side, but if CP Air does not have its operating certificate from the FAA yet, how can the DOT insist that they fly?

Yes good question.

Basically the DOT requires that once the economic authority has been granted, a prospective air carrier has 12-months to satisfy remaining fitness conditions including achieving its FAA AOC, getting the required money in the bank and launching commercial services.

Failing to meet this 12-month criteria places the authority back into dormancy or essentially being revoked. Baring an extension, the carrier would then need to restart the process to earn its economic authority back.

Seems CP did not have its eggs lined up in the right order. It took them 15 months to achieve the economic authority, but its been going on 29 months now to get the AOC. Last I heard according to their filings they were looking at late Q1 2013 as a target for that.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently onlineusxguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1010 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 7528 times:

Mariner, there are two parts of regulations for an air carrier.

First is operations - that's the FAA portion. And where you hear Part 91, 119, 121, 135 etc all come from -- those are the "rules" that each airline operates under.

Second part is economic authority - the US DOT reviews the business plan & financial fitness of an airline. The DOT has limitations for smaller carriers (up to 60 seats) and larger operators with set guidelines for both. This is also where DOT 380 operations come from - basicly ad-hoc/limited service that mocks scheduled service.

Both go hand-in-hand, but just because you have one doesn't mean you have the other.



xx
User currently offlineLHCVG From United States of America, joined May 2009, 1546 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 7459 times:

Quoting ridgid727 (Reply 13):
or become an express or connection carrier for smeone else.

Sadly that will probably be the eventual fate for these guys. I see this going in 3 phases:

-Phase 1- the honeymoon where it's a hip new carrier and things look bright

-Phase 2- the model begins to run out of steam as the independent revenue stream tops out and fails to support the envisioned level of service or future expansion. Somewhere along the line (years probably) they eventually have to link up with a larger carrier(s) to prop themselves up by bringing in that additional business from codeshare traffic.

-Phase 3- At some point, they begin a death spiral of becoming ever more dependent on these codeshare/alliance agreements to survive. Routes, planes, and crews get trimmed down as more and more routes that aren't sustainable without heavy codeshare traffic get axed. They eventually end up as another regional serving under the banner of a major carrier's connection brand, ceasing to exist as an independent carrier, save perhaps for a handful of OO-style at-risk flights on the side.


User currently offlinemariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25012 posts, RR: 85
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 7454 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 14):
Yes good question.
Quoting usxguy (Reply 15):
Mariner, there are two parts of regulations for an air carrier.

Thanks, both. I get it now. Or - I think I do.

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlinejamake1 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1005 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 6466 times:

Quoting rampart (Reply 5):
Good grief, what a rant!
Canadian Pacific? Canadian North? Cathay Pacific? British Mediterranean? Air Atlanta Icelandic? Pacific Coastal? All but BMed fit into the Department of Redundancy Department, but big deal! I personally like those kinds of names, harkens back to old descriptive railroad names, like Colorado and Southern, Burlington Northern, Lehigh and Hudson.

And my favorite name: British Caledonian



United's B747-400. "She's a a cruel lover."
User currently offlineLHCVG From United States of America, joined May 2009, 1546 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5336 times:

Quoting jamake1 (Reply 18):
And my favorite name: British Caledonian

  

Both name and logo/livery!


User currently offlineGoldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5970 posts, RR: 14
Reply 20, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5177 times:

Quoting LHCVG (Reply 16):

-Alternative phase 3:

Instead of becoming another regional carrier, I could see them get bought out by another regional to either a) get rid of competition by merging them into an existing carrier, or b) dissolving them for the assets.

[Edited 2012-10-03 06:27:13]


Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
User currently offlineLHCVG From United States of America, joined May 2009, 1546 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 5042 times:

Quoting Goldenshield (Reply 20):

-Alternative phase 3:

Instead of becoming another regional carrier, I could see them get bought out by another regional to either a) get rid of competition by merging them into an existing carrier, or b) dissolving them for the assets.

Yep that too! I was just getting at the fact that I believe they are destined to get co-opted or swallowed up eventually. This whole small, independent airline business is just not sustainable IMHO.


User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6713 posts, RR: 32
Reply 22, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4190 times:

Quoting usxguy (Reply 15):
Second part is economic authority - the US DOT reviews the business plan & financial fitness of an airline. The DOT has limitations for smaller carriers (up to 60 seats) and larger operators with set guidelines for both. This is also where DOT 380 operations come from - basicly ad-hoc/limited service that mocks scheduled service.

Both go hand-in-hand, but just because you have one doesn't mean you have the other.

This is basically why I'm still puzzled that California Pacific didn't go the route of having an existing regional carrier (most likely Republic/Shuttle America if they wanted the E170) operate the service. Obviously they'd be stuck with paying a profit margin to the regional carrier, but then a small operation with a handful of jets carries some significant overhead.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24906 posts, RR: 22
Reply 23, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3315 times:

Quoting LHCVG (Reply 21):
This whole small, independent airline business is just not sustainable IMHO.

Reminds me of Baltia which was first granted route authority more than 21 years ago and still hasn't started service.
http://www.baltia.com/

1991 news item re approval of their route authority.
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/06/06/bu...t-union.html?ref=baltiaairlinesinc

When they first announced their launch, Russia was still the Soviet Union and their planned primary destination, St. Petersburg, was still known as Leningrad.


User currently offlineDarksnowynight From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1347 posts, RR: 3
Reply 24, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3226 times:

Quoting cedarjet (Reply 4):
California Pacific Airlines is like a fake airline name from a disaster movie.

Any airline sounds like that if you try hard enough...

Quoting PlanesNTrains (Reply 11):
I don't think this bodes well for them. How many airlines get planes painted but never inaugurate service?

Well, there was this disaster...



Posting without Knowledge is simply Tolerated Vandalism... We are the Vandals.
25 ridgid727 : Actually if they had pulled a page out of the Morris Air Handbook, and contracted with another carrier to operate the service until they got their ow
26 mariner : I suspect that given the age (and fortune) of the founder it should really be called Vanity Airlines. But that's okay - it's his seed money, he can c
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lufthansa To Start-up Airline In India? posted Sun Jul 16 2006 12:15:20 by Johnny
Air Nepal To Start Up With 767 posted Tue Jul 12 2005 21:52:47 by HighFlyer9790
JetBlue Airways To Start Up In Newark posted Tue Jul 12 2005 11:44:09 by Laxintl
US Air To Start Up Routes To OGG posted Mon Jun 20 2005 00:35:03 by FlyHI777
Royal Airways To Start Up posted Fri Aug 22 2003 22:56:34 by Vimanav
Argentine Members: S.Winds To Start Up LH Flights! posted Mon May 21 2001 13:52:22 by Capt.Picard
California Pacific Asks DOT For Start-up Extension posted Wed Aug 8 2012 09:03:53 by LAXintl
Delta Asks To Further Delay Guangzhou Start-up posted Tue Aug 21 2012 16:08:24 by LAXintl
MSY Numbers Up To Start '12 posted Thu Apr 26 2012 16:57:38 by MSYtristar
WN To Start ICT In 2013 posted Fri Jan 13 2012 10:22:15 by TSRA