Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
KL Asia: Chinese Characters Under Their Name?  
User currently offlineolddominion727 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 382 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2866 times:

What are the Chinese characters under the KLAsia on the aircraft?

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2783 times:

That's 荷蘭亞洲航空公司, which is the chinese translation of KLM Asia.

User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7474 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2500 times:

Just a question, why does KL need an "Asia" division? I thought it was something about overflying China, but AF and other euro airlines have done this for years, right?


次は、渋谷、渋谷。出口は、右側です。電車とホームの間は広く開いておりますので、足元に注意下さい。
User currently offlinemeta From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 337 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2475 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 2):
Just a question, why does KL need an "Asia" division? I thought it was something about overflying China, but AF and other euro airlines have done this for years, right?

They have KLM Asia so that they can fly directly over China to Taiwan rather than having to go around. It has to do with Chinese politics and not making them angry.


User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2475 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 2):
Just a question, why does KL need an "Asia" division? I thought it was something about overflying China, but AF and other euro airlines have done this for years, right?

That's because KLM wants to fly PRC and ROC at the same time and it's not permitted either by PRC or ROC. And KLM is the only european carrier flying to ROC now. So they established a new entity which is KLM Asia and avoided the problem. In fact, even Air China, the flag carrier of PRC, has to cover its flag on the planes that are used to fly ROC.

[Edited 2012-10-02 19:37:34]

User currently offlineinfinit From Singapore, joined Jul 2008, 560 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2475 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 2):

Just a question, why does KL need an "Asia" division? I thought it was something about overflying China, but AF and other euro airlines have done this for years, right?

It has something to do with The China government not allowing airlines to fly into China if they're also doing Taiwan. Hence a different "subsidiary" has to be created.

But maybe it's something that goes on behind close doors because SQ or TG seem to be exempted for example. They both fly to both countries without a different paint scheme or what not.. and knowing how SQ at least guards its brand zealously, they'd probably rather not fly there than change the slightest bit of their livery.

I think its terrible that KLM would compromise their branding like this. So much for being the oldest airline to still use its original name.


User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7474 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2430 times:

Quoting infinit (Reply 5):
I think its terrible that KLM would compromise their branding like this. So much for being the oldest airline to still use its original name.

Agreed.

Quoting justinlee (Reply 4):
That's because KLM wants to fly PRC and ROC at the same time and it's not permitted either by PRC or ROC. And KLM is the only european carrier flying to ROC now. So they established a new entity which is KLM Asia and avoided the problem. In fact, even Air China, the flag carrier of PRC, has to cover its flag on the planes that are used to fly ROC.
Quoting meta (Reply 3):

Ahhh, the "Peoples" Republic of China      



次は、渋谷、渋谷。出口は、右側です。電車とホームの間は広く開いておりますので、足元に注意下さい。
User currently onlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15735 posts, RR: 27
Reply 7, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2408 times:

Quoting infinit (Reply 5):
It has something to do with The China government not allowing airlines to fly into China if they're also doing Taiwan. Hence a different "subsidiary" has to be created.

Not all airlines, just flag carriers I think. There used to be Swissair Asia, British Asia Airways, and a Qantas subsidiary too, among others, all with the flags removed so the national flag carrier would not operate to both China and Taiwan. American carriers, not having an official flag carrier, didn't have this issue.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25170 posts, RR: 22
Reply 8, posted (1 year 11 months 6 hours ago) and read 1774 times:

Quoting infinit (Reply 5):
I think its terrible that KLM would compromise their branding like this.

What's the alternative? Cancelling service to TPE? Hardly anone notices the aircraft livery and I expect they generate a lot of revenue as the only European carrier serving Taiwan.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25170 posts, RR: 22
Reply 9, posted (1 year 11 months 6 hours ago) and read 1732 times:

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 7):
Quoting infinit (Reply 5):
It has something to do with The China government not allowing airlines to fly into China if they're also doing Taiwan. Hence a different "subsidiary" has to be created.

Not all airlines, just flag carriers I think. There used to be Swissair Asia, British Asia Airways, and a Qantas subsidiary too, among others,

Also Air France Asie (Asia in French)


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © George W. Hamlin
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Remi Dallot



Swissair Asia


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © YK



British Asia Airways


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Brian Wilkes



Australia Asia Airways (QF)


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank C. Duarte Jr.
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Brian Wilkes



Japan Asia Airways (JL)


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Marlon
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alex Pan


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Marc Hasenbein
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bill Blanchard - AirTeamImages



User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7474 posts, RR: 18
Reply 10, posted (1 year 11 months 5 hours ago) and read 1675 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 9):
Japan Asia Airways (JL)

But doesn't JL operate to both PRC and ROC still today?



次は、渋谷、渋谷。出口は、右側です。電車とホームの間は広く開いておりますので、足元に注意下さい。
User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 11 months 5 hours ago) and read 1663 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 10):
But doesn't JL operate to both PRC and ROC still today?

That's because JAL is privatlized after 2000 so it's not the official flag carrier.


User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7474 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (1 year 11 months 4 hours ago) and read 1621 times:

Quoting justinlee (Reply 11):
That's because JAL is privatlized after 2000 so it's not the official flag carrier.

Ohh that makes sense.



次は、渋谷、渋谷。出口は、右側です。電車とホームの間は広く開いておりますので、足元に注意下さい。
User currently offlineQFVHOQA From Australia, joined Mar 2012, 439 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 11 months 4 hours ago) and read 1603 times:

I believe the restriction only applied to carriers that were government owned (even partially). So as AF-KL is part owned by the French government, they seem to still need the "Asia" brand.
If BA start the rumoured LHR-TPE again, I doubt they will need the British Asia Airways brand.
I too wonder why this doesn't apply to Asian carriers, as SQ, TG, MH, GA, VN all fly to TPE.


User currently offlinecloudyapple From Hong Kong, joined Jul 2005, 2454 posts, RR: 10
Reply 14, posted (1 year 11 months 4 hours ago) and read 1584 times:

It's stupid in this day and age given Air China flies to Taipei and China Airlines flies to Beijing.

Air China even has a Taiwanese website in Traditional Chinese and China Airlines has a Mainland website in Simplified Chinese.



A310/A319/20/21/A332/3/A343/6/A388/B732/5/7/8/B742/S/4/B752/B763/B772/3/W/E145/J41/MD11/83/90
User currently offlineinfinit From Singapore, joined Jul 2008, 560 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 11 months 3 hours ago) and read 1530 times:

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 7):
Not all airlines, just flag carriers I think.
Quoting QFVHOQA (Reply 13):
believe the restriction only applied to carriers that were government owned (even partially). So as AF-KL is part owned by the French government, they seem to still need the "Asia" brand.
If BA start the rumoured LHR-TPE again, I doubt they will need the British Asia Airways brand.
I too wonder why this doesn't apply to Asian carriers, as SQ, TG, MH, GA, VN all fly to TPE.

Precisely. If I'm not wrong about 55% of SQ is owned by Temasek Holdings which is pretty much the investment arm of the Sg government. MH is also government owned. So I guess the Asian carriers were exempted somehow

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 8):
What's the alternative? Cancelling service to TPE? Hardly anone notices the aircraft livery and I expect they generate a lot of revenue as the only European carrier serving Taiwan.

Well I'm sure they could negotiate. SQ would never allow their livery to be changed. When they joined Star A and had to paint a few aircraft in Star A colours, they refused to have the Star A logo on the tail, saying their brand is more important. They threatened to leave the alliance otherwise.


User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 11 months 3 hours ago) and read 1505 times:

Quoting QFVHOQA (Reply 13):

Actually PRC and ASEAN has special air transport agreement, or partially open skies. SQ, MH and TG are from ASEAN countries. And both ROC and PRC also has open sky with Japan. I didn't check the details in these agreements but I read some reports that JAL closed JAA because of these agreements.


User currently offlineinfinit From Singapore, joined Jul 2008, 560 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (1 year 11 months 3 hours ago) and read 1490 times:

Quoting justinlee (Reply 16):
Actually PRC and ASEAN has special air transport agreement, or partially open skies. SQ, MH and TG are from ASEAN countries. And both ROC and PRC also has open sky with Japan. I didn't check the details in these agreements but I read some reports that JAL closed JAA because of these agreements.

Ah. so that's why. Now this makes sense.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus: Is Someone Ripping Off Their Name? (photo) posted Thu Jun 1 2006 19:54:05 by SimProgrammer
How Many Airlines Take Their Name Seriously posted Wed Oct 27 2004 22:16:49 by Servisairkid
Airlines That Have Changed Their Name posted Wed Nov 13 2002 00:22:11 by Zrs70
Jersey European Change Their Name! posted Mon May 8 2000 19:43:12 by Jmc757
Why Don't All Airlines Name Their A/C? posted Thu Mar 22 2012 01:27:42 by EY460
What Will Boeing Name Their Aircraft After 797? posted Thu May 6 2010 09:36:27 by jayeshrulz
DL/NW And Their Partnership With AF/KL At AMS/CDG posted Sat Dec 26 2009 11:40:29 by Gilesdavies
How Many Airlines Still Name Their Planes? posted Mon Sep 14 2009 00:17:06 by TFFIP
Where Did KL And LH Fly Their A310s? posted Mon Apr 6 2009 17:12:25 by San747
Golden Girls & Their Flying Machines KL AV QF MX posted Sat Dec 20 2008 15:13:30 by MayaviaERJ190