Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA ATR Withdrawal On MIA-NAS Complete Nov 15th  
User currently offlineN62NA From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4411 posts, RR: 6
Posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 5692 times:

Just downloaded and checked the new AA timetable and MIA-NAS will be all ERJ-145 (and 1 ERJ-140) starting on November 15th.

For a route that traditionally carries a lot of extra passenger bags I wonder how AA will cope with the rather limited baggage capacity on the RJs compared to the ATRs.

31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 5682 times:

Well this sucks. The ATR's were always a rather exotic aircraft to me and it looked so at-home on the ground in NAS with the palm trees and Caribbean setting. Also, in addition to a cargo capacity decrease, isn't this a rather drastic passenger decrease? Will there be any added frequencies?

User currently onlinedoug From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 852 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5629 times:

It looks like most if not all ATR's are gone from MIA all of the flights to JAX and EYW are rj's as NOV 15.

User currently offlineN62NA From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4411 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5595 times:

Quoting doug (Reply 2):
It looks like most if not all ATR's are gone from MIA all of the flights to JAX and EYW are rj's as NOV 15.

Yeah, seems that way.

What's going to happen to all those ATR pilots????


User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6517 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5394 times:

ATRs sell left and right but a company looking for efficiency everywhere replaces them with RJs every other company is trying to sell. Makes sense.


New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlineThomas_Jaeger From Switzerland, joined Apr 2002, 2376 posts, RR: 28
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5365 times:

I guess some of them will be losing their jobs. Interestingly enough until some days ago quite a few flights from MIA where showing with ERJ-140 and ERJ-145 equipment and as operated by Executive Airlines from January onwards, now all has disappeared and is back to American Eagle.


Swiss aviation news junkie living all over the place
User currently offlineacelanzarote From Spain, joined Nov 2005, 820 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 5184 times:

Wonder why AA did not order some ATR72-600´s, surprised they are going down the E145 route with reduced seating/cargo....


from the Island with sun and great photo's.. Why not visit Lanzarote
User currently offlinevikinga346 From Sweden, joined Oct 2006, 515 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 5159 times:

So are we sure the AA are selling all of their ATRs?


...you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you shall return
User currently offlinepar13del From Bahamas, joined Dec 2005, 7050 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 5126 times:

Quoting N62NA (Thread starter):
For a route that traditionally carries a lot of extra passenger bags I wonder how AA will cope with the rather limited baggage capacity on the RJs compared to the ATRs.

Loss in revenue on the bags is a given, having less cargo capacity will not force travellers NOT to purchase in Mia and carry home. Bahamians for example also ship a lot of stuff home via boat, take a look at South River drive, so it is not as if flying with excess bags is our only option.

On the number of seats, time will tell, certainely the jets are more expensive to operate on these short flights, certainely the busy xmas season will show how this should shake out next year.


User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 5095 times:

Quoting vikinga346 (Reply 7):
So are we sure the AA are selling all of their ATRs?

Thee are a good number of them sitting at AvCraft Technical services in MYR waiting for a new home so I know don't know if they are selling ALL of them, but they are selling a good deal of them.


User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11411 posts, RR: 62
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 5013 times:

Quoting N62NA (Thread starter):
Just downloaded and checked the new AA timetable and MIA-NAS will be all ERJ-145 (and 1 ERJ-140) starting on November 15th.

Yes. Looks like all of the new LAX SkyWest Eagle flying has also now been fully loaded.

Quoting N62NA (Thread starter):
For a route that traditionally carries a lot of extra passenger bags I wonder how AA will cope with the rather limited baggage capacity on the RJs compared to the ATRs.

I would guess that AA analyzed the situation and determined that any extra revenue that could be derived from larger bag and/or cargo capacity on these flights still did not justify the added cost of a fleet of old, maintenance-intensive, and costly ATR72s, particularly since there are so few of them left.

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 1):
The ATR's were always a rather exotic aircraft

You say "exotic." I say "awful." Most of Eagle's ATRs are horribly outdated and had not been refurbished in years. They are badly showing their age.

Quoting Aesma (Reply 4):
ATRs sell left and right but a company looking for efficiency everywhere replaces them with RJs every other company is trying to sell. Makes sense.

It does make sense. The ATRs selling "left and right" are brand new, substantially upgraded, and more fuel efficient models, not the ancient vintage of ATR72 that Eagle flies.

Quoting acelanzarote (Reply 6):
Wonder why AA did not order some ATR72-600´s, surprised they are going down the E145 route with reduced seating/cargo....

I suspect RJs are not the permanent solution for replacing the ATR72s, but rather an interim measure until AMR has the time to analyze a more suitable long-term replacement for many of the former ATR missions - they will probably go with either new ATR72s or Q400s. Ultimately, given where the economics of 50-seat jets are going, AMR will probably, in the long-run, end up replacing a lot RJ capacity with large turboprops, not the other way around.


User currently onlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 1370 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4966 times:

Quoting commavia (Reply 10):
I suspect RJs are not the permanent solution for replacing the ATR72s, but rather an interim measure until AMR has the time to analyze a more suitable long-term replacement for many of the former ATR missions - they will probably go with either new ATR72s or Q400s

Or they could be following DL and getting rid of all turboprops.



You will either love or hate the airline industry. If you love it, it will get in your blood and it will never leave.
User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11411 posts, RR: 62
Reply 12, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4948 times:

Quoting airliner371 (Reply 11):
Or they could be following DL and getting rid of all turboprops.

My personal opinion, based solely on what we have seen happen to the economics of small RJs, is that you are going to see both carriers - AA and Delta - move back into turboprops in the next few years. There are some markets where a 50-seat RJ is simply no longer economically viable, but where a 70-seat RJ would also be too large and uneconomic. For many of these markets, turboprops like Q400s and/or newer ATR72s makes sense.


User currently offlineAcey559 From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1522 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4948 times:

All Executive (ATR) pilots are slowly displacing to the Eagle side of the operation, so no job losses. All ATRs will be gone by sometime next year, I believe. Rumor has it that a chunk of the LAX EMBs will be reallocated and we'll be seeing RJs in SJU eventually. Nothing official, just rumors for now.

User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11411 posts, RR: 62
Reply 14, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4919 times:

Quoting Acey559 (Reply 13):
All Executive (ATR) pilots are slowly displacing to the Eagle side of the operation, so no job losses.

Good to hear.

Quoting Acey559 (Reply 13):
Rumor has it that a chunk of the LAX EMBs will be reallocated and we'll be seeing RJs in SJU eventually. Nothing official, just rumors for now.

I remember those rumors being mentioned in the past. That would be fascinating to see - I just have a hard time imagining a tiny base of RJs making sense out of SJU, particularly now that the mainline operation in SJU feeding those RJs is so small, and given that there are so few markets left in the Caribbean that already have or could have nonstop flights to MIA. Of the few markets left, I always thought the ERJs were in several cases a no-go because of runway length.


User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4850 times:

Quoting commavia (Reply 14):

Runway length was my first concern as well. I guess some markets will forfit service when the jets are moved down there. I could see maybe a codeshare with LIAT to hel pwith some of that?


User currently offlineUnited_fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7447 posts, RR: 7
Reply 16, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4680 times:

Quoting doug (Reply 2):
It looks like most if not all ATR's are gone from MIA all of the flights to JAX and EYW are rj's as NOV 15.

You wouldn't think EYW 's runway is long enough,but it must be.



'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineCRFLY From Costa Rica, joined Jan 2004, 197 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4657 times:

Saw the other day the Delta 73G landing and taking off from EWY Airport... So if a 737-700 can do it, I guess an ERJ can do the mission as well... I had a great farewell flight on the ATR, great plane, very powerful although outdated... Cheers for the "Super ATR!"


With Age comes Wisdom...
User currently offlineJBo From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 2312 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4616 times:

One consideration that has not yet been mentioned in this thread ... isn't part of the reason AMR is drawing down ATR ops is so they can phase out the Executive operation altogether? The operating costs for the ATR are somewhat skewed compared to the ERJs by the fact that AMR is operating an entire subsidiary for one aircraft type. Eliminating the ATRs also elminiates the extra overhead that comes with OW.


I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.
User currently offlinehaggisman From Canada, joined Feb 2010, 71 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4610 times:

Presumably the Miami-Marsh Harbour flight will be using something else too - anyone have any idea what equipment will be used on that leg? It was an ATR when we went in 2009

Scotty



e pluribus Scotsman
User currently offlineN62NA From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4411 posts, RR: 6
Reply 20, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4535 times:

Quoting haggisman (Reply 19):
Presumably the Miami-Marsh Harbour flight will be using something else too - anyone have any idea what equipment will be used on that leg? It was an ATR when we went in 2009

ERJ-140 (ERD)


User currently offlineyellowtail From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 6037 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4526 times:

Quoting CRFLY (Reply 17):
Saw the other day the Delta 73G landing and taking off from EWY Airport... So if a 737-700 can do it, I guess an ERJ can do the mission as well... I had a great farewell flight on the ATR, great plane, very powerful although outdated... Cheers for the "Super ATR!"

I had my farewell a few months ago on MIA-NAS...for all their rattiness...I will miss the variety!



When in doubt, hold on to your altitude. No-one has ever collided with the sky.
User currently offlinelarshjort From Denmark, joined Dec 2007, 1426 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4367 times:

Quoting vikinga346 (Reply 7):
So are we sure the AA are selling all of their ATRs?

AA didn't own any of the ATR's. They sold them a few ago to NAC/Nordic Aviation Capital



139, 306, 319, 320, 321, 332, 34A, AN2, AT4, AT5, AT7, 733, 735, 73G, 738, 739, 146, AR1, BH2, CN1, CR2, DH1, DH3, DH4,
User currently offlineAcey559 From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1522 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4252 times:

Quoting commavia (Reply 14):

Apparently a lot of the flights will be flown through Miami. Say for instance, MIA-LRM-SJU-SXM-SJU...etc. etc. We'll see, but it seems AA still wants to provide a presence down there. To further compound the rumor, we received a new High Enroute chart for the Eastern Caribbean with our last revision, so take that as you will.  

Runway isn't a problem for the EMB except a few cities, which I presume will be dropped/codeshared. The EMB can do EYW, but we have to do them flaps 22 in the -145 or 18 in the -135/-140.


User currently onlineWingtips56 From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 353 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3692 times:

This is from an internal American Eagle announcement....a portion of the notice that included adding SkyWest and ExpressJet to the mix.

"And, as previously announced, American has negotiated the early return of the ATRs. This fleet is old, and there are very high maintenance and leasing costs associated with these aircraft. This action will result in the closure of the Miami (MIA) Executive pilot and flight attendant domiciles on Nov. 15. However, all Executive pilots and flight attendants will be able to use their seniority to bid for positions at American Eagle – including positions at MIA. We do not foresee any furloughs as a result of this displacement. We do anticipate that American Eagle will be providing more regional jet flying out of MIA to replace some of the discontinued ATR flying. Additionally, all MIA and Key West Executive employees will become American Eagle employees as of Jan. 1, 2013."



Worked for WestAir, Apollo Airways, Desert Pacific, Western, AirCal and American Airlines
25 N766UA : They're heading to RJ's. I thought all the ATRs were gone already?
26 guyanam : The various Eastern Caribbean govts are frantic with worry about what AA plans to do with its SJU hub. A conference in SKB will be attended by a very
27 NWADTWE16 : From what i can see B6 plan is to keep growing SJU and make it the premier Carribean hub/Focus city just like the AA of past. B6 operation there is g
28 Cubsrule : I'm not sure that's true, actually. One of the advantages of OW was that Eagle was able to confine the costs of overwater operations to them rather t
29 usxguy : I thought they are trying to build a bigger runway @ EIS.
30 OB1504 : I can see how it would make sense to simplify the fleet by eliminating an aircraft type, but the ERJ is not a viable replacement for these aircraft.
31 usxguy : CRJ 700 also has better short-field characteristics. The ERJ's will have weight restrictions... that's why Delta preferred sending in the E135.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA Dropping 777 On MIA-LAX-MIA posted Sat Apr 10 2010 10:02:06 by N62NA
AA with 777 on MIA-JFK - Summer 2010 posted Sun Jan 31 2010 16:45:12 by Flyguy1
AA Adding Frequency On MIA-GIG posted Sun Mar 3 2002 19:51:53 by Mah4546
AA And AR Each Boost Capacity On MIA-EZE posted Tue May 29 2012 12:43:17 by IrishAyes
AA (Again) Drops 777 On MIA-LAX-MIA posted Sun Aug 8 2010 11:05:36 by N62NA
AA Brings 762 Back On MIA-LAX posted Thu Jun 3 2010 11:29:14 by N62NA
Why No AA On MIA-BQN? posted Wed Feb 3 2010 12:56:15 by BNAFlyer
Will AA Go All 738 (and A 777) On MIA-LAX? posted Mon Oct 19 2009 18:55:18 by N62NA
AA Keeping 777 Flight On MIA-GRU Daylight? posted Sun Jan 13 2008 10:36:26 by Tonytifao
Why Only AA And AF On CDG-MIA Route? posted Mon Oct 29 2007 12:21:02 by LY777