Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA To Paint Aircraft Silver, No Buffing...?  
User currently offlineolddominion727 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 380 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 23773 times:

At SFO today chatting with another who was enjoying the great weather... He was here on vacation from TUL. I assume in some type of MX capacity--employed w/AA. He sounded pretty convincing saying AA was going to only modify their scheme by painting the body silver (that much like the DL Skyteam aircraft), put the Eagle's wings on the engines, and slightly change the fonts on the AA's, as well as the red, white and blue cheat lines will be less pronounced (one cheat line, starting with red around the nose to just before the wing, white over the wing, then blue from the back of the wing to around the tail). He said the changes would be very minimum, like AF's and QF's--you will see them on the new 77W and newly arriving 738's first. He said this was hotly debated months even before the Airbus order. He said all of full-time employees of 10 years or more (former TW & QQ employees included) answered an anonymous poll about their choice of changing the livery or giving the old one a face lift. Many employees think the 'AA' livery as-is now suits them well and has kept them flying thus far. He said they're debating right now to eliminate the 'AA Eagle' brand and change everything over to AA Connection so there's no confusion. Regardless all Eagle equipment will be painted silver to match!

He continued to say MX was convinced that if US took over it would be the final nail in the coffin for anything originally AA. The unions don't really want to merge, they're trying to awaken management to get the glory days back when Bob Crandall was in power.

Apparently the airport areas are going to see the biggest changes in their hub cities as well as LON, TYO, SAO, PAR (surprising HKG too--they're begin to "share" things in HKG--WTF?) I asked him if AA was going to start HKG? He said rumor was that they would start from DAL & LAX first with the 772's not used when replacing them with 77W's. Apparently they're talking about adding SIN as an add-on to HKG where most OW airlines intersect CX, JL, QF, BA (AB 2013 from DUS); look for it Spring of 2013. They have orders to completely renovate all 772's first, then the 763's. Minor changes will be made to the 752's to hold them over until the new 321's arrive--laughing he said they're going to starting bolting the seats down. Continuing we should look for more things dark blue with bold reds and whites, and more lit AA logo marquis. Also look for a new OW logo that all carriers must have at least 2 equipment (per carrier) painted.

Apparently management is really trying hard to drum up new support for the new AA. They are concerned they could be taken down as TW, EA, CO & PA were, They wanna bring back things like playing cards too (for a fee of course), and a large (cold & free) snack on flights of 2 hrs or more. I told him the 77W 3-4-3 is not the way to go forward. Cards and meals are nice, but one bag free and snacks is much better than playing cards you're charged for. He said MANY balked at that 77W configuration, especially the flight attendants. However, secretly they have conceded that if business drops in coach they are ready to go back to the 3-3-3 config (not 2-5-2).

There's a lot of information here. Does it sound logical? I am so accepting of anything that sounds genuine. Just curious to hear other's opinions.

39 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTWA1985 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 650 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 23740 times:

Are the snacks for coach? If so, that would be a welcome return!

User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7874 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 23612 times:

I don't get how there are so many people with priviledged information that seem to always spill the beans to random people. Not saying you are wrong, but I'm skeptical. Doesn't implausible, it's just that most of these employee rumors are not true


Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineCX Flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6597 posts, RR: 55
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 23437 times:

HKG has been rumoured for a long time. AA will also be sending their widebody aircraft here for maintenance. There is a possibility that this maintenance contract might have fuelled the rumour that actual services are started though. I've heard rumours like that before where a one-off charter service or maintenance ferry flight, through Chinese whispers became a full-on new revenue service.

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 2):
I don't get how there are so many people with priviledged information that seem to always spill the beans to random people. Not saying you are wrong, but I'm skeptical. Doesn't implausible, it's just that most of these employee rumors are not true

In my airline you would be surprised at how easily even managers spill the beans about unannounced stuff, especially if they have a beer or two in them!


User currently offlineqqflyboy From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2272 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 23389 times:

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
He said all of full-time employees of 10 years or more (former TW & QQ employees included) answered an anonymous poll about their choice of changing the livery or giving the old one a face lift.

Perhaps this was just maintenance, because flight attendants were never asked.

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
He said they're debating right now to eliminate the 'AA Eagle' brand and change everything over to AA Connection so there's no confusion.

We already know, from AA, that American Connection is the brand that is going away. All regional flights, Connection included, will be rebranded American Eagle. Because of this, American Eagle (the actual airline) needs to find a new name. American Eagle will be used for marketing purposes on all AA regional flights, regardless of the operator. My assumption is whatever they plan on doing with the Eagle brand (logo/paint) we'll see on the OO CRJs that will start covering LAX in the coming months.

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
He continued to say MX was convinced that if US took over it would be the final nail in the coffin for anything originally AA.

That's odd, because the TWU, along with the APA and APFA, continue to push for a merger with US.

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
They have orders to completely renovate all 772's first, then the 763's. Minor changes will be made to the 752's to hold them over until the new 321's arrive

AA previously announced they'll be refurbishing and reconfiguring their 777-200ERs to match the -300s, but as a two class bird -- no more first on the -200. The 763s will get the new Business class seat (like the 777s), but coach will remain the same (a HUGE letdown IMHO). The 752's refurbishment program is well under way with more than half of the fleet now complete.

As a side note, AA now has 188 active MD-80s, and 186 active 738s. The 738 is about to pass the MD-80, something I know a lot of us thought would never happen (AA use to operate 360 MD-80s!).



The views expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect my employer’s views.
User currently offlineJBo From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 2316 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 23302 times:

Chances are the livery probably will end up being a painted color just because you can't do bare metal on composites or on Airbus aircraft. That part is inevitable.

The idea of rebranding Eagle to Connection is a horrible idea. If anything, it should be the other way around. Rebrand the Connection operators as Eagle (if Executive can operate as Eagle, then Chautaqua and SkyWest might as well, too).

As for the rest of the branding, some evolution/change/refresh is inevitable. What actually comes to fruition remains to be seen, however.



I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.
User currently offlineNWADC9 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4896 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 23193 times:

Quoting qqflyboy (Reply 4):
Because of this, American Eagle (the actual airline) needs to find a new name.

Executive uses the American Eagle branding on their ATRs. Why couldn't the regionals be "American Eagle operated by XYZ Airlines" and the real American Eagle simply remain "American Eagle"?



Flying an aeroplane with only a single propeller to keep you in the air. Can you imagine that? -Capt. Picard
User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11526 posts, RR: 61
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 23068 times:

Quoting qqflyboy (Reply 4):
American Eagle will be used for marketing purposes on all AA regional flights, regardless of the operator.

Yep - just as it was for the first 14 years of Eagle's existence from 1984 through 1998.

Quoting qqflyboy (Reply 4):
My assumption is whatever they plan on doing with the Eagle brand (logo/paint) we'll see on the OO CRJs that will start covering LAX in the coming months.

Seems logical.

Quoting qqflyboy (Reply 4):
AA previously announced they'll be refurbishing and reconfiguring their 777-200ERs to match the -300s, but as a two class bird -- no more first on the -200.

Yep. With as good as the new 777 J looks, I doubt AA would need F on those planes anyway. The new 777 J seat looks better than any other cabin product AA has ever offered on any aircraft, in any cabin, except the current 777 F (Flagship Suite), including the original 777 F (Coffins). That new J is going to be awesome - as will the somewhat-upgraded new 777 F on the 77Ws.

Quoting qqflyboy (Reply 4):
The 763s will get the new Business class seat (like the 777s), but coach will remain the same (a HUGE letdown IMHO).

Letdown, indeed - AA did a half- job on the 763 refurbs the last time when it came to Y. I guess they are figuring that by the time the half of the 763 fleet that is to get refurbished actually gets the work, AA will by that time already be well on their way to replacing much of that flying with 787s, and thus no need to sink the investment in the 763 fleet anyway. May make sense on a spreadsheet, but AA's 763 Y product is simply not competitive.

Quoting qqflyboy (Reply 4):
As a side note, AA now has 188 active MD-80s, and 186 active 738s. The 738 is about to pass the MD-80, something I know a lot of us thought would never happen (AA use to operate 360 MD-80s!).

It is remarkable.

Quoting NWADC9 (Reply 6):
Executive uses the American Eagle branding on their ATRs. Why couldn't the regionals be "American Eagle operated by XYZ Airlines" and the real American Eagle simply remain "American Eagle"?

Because once American Eagle (the airline company) is no longer wholly-owned by AMR, it would have to pay a license fee to AMR to use 'American Eagle' (the brand), which would likely not be economically feasible. In addition, American Eagle (the airline company) wants to be able to go out and secure capacity purchase business from other airlines besides AA, which I suspect they feel would be challenging if their company's name and branding is so closely linked with AA.


User currently offlineCIDFlyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2282 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 22904 times:

You may have some truth's in the story you heard but as always some info is probably stretched. For instance we already know American Eagle is going to be the name of the connection flights. As for the merger with US I'm skeptical on that, the unions seem to be pushing for that. A silver paint would be nice, especially on Eagle aircraft, excited to see that. I would imagine they would have to unveil it soon if they are going to start using other carriers to fly as Eagle in the near future...

[Edited 2012-10-07 18:05:13]

User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined exactly 2 years ago today! , 1379 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 22883 times:

Quoting commavia (Reply 7):
Because once American Eagle (the airline company) is no longer wholly-owned by AMR, it would have to pay a license fee to AMR to use 'American Eagle' (the brand), which would likely not be economically feasible. In addition, American Eagle (the airline company) wants to be able to go out and secure capacity purchase business from other airlines besides AA, which I suspect they feel would be challenging if their company's name and branding is so closely linked with AA.

AA said they are going to be renaming American Eagle Airlines and using American Eagle operated by XYZ Airlines for American Airlines.



You will either love or hate the airline industry. If you love it, it will get in your blood and it will never leave.
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 22888 times:

Quoting JBo (Reply 5):
If anything, it should be the other way around. Rebrand the Connection operators as Eagle

That is what is happening. American Connection is being rebranded as American Eagle. It WOULD, however, be a bad idea to change everything to American connection.

Quoting JBo (Reply 5):
Chances are the livery probably will end up being a painted color just because you can't do bare metal on composites or on Airbus aircraft. That part is inevitable.

Yupp. I think that whatever the new livery is, it'll probably look good. At this point and maturity of the current branding, it won't be that hard to refresh it very nicely. I imagine the fuselage will probably be painted, similar to the early liveries on the a300s, but with the red and blue lines more "swooshy", if that make sense. I also imagine they'll go for billboard-style lettering, which would add a touch of class to the colorscheme. Also, maybe a refreshening of the logo (AA with the wings).

But, that's just my   


User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined exactly 2 years ago today! , 1379 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 22793 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 10):
but with the red and blue lines more "swooshy", if that make sense.

Similar to the UA 787? If so I agree.

I also agree with you that whatever new livery it is will look good. Of course their will be people that hate change but I agree with you.

And if by billboard you mean similar to JetBlue on the fuselage I also agree.



You will either love or hate the airline industry. If you love it, it will get in your blood and it will never leave.
User currently offlineeastern023 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 871 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 22791 times:

I really hope the best for AA. I hope the rise from the ashes. As is the current situation could not go on. AA is terrible especially on their long haul Y product. I hope things turn around...

Rudy from IAD



AA will Rise Again!
User currently offlineJBo From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 2316 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 22563 times:

Quoting commavia (Reply 7):
Because once American Eagle (the airline company) is no longer wholly-owned by AMR, it would have to pay a license fee to AMR to use 'American Eagle' (the brand), which would likely not be economically feasible. In addition, American Eagle (the airline company) wants to be able to go out and secure capacity purchase business from other airlines besides AA, which I suspect they feel would be challenging if their company's name and branding is so closely linked with AA.

It makes sense to rename the American Eagle corporate entity once it is spun off. My vote is to bring back "Simmons"  



I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.
User currently onlineAJMIA From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 733 posts, RR: 15
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 22152 times:

Now I heard a rumor that the main color was going to be blue....

I like the idea of silver better though.
Guess we will just have to wait and see.

AJMIA



Lady it's a jet... not a kite.
User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21505 posts, RR: 60
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 22054 times:

Crandall left because the glory days were over and the unions had become too difficult to work with. Hardly possible to return to those glory days.


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineManekS From Singapore, joined Oct 2008, 241 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 21980 times:

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
Apparently they're talking about adding SIN as an add-on to HKG where most OW airlines intersect CX, JL, QF, BA (AB 2013 from DUS); look for it Spring of 2013.

Interesting. AA also happens to be recruiting a sales manager for SIN, which would make this rumor somewhat plausible?

http://sg.jobsdb.com/SG/EN/Search/Jo...il?jobsIdList=400003001251776&sr=1


User currently offlineBobloblaw From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1678 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 21876 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

TW and CO weren't "taken down" and EA and PA went under for vastly differing reasons.

User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 21803 times:

Quoting airliner371 (Reply 11):
Similar to the UA 787? If so I agree.

That's exactly what I mean. Good comparison, didn't think of that, but yes.

Quoting airliner371 (Reply 11):
And if by billboard you mean similar to JetBlue on the fuselage I also agree.

Also, exactly what I meant. I think billboard lettering looks better on an aircraft and can even make an all-white plane look good! That's why I'm a big fan of the Finnair livery.


User currently offlineCoal From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 2016 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 17687 times:

Quoting ManekS (Reply 16):
Interesting. AA also happens to be recruiting a sales manager for SIN, which would make this rumor somewhat plausible?

AA already has a sales office in Singapore, so this could be to back fill someone leaving their current role. If it was a station manager, that would be different.

http://www.aa.com/i18n/aboutUs/where...internationalTickets/singapore.jsp

Would be great if they came to SIN, or at least to HKG. I plan to non-rev on AA to MIA from Singapore, which means I first need to get to NRT, PVG, or PEK, and at the price it costs to get there, I might as well pay for a Y ticket all the way.

Cheers
Coal



Nxt Flts: VA SYD-CBR-SYD | VA SYD-OOL-SYD | JQ SYD-MEL | VA MEL-CBR-SYD | DL SYD-LAX-ATL-MIA | B6 FLL-DCA-BOS | DL BOS-L
User currently offlineAcey559 From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1529 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 15953 times:

In internal documents right now they're calling us AMR Eagle. Not sure how long that will stick but for the interim that's the name we're being given.

User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11526 posts, RR: 61
Reply 21, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 15752 times:

Quoting Acey559 (Reply 20):
In internal documents right now they're calling us AMR Eagle. Not sure how long that will stick but for the interim that's the name we're being given.

That's the legal name the holding company has had for over a decade. AMR Eagle, Inc. is the wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR Corporation that itself has two wholly-owned subsidiaries - American Eagle Airlines, Inc. and Executive Airlines, Inc.


User currently offlineAA777223 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1244 posts, RR: 6
Reply 22, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 14661 times:

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
I asked him if AA was going to start HKG? He said rumor was that they would start from DAL & LAX first with the 772's not used when replacing them with 77W's.

Do their 772s have the legs for this? I know their RR powerplants and MGTW rating are supposed to make them some of the longer-legged 77Es out there, but I think the 8200 mile trek might be tough for them or even the 77W (which contrary to popular believe has a very similar range to the 77E when fully loaded. It just carriers more stuff while doing so.). I can see LAX at ~7300 miles being much more plausible, but I just think that DFW to HKG might be a stretch with currently available equipment.

Feel free to roast me if I have made an error.



Sic 'em bears
User currently offlinerj777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 1799 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 14338 times:

The 1st 777-300ER should be done within the next couple weeks, shouldn't it?

User currently offlinelaca773 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 4006 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 11373 times:

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
Apparently the airport areas are going to see the biggest changes in their hub cities as well as LON, TYO, SAO, PAR (surprising HKG too--they're begin to "share" things in HKG--WTF?) I asked him if AA was going to start HKG? He said rumor was that they would start from DAL & LAX first with the 772's not used when replacing them with 77W's. Apparently they're talking about adding SIN as an add-on to HKG where most OW airlines intersect CX, JL, QF, BA (AB 2013 from DUS); look for it Spring of 2013. They have orders to completely renovate all 772's first, then the 763's. Minor changes will be made to the 752's to hold them over until the new 321's arrive--laughing he said they're going to starting bolting the seats down. Continuing we should look for more things dark blue with bold reds and whites, and

Wouldn't it be in AMR/AA's interest to have CX do all the HKG flying?

OO is known for many, many mechanical delays with those old CRJs. I hope AA stays on top of them for that. I know AS has issues with them and they only have a small fleet flying for them.


User currently offlineAcey559 From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1529 posts, RR: 2
Reply 25, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 11404 times:

Quoting commavia (Reply 21):

Guess I just never noticed it before, thanks for the clarification.


User currently offlineqqflyboy From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2272 posts, RR: 13
Reply 26, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 11020 times:

Quoting rj777 (Reply 23):
The 1st 777-300ER should be done within the next couple weeks, shouldn't it?

Last I knew, delivery of the first bird is scheduled for November 17.



The views expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect my employer’s views.
User currently onlineseabosdca From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 5385 posts, RR: 4
Reply 27, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 11178 times:

Quoting AA777223 (Reply 22):
Do their 772s have the legs for this?

They could do it, but would likely take weight penalties rather frequently. HKG-DFW is almost identical in length to HKG-EWR which UA flies with capable sCO 772s. Usually they can make it with a full passenger load, but they're not carrying cargo.

Quoting AA777223 (Reply 22):
(which contrary to popular believe has a very similar range to the 77E when fully loaded.

That used to be true, but the 77W range has kept creeping up. A 77W being delivered today has a good half hour or more of full-passenger range on one of AA's 772s.


User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8230 posts, RR: 23
Reply 28, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 10724 times:

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
There's a lot of information here.

Which is exactly why I believe pretty much none of it. Airline workers, especially front-line employees, are some of the biggest gossipers/rumor starters on the planet. Consider all of that info to be a rumor and you'll be ok.



This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4441 posts, RR: 19
Reply 29, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 9959 times:

I believe the GE powered 77E's operated by Airlines such as L Cal have the best range performance compared to the RR powered version.


The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlineAA94 From United States of America, joined Aug 2011, 582 posts, RR: 2
Reply 30, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 9248 times:

I take all of this with a grain of salt. I like the way a lot of it sounds, but I'm not going to speculate based on other speculation.

We do know some truths, though. Of all the OP posted, the most plausible thing (IMO) is the livery change. We know that the 787s and Airbus aircraft can't do the polished aluminum that AA's birds have now, and considering that AA is working on emerging from bankruptcy as a fresh, new carrier, the timing of a brand refresh is ideal at this point.



Choose a challenge over competence / Eleanor Roosevelt
User currently offlineTWA772LR From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 1872 posts, RR: 1
Reply 31, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 8350 times:

Does anyone have a mock up of what the livery described in this thread will look like? If it's like the one in my head, it will be very nice, and old-school!


Go coogs! \n//
User currently offlineTUSAA From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 240 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 6216 times:

So far there are 2 OO CRJ's painted in the current white AE color scheme.

User currently offlineN737AA From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 270 posts, RR: 0
Reply 33, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 5392 times:

Quoting qqflyboy (Reply 26):
Quoting rj777 (Reply 23):
The 1st 777-300ER should be done within the next couple weeks, shouldn't it?

Last I knew, delivery of the first bird is scheduled for November 17.

Yep, its behind schedule and should be third week in Nov.

Quoting N766UA (Reply 28):
Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
There's a lot of information here.

Which is exactly why I believe pretty much none of it. Airline workers, especially front-line employees, are some of the biggest gossipers/rumor starters on the planet. Consider all of that info to be a rumor and you'll be ok.

First, those in the know don't say jack to the rank and file (including middle/front line mgt) let alone someone on the outside. Second, if you hear anything it is just rumor/wishful thinking/speculation, unless of course it was from Horton and the gang.

N737AA


User currently offlinetimf From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 969 posts, RR: 1
Reply 34, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 5003 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have a feeling we won't be seeing the new livery on the first 77W, especially if they are already painting OO CRJs in the current livery. Even if they plan on changing it when they exit bankruptcy, it's not like there's much effort required to paint a brand new aircraft that is already bare metal in the current livery. The change really only needs to be made in advance of the Airbus and 787 deliveries.

User currently offlineJAAlbert From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1573 posts, RR: 1
Reply 35, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 4869 times:

Quoting AA94 (Reply 30):
We do know some truths, though. Of all the OP posted, the most plausible thing (IMO) is the livery change.

I think AA management itself has also said it is going to refresh the livery.


User currently offlineAmerican 767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3761 posts, RR: 12
Reply 36, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4675 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting qqflyboy (Reply 4):
As a side note, AA now has 188 active MD-80s, and 186 active 738s. The 738 is about to pass the MD-80, something I know a lot of us thought would never happen (AA use to operate 360 MD-80s!).


The 738 phase out is already on the horizon. although still years away. By the time the last MD-80 leaves the fleet, the 738 retirement will have begun.



Ben Soriano
User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined exactly 2 years ago today! , 1379 posts, RR: 2
Reply 37, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4121 times:

Quoting American 767 (Reply 36):
the 738 retirement will have begun.

The 738s from the first batch.



You will either love or hate the airline industry. If you love it, it will get in your blood and it will never leave.
User currently offlineWROORD From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 951 posts, RR: 0
Reply 38, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3720 times:

Quoting laca773 (Reply 24):
Wouldn't it be in AMR/AA's interest to have CX do all the HKG flying?

LAX-HKG would be the third flight and on some days the fourth. Not sure there is so much demand. DFW would make more sense as currently there is no non-stop connection and it could give CX passangers some option for Central and South America.


User currently offlineNYCAAer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 692 posts, RR: 3
Reply 39, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3658 times:

I heard a company rumor that the new livery is going to be a total departure from the current one, including the colors used, and that it will most likely be revealed on the new 77W. Apparently management is looking to rebrand as a whole new airline, leaving behind the bad reputation we've gained in the past few years.

After training on the 77W, I think it would be appropriate the reveal the new look with this plane. The AA 77W is going to be awesome, trust me! There are going to be passenger amenities we've never offered before, and will be appreciated by all.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
American Airlines To Paint Aircraft posted Tue Sep 28 1999 22:40:33 by Tol air
AA To Brazil - Efficient Use Of Aircraft? posted Fri Sep 9 2011 06:10:29 by richiemo
AA To Maui Flight 7 Aircraft Interior? posted Mon Jul 14 2008 14:29:06 by Kingairman
NO AA To HKG? posted Thu Feb 14 2008 08:37:35 by JAL
Why No AA Cargo Only Aircraft? posted Sat Jul 28 2007 22:49:52 by JAM747
AA To Remove Ovens From Most Aircraft posted Sun Jul 30 2006 17:11:31 by Dc10s4ever
How Much Does It Cost To Paint An Aircraft posted Thu Jul 28 2005 07:46:25 by Snaiks
How To Find Aircraft Belonging To Flght No? posted Thu Jul 14 2005 19:09:56 by Glareskin
Why No AA To SYD? posted Mon Apr 5 2004 23:03:44 by Aa777jr
Why No AA To Ams? posted Tue Jun 25 2002 03:35:26 by KL808