Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The P&W JT9D-70 - Special Engine?  
User currently offlineTR From UK - England, joined May 2001, 953 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 3 days ago) and read 3090 times:

Can anyone bring me info on the P&W JT9D-70 engine seen her on this 747?

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Andries Cafmeyer


It is very visible that the engine looks much more like the GE CF6-50E2 engines also offered for classic 747s than the "standard" JT9D engine seen here:

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Craig Murray


What is the story of the JT9D-70? was it a special engine option that simply turned out to be unsaleable? I know that SAS and Air Madagascar also had 747s with the JT9D-70 engine!

Thanks for any info
Thomas

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3056 times:

The first engine available for the 747 when it was introduced was the JT9D-7, and was the only engine available until 1973 or 74. The JT9D-7 came in a long list of varieties:

JT9D-7A
JT9D-7AH
JT9D-7W
JT9D-7J
JT9D-7F
JT9D-7R4G2
JT9D-7Q
JT9D-7FW
JT9D-70
JT9D-70A

to name a few. As to their differences, I expect only God and P&W can know.

Cheers,

Charles


User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6822 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (13 years 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3032 times:

As I recall the JT9D-70 (or maybe -7O) was the "same" as the -59 on the DC-10-40, and commonality with the DC-10 (and A300, P&W hoped) was the reason for the different nacelle. Seems to me the -7Q was the "same" engine, modified to use the usual P&W nacelle.

Wasn't the 747 originally powered by the -3 or -3A?


User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3030 times:

According to Bill Harms, The prototype and the first 17 planes that followed all had the JT9D-7A. After that they started going into different variations.

Charles


User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6822 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (13 years 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3025 times:

Wouldn't Bill Harms just be telling us what they have now (or had when retired)?

User currently offlineCeilidh From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3025 times:

The -70A was specifically designed as a 'hot and high' performer, and was replaced by the -7J.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The New All New A350 Engine posted Sat May 13 2006 14:26:50 by Trex8
Terminal Style Of SFO In The 50's To 70's posted Sun Feb 5 2006 23:38:01 by Apollo13
The Creative Process Behind Special Paint Schemes posted Wed Nov 9 2005 16:12:47 by Mwk
The O&D Calculation Website posted Mon Nov 7 2005 01:47:42 by DLX737200
P&W's Future In Commercial Engine Business? posted Thu Nov 3 2005 19:33:02 by 1337Delta764
The New US And Special Liveries posted Tue Aug 23 2005 23:53:57 by Jdwfloyd
B747 200 With P&W JT9D-7R4H posted Wed Jun 8 2005 21:18:07 by 747400sp
What Is The O&D Market Like In Denver? posted Thu Nov 18 2004 02:04:42 by JeffLAS
LAX Approach On The 6 & 7's posted Fri Aug 13 2004 20:55:57 by Pizzapolli
Where Are The M&E Bases For Each Airline? posted Fri Feb 6 2004 06:09:07 by AirframeAS
The O&D Calculation Website posted Mon Nov 7 2005 01:47:42 by DLX737200
P&W's Future In Commercial Engine Business? posted Thu Nov 3 2005 19:33:02 by 1337Delta764
The New US And Special Liveries posted Tue Aug 23 2005 23:53:57 by Jdwfloyd
B747 200 With P&W JT9D-7R4H posted Wed Jun 8 2005 21:18:07 by 747400sp