Toady From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 724 posts, RR: 0 Posted (13 years 8 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 860 times:
I'm nowhere near as serious about civil aviation as some of you folk (and maybe I never will be) but I'm begining to enjoy most aspects of the subject. Gone are the days when I saw an aircraft and simply thought "I wonder what that is" and I now have a slight appreciation of aircraft identification.
However, it's not an area without difficulties! I found this photograph in a gallery of Northwest DC10s but (to me) it doesn't look like a NW DC10. At first glance, my guess (please don't laugh too much) would have been a US Airways A330 or Boeing 767. What's really 'thrown' me about this picture is the lack of a third contrail. I read in a recent thread that some DC10 pilots would throttle back the #2 engine during cruise, could that explain the lack of a third contrail? Or is the third one simply hidden behind the contrail from #1 engine?
Also, the trailing edge of the tail seems to be nearly vertical, whereas it's my understanding that a DC10's tail has a sharp rake and that its top (horizontal) edge is quite short.
Furthermore, I'll guess that the Northwest colour scheme doesn't show too clearly at that altitude!
Any comments or advice from experienced spotters would be much appreciated.
FlagshipAZ From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3419 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (13 years 8 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 838 times:
Definitely not a DC-10. Twin-engined aircraft for sure. My best educated guess is..it's an A320. This plane has a "nose" to it. DC-10s have practically no noses at all. It certainly looks like a A320 to me anyway. Regards.
"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
Toady From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 724 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 8 months 23 hours ago) and read 811 times:
Ha! Maybe I'm not as dumb as I thought FlagshipAZ, thanks for your input. I can't see a tail-mounted engine in that picture but I remember a recent thread about a 727 performing a very low level fuel dump - in that case, the centre engine was all but invisible due to lighting and the angle of the shot & I wondered if that may also be the case with this "DC10". Apparently not!