Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA Likely To Add New/ex LHR Aircraft At LGW  
User currently offlinejet72uk From UK - England, joined Oct 2011, 102 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 9 months 2 days ago) and read 8491 times:

In buisnessweek and it can't come soon enough.
http://mobile.businessweek.com/news/...ews-makeup-of-london-gatwick-fleet

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineraffik From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2006, 1716 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 8430 times:

Interesting article. I would be surprised if BA were to buy second hand 777s or A330s and struggle to visualise a BA A380 at gatwick either


Happy -go- lucky kinda guy!
User currently offlineVasu From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 3860 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 7967 times:

Interesting article - as for LGW fleet renewals, I'll believe it when I see it!

User currently offlineAirbusA6 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 2011 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 7859 times:

Quoting raffik (Reply 1):
Interesting article. I would be surprised if BA were to buy second hand 777s or A330s and struggle to visualise a BA A380 at gatwick either

Have BA ever bought secondhand long haul aircraft? It's not the way they usually do things, which is to buy new and then keep them for (more or less) their whole life.



it's the bus to stansted (now renamed national express a4 to ruin my username)
User currently offlinepar13del From Bahamas, joined Dec 2005, 7067 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 7822 times:

So we have numbers for the Boeing a/c in particular the 737-400's which BA have on the way out for a few years, do we know how many A32XX a/c are based there, if they were lowering cost, how does maintaining older a/c like the -400 work when they also have more modern a/c in their overall fleet?

We also have another thread on the dropping of the MAN-LGW route, are we on the way to more consolidation at LHR?


User currently offlineDano1977 From British Indian Ocean Territory, joined Jun 2008, 484 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 7697 times:

Quoting par13del (Reply 4):

I'm no expert..

But I would say that at the moment, its probably cheaper to maintain these 737's than having to lease and or finance new aircraft, as these 737's are owned outright.

But presumably there comes a point, when its no longer cost effective to maintain 20+ year old aircraft.



Children should only be allowed on aircraft if 1. Muzzled and heavily sedated 2. Go as freight
User currently offlineBongodog1964 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2006, 3535 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7640 times:

I can see BA moving more 772's to LGW to increase long haul leisure flying as planes are freed up by new deliveries, however I can't see BA purchasing 2nd hand long haul aircraft. As stated earlier this would be a total departure from their normal fleet policy.

User currently offlinefcogafa From United Kingdom, joined May 2008, 772 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7570 times:

But if they are in a hurry to start all these new long haul routes using the LHR slots acquired from BMI it would be understandable if they were looking for used aircraft that were available quicker than their scheduled deliveries.

User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7399 posts, RR: 17
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 7342 times:

Quoting par13del (Reply 4):
if they were lowering cost, how does maintaining older a/c like the -400 work when they also have more modern a/c in their overall fleet?

Low or minimal capital cost.

The Airbus list price of an A320 is US $88.3 million. The amortization cost of US $ 88.3 million at, say, 5.5 per cent per year is nearly US $ 5 million. The amortization cost of a 734 depreciated to its scrap or spares value is US $ 0.

So if we allow for a discount of, say ,around 20 per cent on the list price of an A320 we are looking at an additional annual capital cost of a new 320 being around US $ 4 million more than that of a fully written down 734. That's a hell of a lot of money to have to save through the improved fuel efficiency and the lower maintenance costs of new aircraft. Put another way, looking at an annual aircraft utilisation of 2,500 hours, an airline would need to save $1,600 per hour through fuel efficiency and lower maintenance costs for a depreciated 734 to have as high operating costs of a new 320.

This explains why many airlines including BA and the likes of AF and LH buy new aircraft and then retain them for most if not all their useful working lives. It also explains why third world start up airlines initially buy aircraft like old 734s rather than new 320s.

Aircraft cost is a major contributor to operating costs. And there would still be a significant saving in capital costs if the old 734 had not been fully depreciated. This is because it would have been bought in 1990 $s. With four per cent inflation over twenty years what costs US $ 88.3 million today would have cost a little more than $ 40 million twenty years ago. So depreciation costs would be around 45 per cent below those of a new aircraft.

All aircraft require a major D Check every five years or so. It is likely that the D Check of a five year old aircraft undergoing its first Heavy Maintenance Visit will cost less than one undergoing its third or fourth such procedure because less new parts may be needed. But a major cost element will be skilled engineering costs which are likely to be somewhere around 40,000 hours be it for a first or fourth such check.


User currently offlinebluesky73 From UK - England, joined Oct 2012, 321 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 7211 times:

How comes Ryanair and Easyjet manage to expand and make profit with new aircraft. I know they buy in bulk and keep aircraft for less years but clearly it works.

As much as a fully depreciated 734 can be more profitable why is BA on back foot at LGW for last 10 years - should theyhave kept more older depreciated aircraft?

Just on a fantasy, never going to happen tip- Maybe they could size up and do modern day equivalent of British Airtours or Caledonian. Sadly those wide-bodies to the med and those big package days have gone. A 777 in either livery would be cool if both brands were still around. Miss those Tristars to Alicante though...


User currently offlinevectismanpaul From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2012, 68 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 7140 times:

Ryanair bought most of it planes at very good prices after 9/11 when Boeing were desperate to sell aircraft. They were then able to sell them on at reasonable prices. However Boeing no longer neds to sell at low prices and the deliveries to Ryanair are also nearly complete. Ryanair is still looking for a deal with a manufacturer.
I believe and stand to be corrected that most of the Easyjet fleet is leased so initial costs may be less. Like Ryanair the deliveries to Easyjet are slowing. However I do agree that the maintenance costs may be less.
However do remember Ryanair is becoming a seasonal airline with nearly 100 aircraft out of service for the winter months.
Both British Airways and Easyjet keep most of their fleet flying all year although there is increased maintemance in the quieter periods.
British Airways tends to own aircraft and has higher costs owing to their business model that includes providing premium services.
Easyjet is sort of in between with better levels of service than Ryanair.
Don't forget most of Ryanair's expansion has been outside the UK. As its markets mature there expansion rate will slow.
Difficult to compare the three airlines really.
Also I believe the negative stories about the BA 737s can be misleading. I have travelled on them often and they appear quite fit for purpose most of the time.
V.


User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7399 posts, RR: 17
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 6281 times:

Quoting bluesky73 (Reply 9):
How comes Ryanair and Easyjet manage to expand and make profit with new aircraft. I know they buy in bulk and keep aircraft for less years but clearly it works.

Confirming vectismanpaul's comments, FR got such a good deal. from Boeing that it was reported that it sold on some of their early deliveries at a higher price than it was paying Boeing for what were effectively the replacement, totally new aircraft.

Quoting bluesky73 (Reply 9):
As much as a fully depreciated 734 can be more profitable why is BA on back foot at LGW for last 10 years - should theyhave kept more older depreciated aircraft?

If it had tried to operate the same services with new aircraft there might not be a BA presence at LGW today.

If they had kept older aircraft in service it would mean they would still be operating the 732 fleet that was delivered in the early 80s. Profit wise this would not have helped. It would have made things worse.

Like the 734 fleet the aircraft would have been all written down to a residual value, so there would be no cost savimg there.

Being less fuel efficient than the 734s there would be a higher fuel cost to operate the 732s.

Maintenance wise the 732 fleet would also likely cost more to keep flying. So operating aircraft pre-dating their 734 fleet would likely prove significantly more inefficient.

The balance is always fine. An example is the latest update to BA's 724 fleet. In 2010-11 they were fitted with slim-back seats in the rear (Y) cabin. These seats were lighter and allowed an additional row to be installed increasing the number of seatsfrom 147 to 153 when in an all-Y configuration (as in all domestic flights). However the centre seat on the left (?) side in the front four rows is never sold. Why? Because with 150 passengers regulations require that there be four FAs on board. Less than 150 requires only three. So not selling those seats saves on the costs and carrying the weight of one FA.

That raises the question as to why install an extra row of six seats but only use two of them? Answer: When the front of the cabin is sold as Club Europe then the centre row of all BA short haul aircraft is not sold. So with an additional row of seats behind the Club Europe cabinin the 754s the Y capacity is then 6 more than it would otherwise have been.


User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3199 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 6204 times:

"BA could have wide-bodies available for transfer to Gatwick from Heathrow following an over-haul of its long-haul fleet that includes the arrival of 12 A380s and 24 Boeing 787-8s due for delivery starting in May.

The company will also assess the A350-1000, the biggest version of Airbus’s latest wide-body plane, and Boeing’s stretched 787-10 and re-winged 777-X, fleet manager Alexander Grant said last year. Those models are candidates for the replacement of 52 Boeing 747s -- comprising the largest jumbo fleet -- BA chief executive officer Keith Williams said Oct. 15. "

All it's saying is what we already know. There is not a single thing new here, except the slightly misleading idea that the costbase is now "very competitive". How can I put this? That's not true, it's just not as far from being competitive as it once was. LGW is back to nine based B777s which is where they were when the hub was closed and before the Texas routes moved to LHR. That's pretty good but no one is seriously saying BA are going to re-hub LGW. The new long haul aircraft will be LHR based to extract maximum value from the bmi purchase, I am not convinced there's going to be a whole lot of spare B777s freed up for Gatters.


User currently offlinejet72uk From UK - England, joined Oct 2011, 102 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 6186 times:

I don't mind the 737-400 and they cannot run routes like AGP, ALC, TFS, ACE, PFO, CTA on A319's. They will need A320/21's. Ask Silla, she'll know...

User currently offlinebluesky73 From UK - England, joined Oct 2012, 321 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 6087 times:

Sorry when I said older aircraft I didn't mean 732 although to see one back at London airports would be great, although probably not legal due to noise restrictions., I was thinking other 734/733/735s that left fleet but think some of these were leased.

As some of 734s have been repainted with crest and as you say refitted with slim seats some of the 734s aren't leaving the LGW fileet any time soon.

As for the bigger birds it will be interesting to see what BA has planned.


User currently offlineshankly From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 1541 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 5771 times:

Quoting AirbusA6 (Reply 3):
Have BA ever bought secondhand long haul aircraft? It's not the way they usually do things, which is to buy new and then keep them for (more or less) their whole life.

Buying secondhand? Maybe not. But BA has historically bumped its fleets with lease or other temporary arrangements:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank C. Duarte Jr.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Fitzgerald


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank Schaefer


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank C. Duarte Jr.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Udo K. Haafke


...yes I know 323 was not long haul, but used to be very fond of her in her 70's heyday...she even had her own safety cards

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim Rees




L1011 - P F M
User currently offlineWB556 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2011, 29 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5189 times:

I travel to Ibiza frequently to visit family and must say that the 734's on the most part took smart and do the job. Most people don't know the difference but I find it a nice change to take a ride on a classic 737, they won't be about for a lot longer, enjoy them while you can. My only bug bare is the lack of club lounge and priority boarding in Ibiza.

This route seems good for BA, rarely a seat free in economy and only a couple up in club. Excellent service in club too as there are often only 4 rows.


User currently offlinekaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12409 posts, RR: 37
Reply 17, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4974 times:

I have to agree with those who say that the 734s are anything but past it; I travel on them a fair bit between JER and LGW and if I didn't actually know that they were 20+ years old, I would be surprised to hear it; they are clean, they look well and they're comfortable. Certainly, they don't look or feel their age and I find the interiors perfectly comfortable and acceptable..

That said, reality bites; a few weeks back, I went to LGW a few weeks back and I was amazed to see how dominant U2 has become at LGW. Their fleet has age on their side; BA doesn't and sooner rather than later, a time will come when BA has to make a decision. Frankly, I just don't think their heart is in it to invest in a new fleet, so if they are to hang in there, it will have to be A319s, possibly a few 320s. However, I do think that U2 will continue to grow at LGW and they will come into current BA markets.


User currently offlineAirbusA6 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 2011 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4320 times:

Most passengers would just see a 737, would the general public tell the generational difference between a BA 734 and an FR 738?

It's not as if BA are operating BAC1-11s vs rival 737s!



it's the bus to stansted (now renamed national express a4 to ruin my username)
User currently offlineTupolevtu154 From Germany, joined Aug 2004, 2178 posts, RR: 28
Reply 19, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day ago) and read 3679 times:

Quoting jet72uk (Reply 13):
AGP, ALC, TFS, ACE, PFO, CTA

All of those routes can be done with A319's. EZY use A319's on a daily basis to AGP, ALC and CTA and have been known to do the rest when needed. ALC is only two hours away!



Atheists - Winning since 33 A.D.
User currently offlinekdhurst380 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2010, 174 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day ago) and read 3489 times:

Quoting Tupolevtu154 (Reply 19):
Quoting jet72uk (Reply 13):
AGP, ALC, TFS, ACE, PFO, CTA

All of those routes can be done with A319's. EZY use A319's on a daily basis to AGP, ALC and CTA and have been known to do the rest when needed. ALC is only two hours away!

The A319 in fact has more range than the A320, in standard configuration.

This is true in most cases except for most notably, EZY, who have double overwings and other modifications which make their A319s almost as heavy as their A320s.

BAs A319s can go quite a bit further than their 734s.

[Edited 2012-10-31 18:04:43]

User currently offlinejet72uk From UK - England, joined Oct 2011, 102 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 9 months 15 hours ago) and read 3271 times:

Quoting kdhurst380 (Reply 20):
The A319 in fact has more range than the A320, in standard configuration.

I was thinking more along the lines of seat capaticy


User currently offlinevectismanpaul From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2012, 68 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (1 year 9 months 15 hours ago) and read 3201 times:

Hi there jet72uk
I have sent you a private message.
Thanks
V.


User currently offlinejumpjets From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2012, 793 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (1 year 9 months 12 hours ago) and read 3003 times:

Quoting AirbusA6 (Reply 18):
It's not as if BA are operating BAC1-11s vs rival 737s!

I sort of wish they still were - my first ever flight was on a BAC1-11 and I have rather a soft spot for them!


User currently offlineDano1977 From British Indian Ocean Territory, joined Jun 2008, 484 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 9 months 12 hours ago) and read 2973 times:

Quoting bluesky73 (Reply 9):

I think easy jet did or still do buy there planes, then they sell them and do a leaseback.



Children should only be allowed on aircraft if 1. Muzzled and heavily sedated 2. Go as freight
User currently offlinebluesky73 From UK - England, joined Oct 2012, 321 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 9 months 8 hours ago) and read 2748 times:

Thanks Dano1977. So is it more economical to buy, sell then lease back aircraft?
If you buy an aircraft I would assume that you're better off keeping for good number of years unless you got a real cracking deal when buying in bulk?


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Wizz Air: To Add New 320 And New Routes At BUD posted Tue Oct 14 2008 09:09:13 by Pe@rson
Air Pacific To Add New Aircraft posted Fri Nov 22 2002 13:39:53 by Gulfair
Blue1 717 Operating For Estonian? Aircraft At LGW posted Sun Feb 5 2012 21:03:30 by LGWflyer
AM Looking To Add 3 New Cities In USA East Coast posted Tue Nov 1 2011 06:14:57 by LIPZ
U2 Aircraft At LGW posted Sun Aug 15 2010 04:35:33 by richardw
IB Looking To Add New Flights To Brazil In 2011 posted Thu Aug 12 2010 19:14:13 by LipeGIG
Is Qantas Going To Add New International Routes? posted Mon Feb 22 2010 03:35:15 by fab747
Etihad To Add 4 New India Cities posted Thu Feb 7 2008 12:40:05 by Behramjee
Royal Air Maroc To Add New African Destinations posted Fri Dec 7 2007 07:19:24 by Bambicruz
Delta To Add 3 New Routes From CVG posted Tue Oct 9 2007 06:24:11 by DAL767400ER