Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could LAF See G4 To SFB With The A319?  
User currently offlineFWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3704 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1419 times:

I went to a concert at Purdue several weeks ago, and saw a Miami Air 738 on approach to LAF (probably an athletic charter) as I was walking on campus. This made me think: The last scheduled service LAF had was AA/RegionsAir to STL on Jetstreams (and before that, NW/XJ SAABs to DTW). Competition with IND (less than an hour away, with extremely low fares at the time RegionsAir pulled out) was likely a factor.

That said, I still think LAF has potential for commercial air service - not with legacy RJ service to major hubs, but with ULCCs like G4 that want to provide a vacation alternative to big airports (IND, ORD/MDW) and serve a large local population base. G4 has done a similar strategy elsewhere in the state at GYY, serving GYY-SFB as an alternative to ORD/MDW-MCO and tapping into the large northwest Indiana population base. Because it still handles sports and other charters, LAF could also be modified for scheduled passenger service with minimal expense. And as a bonus, if pax service is successful at LAF again, they get more FAA funding. I could see G4 normally flying the route their normal 2x/week most of the year and boosting it to 4-5x/week during spring break at Purdue.

But I think there's a big reason why G4 hasn't started LAF yet: short runways and MD-80s don't mix. LAF has a short runway (6,600 ft), so G4 probably couldn't send their Mad Dogs in to SFB (which I think would be a natural route for relaunching scheduled service). But with the A319s coming online soon (far superior short-field performance) and SFB as one of the first Airbus bases for G4, plus rising fares at IND across the board, could G4 give LAF-SFB the ol' "college" try? I could see G4 doing a good job, and it could even draw people from Indy's north/northwest suburbs thanks to IND's rising fares and free parking at LAF.

Anyone else see potential for G4 at LAF?


I don't work for FWA, their tenants, or their ad agency. But I still love FWA.
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinekcrwflyer From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3791 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

Quoting FWAERJ (Thread starter):
But I think there's a big reason why G4 hasn't started LAF yet: short runways and MD-80s don't mix. LAF has a short runway (6,600 ft), so G4 probably couldn't send their Mad Dogs in to SFB (which I think would be a natural route for relaunching scheduled service).

That's not short unless there is an obstacle impacting climb requirements or you're at a higher altitude. I don't think LAF has either.. so that's probably not the reason G4 doesn't fly there.


User currently offlineFWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3704 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

Quoting kcrwflyer (Reply 1):
That's not short unless there is an obstacle impacting climb requirements or you're at a higher altitude. I don't think LAF has either

In LAF's approach, planes basically do a low-fly over the university campus.



I don't work for FWA, their tenants, or their ad agency. But I still love FWA.
User currently offlinekcrwflyer From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3791 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

Quoting FWAERJ (Reply 2):
In LAF's approach, planes basically do a low-fly over the university campus.

I doubt that's impacting the approach angle or climb. I'm talking about one of these:

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb...53089_8213851_n.jpg&size=604%2C453

Or...

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb...168089_274184_n.jpg&size=720%2C540


User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 22681 posts, RR: 20
Reply 4, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

Quoting FWAERJ (Thread starter):
LAF has a short runway (6,600 ft), so G4 probably couldn't send their Mad Dogs in to SFB (which I think would be a natural route for relaunching scheduled service).

AA ran M82s on MDW-DFW of a shorter runway with no problems for years.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineMainliner From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 410 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

ROA's longest runway is just 200' longer than LAF's and G4 has no problem sending MD-80's here, and that's with mountains on almost all sides.

I'm sure that LAF-Florida flights would fill up during the spring break season, but the terminal is pretty small. Not sure that they have enough seating capacity for more than 50 pax or so, but I could be wrong. There is quite a large amount of empty space that could be converted though.

Generally, I think with IND just over an hour down the road, and with GYY and ORD/MDW a few hours north, I wouldn't expect to see G4 in LAF any time soon.



Every flight counts.
User currently offlinedsuairptman From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 891 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

If there is enough runway and pax willing to buy ancillary products/services, then it would not surprise me to see G4 consider the possiblity.


GEAUX SAINTS!
User currently offlineweb500sjc From United States of America, joined Sep 2009, 719 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 1418 times:

Quoting FWAERJ (Reply 2):
In LAF's approach, planes basically do a low-fly over the university campus.

?


the Long runway...the only one any jet can normally use runs east->west about 1/2 mile south of campus, its the only runway with either an ILS or GPS approach. The only instrument approach that could really come close to campus is the VOR-A, which i am almost certain you will never see a commercial jet on.

the approaches will have no bearing on weather commercial jets will be able to fly into LAF.

just so i can put it out there, there would have to be upgrades to the airport. as of right now i have no idea how security is done, but the only service we get is charter ops for either sports teams or veterans flights to the DC area.

edit;

the largest aircraft I have seen out of LAF was a DL752 for the Minnesota Gophers, and an USA321 for Penn State - others tend to use Miami Air B738

[Edited 2012-11-07 12:25:46]


Boiler Up!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Flyi To Start Three More CLT Flights With The A319 posted Wed Mar 30 2005 04:15:51 by StowAway
A New B747NG To Compete With The A380? posted Mon Dec 20 2010 11:17:18 by BOEING747400
KOWB: G4 To SFB Starts Tomorrow! posted Tue Feb 17 2009 08:19:23 by Lexy
What Has Roel Pieper To Do With The Eclipse 500? posted Sat Feb 10 2007 13:58:58 by Boeing777/747
Wow! A Thread That Has Nothing To Do With The A380 posted Sat Oct 7 2006 19:37:20 by 727200er
How To Mess With The Pax posted Thu Jul 20 2006 17:14:08 by Starlionblue
Airbus A300-800 Or How To Compete With The 783? posted Wed Feb 22 2006 09:20:55 by PADSpot
How Is Airbus Going To Compete With The 7E7? posted Sat Jun 12 2004 02:25:55 by BoeingBus
Was The A320 Built To Compete With The 757 posted Thu May 13 2004 02:06:14 by 747400sp
From Paris To Brusselsairport With The T.G.V posted Mon Sep 8 2003 15:48:29 by Lumumba