Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A380 Flying Into EMA With Trent XWB Engine  
User currently offlinenema From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2006, 724 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2354 times:

Must have been an amazing site to those driving along the M1 motorway today when the A380 flew over on short final to EMA.

It was showing off (and testing) the Trent XWB engine which is destined for the A350.

Wish i had the time to have be there, only 30 miles from where i live.

Here are some images...

http://www.itv.com/news/central/upda...east-midlands-airport-in-pictures/


http://www.itv.com/news/central/2012...er-lands-at-east-midlands-airport/


There isnt really a dark side to the moon, as a matter of fact its all dark!
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEmalad From United Kingdom, joined May 2006, 450 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2355 times:

Wow, would have been amazing to see it land at EMA. My dad works ar RR and the staff got a 30 notification that it was coming over Derby and the factory.

User currently offlineGlareskin From Netherlands, joined Jun 2005, 1308 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2357 times:

The engine diameter doesn't look very big. I expected more something like the engines of the 777.


There's still a long way to go before all the alliances deserve a star...
User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6844 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2357 times:

Well it's bigger than anything else aside from the GE90. It's not that impressive because it's on the wing of a very big airplane. In fact it's bigger than its cousin the Trent 800 which is an engine for the 777.


New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlineflyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 2456 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2353 times:

Hmm, a little question:

For what reason are 4-engined A/C not equipped with larger-diameter #2 and #3 engines? Ground clearance would be the same. So the reason must be commonality, so that you can save the trouble of training mechanics for another engine type, and having to store additional replacement parts?

Well, an airline with the 350 and the 380... but I agree the plane will look ugly. 


David



Keeping calm is terrorism against those who want to live in fear.
User currently offlineJamBrain From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2008, 251 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2353 times:

Quoting Glareskin (Reply 2):
The engine diameter doesn't look very big. I expected more something like the engines of the 777.
http://vimeo.com/53176215#t=130

You can see in this still that is is significantly larger then the 900.



Jambrain
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13438 posts, RR: 100
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2355 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 4):
For what reason are 4-engined A/C not equipped with larger-diameter #2 and #3 engines? Ground clearance would be the same. So the reason must be commonality, so that you can save the trouble of training mechanics for another engine type, and having to store additional replacement parts?

Several reasons:
1. It costs billions to develop each engine size. So no one is going to develop multiple engines for one airlines. They will spend the money instead on a more competitive engine. We're talking an added cost of about $500 a takeoff here or $1.25 (US dollars) per flight per passenger.
2. As you noted commonality. Every size has different parts. The training isn't an issue, it is all the certification of all the different part sizes. This is mostly in that cost in point #1.
3. You do not gain much. The engines are optimized for the best cruise thrust versus nacelle drag for the mission. Savings of about $0.03 in fuel per flight.
4. Engine out: The airframe must work with any one engine failing. Having different engine sizes complicates rudder certification. I am unable to estimate the cost of this quickly.
5. It takes a large number of one engine out there to debug an engine. The CF-6 on the A330 has different issues than the CF6 on the 767. This means added fuel burn of about $0.02 later in the engine life due to fewer PIPs.
6. Engine rotation. In general, the oldest engine on the airframe is placed on an inside position as that is the safest place for an engine out and older engines are the most likely to have an issue. So if the inner and outer engines are of different sizes, that messes up maintenance schemes and would add a cost of about 50 US cents (half a dollar) to every passenger for every flight if that flexibility were to be removed. Why pay that for a negligible fuel burn savings? The added maintenance costs would outweigh any propulsion advantage.

So net, the added cost per flight is about $1.74 per passenger. So cost/benefit says keep to one engine type.

Heck, its common for different airframes to share engines (or their cores) due to high development costs. Since widebody engines sell so few engines, we saw the same engines on the 767, DC-10/MD-11, 744, A300, and if one stretches commonality L1011. It is likely any future quad will be lucky to even gain a custom fan diameter. Quads are tough business cases to start with.

Besides, the next quad is likely to be a BWB. With the changed engine packaging, it will necessitate a quad have four identical engines and if built as a 3-holer, the engines must be of same size for the engine out condition (rudders on a BWB must be drag rudders and that constrains the design).

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineflyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 2456 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2352 times:

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 6):

Thank for taking your time to answer. Of course, I didn't think of these problems, but now I understand.



David



Keeping calm is terrorism against those who want to live in fear.
User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6844 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2352 times:

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 4):
For what reason are 4-engined A/C not equipped with larger-diameter #2 and #3 engines? Ground clearance would be the same.

I don't understand what you mean, ground clearance would not be the same with bigger number 2 and 3 engines. With 1 and 4 it would, since those are higher.

And then if we assume that current engines are ideally sized on quads, using bigger engines 1 and 4 would lead to using smaller 2 and 3 than current ones, or it wouldn't make sense. Then you have the two most powerful engines the farthest from centerline, and many new issues arise.



New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Qantas, "A380 Unprofitable To LAX With Trent 900" posted Tue Dec 14 2010 17:39:43 by netjetsintl
Trent XWB Engine Testing - Any News? posted Fri Sep 10 2010 07:14:13 by LH452
SIA A380 IN ZRH. Video With Amazing Engine Sound! posted Thu Jul 22 2010 00:08:31 by glidepath73
AC003 Flying To NRT With Two Engine Air Bleeds Not Working? posted Sat Nov 25 2006 03:59:50 by Ktachiya
"A380 Is Flying Into The Headwind Of Reality" posted Wed Jan 19 2005 20:52:28 by Jacobin777
Monarchs From Around The World Flying Into UK posted Fri May 18 2012 00:53:19 by Bthebest
Irish 6/12: Flying Into Summer posted Sun Apr 8 2012 10:17:45 by kaitak
EL AL B738 Flying Into Shannon? posted Tue Apr 3 2012 15:06:34 by abrown532
How Long Have AnadoluJet Been Flying Into STN? posted Wed Dec 15 2010 07:29:01 by 8herveg
Aboulafia, Akbar Al Baker Take Aim At RR Trent XWB posted Tue Nov 30 2010 05:05:27 by keesje