Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
No More Q400's For UA?  
User currently offlineEWRkid1990 From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 181 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2161 times:

Recently looking at several booking options that originate/arrive at EWR, I noticed that the Q400 has been replaced on several routes I have flown the Q400 on before, like EWR-PIT, EWR-BUF, EWR-ALB. I know this is only a small sampling of the routes it flew out of EWR, but it looks like they've been removed from the EWR schedule. Are the Q400's flying out of another UA hub, or are they gone altogether, because United still lists the aircraft on its fleet page.

Cheers!
-EWR1990

28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinejetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2777 posts, RR: 33
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

Republic (YX) is flying them out of DEN.

Hate em, hate em, hate em.



No info
User currently offlineCaspian27 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 381 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2165 times:

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 1):
Republic (YX) is flying them out of DEN.

Hate em, hate em, hate em.

While I'm not exactly a fan of who is operating them, can you expound a bit on why you dislike them?



Meanwhile, somewhere 35,000 ft above your head...
User currently offlineRiverCityFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2165 times:

Republic has them in DEN, and is forming an operation on the east coast right now. Other aircraft are just replacing the Q400 as the flying transitions from Colgan to Republic.

User currently offlineyyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16248 posts, RR: 56
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2163 times:

What was the rationale for moving the Q400 fleet west from EWR?

It seemed to just cause a re-influx of more E145's into EWR, which is the last thing that congested airport needed.

For example, the 8x daily EWR-YYZ on the Q400 were replaced by 10x daily E145. I doubt the all-up costs of this daily E145 route is more cost effective.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineEWRkid1990 From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 181 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2163 times:

So Q400's are coming back to EWR soon? I love them if you sit aft of the engine, WAY less noisy. The flights I've had with them were comfortable, quiet (again, sit BEHIND the prop), and felt less cramped than an E145, even though its 2-2 seating. The ceilings seemed higher also, and having bins on both sides of the isle is definitely a plus.

User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3303 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2163 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 1):

Hate em, hate em, hate em.

Funny, the only regional jet I like more than the Q400 is the ERJ-135/145. I've loved the Q400 (I hate the Q200, don't get me wrong) since my first flight in one three years ago. Just phenomenal.

TIS



www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2163 times:

Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 7):

I assume you mean the only regional AIRCRAFT you like better than the Q400?  

BTW, looking at the schedules for this spring, Republic is operating them on the IAD-PVD route again!

I am ecstatic to see them coming back! Love them! The Q1/200, while only having flown on my first one very recently, are fun little puddle-jumpers! The shaking and rattling makes the flight more interesting!  


User currently offlineThomas_Jaeger From Switzerland, joined Apr 2002, 2382 posts, RR: 28
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2165 times:

From what I can see in our schedule data at ch-aviation, they plan to resume EWR operations from January 2, 2013 operating to ALB, BWI, BOS, BUF, BTV, PIT, PWM, RDU, ROC, IAD.

Does anyone have an updated status of their fleet, we currently have the following as flying in our database. Is that list correct or do we have too many as I assume:
N188WQ
N191WQ
N196WQ
N199WQ
N202WQ
N203WQ
N208WQ
N209WQ
N214WQ
N323NG
N328NG
N332NG
N336NG
N339NG
N342NG
N346NG
N34NG
N356NG
N380NG
N502LX
N507LX
N508LX
N510LX

Are the following still parked or already operating?:
N187WQ
N190WQ
N195WQ
N204WQ
N213WQ
N333NG
N338NG
N341NG
N345NG

[Edited 2012-11-11 18:38:28]


Swiss aviation news junkie living all over the place
User currently offlinejetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2777 posts, RR: 33
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2163 times:

Quoting Caspian27 (Reply 3):
While I'm not exactly a fan of who is operating them, can you expound a bit on why you dislike them?

From a ramp agent perspective:

Extremely unreliable and maintenance sensitive aircraft, we have at least one flight a day that is delayed 4+ hours for maintenance. "A Day" If it doesn't delay it cancels.

They are a pain in the neck to load and unload because of the shelf in the aft bin. On landing, all the bags that are stacked on the shelf fall forward onto the floor section (because of the braking action) of the bin and block the doorway and get stuck in the bin webbing.

On overnighters you have to secure the propellers with ropes and ties so they don't windmill on the ramp.

You have to hand pump the brakes before dead towing. This is done with a pole that is inserted into a hand pump in the gear well of the right main gear. Takes some pumping to get the brake system up to pressure.

The aft bin door is also temperamental and difficult to shut sometimes. And having to raise the door and then secure the door from closing on you with a large pole adds more time and complexity to a "quick turn."

The lavatory dump system is also fun, it's not uncommon to not get it right and have lavatory waste on the ramp. Luckily I haven't had that problem yet (knock on wood), but have seen many very experienced agents mess it up and put turds on the ramp. Other aircraft it's a very easy task and usually no problem.

From a passenger perspective:

They are noisy and the vibrations can drive you insane, especially the closer to the engines you are. The forward door is very small and you have to duck quite a bit on entering.

All around, I do not like this aircraft.



No info
User currently offlineUnited_fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7483 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 1):
Republic (YX) is flying them out of DEN.

So,who is going to fly them out of EWR ? Colgan did until they closed .



'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlinejetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2777 posts, RR: 33
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

Quoting United_fan (Reply 10):
So,who is going to fly them out of EWR ? Colgan did until they closed .

Republic is the sole operator of the Q400 for UA and they are being exclusively flown out of DEN. No EWR Q400's.



No info
User currently offlineEWRkid1990 From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 181 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

Also, are there plans for United to bring its CRJ's to EWR then? And wouldn't the lack of Q400's free up gate space for mainline jets in the C2 concourse, where the -400's seem to always park?

User currently offlineRDH3E From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 1651 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 9):
All around, I do not like this aircraft.

No Kidding.

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 9):
From a passenger perspective:

I disagree with everything you just wrote. The Q is a pretty quiet aircraft, and I do not notice any real vibrations that would "drive me insane". Most people seem to agree with me.


User currently onlineRyanairGuru From Australia, joined Oct 2006, 5392 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

Quoting EWRkid1990 (Reply 12):
wouldn't the lack of Q400's free up gate space for mainline jets in the C2 concourse, where the -400's seem to always park?

As said above they are coming back, and looking at summer schedules (which are, admittedly, a place holder) they seem to be using them out of EWR and IAD.

Assuming that they don't come back, then it must be inevitable that there will be more big RJs in EWR. I think the first step to filling in those C gates would be to move the ERJ-170s over from A1, allowing them to consolidate their A operations and close the A1 United Club.

Unfortunately the A2 zoo is here to stay since there is simply no way to shoehorn those ERJs into C  



Worked Hard, Flew Right
User currently offlineThomas_Jaeger From Switzerland, joined Apr 2002, 2382 posts, RR: 28
Reply 15, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 11):
Republic is the sole operator of the Q400 for UA and they are being exclusively flown out of DEN. No EWR Q400's.

Republic will fly them from EWR from next year.

From what I can see the only regional operators currently at EWR are Commutair with Dash 8-200s and Dash 8-300s, Expressjet with ERJ-145s and Shuttle America with EMB-170s. I do not see any CRJs scheduled today or for any future dates.



Swiss aviation news junkie living all over the place
User currently offlinejetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2777 posts, RR: 33
Reply 16, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

Quoting RDH3E (Reply 13):
I disagree with everything you just wrote. The Q is a pretty quiet aircraft, and I do not notice any real vibrations that would "drive me insane". Most people seem to agree with me.

On short flights they are no problem, but United is deploying these aircraft on 1.5-2 hour flights. 2 hours on any prop is a non-starter for me.



No info
User currently onlineRyanairGuru From Australia, joined Oct 2006, 5392 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 16):
2 hours on any prop is a non-starter for me.

I can only talk for myself, but I don't have any problem with the Q. It does rattle a bit when it starts up, and takeoffs can be a bit noisy, but during cruise I've never had a problem with noise or vibration.

My longest Q flight was CBR-BNE, which was blocked at 2:20. Other than being a pain since the 737 block time is 1:50, i didn't bother me at all.

I am, however, a much bigger ATR fan than Q. the 72-500s are a great little aircraft. They are (I feel) more spacious and quieter.



Worked Hard, Flew Right
User currently offlinemcg From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 800 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2162 times:

For what it's worth I recently had a trip from DEN that was Q400's both ways. The outbound was delayed a couple of hours by unspecified mechanical issues. The return flight was canceled. When I asked the customer service agent what was the reason for the cancellation she said 'well we've got this aircraft called a Q400 and it presents us with ongoing reliability issues'.

I like riding in the aircraft. It's a little loud but I like the lower cruise altitude for looking out the window. My wife said the airplane on the outbound leg was 'real nice', which is a good measure of how typical passengers would perceive it.


User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2162 times:

Quoting RDH3E (Reply 13):
Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 16):

For what it's worth, I have flown them on the EWR-MYR route, which clocks in at between 1:20-1:45, a few times and I didn't notice any of what you mentioned. It was the same as a CRJ-900, except for the higher noise pitch, but that's it.


User currently offlineRDH3E From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 1651 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2162 times:

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 16):
On short flights they are no problem, but United is deploying these aircraft on 1.5-2 hour flights. 2 hours on any prop is a non-starter for me.

The longest flight UA does on the Q currently is DENMCI, which is a maintenance rotation for the Republic, it's the only flight over 2 hours currently in the schedule.

UA has used the Q's on 14 markets in Q4, 6 of which are under 1.5hrs, 7 between 1.5-2 hrs, and 1 (noted above) over 2 hours (by less than 5 minutes).

It appears there is a sweet spot with this aircraft that it makes sense to target this type of segment.


User currently offlinejetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2777 posts, RR: 33
Reply 21, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2162 times:

Quoting RDH3E (Reply 20):
It appears there is a sweet spot with this aircraft that it makes sense to target this type of segment.

Yes but how much are the rebookings and loss of reputation costing the airline when everyday you are spending money to rebook passengers at a much higher cost on Frontier, Delta, and American?

The dispatch reliability of this aircraft is terrible. Republic acknowledges it and is agreeing to sub in E170's on routes if the maintenance delay is in excess of 4 hours (which is becoming extremely common, almost daily is a Q400 flight delayed more than 4 hours at my station).



No info
User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 22876 posts, RR: 20
Reply 22, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2162 times:

Quoting RyanairGuru (Reply 17):
It does rattle a bit when it starts up, and takeoffs can be a bit noisy, but during cruise I've never had a problem with noise or vibration.

I agree that it's not "bad," but I do think it's different from a jet. Particularly in front of the wing, the sound is a lot different - I'd say lower-pitched. That might bother some people.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineRDH3E From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 1651 posts, RR: 3
Reply 23, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2162 times:

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 21):
The dispatch reliability of this aircraft is terrible.

It's not the just aircraft, it's the operator as well.


User currently offlinejetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2777 posts, RR: 33
Reply 24, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2162 times:

Quoting RDH3E (Reply 23):
It's not the just aircraft, it's the operator as well.

We had similar issues with Colgan Air. Which ironically these are literally the exact same aircraft, just being operated by Republic now. This aircraft is just a maintenance hog.



No info
25 RDH3E : Check the stats, maintenance accounts for less than 1/4 of the delays and cancels. Not the case when Colgan was operating the aircraft. Two entirely
26 pvd757 : PVD-IAD will see Q400s some time over the next couple of months.
27 thegreatchecko : Funny how everyone bags the Q, but Horizon and Porter seem to keep them in the air and on time just fine. I think the blame should go to RAH for tryin
28 jetmatt777 : It may account for 25% of the delays and cancels, but compared to the rest of the operation, the Q400 as a whole has terrible on time performance. Wh
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UA's McDonald: No More A/C Retirements For 2012 posted Mon Jul 9 2012 07:13:20 by tommy767
No More -800's For WN? posted Mon Aug 6 2012 03:13:40 by gen2stew
No More *A Themed A/c For SQ? posted Wed May 5 2010 17:47:11 by Coal
No More GE For TUI 787s? posted Thu Dec 31 2009 21:32:31 by PM
No More Pets For AC posted Sat Jun 23 2007 03:02:29 by Boeingluvr
No More Commercial For US Military War Dead posted Sat Apr 7 2007 03:54:44 by LTBEWR
Alitalia: No More Skirts For Its F/A (funny) posted Fri Nov 10 2006 11:27:17 by Wingedarrow
No More Funding For Scottish Long Haul Flights posted Sun Sep 10 2006 21:42:58 by Humberside
No More Elko For Casino Express posted Sat Dec 3 2005 18:50:23 by FlyingTexan
No More Names For Mexicana Planes? posted Tue Apr 19 2005 14:29:14 by Udo