Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Insane Citation Jet Emergency Landing Video  
User currently offlineFlexJetOKC From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 54 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1795 times:

Look at this absolutely insane video from Sao Paulo at the Congonhas Airport (CGH) airport. Amazingly, there was only very minor injuries to the pilot.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=185_1352686353

[Edited 2012-11-12 06:31:03]


Above the planet on a wing and a prayer, my grubby halo, a vapour trail in the empty air...
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9003 posts, RR: 76
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1797 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting FlexJetOKC (Thread starter):
there was only very minor injuries to the pilot.

This guy was very lucky. The first impact looked pretty hard. Thank god he is ok!

wilco737
  



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineA388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 9781 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1798 times:

Very lucky indeed that they all survived that impact.

A388


User currently offlineABQopsHP From United States of America, joined May 2006, 850 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1799 times:

Im guessing after that first impact where they went airborne again, that all 3 must have incurred some back injury. That upward bounce had to have put strain on their backs and neck. I also noticed after it went over the wall you could tell the engines were still running since it stirred up lots of dust. Or was that the fire bottles going off?

JD CRP



A line is evidence that other people exist.
User currently offlineFlexJetOKC From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 54 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1801 times:

ABQopsHP,
I believe that was just dust at the end. Personally, that does not look like the fire bottle agent color to me.



Above the planet on a wing and a prayer, my grubby halo, a vapour trail in the empty air...
User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1799 times:

J H C !!!!

Those folks are lucky. They though Jack Roush and his passenger weren't badly injured, until the hospital did x-rays of their spines.

That cloud of dust rises awful suddenly and strongly. Hydraulic fluid spraying on the engines ?

And if must have been scary for the people nearby - that has to be either the place or the parallel runway where the TAM aircraft over ran the runway.


User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8961 posts, RR: 40
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1795 times:

PR-MRG Citation CJ3, inbound from FLN. The dust being kicked up has been confirmed as being from the still powered engines. Pilot (66 yrs old) banged his head pretty hard and might be going through neurosurgery. Copilot has a broken nose. One pax with minor injuries.

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 5):
And if must have been scary for the people nearby - that has to be either the place or the parallel runway where the TAM aircraft over ran the runway.

TAM went off 35L, I am pretty sure this was 35R.



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlinebohica From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2691 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1797 times:

They're lucky the plane came to rest where it did and not on the freeway. If the plane continued onto the freeway it would have collided with a number of vehicles and the outcome could have been deadly. Thank God nobody was killed in this accident.

User currently offlinemcr From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 128 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1796 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Very lucky not to end up killed or seriously injured, obviously.

Where do you draw the line between an "emergency landing" and a crash? IMHO that looks more like a crash than any sort of landing. I assume the aircraft is no longer useful other than perhaps breaking for spare parts?


User currently offlinea36001 From Australia, joined Sep 2012, 174 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1796 times:

Goodness me! Glad he made it out ok  

User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1798 times:

Quoting mcr (Reply 8):
Where do you draw the line between an "emergency landing" and a crash?

My assumption is that "emergency landing" means the aircraft was flying and had to set down on the runway due to an emergency.

The runway overrun and destruction of the aircraft would then be a continuation of the need to land due to the emergency.

If it was simply landing long or a problem with the brakes after landing - then it would be a crash, not an emergency landing in my opinion.

The OP does say this occurred upon landing, so it would not be a rejected takeoff overrun. (Yes, I know it looks like they would have been past V1 if it was an RTO, but sometimes taking the overrun is necessary even above V1. The key knowledge factor being knowing the plane will crash - the pilots just choosing where to crash.)

The English writeup with the video only talks about the aircraft failing to stop on the runway and does not indicate there was any emergency until the overrun. However I have no idea what was said by the TV announcer in the video in Portuguese?

If the aircraft used Rwy 35R which is only 4,680 ft long - he was still going awful fast when it left the end of the runway. Certainly faster than 50 kts but less than 100 kts would be my guess from the video.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
KAL 747-400 Near-crash Zig-zag Landing Video File. posted Fri Jan 11 2002 23:54:48 by Bobcat
TAM Narrowly Avoids Crash Landing @ JFK posted Wed Sep 26 2012 15:59:34 by plateman
Manx2 Crash Landing In The Isle Of Man posted Sat Mar 10 2012 12:01:31 by Cabincrewifly
Fatal Crash Landing At Kleb 2/9/12 posted Sun Feb 12 2012 16:07:46 by calibansa333
Difficult Crosswind Landing Video posted Mon Dec 20 2010 08:54:56 by bochora
Premier Jet Crash At Oshkosh posted Tue Jul 27 2010 16:43:45 by justindpilot
Afriqiyah Airways Crash Landing In Tripoli, Libya #3 posted Thu May 13 2010 11:58:38 by SA7700
Afriqiyah Airways Crash Landing In Tripoli, Libya #2 posted Wed May 12 2010 07:44:35 by SA7700
BREAKING: Crash Landing In Tripoli, Libya: posted Wed May 12 2010 00:08:15 by Flying Belgian
Pan Am Introduction To Jet Service - 1958 Video posted Sun Apr 25 2010 13:54:08 by Mortyman