Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JFK T2 To T4 Walkway Plans Scrapped  
User currently online1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6529 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1353 times:

According to a post on FT, it looks like the planned T2 to T4 walkway has officially been scrapped. From what I heard, Delta will instead add more shuttle buses running more frequently, and the buses will use a dedicated travel path.

IMO, in addition to more frequent buses, Delta should add some New Flyer Xcelsior articulated buses. Articulated buses would provide more capacity, thus alleviating overcrowding.


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16863 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1362 times:

It's was going to be too long of a walk anyway, even with moving sidewalks. It's pretty clear DL's plans for JFK have changed over the last couple years, ideas of turning JFK into a connecting hub (EWR) are not going to work. Thus the LGA slot swap, where they are building a terminal to terminal connector.

[Edited 2012-11-16 03:34:50]


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1362 times:

I am a bit disappointed . I hate hate hate the buses and being packed into them llike that. Personally, it doesn't bode well with my claustrophobia.

User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 1393 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1363 times:

Now, total speculation but this could be because they don't plan on keeping T2 much longer. They could plan on building a new terminal and connect that to T4. Or they could do some kind of gate swap where other airlines go to T2. My point being, they may not plan on using T2 long enough to make it worth while.


You will either love or hate the airline industry. If you love it, it will get in your blood and it will never leave.
User currently offlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3468 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1364 times:

Told you! I want credit for calling this one over a month ago. haha

It was a long walk, T2 isn't long for this world, and there is an intense rumor that DL and AA will pull a switcharoo.

No need for this walkway


User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1365 times:

Quoting jfklganyc (Reply 4):

Would be cool if DL and AA switched terminals, but why would DL want to juat abandon a half-built terminal into which they've sunk a lot of money. Also, why would AA want to leave their terminal and move to an older one and a half-built one with less gate space?


User currently offlineklkla From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 933 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1363 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 5):
but why would DL want to juat abandon a half-built terminal into which they've sunk a lot of money. Also, why would AA want to leave their terminal and move to an older one and a half-built one with less gate space?

I think American would only need the nine new gates at T4 if this was to take place. T2 and T3 would close. Delta would instantly get the gates they need at T8. It would be a win/win situation for both airlines but I don't see it happening.


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21620 posts, RR: 55
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1363 times:

Quoting klkla (Reply 6):
I think American would only need the nine new gates at T4 if this was to take place. T2 and T3 would close. Delta would instantly get the gates they need at T8. It would be a win/win situation for both airlines but I don't see it happening.

It wouldn't be a win for AA - they can't run their JFK operation with nine gates, even if they scaled it down somewhat. They'd have to really draw down at the airport in order to fit into T4.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinePIEAvantiP180 From United States of America, joined exactly 5 years ago today! , 539 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1363 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Mir (Reply 7):

Well we do know that DL will get a few more gates in T4, i believe they will have 12-15 all together in T4. Plus if they decide to finish building out and make an RJ concourse at the end of the pier it would take care all of AA needs since they run a much smaller operation at JFK then DL does. I don't believe that this will happen at all just an opinion on how it could be done. This was one of the T4 renderings that they accidentally released into the press that was later pulled down, i was lucky enough to save it before it disapeared.



[Edited 2012-11-16 10:10:10]

User currently offlineLONGisland89 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 735 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1361 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 5):
why would DL want to juat abandon a half-built terminal into which they've sunk a lot of money.

Not to mention...why would AA want to abandon their half built terminal into which they sank even more money.


User currently offlineLDVAviation From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 1067 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1363 times:

Quoting LONGisland89 (Reply 9):
Not to mention...why would AA want to abandon their half built terminal into which they sank even more money.

And, on which (T8), AA owes less money than they would have to cover in increased rents at T4.

By the end of this phase of construction on T4, there will be more debt on T4 than T8.


User currently offlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3468 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1367 times:

Guys, I'm just mentioning the rumor.

What is fact is that the connector stopped being built mid construction. The pier is there on T4 for it... they just built a wall instead.

Something made them change course in an unusual way


User currently offlinejaybird From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1367 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Wow .. strange to see that picture of JFK without the Pan Am rotunda ..

User currently offlinedelta2ual From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 620 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1365 times:

Quoting jfklganyc (Reply 4):
Told you! I want credit for calling this one over a month ago. haha

Actually, this was mentioned last month on the Facebook page of Save the PanAm Worldport. I thought it was common knowledge.



From the world's largest airline-to the world's largest airline. Delta2ual
User currently offlinejetlanta From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 3292 posts, RR: 35
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1363 times:

The cost of the connector can be better spent on further investments in T4. That pretty much says it all. Read into it what you will.

User currently offlineDeltal1011man From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 9390 posts, RR: 14
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1364 times:

Quoting klkla (Reply 6):
I think American would only need the nine new gates at T4 if this was to take place. T2 and T3 would close. Delta would instantly get the gates they need at T8. It would be a win/win situation for both airlines but I don't see it happening.

minus the fact that Delta would have to build T8 all the way out.....and still end up with less gates than they have at T2/3
Oh and AA would need (at least) all of T4B

Quoting STT757 (Reply 1):

uhh... no? Delta was never trying to make JFK into EWR. JFK's domestic network will stay pretty much right where it is for the future....

Quoting jetlanta (Reply 14):

rocket science......



yep.
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16863 posts, RR: 51
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1364 times:

Quoting Deltal1011man (Reply 15):
Delta was never trying to make JFK into EWR. JFK's domestic network will stay pretty much right where it is for the future...

I can remember a direct quote from Leo Mullin during the first attempt at the JFK project that DL was going to "replicate what CO has done with their EWR hub". I've been looking for that article this morning but I'm having trouble finding it, I remember discussing it on here.

Here's what I did find,

Quote:
"Continental is a worthy opponent and has done a nice job at Newark," Mullin said. "But we feel the expansion opportunity is greater at JFK because Newark and LaGuardia are (physically) constrained."
http://www2.airliners.net/aviation-f...general_aviation/read.main/308905/



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlinedelta2ual From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 620 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1366 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 16):
I can remember a direct quote from Leo Mullin during the first attempt at the JFK project that DL was going to "replicate what CO has done with their EWR hub". I've been looking for that article this morning but I'm having trouble finding it, I remember discussing it on here.

There have been 2 CEO's since Mr. Mullin; I would hardly take what he said years ago as indicative of what DL's plans are now. He also thought hourly service to all major cities from ATL was key to success too (DFW,PHL,LGA,ORD,EWR,BOS, DCA, etc.). Does anyone remember SkyDeli? He was wrong on many accounts and some would say led DL to BK (well he and his other cronies).

Back to NYC and DL's strategy, I think the leaders of DL now see NYC for what it is: JFK for international, with connecting service to many "spokes" and LGA with service to as many cities as will support it, within perimeter. I don't think the current DL leadership have any delusions to think they can replicate what UA has at EWR. People forget how may folks thought CO was crazy for building up EWR when they began the buildup; the thinking then was "why EWR?" Clearly, it was a brilliant move (along with other initiatives CO achieved under Bethune). They really turned themselves around and now UA is benefitting from it.

And why in the world would AA ever let their Terminal 8 go to DL? That is one beautiful terminal! The only way I could see that happening would be if AA merged with JetBlue and got terminals 5/6.



From the world's largest airline-to the world's largest airline. Delta2ual
User currently offlinejustplanenutz From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 525 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1368 times:

Quoting delta2ual (Reply 17):
The only way I could see that happening would be if AA merged with JetBlue and got terminals 5/6.

A physical connection to T5 and a closer relationship with B6 (merger or codeshare) would be the only advantage to AA in swapping. Perhaps if BA said "no way, no how" to co-locating in an expanded T8 that might help too.


User currently offlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3468 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (1 year 10 months 12 hours ago) and read 1358 times:

Quoting delta2ual (Reply 17):
Back to NYC and DL's strategy, I think the leaders of DL now see NYC for what it is: JFK for international, with connecting service to many "spokes" and LGA with service to as many cities as will support it, within perimeter. I don't think the current DL leadership have any delusions to think they can replicate what UA has at EWR. People forget how may folks thought CO was crazy for building up EWR when they began the buildup; the thinking then was "why EWR?" Clearly, it was a brilliant move (along with other initiatives CO achieved under Bethune). They really turned themselves around and now UA is benefitting from it.

That's interesting, because when they branded their hub at JFK just a few years ago, that wasn't their plan. Seems like Delta's plan for JFK and NYC changes frequently. Hopefully this one works for them. They seem to be in a good place now


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Tranfer From T2 To T4 At LHR, Landside posted Thu Jun 7 2007 01:45:32 by Robffm2
Virgin Atlantic Moving To T4 At JFK posted Tue Jun 3 2003 22:14:46 by Mcmahonsmr
Is Nigeria Key To Ethiopian Expansion Plans? posted Mon Sep 17 2012 16:40:40 by Alibo5NGN
Aer Lingus To Move JFK Operations To T5 posted Mon Jul 9 2012 05:35:43 by B6MoneyGuyJFK
What Ever Happed To LAX Enlarging Plans? posted Wed Nov 2 2011 11:31:34 by 747400sp
MEA Moving To T4 At LHR Next Year? posted Sun Oct 23 2011 13:27:38 by OLBA
What Has Happened To GA'expansion Plans To Europe? posted Sun Oct 2 2011 07:53:18 by LIPZ
Heathrow And Stansted Runway Plans Scrapped By BAA posted Mon May 24 2010 08:27:41 by EI320
JFK T3 To Be Demolished posted Thu Feb 11 2010 15:46:48 by xzavierrsa
Delta TXL-JFK Diverted To MSP? posted Sun Dec 20 2009 16:51:41 by Delta777Jet