Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
American Eagle Saab Storage In Abilene TX  
User currently offlineplanesofthepast From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (2 years 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4569 times:

The story about the American Eagle Saab 340 storage facility in Abilene is fascinating. It has seemed an unlikely place for an airliner boneyard, in West Texas.

I've wanted to see it for myself, and had the opportunity recently. I've posted a few photos I shot, at ...

http://www.planesofthepast.com/abilene-regional-airport.htm

23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNWAROOSTER From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1134 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 4575 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Interesting article. I still think there is a future for the Saab 340s. Especially the B and B+ models.   

User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4577 times:

I was there the last weekend of October.

Sad to see the planes deteoriating.


User currently offlineJBo From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 2373 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 4575 times:

Quoting NWAROOSTER (Reply 1):
Interesting article. I still think there is a future for the Saab 340s. Especially the B and B+ models.

How much support do the aircraft still get from Saab Aerospace? That's a big factor. At least they aren't orphaned aircraft like the Dornier 328 and 328JET, those aircraft became really expensive to maintain after Fairchild-Dornier went under.

The Saab is a workhorse and it's a shame nobody wants to operate them (at least in the U.S.). I think the only way we will truly see these aircraft make a comeback is if it involves some sort of modernization program that improves performance and economics.



I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.
User currently offlinewoodreau From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1050 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (2 years 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 4574 times:

You should check out the EMB-120 Brasilia boneyard in Hot Springs Ark. There's about 40 of the parked out there ASA colors. Who ever owns them seems to keep these planes running and maintained and doing periodic engine run-ups. But they're parked out there on the airport ramps at HOT.


Bonus animus sit, ab experientia. Quod salvatum fuerit de malis usu venit judicium.
User currently offlinebjorn14 From Norway, joined Feb 2010, 3622 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (2 years 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4573 times:

Quoting JBo (Reply 3):
At least they aren't orphaned aircraft like the Dornier 328 and 328JET,

IIRC Ruag Aerospace has bought the Dornier MX business. There were rumors that they were going to restart the Do228.



"I want to know the voice of God the rest is just details" --A. Einstein
User currently offlinemhkansan From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 710 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (2 years 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4573 times:

Quoting JBo (Reply 3):
some sort of modernization program that improves performance and economics.

Allow me!


Ahhh, just imagine a S2K in MQ colors!!


User currently offlinefloridaflyboy From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 2016 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4579 times:

At XJ, I did more than 500 flights on the Saab 340 and loved every last minute of it. It was very sad to see it go, but nice to see Silver pick up a few of them. Passengers loved the aircraft, the crews, airport staff, etc. were always very close. Too bad to see the end of an era to some extent.

Quoting mhkansan (Reply 6):

At XJ, several of our managers had scale model Saab 2000's in XJ/NW colors. Always wish it would have come true  



Good goes around!
User currently offlinedoulasc From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 566 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 4575 times:

I always wonered why AE took their Saab 340s out of service?

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (2 years 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4576 times:

The Saab 2000 is not approved to operate under an airline in the US by the FAA. I know a few that have looked into adding it, but due to a limited number of airframes and the cost with getting it approved they have all passed. It's an awesome aircraft and very fast.

[Edited 2012-11-18 14:10:59]


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineblueflyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 4128 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (2 years 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4576 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting EMBQA (Reply 9):
The Saab 2000 is not approved to operate under an airline in the US by the FAA.

Are there underlying issues, or is jut a matter of not being approved because no one's asked?



I've got $h*t to do
User currently offlineplanesofthepast From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4428 times:

Just saw this article ... might bring a new life and purpose to the Saab 340 and other similar aircraft.

http://www.npr.org/2012/11/28/166087...es-come-back-amid-high-fuel-prices


User currently offlinemiaskies From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 1348 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 4236 times:

The rumor is wil be seeing some of these ex-AE Saab 340B's down at SJU come next year as Seaborne takes over Eagle flying. What is yet to be seen is if Seaborne will fly as an "Eagle" carrier using AE livery or their own.


Nothing better than making love at 35K Feet!
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 13, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4178 times:

Quoting blueflyer (Reply 10):

No...no issues. Just no one has gone through the process



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlinefreakyrat From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 884 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4097 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I've seen a few corporate Saab 2000's in the US.

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4064 times:

Quoting freakyrat (Reply 14):

They don't fly under part 121 so there is no need to go through all of the FAA hoops to get certified



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineB6JFKH81 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2900 posts, RR: 7
Reply 16, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4044 times:

Quoting EMBQA (Reply 9):
The Saab 2000 is not approved to operate under an airline in the US by the FAA. I know a few that have looked into adding it, but due to a limited number of airframes and the cost with getting it approved they have all passed. It's an awesome aircraft and very fast.

Weren't y'all working on a bunch of 340's the last time I was down there? I can't remember the entire story, but if my memory serves me correctly, they were from NW Airlink and going all the way to Australia when you were done with them...REX I think was who was taking them. How many of those birds did you guys work on?



"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
User currently offlineThomas_Jaeger From Switzerland, joined Apr 2002, 2397 posts, RR: 28
Reply 17, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 3913 times:

Quoting miaskies (Reply 12):
The rumor is wil be seeing some of these ex-AE Saab 340B's down at SJU come next year as Seaborne takes over Eagle flying. What is yet to be seen is if Seaborne will fly as an "Eagle" carrier using AE livery or their own.

They will get three ex-Calm Air Saab 340Bs:
340B-166: N327SA
340B-336: N336SA
340B-351: Still with Calm Air as C-FSPB



Swiss aviation news junkie living all over the place
User currently offlineBDL757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 152 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 12 months 3 days ago) and read 3892 times:

Quoting miaskies (Reply 12):

Yes, I think that as Seaborne acquires some saabs that they will partner/codeshare with a larger carrier in SJU...it might not be AA/AE though...


User currently offlineSQ22 From Germany, joined Feb 2012, 99 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 12 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3687 times:

Quoting bjorn14 (Reply 5):
IIRC Ruag Aerospace has bought the Dornier MX business. There were rumors that they were going to restart the Do228.

Off topic:

They are doing DO 228 MX only and the NG is already available, see:

http://www.ruag.com/do228ng_en/Do_228NG/Do_228NG


User currently offlineasqx From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 618 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3425 times:

Quoting EMBQA (Reply 15):
They don't fly under part 121 so there is no need to go through all of the FAA hoops to get certified

Even though not operated by any 121 certificated air carriers, the Saab 2000 is fully certified to do so. In fact, unless someone wants to get an experimental aircraft waiver, any plane that carries passengers be it under Part 91 (owner/operator), Part 135 (commuter/on demand), or Part 121 (domestic, flag, and supplemental) has to be certified.

The Saab 2000's FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet lists it as being certified under Part 25 which is AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS: TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRPLANES.


User currently offlineFlyHossD From United States of America, joined Nov 2009, 947 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3382 times:

Quoting EMBQA (Reply 9):
The Saab 2000 is not approved to operate under an airline in the US by the FAA. I know a few that have looked into adding it, but due to a limited number of airframes and the cost with getting it approved they have all passed. It's an awesome aircraft and very fast.
Quoting blueflyer (Reply 10):
Are there underlying issues, or is jut a matter of not being approved because no one's asked?
Quoting asqx (Reply 20):
Even though not operated by any 121 certificated air carriers, the Saab 2000 is fully certified to do so. In fact, unless someone wants to get an experimental aircraft waiver, any plane that carries passengers be it under Part 91 (owner/operator), Part 135 (commuter/on demand), or Part 121 (domestic, flag, and supplemental) has to be certified.

The Saab 2000's FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet lists it as being certified under Part 25 which is AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS: TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRPLANES.

As I recall, Air Marshall Islands did operate the Saab 2000 on a U.S. 121 Certificate. At least think they had a U.S. Certificate...

I sometimes kick myself for passing on the chance to ride on one of their Saab 2000 flights.



My statements do not represent my former employer or my current employer and are my opinions only.
User currently offlinemhkansan From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 710 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3240 times:

Private Saab 2000s swing by MHK from time to time. It is an absolutely stunning airplane, inside it feels like a Thoroughbred. A plane surely a few years before it's time. Imagine if legacies had bought fleets of Saabs 2000's to replace the 340s and short-range ERJs and CRJs? Maybe the day will come. Bombardier and ATR seem to have a tough time cracking the US legacy market with the turbos.

User currently offlineBooDog From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 257 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day ago) and read 3044 times:

Here's a story done by our local paper a couple of years ago about the planes.

http://www.reporternews.com/news/201...rops-wait-till-they-may-fly-again/



B1B - best looking aircraft ever.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
American Eagle DFW - BOI In A CRJ posted Mon Mar 4 2002 19:55:31 by Mls515
American Eagle In PHX, 1980s posted Wed Jul 4 2012 14:52:04 by dlramp4life
Info About American Eagle Saab 340 posted Thu May 17 2001 00:28:10 by Jeffen
Info About American Eagle Saab 340 posted Thu May 17 2001 00:28:10 by Jeffen
American Eagle In PHX, 1980s posted Wed Jul 4 2012 14:52:04 by dlramp4life
American Eagle Restoring Flights In The Carribean posted Mon Apr 6 2009 16:51:55 by BooDog
American Eagle CRJ Already In Service? posted Thu Nov 22 2001 20:15:35 by Djcrooks
American Eagle Saab 340 ORD posted Fri Mar 21 2008 09:47:36 by Vw
Info About American Eagle Saab 340 posted Thu May 17 2001 00:28:10 by Jeffen
American Eagle In PHX, 1980s posted Wed Jul 4 2012 14:52:04 by dlramp4life
American Eagle In PHX, 1980s posted Wed Jul 4 2012 14:52:04 by dlramp4life
American Eagle In PHX, 1980s posted Wed Jul 4 2012 14:52:04 by dlramp4life
American Eagle Tail Strike In BOS posted Fri Jun 22 2007 23:55:22 by Md94
American Eagle Saab 340 Ferried ABI-MSP posted Sun Sep 24 2006 04:34:51 by Pilottim747
American Eagle Saab At SJC? posted Mon May 17 2004 17:48:36 by Mikesairways
Help With American Eagle Saab Reg... posted Mon Mar 22 2004 19:44:44 by GulfstreamGuy
American Eagle DFW - BOI In A CRJ posted Mon Mar 4 2002 19:55:31 by Mls515
American Eagle CRJ Already In Service? posted Thu Nov 22 2001 20:15:35 by Djcrooks
Info About American Eagle Saab 340 posted Thu May 17 2001 00:28:10 by Jeffen
American Eagle In PHX, 1980s posted Wed Jul 4 2012 14:52:04 by dlramp4life