Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AI May Fly Dreamliner To SFO Via SIN  
User currently onlineJOYA380B747 From India, joined Mar 2005, 529 posts, RR: 1
Posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2341 times:

Based on today's news

AI may fly Dreamliner to San Francisco

Quote:
The state-owned Air India is working out a plan to fly from India to San Francisco, with a stopover in Singapore. It would deploy Dreamliner (Boeing 787) aircraft on the route. The plane is 25 per cent more fuel efficient than the Boeing 777 Air India currently uses to fly to New York. The Dreamliner can fly 10-14 hours at a stretch on the route.

Ajit Singh, civil aviation minister, told Business Standard, “We are considering going to San Francisco through the West Coast. We are weighing the option of a direct flight or we can use the Dreamliner to go via Singapore.”

My question is Why via SIN? Won't that increase the flight route immensely, considering the Dreamliner route will probably be from DEL.


If it wasn't for AI and those money mongers sitting in the parliament, 9W would have been as big as SQ...:(
42 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineIndianicWorld From Australia, joined Jun 2001, 2992 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2354 times:

My question is why at all?

Seems another sure way to lose $$, considering the amount of competition that already exists via Asia, Europe or the Middle East.

This airline seems to just have different ideas each day, without actually thinking them through.


User currently offlineAirIndia From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1644 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2355 times:

Quoting JOYA380B747 (Thread starter):
Ajit Singh, civil aviation minister, told Business Standard, “We are considering going to San Francisco through the West Coast.

Why is Ajit singh making thsese statementes. Shouldnt AI MD be the one making this?


User currently offlinePolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2261 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2354 times:

Can the 788 even fly SIN-SFO nonstop in a typical configuration with any meaningful payload?

User currently offlineairindia787 From United States of America, joined May 2011, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2355 times:

Considering that SQ couldn't make their SIN-LAX/EWR nonstops work, I don't see how this would work by any stretch of the imagination. I don't even think that the 788 would be able to make the route nonstop, especially the earlier, heavier ones.

User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7757 posts, RR: 18
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2353 times:

Quoting airindia787 (Reply 4):
Considering that SQ couldn't make their SIN-LAX/EWR nonstops work, I don't see how this would work by any stretch of the imagination. I don't even think that the 788 would be able to make the route nonstop, especially the earlier, heavier ones.

This is precisely where my eyebrows raise. It looks like a whole jumbled mess of a route.



我思うゆえに我あり。(Jap. 'I think, therefore I am.')
User currently offlinetimpdx From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 572 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2356 times:

Why on earth would they route that way? Even if you took the closest logical city to SIN like BLR or HYD to SFO, great circle route is 300 miles further for the SIN leg to SFO? Boggles the mind. DEL is even closer to SFO than BLR. If you need a tech stop to take a meaningful payload, then ICN or even TPE makes much much more sense. Then again, having been to India, there is plenty of things that make no sense there.

User currently onlineJOYA380B747 From India, joined Mar 2005, 529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2352 times:

The things AI and Govt of India keep doing every now and then...      


If it wasn't for AI and those money mongers sitting in the parliament, 9W would have been as big as SQ...:(
User currently onlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2091 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2353 times:

If not SIN, what other transit city could they use. HKG, NRT, SEL, TPE? All these cities have 3-4 daily flights on them already. If they try through Europe. MUC, FRA are covered by UA&LH and LHR has 5 flights a day.

Or, should they just focus on getting their carrier back to a profitable and lean carrier.



John@SFO
User currently offlineojas From India, joined Mar 2008, 2977 posts, RR: 24
Reply 9, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2352 times:

I don't see this even a point of discussion.

A sound byte taken from Ajit Singh that AI is considering a destination and there you go ..... a full article on that.

AIs B788s cannot even do a SIN - SFO non stop without a significant payload restriction.



A lion does not concern himself with the opinions of the sheep
User currently offlinebohica From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2718 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2353 times:

Let's see here.   

According to Great Circle Mapper:
DEL-SFO 7706 Miles
SIN-SFO 8446 Miles

Why would AI want to make a stop in SIN which is further from SFO than DEL? This absolutely makes no sense to me.


User currently onlineJOYA380B747 From India, joined Mar 2005, 529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2351 times:

Quoting ojas (Reply 9):
I don't see this even a point of discussion.

Other than to have a good laugh. When you put it that way most AI related threads are about something that makes no sense.



If it wasn't for AI and those money mongers sitting in the parliament, 9W would have been as big as SQ...:(
User currently offlineAsiaflyer From Singapore, joined May 2007, 1140 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2351 times:

Quoting bohica (Reply 10):
Why would AI want to make a stop in SIN which is further from SFO than DEL?

Does AI have freedom rights between SIN and SFO? If so I could see AI aiming for the Indian population both in SIN and California. AI is today codesharing on SQ to SFO so they must have a good idea about that route.
Will it work for AI?



SQ,MI,MH,CX,KA,CA,CZ,MU,KE,OZ,QF,NZ,FD,JQ,3K,5J,IT,AI,IC,QR,SK,LF,KL,AF,LH,LX,OS,SR,BA,SN,FR,WF,1I,5T,VZ,VX,AC,NW,UA,US,
User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8428 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2352 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting bohica (Reply 10):
According to Great Circle Mapper:
DEL-SFO 7706 Miles
SIN-SFO 8446 Miles

Why would AI fly via Singapore to San Francisco when nonstop is more direct and shorter ? IF Singapore Airlines can't make Singapore to the USA nonstop work why would AI think it can ? IF putting a 787 on the route was all that is needed to make it work SIA would be doing it.


User currently offlinetrex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 4787 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2346 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 13):
Why would AI fly via Singapore to San Francisco when nonstop is more direct and shorter ? IF Singapore Airlines can't make Singapore to the USA nonstop work why would AI think it can ? IF putting a 787 on the route was all that is needed to make it work SIA would be doing it.

Except that would be a new capital investment and SQ had already decided replacing the A345in their fleet with 77Ls was not economically viable given the depreciation on the A345s and capital costs for acquiring the 77L. The margins are paper thin if present at all and just changing the equipment even if the actual direct operating costs of the flight were lowered may still not be worth it in the long term.
Maybe there is enough traffic for AI on India to SIN and the codeshare with SQ from SIN to SFO will help. Look at BR and CI going to AMS from TPE via BKK. Something makes the numbers work to add 1200nm and 2 1/2 hr flight time!


User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31124 posts, RR: 85
Reply 15, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2345 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting AirIndia (Reply 2):
Why is Ajit singh making thsese statementes. Shouldnt AI MD be the one making this?

It appears that the GoI dictates AI operational policy.



Quoting jfk777 (Reply 13):
Why would AI fly via Singapore to San Francisco when nonstop is more direct and shorter?

Maybe the routing will be DEL-SIN-DEL-SFO.  


User currently offlineNimish From India, joined Feb 2005, 3262 posts, RR: 9
Reply 16, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2346 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 15):
Maybe the routing will be DEL-SIN-DEL-SFO.  

Absolutely spot on  !

I'm glad someone in AI/ GoI is thinking of SFO from DEL - highly overdue IMO. Of course it can't be via SIN - that is either the MoCA going nuts, or the reporter on a high.



Latest Trip Report - GoAir BLR-BOM-BLR
User currently offlineflyingalex From Germany, joined Jul 2010, 1016 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2347 times:

Quoting bohica (Reply 10):
Let's see here.

According to Great Circle Mapper:
DEL-SFO 7706 Miles
SIN-SFO 8446 Miles

Why would AI want to make a stop in SIN which is further from SFO than DEL? This absolutely makes no sense to me.
Quoting jfk777 (Reply 13):
Why would AI fly via Singapore to San Francisco when nonstop is more direct and shorter ? IF Singapore Airlines can't make Singapore to the USA nonstop work why would AI think it can ? IF putting a 787 on the route was all that is needed to make it work SIA would be doing it.

I'm not sure whether Air India (or any other airline for that mattter) can just fly the direct route. That part of China has significant operating restrictions because of the high terrain levels in the area (Basically, the problem is this: if you have a decompression, you cannot descend to a level low enough to allow for normal breathing without supplementary oxygen, because those levels are below the mountain peaks. Because of the sheer size of this area, you could be flying for an hour or more before you get a chance to descend low enough.). You either have to carry additional oxygen or just avoid the area entirely (most airlines go for the latter).

As a result, AI has two choice of routes for a nonstop to SFO:

The first backtracks to Afghanistan and then heads north, cross Kazakhstan and Siberia for a near-pole routing across the Arctic Ocean. The second option tracks east across Bangladesh and Myanmar, then clear across the lower-lying parts of China and up the Russian Far East for a North Pacific routing.

http://www.gcmap.com/mapui?P=del-sfo...-dac-kmg-she-sfo&MS=wls&MP=r&DU=mi

So DEL-SFO nonstop may be a lot longer and more complicated than you think.

If there are solid commercial reasons for flying via SIN (and the 787 can do SIN-SFO nonstop), it's not as bonkers as it seems at first glance.

Quoting trex8 (Reply 14):
Look at BR and CI going to AMS from TPE via BKK. Something makes the numbers work to add 1200nm and 2 1/2 hr flight time!

There is another reason why they fly that way though. Back in the bad old days, Taiwanese carriers were not allowed to fly through mainland Chinese airspace, so they had to detour around China. Back then, flying the Siberian route was not an option, so they went south via Thailand. Initially, the stops in Bangkok were just to take on fuel, but I'm sure by now they're so well established in the market that it's earning them a nice pile of money.

To this day, flights to/from third countries cannot cross directly between mainland Chinese airspace and Taiwanese airspace. They can fly in mainland airspace along the way, but they need to fly through "neutral" (so Hong Kong, Japanese or Philippine) airspace before crossing into Taipei FIR.

I recently flew FRA-TPE-FRA with CI, and these were our approximate routings:

http://www.gcmap.com/mapui?P=fra-tpe...-kmg-hkg-khh-tpe&MS=wls&MP=r&DU=mi

http://www.gcmap.com/mapui?P=tpe-fra,+tpe-kix-khv-fra&MP=rect&DU=mi

The flight time on the return was 14 hours, 12 minutes!



Public service announcement: "It's" = "it is". To indicate posession, write "its." Looks wrong, but it's correct grammar
User currently offlinecedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8145 posts, RR: 54
Reply 18, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2347 times:

There was an Indian carrier - Jet or Kingfisher - that flew from Bangalore (I think it was - IT capital) to SFO (Silicone Valley) via Shanghai and had fifth freedom rights on PVG-SFO, and this was in economic boom years for the planet, and they couldn't make it work (although I thought it would - and the choice of stopover, Shanghai, was a good one as PVG-SFO was either underserved or not served at all).

Air-India is a horrible joke, such a shame.



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineTC957 From UK - England, joined May 2012, 920 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2346 times:

Perhaps routing via Moscow could work, given there is no Moscow - SFO direct with anyone.

User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8428 posts, RR: 7
Reply 20, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2345 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting trex8 (Reply 14):
Maybe there is enough traffic for AI on India to SIN and the codeshare with SQ from SIN to SFO will help

who in their right mind would fly Air India from Singapore to SFO when they have double daily flights on Singapore Air, with a stop. SQ with a stop beats AI ( even nonstop) any day of my year. Cathay also offers attractive connections via HKG.


User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8493 posts, RR: 10
Reply 21, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2345 times:

Quoting JOYA380B747 (Thread starter):
My question is Why via SIN? Won't that increase the flight route immensely, considering the Dreamliner route will probably be from DEL.

I know it's customary to bash AI but I don't find this to be too far fetched of an idea. The combined yields of the 2 sectors (DEL-SIN + SIN-SFO), could outweigh the yields on a DEL-SFO route which is not known for being a high yielding market. Taking adavntage of 5th freedom rights is a business model that has worked great for a certain airline based in SIN. Why in the world does SQ fly SIN-BCN-GRU which is 20% longer than SIN-JNB-GRU? could it be that they can make more money on BCN-GRU than on JNB-GRU?


User currently offlinemogandoCI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2344 times:

Quoting cedarjet (Reply 18):
There was an Indian carrier - Jet or Kingfisher - that flew from Bangalore (I think it was - IT capital) to SFO (Silicone Valley) via Shanghai and had fifth freedom rights on PVG-SFO, and this was in economic boom years for the planet, and they couldn't make it work (although I thought it would - and the choice of stopover, Shanghai, was a good one as PVG-SFO was either underserved or not served at all).

It was 9W doing BOM-PVG-SFO on 77W. 2 problems with that flight that led to its quick demise :

1. too big a plane on a brand new unproven route

2. should've established BOM-PVG before adding the 2nd leg.


User currently onlineJOYA380B747 From India, joined Mar 2005, 529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2344 times:

Recently AI got new rights for BCN and/or MAD I think. They should use that to do DEL-MAD/BCN-SFO (if they can get 5th freedom from Spain) rather than the immensely competitive SIN routing.

That would give a flight between Spain and SFO as well, a route that is surprisingly unserved currently by any non-stop.


Having said that, I recently came across AI codeshares on two SQ flights - SIN-SFO via ICN and HKG each. So if AI has had this codeshare for awhile, they must be making money on the India-SIN-SFO route, which makes a point for a direct link on the latter route, in my humble opinion.



If it wasn't for AI and those money mongers sitting in the parliament, 9W would have been as big as SQ...:(
User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8493 posts, RR: 10
Reply 24, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2344 times:

Quoting JOYA380B747 (Reply 23):
Recently AI got new rights for BCN and/or MAD I think. They should use that to do DEL-MAD/BCN-SFO (if they can get 5th freedom from Spain) rather than the immensely competitive SIN routing.

The yields on Spain-SFO would be way worse than SIN-SFO and IIRC the demand is highly seasonal too. On the other hand AI would be the only carrier operating SIN-SFO.


User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6161 posts, RR: 24
Reply 25, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2482 times:

Quoting JOYA380B747 (Reply 23):
That would give a flight between Spain and SFO as well, a route that is surprisingly unserved currently by any non-stop.

There is a reason it's unserved.



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently onlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2091 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2493 times:

Quoting mogandoCI (Reply 22):
Quoting cedarjet (Reply 18):
There was an Indian carrier - Jet or Kingfisher - that flew from Bangalore (I think it was - IT capital) to SFO (Silicone Valley) via Shanghai and had fifth freedom rights on PVG-SFO, and this was in economic boom years for the planet, and they couldn't make it work (although I thought it would - and the choice of stopover, Shanghai, was a good one as PVG-SFO was either underserved or not served at all).

It was 9W doing BOM-PVG-SFO on 77W. 2 problems with that flight that led to its quick demise :

1. too big a plane on a brand new unproven route

2. should've established BOM-PVG before adding the 2nd leg.


3. Horrible time arriving Into PVG. Arriving at 3AM is not an attractive time.



John@SFO
User currently offlineUA735WL From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 154 posts, RR: 0
Reply 27, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2555 times:

Does anyone else think that this would be a better use for AI's 77Ls than the planned DEL(and other cities in India)-DXB? Not saying that this will become successful with the 77L but I think it is certainly better suited to the route than the 788...


"One test is worth a thousand expert opinions" -Tex Johnston
User currently offlinemham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3682 posts, RR: 3
Reply 28, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2542 times:

It's interesting how this makes it sound as though they don't have a plan on how to use planes waiting to be delivered. Lenders like to see solid business plans.

User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31124 posts, RR: 85
Reply 29, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2552 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting UA735WL (Reply 27):
Does anyone else think that this would be a better use for AI's 77Ls than the planned DEL(and other cities in India)-DXB?

I would think so. Put in a light Business Class | heavy Economy Class configuration.


User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8493 posts, RR: 10
Reply 30, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2521 times:

Quoting UA735WL (Reply 27):
Does anyone else think that this would be a better use for AI's 77Ls than the planned DEL(and other cities in India)-DXB? Not saying that this will become successful with the 77L but I think it is certainly better suited to the route than the 788...

I don't think so. The 77L is way too much capacity for SIN-SFO which like any ULH route would be a very thin route, especially so considering AI is not a member of any alliance.


User currently offlineGr8circle From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 3116 posts, RR: 4
Reply 31, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2499 times:

Quoting JOYA380B747 (Reply 23):
Having said that, I recently came across AI codeshares on two SQ flights - SIN-SFO via ICN and HKG each. So if AI has had this codeshare for awhile, they must be making money on the India-SIN-SFO route, which makes a point for a direct link on the latter route, in my humble opinion.

  

A lot of people fly from India to the US West Coast via SIN and it's been that way for a long time......not saying that AI can make a success of that route, but it's not as bonkers as some on this thread make it look....of course, there are a lot of other factors to consider too.....


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25653 posts, RR: 22
Reply 32, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2483 times:

As already mentioned, it makes no sense. SIN-DEL-SFO is shorter than DEL-SIN-SFO.

DEL-SIN-SFO 9581 nm (43% further than nonstop DEL-SFO)
SIN-DEL-SFO 8938 nm

DEL-SFO 6697 nm
SIN-SFO 7340 nm


User currently offlineaeroblogger From India, joined Dec 2011, 1363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 33, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2474 times:

While SFO was on the list of destinations AI/IX was studying in January (the others being DFW, FJR, IAD, JNB, LAX, MEL, NBO, RKT, SYD), flying via SIN seems exceedingly unlikely to me.

If DEL-SFO ever happens, I think a PEK, ICN, or NRT stop is far more likely. The route is unlikely to be attempted nonstop, which may be the idea which Ajit Singh was talking about, but as it happens, it appears that his knowledge of Asian geography is poor to say the least.

All in all, this whole thread is a total waste of space. Instead of taking soundbytes from clueless politicians caught unprepared, the media should be focusing on real news.

[Edited 2012-11-19 18:33:42]


Airports 2012: IXE HYD DEL BLR BOM CCU KNU KTM BKK SIN ICN LAX BUR SFO PHX IAH ORD EWR PHL PVD BOS FRA MUC IST
User currently onlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2091 posts, RR: 0
Reply 34, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2451 times:

Quoting aeroblogger (Reply 33):
If DEL-SFO ever happens, I think a PEK, ICN, or NRT stop is far more likely.

But why would they want to route through those cities you mentioned where there are multiple flights per day. Granted, the vast majority of paxs would originate from DEL, for example, and "top off" at the transit airport(s).

When 9W flew through PVG, the Chinese gave them an awful time slot, 2AM, that turned a lot of people off. KIX or NGO has less competition but the fees are quite high.

This just a thought. a few months back, AI was talking with Dublin about a transit airport. A DEL-DUB-SFO route would be interesting as the Dublin authority and Bay Area business groups want a flight connecting the two cities.

[Edited 2012-11-19 19:59:11]


John@SFO
User currently offlineblrsea From India, joined May 2005, 1425 posts, RR: 3
Reply 35, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2460 times:

Quoting Gr8circle (Reply 31):
A lot of people fly from India to the US West Coast via SIN and it's been that way for a long time......not saying that AI can make a success of that route, but it's not as bonkers as some on this thread make it look....of course, there are a lot of other factors to consider too.....

Yes, but SQ makes a stop in either Seoul or Hong Kong. SQ has just one non-stop SIN-LAX flight now on A345 (and even that might be ending soon I think). So it doesn't make sense for AI to fly SIN-SFO with one more stop in between.


User currently offlineojas From India, joined Mar 2008, 2977 posts, RR: 24
Reply 36, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 2437 times:

Quoting legacyins (Reply 34):
This just a thought. a few months back, AI was talking with Dublin about a transit airport. A DEL-DUB-SFO route would be interesting as the Dublin authority and Bay Area business groups want a flight connecting the two cities

AI was never interested in DUB, it was the Irish authorities lobbying with the Indian Govt for them to do so.



A lion does not concern himself with the opinions of the sheep
User currently offlineusdcaguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 979 posts, RR: 2
Reply 37, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2425 times:

There is a problem serving India; people are not just going to DEL or BOM but also to BLR, HYD, MAA and a myriad of other cities within India. That waters down the value of nonstop service, as many people will still have to connect once in India to get to their final destination. I think it might be best for AI to try and do SFO-DEL nonstop with plentiful connections on either end or not at all. Not at all is probably more like it; with EK in SFO and UA/LH offering good connections over FRA, there is already enough service to that part of the world.

User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8493 posts, RR: 10
Reply 38, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2420 times:

Quoting blrsea (Reply 35):
Yes, but SQ makes a stop in either Seoul or Hong Kong. SQ has just one non-stop SIN-LAX flight now on A345 (and even that might be ending soon I think). So it doesn't make sense for AI to fly SIN-SFO with one more stop in between.

It does make some sense actually. AI would be the only airlines flying SIN-SFO non-stop, a highly lucrative route which now requires a stop.

Quoting usdcaguy (Reply 37):
I think it might be best for AI to try and do SFO-DEL nonstop with plentiful connections on either end or not at all.

Maybe AI understands that the market between the US and India is low yield and a ULH route with low yield passengers will never work so they are looking for 5th freedom markets where they can make more money. The way I see it, they think they can make more money flying DEL-SIN+SIN-SFO than they can flying DEL-SFO. After all, SQ wanted to fly SYD-LAX not because they thought that people wanted to fly from Singapore to LA via SYD but because they thought they could make money flying SYD-LAX.


User currently offlineusairways85 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3432 posts, RR: 7
Reply 39, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2424 times:

Quoting airindia787 (Reply 4):
Considering that SQ couldn't make their SIN-LAX/EWR nonstops work, I don't see how this would work by any stretch of the imagination. I don't even think that the 788 would be able to make the route nonstop, especially the earlier, heavier ones.

The 345 is a gas hog. Someone posted the numbers, SQ averaged ~70/100 on EWR. Considering SQ doesn't discount much, especially on premium tixs that isnt bad.


User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31124 posts, RR: 85
Reply 40, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2410 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting airbazar (Reply 38):
AI would be the only airlines flying SIN-SFO non-stop, a highly lucrative route which now requires a stop.

Is it lucrative, however?

If it was, one would think AI would have put their three-class 777-200LRs on it already. Instead, they're going to pack them with Economy seats and run them back and forth to the Middle East as a "commuter shuttle" for workers.

I know IT was at least planning to fly the route with an A340-500 - did they ever launch it?


User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8493 posts, RR: 10
Reply 41, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2410 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 40):
Is it lucrative, however?
If it was, one would think AI would have put their three-class 777-200LRs on it already

The volume may not be big enough for an ousider like AI. You can bet SQ would fight tooth and nail if AI decides to do this. And the LR as good as it is it's still not as good as the 788 for long thin routes.


User currently offlineincitatus From Brazil, joined Feb 2005, 4033 posts, RR: 13
Reply 42, posted (1 year 11 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2391 times:

Quoting flyingalex (Reply 17):
So DEL-SFO nonstop may be a lot longer and more complicated than you think.



Though the routing you mentioned through Afghanistan is not bad.

Quoting airbazar (Reply 38):
Maybe AI understands that the market between the US and India

There is a good chance AI does not understand the market between Singapore and the US.



Stop pop up ads
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Singapore Airlines To Fly A380 To Tokyo: 20 May posted Wed Mar 12 2008 02:00:23 by SINGAPORE_AIR
9W Gets China Approval To Fly BOM-PVG-SFO posted Thu Mar 20 2008 14:19:45 by LAXDESI
Why Would Fed Ex Fly OAK To SFO? posted Thu Mar 9 2006 15:09:22 by Dc10heaven
Jet(9W) Cleared To Fly BOM-SHA-SFO posted Sun Jan 13 2008 18:53:47 by LAXDESI
Singapore Airlines To Fly A380 To Tokyo: 20 May posted Wed Mar 12 2008 02:00:23 by SINGAPORE_AIR
Jet(9W) Cleared To Fly BOM-SHA-SFO posted Sun Jan 13 2008 18:53:47 by LAXDESI
AI May Be Asked To Renegotiate Its Boeing Order posted Thu Dec 15 2005 10:57:11 by UALMMFlyer
UA To Fly New Config 744 SFO-HKG-SIN-HKG-SFO posted Thu Aug 14 2008 09:38:56 by N104UA
Will JetBlue A321 Have The Legs To Fly JFK-LAX/SFO posted Mon Sep 24 2012 17:50:54 by doulasc
Will AA's A321 Have The Legs To Fly JFK-LAX/SFO? posted Mon Sep 24 2012 12:53:35 by mozart
B 787 Dreamliner To OSL On May 1th 2012 posted Thu Apr 12 2012 08:34:11 by Mortyman
Turkish Airlines To Fly to GRU (via DKR) In 2009 posted Wed Oct 8 2008 06:33:35 by Hardiwv
9W Gets China Approval To Fly BOM-PVG-SFO posted Thu Mar 20 2008 14:19:45 by LAXDESI
Singapore Airlines To Fly A380 To Tokyo: 20 May posted Wed Mar 12 2008 02:00:23 by SINGAPORE_AIR
Jet(9W) Cleared To Fly BOM-SHA-SFO posted Sun Jan 13 2008 18:53:47 by LAXDESI