Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA Vs DL - MD80/83/88/90s  
User currently offlinetonytifao From Brazil, joined Mar 2005, 1035 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5982 times:

Everyone bashes AA MDs, being old, gas guzzlers, etc. I don't see why it's not said the same about DL MDs. Delta is actually acquiring while AA is slowly retiring. Is there much difference between the MDs fleet of these two airlines?

86 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6002 times:

I can't really comment on the AA Mad Dawgs as I've never been on one, but I have been on several DL MD-88's and they have all been pretty nice. Clean, well-kept, nice interiors, WiFi, overall a pretty nice plane. I don't know if the same is to be said about the AA MD's, so I'll leave that up to somebody who has expereinced them. athough, from what I hear on A.net and see for myself, DL's MD's have a better maintenance reliability than AA's.

User currently offlinequestions From Australia, joined Sep 2011, 852 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5998 times:

Part of it is philosophy... take on a lot of debt for new fuel efficient aircraft (spend money on aircraft) vs take on significantly less debt acquiring and upgrading cabins on fuel inefficient aircraft (spend money on fuel).

Part of it is brand... leading edge, advanced, modern vs conservative, second-hand, good enough will do

At the end of the day, excluding network, the strategy that pulls in the most revenue with best margins wins.


User currently offlinesouthwest737500 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6005 times:

AA has Md82/83

AA simply can't make money with those planes they had to many and by the time they realized they needed newer efficient planes it was to late. Gotta love US has one of the most fuel efficient planes in the fleet
DL has md88/90 and soon to be 717

DL on the other hand is making money with and is acquiring more for a cheap cost which is enables then to generate more revenue.


User currently offlinetonytifao From Brazil, joined Mar 2005, 1035 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5999 times:

I fly both of them on a weekly basis, I'm fine with both airlines MDs, I just hear that AA can't make money with them, but like I said, DL keeps acquiring them, so they must e making money

User currently offlinempdpilot From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 1005 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6000 times:

I think the difference is in the types of MD aircraft that Delta is acquiring.

Where AA has the 280 MD-82 give or take, Delta is acquiring aircraft that are far more fuel efficient than AA's MDs.

Delta is acquiring MD-90's and 717s these are quite fuel efficient aircraft and very cheap to purchase so the cost is more about the maintenance. Verse the AA MD's which are not as fuel efficient and maintenance heavy.

Having both is a problem, having just one is workable.

The other thing to remember is that airlines aren't just looking for a profit in part it is the whole picture. AA's MDs, might actually be making money for AA even though the margins might be very small. Mix that with revenue issues in other areas and you have a loss.

At the end of the day, I don't think that AA MDs are the problem, I think they are unsustainable. I think the issue isn't their fuel efficiency it is the shear size of the fleet. Even if they took delivery of every A320 coming off the line it would take years.

Taking on that kind of debt (something Delta is trying to avoid) will be crippling. With something like 480 aircraft on order, paying for that will require a lot of cash and a steady cash flow, something that I don't think this industry can guarantee yet. I also really don't think that AA's plan of acquiring 480 some aircraft is going to allow them to be as flexible as they will need to be to remain profitable.



One mile of highway gets you one mile, one mile of runway gets you anywhere.
User currently offlinetonytifao From Brazil, joined Mar 2005, 1035 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6000 times:

Thank you all for the responses.

So what makes MD90s more efficient than the MD80s?


User currently onlinemayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 10645 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6001 times:

Quoting questions (Reply 2):
Part of it is brand... leading edge, advanced, modern vs conservative, second-hand, good enough will do

Been awhile since AA has been "leading edge", in my estimation and I'll take conservative, second-hand (but refurbished) any day over another bankruptcy.



"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
User currently onlinemhkansan From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 720 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6004 times:

Quoting tonytifao (Reply 6):
So what makes MD90s more efficient than the MD80s?

Gigantic, high-bypass V2500 engines in the back.


-

I'm going to be the first to say this here, AA's MD-80s are a lot nicer than DL's. Sure Delta has economy comfort and embroidered headrests and what have you, but the entire back of that airplane, like five rows, has no view since the reconfiguration. AA's S80s have only two (one 1.5 really since you can still get a half window in row 31) and AA has extended overhead bin space on the DEF side of the airplane. AA has nicer first class seats in the S80 and most economy seats are fitted with winged headrests, something you can't get on DL.

I think the big difference in philosophy is how they're being deployed. DL still sends MD-88s on higher yeilding long-distance flights. AA only does to a very limited extent. DFW-PDX, ORD-TUS, LAX-STL are among the longest and they are disappearing more and more. Alternatively, they're deploying them exclusively on high-cycle, high-frequency, high-density routes from DFW and to a lesser extent ORD. (DFW-AUS/SAT/OKC/TUL/MCI/DEN) (ORD-MSP/STL/LGA/DCA/PHL).

I think the notion that AA can't make money with the S80 is false. DL has more seats in the back than AA and a better (cheaper) contract for them. Other than that I can't see why the costs would be any different. AA's MD-83s were built to the same MD-88 standard as DL's except with the older cockpit to keep commonality with the other jets.


Whatever your opinion, they're still fun jets to fly. I just got off one, ELP-DFW. I hope they stick around for awhile.


User currently offlineN243NW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1640 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6001 times:

Quoting mpdpilot (Reply 5):
Where AA has the 280 MD-82 give or take

More like 180 (-82 and -83 combined). The 737 just passed up the Mad Dog in number.

Quoting tonytifao (Reply 6):
So what makes MD90s more efficient than the MD80s?

V2500 engines are the main thing. More or less the same engine as the A320...a much newer design and higher bypass ratio than the JT8Ds they replace. Also, the fuselage stretch allows more pax and therefore more revenue...



B-52s don't take off. They scare the ground away.
User currently offlineAAplat4life From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 199 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 5996 times:

AA still flies MD80s on long flights. ORD-LAS should be all 738, but it is all MD80. Last month, there was a daily 738 flight, but no longer. ORD-PSP is almost always a full flight, but it is always MD80. Even some ORD-LAX routes find some MD80s there. AA always comes up with some reason to put the MD80s back into service on long haul flights out of ORD, but the reasoning seems suspect given high fuel prices and heavy passenger loads.

User currently offlineckfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5309 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5995 times:

Quoting southwest737500 (Reply 3):
AA simply can't make money with those planes they had to many and by the time they realized they needed newer efficient planes it was to late

What happened to AA was that Boeing started dropping hints that it was looking to develop a new narrowbody, using some of the technology of the 787. Southwest went on record saying that if Boeing would develop a new narrowbody that could reduce costs by the same percentage that the 787 reduces costs over the 767, it would order 150 and option 150. I seem to recall that this was around 2006. This was also when the 787 wasn't so far behind schedule.

AA didn't want to put in a large order for 737NGs, then have Boeing start taking orders for a new narrowbody within a few years. Between that potential scenrio and trying to conserve cash, AA sat on the sidelines until the price of oil skyrocketed in 2008. So, AA placed its large 738 order for deliveries to start in 2009.

Of course, if AA had decided to go ahead with the 738 order in 2006 or early 2007, they would have been receiving planes as the price of oil mushroomed. But, when AA's primary supplier of aircraft is whispering about a new narrowbody, and Southwest is pushing Boeing hard to start work on a new plane, it makes sense to wait and see.

That said, I've been on a number of AA MD-80s and have found them to be kept in good condition. Obviously, they haven't gone through a major refurbishment since the late 1990s, when AA went to the current color scheme and seats with the adjustable headrests.

I've never been on a Delta MD-88, and it's been some time since any friends of mine have flown Delta on the MD-88. So, I can't comment. But, I would expect that if Delta is planning to keep the MD-88s for some time (or until fuel prices get too expensive for the type), then they will get a lot of TLC.

One would expcet that AA will keep the MD-80s in good condition in terms of operations of the aircraft, but the interiors may not get as much TLC, since the fleet is destined for the desert, as more 738s are delivered and A319s start arriving next year.


User currently offlineDarksnowynight From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1412 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5993 times:

Quoting tonytifao (Thread starter):
Everyone bashes AA MDs, being old, gas guzzlers, etc. I don't see why it's not said the same about DL MDs. Delta is actually acquiring while AA is slowly retiring. Is there much difference between the MDs fleet of these two airlines?

The fact that DL is doing as well as they are with so many MDs puts that myth to rest. AA's problem isn't the S80s, it's AA. Type matters to a small extent, but there's a good deal more to it than that.

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 1):
from what I hear on A.net and see for myself, DL's MD's have a better maintenance reliability than AA 's.

They're newer (although AA does have some of the most recent, courtesy of TWA). DL spends good money on MD MX too. They just don't have that ridiculous lease arrangement on their backs.

Quoting southwest737500 (Reply 3):

AA simply can't make money with those planes they had to many and by the time they realized they needed newer efficient planes it was to late.

Again, the 80's aren't the problem. It's their usage and their lease back.

Quoting southwest737500 (Reply 3):
Gotta love US has one of the most fuel efficient planes in the fleet

Ok. But why can't VX (who has the same fleet, minus the 21) make any money? There's more to this than individual trip costs.

G4 & NK both print money these days. One with MDs, the other with 319s, 20s, and a 21. But their operational strategies are so different to what we see at AA, DL, and the LCCs that trip costs almost don't matter there.

Quoting mpdpilot (Reply 5):
Verse the AA MD's which are not as fuel efficient and maintenance heavy.


They're not, no. But let's not forget that some of DL's MDs are actually DC-9-50s. Where would those fall on this scale?

I'm not saying updating their fleet is a bad idea. It isn't. But they're going to have to do a lot more than blame the MD80s to set themselves on a less loss-intensive path, going forward.



Quoting tonytifao (Reply 6):
So what makes MD90s more efficient than the MD80s?

More seats, better engines, and above all else, DL has been adept at getting these planes cheap. AA has really not done this with their own MDs. I think by now the type has more than paid for itself, but their being AA with all that entails has been their problem. Frankly, AA would be in the exact same bind they are in even if their S80s were A32xs.

Quoting mpdpilot (Reply 5):

The other thing to remember is that airlines aren't just looking for a profit in part it is the whole picture. AA 's MDs, might actually be making money for AA even though the margins might be very small. Mix that with revenue issues in other areas and you have a loss.

Yup, I think you nailed it. Super high labor, disadvantageous vendor contracts in literally everything they do, refusal to open up new markets, and fierce competition that will not relent have all taken their toll. We really can't just blame the Mad Dawgs, as intellectually facile as that may be.



Posting without Knowledge is simply Tolerated Vandalism... We are the Vandals.
User currently online1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6642 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5990 times:

Overall, I prefer the interiors of the DL MD-88s over the AA MD-80s. DL has gone through the process of refurbishing the cabins, including leather seat covers, updated PSUs, and cool white lighting. The only thing better about AA's MD-80s are the winged headrests in Y.


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offlineslcdeltarumd11 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3637 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5992 times:

Deltas MD-90s are much more fuel efficient than AAs Mad Dogs. You are comparing MD-80s to MD-90s. Its apples to oranges comparison. Delta is getting much more fuel efficient planes. Not a bad move and delta can retire the more fuel guzzling DC9s and older MD88s.

User currently offlineRyanairGuru From Australia, joined Oct 2006, 5938 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5992 times:

While I definitely understand the significant difference between the -80 and -90, what precisely is the MD-88?

Other than being newer, does it have lower operating costs than the -80/-83?



Worked Hard, Flew Right
User currently online1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6642 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5993 times:

Quoting RyanairGuru (Reply 15):
While I definitely understand the significant difference between the -80 and -90, what precisely is the MD-88?

Other than being newer, does it have lower operating costs than the -80/-83?

The MD-88 is an updated MD-82 with a partial CRT cockpit and screwdriver tailcone; DL's first MD-88s were actually converted MD-82s. However, the partial CRT cockpit and screwdriver tailcone later became standard on the MD-82 and MD-83.

As for operating cost, it should be the same as the MD-82.



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offlinejayspilot From United States of America, joined May 2001, 298 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5988 times:

I saw it posted once but someone showed the fuel burn on a 500,750 and 1000 stage length comparing a DL md-88 vs a DL 737-800 and a B6 A320. From what I remember the shorter two legs were almost the same regardless of the plan with the efficiences only showing on the longer legs as the curse phase of flight is where the savings builds up.

User currently offlineJAAlbert From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1624 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5988 times:

I flew one of DL's MD-90s from ATL - SAN a few years back. It was pleasant enough up front. I noticed DL puts its two seat rows on the right side of the plane whereas AA puts theirs on the left. What really struck me about the DL plane I flew in was the noise and vibration in the back of the plane. The racket was so loud, I can't imagine anyone flying in the last five rows. I recall using the lavatory and being shocked at the rear of the aircraft. I don't recall that in the AA planes, but I haven't flown one recently.

User currently offlineL1011 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1684 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5988 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think Delta's and American's MD-80s are both very nice aircraft to fly in. The interiors of both are clean and well-maintained. I prefer AA's because of the cloth seat covers. I'm not crazy about leather.

Bob Bradley



Fly Eastern's Golden Falcon DC-7B
User currently offlineMountainFlyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 477 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5991 times:

Quoting JAAlbert (Reply 18):
I flew one of DL's MD-90s from ATL - SAN a few years back. It was pleasant enough up front. I noticed DL puts its two seat rows on the right side of the plane whereas AA puts theirs on the left.

That's only the case with the DL MD-88's. The DL MD-90's are, as AFAIK always have been two on left, three on right.



SA-227; B1900; Q200; Q400; CRJ-2,7,9; 717; 727-2; 737-3,4,5,7,8,9; 747-2; 757-2,3; 767-3,4; MD-90; A319, 320; DC-9; DC-1
User currently onlinemhkansan From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 720 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5988 times:

Quoting MountainFlyer (Reply 20):
That's only the case with the DL MD-88's. The DL MD-90's are, as AFAIK always have been two on left, three on right.

You've got it swapped. AA's S80s 2-3 (AB, DEF). DL's MD-90s and DC-9-50s are also like this, but the DL MD-88s are 3-2 (ABC DE).

Its awfully confusing, and since I'm familiar with the way AA does it it just looks weird!

Remember AA's have the expanded bins on the DEF side while DL's do not.


User currently offlineMountainFlyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 477 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5990 times:

Quoting mhkansan (Reply 21):
You've got it swapped. AA's S80s 2-3 (AB, DEF). DL's MD-90s and DC-9-50s are also like this, but the DL MD-88s are 3-2 (ABC DE).

That's exactly what I said. Generally, when making reference to "right" and "left" side of the aircraft, we are referring to aircraft right or left, meaning looking forward from the back, not looking backward from the front as you walk into the plane.



SA-227; B1900; Q200; Q400; CRJ-2,7,9; 717; 727-2; 737-3,4,5,7,8,9; 747-2; 757-2,3; 767-3,4; MD-90; A319, 320; DC-9; DC-1
User currently offlinedowntown273 From Spain, joined Aug 2005, 321 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5989 times:

I fly SK's MD-82's 2 or 3 times per week. I'll choose an MD80 over A320/B738 any time. If you fly in the front (business/premium economy) it's incredibly quiet and they have a 2-3 layout. I find the 3-3 configuration on A320/B738 way more uncomfortable for foodservice / working.

They might be old planes but the flying experience is great, in my opinion!


User currently online1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6642 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5986 times:

Quoting mhkansan (Reply 21):
Remember AA's have the expanded bins on the DEF side while DL's do not.

That is where you are wrong. DL has expanded bins on the ABC side on the MD-88s and the DEF side on the MD-90s. They were installed on the MD-88s in 2000, and the MD-90s have been retrofitted in the past year or two. Also, unlike AA, the bin extensions on DL's MD-88s have a holding rail.



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
25 asqx : Delta has extended bins on the ABC side of the MD-88 and the CDE side of the MD-90.
26 woodsboy : I worked OPS for Alaska Airlines in the 90s when we operated MD82/83 and 737-400s on both long and short routes. When you do ops you get to see and co
27 N766UA : I really don't think that's DAL's philosophy. They're taking early to mid-aged jets (with the exception of the ancient -9's,) and putting fuel in the
28 B727FA : I'll make it easy here: DL and AA have the extended bins on the 3 seat side. Done.
29 Post contains images TrnsWrld : Someone above described the differences between the MD82 and the MD88, but can someone tell me the differences between the MD88 and the MD83? I know i
30 1337Delta764 : The MD-83 is the longer range variant of the MD-80 family, equipped with more powerful engines and more fuel capacity. The MD-83 has a range of 2500
31 captainstefan : In general, DL does not fly the 88s west of the Rockies. Those missions are left for the 90s and bigger. Seconded. I don't like that... swampy... fee
32 B757forever : DL moved away from cloth and chose leather because fluids (let your imagination run wild) do not soak into leather as they do cloth. The leather is c
33 Viscount724 : Fully agree. Leather is no improvement in my opinion. I much prefer cloth. The only reason airlines use leather is because it lasts longer and is che
34 PSU.DTW.SCE : DL does not fly the MD88s any farther west than cities like DFW, SAT, OKC, or MCI. Unlike AA, DL does not even use their MD-88s into hotter/higher ai
35 usdcaguy : I completely agree and like flying KL for the same reasons, although I find their aircraft to be nicer than that of AF for some reason. The problem w
36 totesen : Well the MD90 has the same CFM engines as the A320, making it as efficient as a new generation aircraft, it is also built on the late 90´s while the
37 Viscount724 : Not correct. The MD-90 has the IAE V2500. Both the CFM56 and V2500 are options on the A320 family. The CFM56 was never an option on the MD-90.
38 brilondon : Not exactly. AA acquired their fleet of MD's through mergers with Reno Air, TWA, and I think another airline which I cannot remember as well as their
39 dtw9 : Delta BOD has approved the flat panel mod for the MD80/90 fleet. First Mods will start mid to late 2013. Center stack stays with flat panels on either
40 UpstateDave : People, people! AA's MDs are the smaller variant so the higher fuel costs are exacerbated compared to DL's. Its the same problem the 737-600/-700 have
41 N243NW : Unless you're talking about the MD-90, that's not true. The -81, -82, -83 and -88 all have the exact same exterior dimensions and seating capacities.
42 Deltal1011man : lack of JT8s.....MD90 has V2500s....which also powers some A320s. for the record Delta has run ATL-ABQ with 88s. Its fairly new that they have mostly
43 PSU.DTW.SCE : Right. However now with the increased size of the MD-90 fleet, they've been able to get the MD-88s off the longer stage length flights. Routes like A
44 dtw9 : What everybody is neglecting to look at in this comparison between AA and Delta's MD-80 fleets is that up until recently AA had higher crew costs then
45 FlyASAGuy2005 : As does all Delta 88s on the side with 3 seats... ??? The longest 88 routes right now are 2.5 hour missions. Most of the flights on 88s today are 2 h
46 dtw9 : Yes, but AA renegotiated alot of their lease payments on the MD-80 fleet. Add in lower crew costs and you have the basis of AA possibly making money
47 Darksnowynight : AirCal.
48 FlyASAGuy2005 : A lease payment is a lease payment. And i'm not sure what lower crew cost we're talking about. The pilot contract is not ratified as far as I know. F
49 dtw9 : Really. So you're trying to tell me that if I lower a lease payment from say 100,000 a month to say 75,000 a month, that its not going to help my bot
50 pwm2txlhopper : Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but DL's MD's are newer than AA's. Most of AA's MD's were earlier built models from the early 1980's. DL didn't sta
51 PIEAvantiP180 : It will def help AA internal numbers and improve their economics of that fleet compared what it used to be. But since we are talking about AA MD80's
52 mayor : Correct.......the first MD-88 delivered, with the Western "WallyBird" on the fuselage, came thru SLC on it's delivery flight, in '87, shortly after t
53 PSU.DTW.SCE : DL is still making payments on their MD-88 fleet, of which about 50% is on operating leases. Everyone is speaking in hypothetical, since none of us kn
54 B757forever : That was ship 905 that had the Wally Bird just aft of the L1 door. This aircraft was delivered on April 1, 1987, the official day of the Delta / West
55 Post contains links BOACCunard : An MD-88 is just an MD-82 with different avionics. It doesn't have different engines and is not any more efficient. For all intents and purposes, an
56 PIEAvantiP180 : Thank you for posting that, I did not know that was the case with their MD80's. Just checked DL website and on their corporate information fleet page
57 mayor : Actually, it was on the 2nd. I was off on the first, but was there, working, when it came in on the 2nd. I'm actually glad I wasn't working on the fi
58 tommy767 : DL M88s are pretty average. Mostly clean, safe, well maintained. I would say they are on average a few years younger than an S80 at AA, but AA has muc
59 flashmeister : Never understood the hate for the 90. Comfortable and modern, and if you're seated ahead of the wings, it's spooky how quiet it is.
60 mpdpilot : When you only have a handful still operating they don't pose a problem like the 180 or so MDs that American has. Also, the DC-9s are completely owned
61 MountainFlyer : I can't seem to find it, but a while back the Minneapolis Star Tribune ran an article about the changes at MSP since the DL/NW merger. For some reaso
62 Post contains images mayor : Never let facts get in the way of a good story.
63 luckyone : Perhaps off topic, but could you elaborate on that please? I'm not saying you're wrong, it just sounds funny that a Supreme Court Justice would, on h
64 mayor : Unfortunately, I don't remember all the particulars, but as a Judge, she could, on her own, if requested, issue a stay.
65 luckyone : Thanks. I've done a little reading into it...Interesting to say the least.
66 FlyASAGuy2005 : I was in the very last row a couple weeks ago DEN-ATL and even right next to the engines, they aren't nearly as bad as the 88s. In first class? Forge
67 Deltal1011man : ....aA's plan is simply take money from labor to make money. IMHO they are going to up much like EA. Employees could work for free and the company wo
68 BOACCunard : AA's MD-80s are not older than DL's. DL's entire MD-80 fleet was built new for DL between 1987 and 1993. Nearly all remain in service. AA's own new-bu
69 PSU.DTW.SCE : This is a very true and overlooked a.net stereotype. The fact is that AA has been steadily retiring their oldest MD-80s now to the point where the ol
70 BOACCunard : And given that even before that, AA's oldest MD-80s (except maybe a few really early ones TW acquired second-hand), were at most 3-4 years older than
71 PSU.DTW.SCE : Exactly. Although they AA ones are at the point where they've likely been through one additional (and expensive) heavy maintenance cycle. That being
72 TrijetsRMissed : Great topic with a lot I can contribute to. Regrettably, due to business, I am late to this thread. But hopefully given the interest, a.net nation wil
73 B727FA : The Aircraft Fleet Information summary shows 50 leased and 67 owned...minor point, but it's out there.
74 Post contains images TrijetsRMissed : Exactly. The S80s alone are not the problem for AA. AA circumstance is the real issue. Also, AA is paying fair leases on these aircraft, but at one t
75 TrijetsRMissed : usafdo, for such a statement, please clarify who/what you are referring to. My points made in reply 72 & 74 are based around facts and experience.
76 usafdo : In the past, people have been able to insert into posts the real, actual airline data. The real costs on operating the different ACFT ( a comprehensiv
77 RyanairGuru : Many thanks for explaining this. If you will excuse my ignorance, I take it that the effect of these improvements is that the M88 has slightly lower
78 Post contains images TrijetsRMissed : You're welcome RyanairGuru. In the late '80s McDonnell Douglas touted that a brand new MD-88 would have up to 5.5% improved fuel efficiency from the
79 FlyASAGuy2005 : Whatever happened to the mod (don't even remember what it was) that was suppose to increase fuel efficiency quite a bit?
80 TrijetsRMissed : There was a thrust reverser mod certified, which AA installed on a single MD-82 for a 90 day trial run. Unfortunately, from AA's findings, the result
81 PIEAvantiP180 : Thanks for clarifying that. I always thought that the fuel burn savings were good but AA decided against the idea because they were going to retire t
82 ckfred : Before the bankruptcy filing, you would have a point worth discussing. With Chapter 11, including new labor contracts, reduced head counts, additiona
83 TrijetsRMissed : At least 3.5% per the certification tests and about $460k per aircraft. At $3/gal, it would pay for itself within 16-18 months.
84 N737AA : BOACC is correct, the majority of the super80's on the property are the exTWA variants that were delivered around the same time the AA 737NG's were.
85 FlyASAGuy2005 : What are the realized savings with this flight deck mod. Ability to fly more fuel efficient routes? So easy that they turned about ad did a sale/leas
86 TrijetsRMissed : Approximately 450 lbs of fuel on a 750 nm leg. At 1680 legs, the annual savings is just short of $340k at $3/gal. And to correct my above post, posit
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Questions Regards AA and DL MD80 & 90 Status posted Sun Oct 7 2007 18:20:45 by KochamLOT
AA Vs. DL: 737-800 Overhead Video Monitors posted Fri Jul 30 1999 15:40:41 by ORD
Active Widebody Fleet Of UA/CO Vs DL Vs AA In 2010 posted Sat Apr 24 2010 12:58:51 by CV880
AA/CO Vs. DL/NW Over Pension Bill posted Thu Aug 3 2006 16:35:14 by BigGSFO
AA Or DL Vs. Jblu Hub And Spoke posted Fri May 27 2005 20:38:06 by Pmg1704
DL MD80 Layouts WHY 3-2 Vs. 2-3 posted Tue Aug 24 2004 05:41:29 by Alitalia744
OAG Changes 11/16/2012: AA/B6/DL/F9/UA/US posted Mon Nov 12 2012 09:43:06 by enilria
OAG Changes 11/9/2012: AA/AS/DL/F9/UA/US posted Tue Nov 6 2012 09:41:12 by enilria
OAG Changes 10/12/2012: AA/B6/DL/F9/UA/US/VX posted Thu Oct 11 2012 06:39:41 by enilria
OAG Changes 9/28/2012: AA/B6/DL/UA posted Wed Sep 26 2012 08:15:46 by enilria