Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Does UA Still Need Chelsea Food Services?  
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6433 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2271 times:

Considering that UA flights out of DEN are catered by LSG Sky Chefs, and the fact that UA renewed its contract with Gate Gourmet last month at ORD, SFO, and IAD, why does UA still need Chelsea Food Services? Meal service is a far cry from what it used to be, and I'd be very surprised if the Chelsea operation is actually making money.

IMO UA should sell Chelsea to Gate Gourmet, where they would gain ops at UA's IAH, CLE, and DEN hubs. The only UA hub where Chelsea and Gate Gourmet overlap is EWR. LSG Sky Chefs, for comparison, already has ops in both IAH and DEN, and they pulled out of CLE fairly recently and I don't know if they would be willing to return there.


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinestrfyr51 From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 1074 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2270 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Chelsea came over as part of the merger. If they're going to KEEP them then I say use them exclusively! OR sell them exclusively! United Still needs flight kitchens to keep their menu in the cutting edge but normal catering? They can do that with any reputable catering company. Now it could be about contracts Etc and if that's the case then all bets aside. BUT eiher DO or Don't DO!

User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24823 posts, RR: 46
Reply 2, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 2270 times:

I agree on a corporate level having your own inhouse catering division is not a priority, however if it does manage to cover its cost, I don't see a harm in keeping it.

Also for info Chelsea does more than just airport catering. For instance it preps and distributes sandwiches to places like Starbucks and other chains like grocery stores even.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6433 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2270 times:

Quoting strfyr51 (Reply 1):
Chelsea came over as part of the merger. If they're going to KEEP them then I say use them exclusively! OR sell them exclusively! United Still needs flight kitchens to keep their menu in the cutting edge but normal catering? They can do that with any reputable catering company. Now it could be about contracts Etc and if that's the case then all bets aside. BUT eiher DO or Don't DO!

Of course, most major airlines don't cater only from their hubs; most airlines tend to use whoever is available at the airport. This saves on fuel costs, since round-trip catering from hubs requires having to carry food for two flights on one of the round-trip segments, thus adding weight. Yes, there are a few exceptions to the rule, for example, DL doesn't presently use Chelsea at CLE, who is now the only catering company available there since the departure of LSG Sky Chefs. It would be very expensive for UA to open Chelsea kitchens at all spoke cities.

However, considering that UA renewed its contract with Gate Gourmet at ORD, SFO, and IAD last month, this seems to imply that UA has no plan on growing Chelsea beyond the PMCO hubs and DEN (which was originally set-up for CO's hub-that never-was there). If UA doesn't plan on growing Chelsea, what is the point of keeping them?

[Edited 2012-11-20 11:20:46]


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Future Of Chelsea Food Services With United posted Sat Sep 25 2010 22:09:20 by Schweigend
Why Does Jet Airways Need A Hub In BRU? posted Tue Jun 19 2007 18:31:48 by Addd
Why Does UA Use 2-5-2 Seating? posted Wed Jan 5 2005 19:35:11 by Swisskloten
Why Does Jetblue Still Have Credit Card Swipers? posted Thu Apr 15 2004 03:01:16 by Nycfuturepilot
Does UA Still Have Any Old Seats? posted Fri Jan 24 2003 03:23:26 by UAL1837
Why Does AZ Still Fly To Ewr? posted Tue Jun 18 2002 04:53:10 by ContinentalEWR
Why Does UA Only Fly To LHR In The UK posted Wed Nov 7 2001 17:27:53 by Arsenal@LHR
Why Does UA Has Some Many 744´s? posted Mon Jun 11 2001 01:19:58 by TOMASKEMPNER
Why Do We Still Need The 1989 B 747-400? posted Wed Jun 6 2001 11:38:57 by United Airline
Why Does AA Still Operates The A300s? posted Tue Nov 14 2000 03:08:59 by DELLATORRE