Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA & VS Attack BHX  
User currently offlineyendig From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 145 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 11609 times:

From our local paper:

http://www.birminghampost.net/news/w...ter#sitelife-commentsWidget-bottom

If BHX is so bad, how come Emirates are so successful here? Couldn't other international carriers send an occasional widebody here? I'm thinking especially that a Chinese airline might work given the joint manufacturing connections in the area? LTI, MG & Jaguar-Land Rover spring to mind in the automotive sector alone.

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinepolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2259 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 11380 times:

While "attack" might be a strong word to use...they are right. They didn't say that international airlines cannot be successful in BHX, they said that BHX could never be an alternative to London and a strong international hub, which is correct.

User currently offlineskinny From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2008, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 11130 times:

No suprise there !!

But they are correct BHX is my local airport 15 minute drive great airport love it hassle free for spain etc.

I also consider Heathrow my local Airport as well only a one hour or so drive down the M40 for long haul.

So there you go BHX is way too close to heathrow to ever be a strong international hub.

I would rather fly from heathrow on a wide body to the states than from BHX on the current offering from united the 757.

[Edited 2012-11-23 12:47:19]

User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13256 posts, RR: 100
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 11053 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

From the OP link: By failing to increase capacity at Heathrow for foreign operators, the Government was making it harder for British airlines to expand operations overseas, Virgin said.

Read More http://www.birminghampost.net/news/w...ntsWidget-bottom#ixzz2D55aemAs


That I agree with. Who would grant British airlines more access without equivalent access to LHR?

Quoting yendig (Thread starter):
If BHX is so bad, how come Emirates are so successful here?

But not nearly as successful as at LHR. BHX has promise, but it is not located close enough to sufficient wealth to become an international hub. Will it grow as a major spoke?   

Quoting skinny (Reply 2):
I would rather fly from heathrow on a wide body to the states than from BHX on the current offering from united the 757.

If the A321NEO is made TATL capable, and it will (a question of when, not if), you will have more choice. I do not think BHX will ever become a major hub, but it will gain connections.

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineyendig From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 145 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 10993 times:

Quoting skinny (Reply 2):
I would rather fly from heathrow on a wide body to the states than from BHX on the current offering from united the 757.

Ageed. However, could they not even make a single twin-aisle work from BHX....?    

Maybe the 787 will change things   


User currently offlineskinny From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2008, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 10798 times:

Quoting yendig (Reply 4):
Maybe the 787 will change things

Hope so that might change my view in flying long haul from BHX.

I really miss AA to ORD shame flight always seemed full in Y&J maybe they might be back one day or united may use 787 lets hope so.   

[Edited 2012-11-23 13:31:35]

User currently offlineMCO2BRS From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2007, 542 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 10772 times:

BHX is my local airport as well, and would take it over LHR any day. I suppose its too much to ask for BA and VS to consider that there are some of us in "the regions" who would rather travel from our local airports than shlep to London.

It would be nice to see more long haul flights from BHX, but I don't see it coming from any UK based carriers. We already have service to all of the major European hubs and I'm more than happy to travel via AMS/CDG/FRA/ZRH/BRU to get wherever I need to go.

Cheers,

MCO2BRS


User currently offline22886 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 405 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 9786 times:

Quoting skinny (Reply 2):
I would rather fly from heathrow on a wide body to the states than from BHX on the current offering from united the 757.

You'll find that United are also using the 757 from LHR to EWR.

Anyway what is the problem with flying on a 757 long haul, I bet no one would complain about flying long haul on the upper deck of a 747-400.


User currently offlineyendig From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 145 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 9680 times:

Quoting MCO2BRS (Reply 6):
I'm more than happy to travel via AMS/CDG/FRA/ZRH/BRU to get wherever I need to go.

Quite. I'm off to Thailand in January and will be routing through CPH from BHX. A pity, as I'd prefer non-stop but no longer need the 'Heathrow-hassle' factor.

One query though: I'm not aware of any Oneworld airlines that fly from BHX that also allow me to connect globally. I can utilise Skyteam (AF & KL) & Star (take your pick). Why not Oneworld?


User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7617 posts, RR: 17
Reply 9, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 8852 times:

Quoting MCO2BRS (Reply 6):
BHX is my local airport as well, and would take it over LHR any day. I suppose its too much to ask for BA and VS to consider that there are some of us in "the regions" who would rather travel from our local airports than shlep to London.

Fair enough.

Exactly the same argument can be made about the Birmingham Post article. It says:

"And [BA and VS] claimed that regional airports such as Birmingham could not provide an alternative to expanding capacity in the South East."

Just as those living or working locally to BHX would prefer to fly through BHX those living or working in the South East would rather travel from their local airport than make the trek to BHX for their flight.

As far as lowering APD from regional airports like BHX to try to encourage those travelling to and from the southeast to use those airports this would defeat the whole (somewhat dubious) stated raison d'etre of APD, namely as a "green" tax. It would simply encourage potential passengerrs to fly approximately the same distance but would result in an additional car journey of around 100 miles at the start and the end of their journey for many. But I guess as far as the Exchequer is concerned the loss of APD would be more than made up with the increased income from the duty and VAT on petrol and diesel.


User currently offlinebabybus From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 6718 times:

BHX was a BA euro-hub during the 80s. Anywhere could be a hub if airlines showed confidence in it.

BHX has to have an advantage over other airports which could be fast connections, cheap parking or fantastic facilities.

I admit I have never flown through BHX in all my time, neither on business or pleasure. Maybe it has a marketing problem.


User currently offlineLofty From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2008, 314 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 6080 times:

When BA Regional used the "Euro Hub" with BAC1-11 at BHX the flights did not terminate in BHX all the flight operated a domestic sector for example CDG BHX EDI or TXL BHX EDI or some onto GLA as BHX could not provide enough pax even in those days.

User currently offlinewilld From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2008, 246 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days ago) and read 5519 times:

The issue is that BHX is really too close to LHR and MAN. When living in Worcester, it was, on a good run, only an hour and five minute drive up to MAN to jump on a widebody service across the pond. It could on some days take just as long due to the M42 to get to BHX!

VS could probably make a bucket and spade route to MCO work using a 330. GLA has been successful for VS so far however GLA is different to BHX as it really doesn't have to 'compete' with MAN and LHR.


User currently offlinesbworcs From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 848 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days ago) and read 5430 times:

Quoting willd (Reply 13):

Did you mean 1 hour 50. Worcester to MAN is approx 100 miles.



The best way forwards is upwards!
User currently offlineDrColenzo From UK - Scotland, joined Jan 2012, 143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 5156 times:

Quoting sbworcs (Reply 14):
Did you mean 1 hour 50. Worcester to MAN is approx 100 miles.

Time is relative at speed...


User currently offlinethenoflyzone From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 2584 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4136 times:

BHX is trying to sabotage what little hope, if any, LHR has left at a 3rd runway, and that is why BA and VS are attacking BHX. what did Birmingham expect, a dozen roses instead?

Thenoflyzone



us Air Traffic Controllers have a good record, we haven't left one up there yet !!
User currently offlinetheginge From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2006, 1132 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 11 months 16 hours ago) and read 2838 times:

Quoting yendig (Thread starter):
If BHX is so bad, how come Emirates are so successful here? Couldn't other international carriers send an occasional widebody here?

I think intercontinental services would need a hub at the other end to work properly, hence Emirates can be successful.


User currently offlineTC957 From UK - England, joined May 2012, 912 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2393 times:

I'm sure that if CA can make DUS - BJS work,despite being near their FRA flights, then similary a BHX - BJS link-up should work, given the similar distance BHX is from LHR is to DUS from FRA. Especially, as has already been pointed out, with the automotive industry connections.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Qs Regarding BA/VS/NZ And Their HKG-LHR Flights posted Tue Jul 13 2010 03:10:27 by United Airline
BA/VS's 3rd/2nd Daily HKG-LHR Flights posted Sun Jan 10 2010 02:56:50 by United Airline
EOS Claims Punctuality Title - Beats BA, VS & More posted Fri Feb 1 2008 12:56:45 by TUIflyer
Employee Benefits; BA Vs. US At PHL posted Tue Jul 31 2007 17:25:18 by VikingA346
BA, VS Unaccompied Baggge posted Thu Jul 19 2007 23:11:59 by PlateMan
BA, VS, 9W - BOM-LHR Convenient? posted Sun Dec 10 2006 06:15:17 by B773ER
BA Connect Drop BHX - BHD posted Thu Aug 10 2006 14:42:03 by GayrugbyMAN
Comparing B777 Ops: AF Vs. BA Vs. KL posted Tue Aug 8 2006 15:04:18 by HB-IWC
BA/VS Check-In Question posted Thu Jul 20 2006 19:24:32 by Emirates773ER
AA, BA, VS UA Accused Of Price Fixing! posted Tue Jun 27 2006 15:08:15 by NWDC10