Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Full Panoramic Tour Of LOTs New 787  
User currently offlineThomasCook From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 797 posts, RR: 8
Posted (2 years 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 9998 times:

Hi all,

LOT have released a full panoramic tour of their new 787 - SP-LRA - delivered last week. It is available on their dedicated 787 site and shows pretty much every area onboard as well as external views. Great set up;

dreamliner.lot.com

Enjoy!

ThomasCook


A380 Crew
23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineshamrock350 From Ireland, joined Mar 2005, 6363 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (2 years 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 9877 times:

Great looking cabin!

Also confirms that the seat in row 27 that I'm in next month doesn't have a window which I kind of guessed at the time anyway but it was the only seat left! Luckily I'm flying it twice and booked a seat further forward the cabin for the second flight.

Shamrock350


User currently offlineOlafW From Germany, joined Jul 2009, 103 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 9509 times:

Am I missing something or don't the Premium Club seats have personal screens? Elite Club and Economy Class apparently have them, but why not the class in between?

User currently offlineshamrock350 From Ireland, joined Mar 2005, 6363 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (2 years 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 9505 times:

Quoting OlafW (Reply 2):

Am I missing something or don't the Premium Club seats have personal screens? Elite Club and Economy Class apparently have them, but why not the class in between?

In the armrest I think. You can see the word 'Lift' which I where the screen probably pops up.


User currently offlinepolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2315 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (2 years 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 9448 times:

Quoting OlafW (Reply 2):
Am I missing something or don't the Premium Club seats have personal screens? Elite Club and Economy Class apparently have them, but why not the class in between?

If you go to the actual page showing the seat and hover over the inside right armrest it tells you their is a 12" screen.


User currently offlineN62NA From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4579 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 9240 times:

That was really nice - especially the look at the crew rest facilities!

User currently offlinerwy04lga From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 3176 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (2 years 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 9012 times:

Great presentation! Flight deck looks sweet. Come on Delta, get some of these babies!


Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
User currently offlinevegas005 From Switzerland, joined Mar 2005, 323 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5081 times:

3-3-3 coach and premium economy...no thanks

User currently offlineThomasCook From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 797 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (2 years 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 4995 times:

Quoting vegas005 (Reply 7):
3-3-3 coach and premium economy...no thanks

Premium Club looks awfully like 2-3-2 to me! Take another look...   



A380 Crew
User currently offlineDarksnowynight From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1397 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (2 years 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 4484 times:

What's with the FSX Cessna sound effects?


Posting without Knowledge is simply Tolerated Vandalism... We are the Vandals.
User currently offlinetrent1000 From Japan, joined Jan 2007, 573 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (2 years 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 4365 times:

Having flown on an NH 787, there is no "wow factor" when you enter - there is no amazing, spacious archway at the forward entry as Boeing marketed. That was a key feature of the "Dreamliner", but the "Realityliner" looks pretty much as cramped as other modern aircraft. To prove the point, the LOT animated tour at this thread shows the entry with what seems to be galley instalments that block the view and limit the 'spacious feel' that Boeing has marketed. Furthermore, the views looking forward are of the generic-looking bulkhead wall. At the link below, there's even a mock-up pic by Boeing of the amazing archway which does not feature in the Ethiopian video at that page.

I know it's a case of space, practicalities and efficiency vs design, but it's blatantly false to show images of an "artists image" cabin that bears no resemblance to the reality of what faces you sitting 3-3-3 in economy.

http://blog.seattlepi.com/aerospace/...-on-the-inside-ethiopian-shows-us/


User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 11, posted (2 years 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4138 times:

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 10):
Having flown on an NH 787, there is no "wow factor" when you enter - there is no amazing, spacious archway at the forward entry as Boeing marketed.

The arch is an option. Some carriers have it, some don't. NH doesn't.

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 10):
That was a key feature of the "Dreamliner", but the "Realityliner" looks pretty much as cramped as other modern aircraft.

You show me another equivalently sized airliner where someone who's 6'2" can walk from aisle to aisle without ducking and can stand up straight in every seat except the windows.

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 10):
I know it's a case of space, practicalities and efficiency vs design, but it's blatantly false to show images of an "artists image" cabin that bears no resemblance to the reality of what faces you sitting 3-3-3 in economy.

It's not blatantly false; some carriers have the arch and some don't. The ones that do put it in every photo they've got. The Ethiopian link you sent clearly states that the upper photo is a mockup of the *Boeing* interior while the lower panorama is the *Ethiopian* interior. Ethiopian chose not to have the arch for their interior. Not all airlines made the same choice.

Typically, you see the arch missing from carriers with high density seating combined with planned long-haul routes, in which case they need the extra galley space. Carriers with lower density interiors or medium-range route plans can spare the space.


User currently offlinetrent1000 From Japan, joined Jan 2007, 573 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (2 years 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4100 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 11):
Some carriers have it, some don't.

OK, so which airlines have it? I'd like to see the pics... and experience the "wow factor".


User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 13, posted (2 years 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3917 times:

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 12):
Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 11):
Some carriers have it, some don't.

OK, so which airlines have it?

Of the airlines that have taken deliveries so far:
-ANA's high-density configuration (yes, they're backwards from the trend)...they don't have it on the low-density configuration that I assume you were on
-JAL
-LAN
-Qatar


User currently offlinegigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 14, posted (2 years 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 3654 times:

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 10):
That was a key feature of the "Dreamliner"

It wasn't a key feature. Its just an archway.

The plane flies and does so efficiently and quietly. Those are key features.

NS


User currently offlineThomasCook From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 797 posts, RR: 8
Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3586 times:

Hi,

You've got to remember that this feature uses up valuable 'real estate' and has to fit in with the cabin layout. If you have a J cabin running from doors 1 beyond doors 2 then it may be more practical. It also depends on the kind of flights intended for these aircraft. Galley space is very much at a premium versus saleable seats. LOT has the 'arch' as I expect is standard on all 787s however in this case it is obscured by galley 'down' lighting and the galley units themselves as is similar in United's case. That 'open' entrance isn't quite so open on JAL either. Accommodating this touch may well be the difference between lay flat or angled beds in business; I think it's a no brainer which customers would appreciate the most! The following picture says it all;



There is so much wasted cabin real estate here and airlines need to maximise revenue at every opportunity. To sumise this image simply; you would never find a J cabin with no bulkhead or divider between Y class.

Thanks
ThomasCook

[Edited 2012-11-25 15:25:19]


A380 Crew
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 16, posted (2 years 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3484 times:

Quoting ThomasCook (Reply 15):
You've got to remember that this feature uses up valuable 'real estate'

Its value depends on what you were going to put there instead. You have to have a cross-aisle at the doors so you can't run seats in that space. If you don't have a high enough seat count coupled with long routes, you don't need that galley space (the 787 has a monster aft galley to help with this) so you may as well save the weight/maintenance/cost of galley monuments. If you just do the arch (and not the photo-friendly but unrealistic "lobby" that's much wider) it's a perfectly sensible alternative to a galley/lav complex you don't need.

Quoting ThomasCook (Reply 15):
LOT has the 'arch' as I expect is standard on all 787s however in this case it is obscured by galley 'down' lighting and the galley units themselves as is similar in United's case.

If the galley are there the arch isn't...the galley's and associated chillers go right up into the ceiling and take the place of the arch. There are "arch-looking" ceiling inserts outboard of the galleys but the full arch isn't there.

Tom.


User currently offlineDarksnowynight From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1397 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (2 years 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 3363 times:

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 10):

I know it's a case of space, practicalities and efficiency vs design, but it's blatantly false to show images of an "artists image" cabin that bears no resemblance to the reality of what faces you sitting 3-3-3 in economy

False or otherwise, there's just something about having no bulkhead at all between classes that as a passenger, I really wouldn't like. For me, there is such a thing as too much open space in a plane.

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 16):
(the 787 has a monster aft galley to help with this)

Does it now? How would you say it compares to the set-up in the aft of an MD-11 or A330? Haven't seen the inside of a line 787 yet, but I've seen plenty of the former.



Posting without Knowledge is simply Tolerated Vandalism... We are the Vandals.
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 18, posted (2 years 3 days ago) and read 3305 times:

Quoting Darksnowynight (Reply 17):
Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 16):
(the 787 has a monster aft galley to help with this)

Does it now? How would you say it compares to the set-up in the aft of an MD-11 or A330?

No idea, I haven't been in the aft galley of an MD-11 or A330. I think I've been in the aft galley of a DC-10, which I assume is comparable to the MD-11, but that was about 20 years ago and I really don't remember any details.

Quoting Darksnowynight (Reply 17):
Haven't seen the inside of a line 787 yet, but I've seen plenty of the former.

I based my statement on what I've been told buy galley designers plus the reactions of many many flight attendants who seem very happy when they see the 787 aft galley (although I'm not sure any of them had seen an MD-11 or A330 either).

Tom.


User currently offlinetrent1000 From Japan, joined Jan 2007, 573 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (2 years 3 days ago) and read 3292 times:

Quoting gigneil (Reply 14):
It wasn't a key feature. Its just an archway.

and the larger windows are 'just' larger windows, too... Boeing marketed the interior as well as the avionics.


User currently offlineraffik From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2006, 1718 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (2 years 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3063 times:

What an amazing site- The aircraft looks great but I was a little shocked at how non premium the Business class looks.
The seat pitch looks tight and very cramped- especially for a long haul flight.

I loved the shiny new galleys and wow, what a great crew rest!



Happy -go- lucky kinda guy!
User currently offlineAtlflyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 737 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (2 years 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2680 times:

43cm seat bottom for Economy looks tight!

User currently offlineThomasCook From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 797 posts, RR: 8
Reply 22, posted (2 years 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2651 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 16):
You have to have a cross-aisle at the doors so you can't run seats in that space. If you don't have a high enough seat count coupled with long routes, you don't need that galley space (the 787 has a monster aft galley to help with this) so you may as well save the weight/maintenance/cost of galley monuments.

Yes of course a cross-over is essential however the space a cross-over requires will be used in the most effective way. Now obviously the likes of LO, UA and NH (low density) require that space for galley units as I can confidently asume they haven't just gone and put the galley's in for the fun of it.

In LOTs instance, it is very suitable to have a galley at doors 2 from a cabin service perspective as having no doors 2 galley would be unpractical for the W class service as the crew's galley would then be down at doors 4. For long range operations, having additional galley space in the most practical area without eating into revenue space is essential. A cosmetic touch such as the arched entrance isn't likely to be the focal point of most pax journey. It likely may not make any impact whatsoever or may be quickly forgotten about as it is the comfort and service that will be the defining point of the flight.

Quoting Atlflyer (Reply 21):
43cm seat bottom for Economy looks tight!

It depends on how LOT measures this. Some carriers measure from the inside of the armrests and others from middle. LOTs is line with UA and potentially above LAs at 42.5cm depending on how they measure. JA and NH quote 46cm...

ThomasCook



A380 Crew
User currently offline777way From Pakistan, joined Dec 2005, 5927 posts, RR: 4
Reply 23, posted (2 years 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2510 times:

I dont like these J class seats look on any airline, but in this case the seat cover design and colours make it somewhat tolerable, maybe it they had headrests attached they would look better.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Virtual Tour Of New Boeing 787 Dreamliner - ANA posted Wed Oct 17 2012 18:57:54 by markriv
In-depth Tour Of New Lufthansa 747-8 posted Wed Sep 19 2012 06:31:27 by dcann40
Video Of The New Boeing 787 Window Shades posted Wed Jun 24 2009 07:45:14 by GetYourFlyx
Bmi: New Virtual Tour Of New J Cabin posted Sun Mar 16 2008 07:20:01 by Jamesontheroad
Free Tour Of New Terminal D At DFW On 6-25-05 posted Thu Jun 23 2005 05:23:41 by SonOfACaptain
Status Of DL(NW) 787 Order posted Wed Nov 14 2012 05:14:20 by xdlx
LAN Has A New 787 Video/commercial. posted Thu Sep 27 2012 16:47:11 by g500
China Southern's New 787 Livery posted Thu Aug 16 2012 12:14:14 by Airport
Pictures Of LOT's Second 787 posted Sat Aug 11 2012 13:03:25 by WROORD
LH's New 748i And UA's New 787 Deliveries? posted Wed Jul 18 2012 04:26:02 by VC10er