Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Comac ARJ-21-700 Question  
User currently offlinebrilondon From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 4414 posts, RR: 2
Posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 7128 times:

Did Boeing or MDD have any part of the designing of this aircraft?

http://www.airliners.net/photo/COMAC...d=11bbc1e5cfa9a76aa4ac0f14c5adf7e0


Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineskyhawkmatthew From Australia, joined Oct 2005, 185 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 7131 times:

IIRC the design started out as a licenced copy of the MD-90, and has subsequently gained new engines and wings.


Qantas - The Spirit of Australia.
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11701 posts, RR: 60
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 7057 times:

They purchased the Boeing/Douglas tooling, it's essentially a warmed over mini B717 with new wings and engines.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineNASCARAirforce From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3184 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 7031 times:

It almost looks like Airbus had something to do with the Comac C919 but with new wings.

User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 6982 times:

Quoting skyhawkmatthew (Reply 1):
They purchased the Boeing/Douglas tooling, it's essentially a warmed over mini B717



Nah, can't be a mini B717 as it's missing the center window on the flight deck and no eyebrow windows.

Quoting NASCARAirforce (Reply 3):
It almost looks like Airbus



True, bus windscreen with the Douglas nose.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11701 posts, RR: 60
Reply 5, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 6955 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 4):
Nah, can't be a mini B717 as it's missing the center window on the flight deck and no eyebrow windows.

They were going out of fashion so got them plucked.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlinehawaiian717 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3208 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 6682 times:

They're using the MD-90 tooling leftover from the McDD-Chinese joint venture, so it would probably be more accurate to think of it as a mini MD-90 variant rather than a mini 717. I also noticed that it appears to lack doors for the main landing gear (like the 737) and it has the wedge tail with the side APU exhaust like the 777. And it looks funny with the tiny CRJ engines on it compared to the longer JT8D, V2500, and BRR715.

Part way through the 717 production run the eyebrow windows were removed. So early 717s have them while later 717 lack them.


User currently offlinebohica From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2749 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 6444 times:

It is a reversed engineered DC-9 with a wing designed by Antonov. Besides differences others have mentioned, there are doors just forward of the engines and no overwing exits. Also looking at other pictures it doesn't look like there is a tailcone exit like the DC-9/MD/717 series.

User currently offlinerikkus67 From Canada, joined Jun 2000, 1684 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 6339 times:

Hey brilondon,

bohica is correct in everything he said. I might also add that the engines (GE, CF-series) are similar in type to those used in Bombardiers CRJ's, and Embraers E17X-19X.

China previously tried to build a Western-style airliner, by reverse-engineering a Boeing 707:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Taecoxu




AC.WA.CP.DL.RW.CO.WG.WJ.WN.KI.FL.SK.ACL.UA.US.F9
User currently offlineIndianicWorld From Australia, joined Jun 2001, 3028 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 6297 times:

Has it had many orders?

Looks quite heavy for its size though.


User currently offlineADent From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1406 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 6277 times:

Quoting IndianicWorld (Reply 9):
Has it had many orders?

It had a couple of foreign orders, but they all have been canceled or put on hold.

Chengdu Airlines, owned by Comac - the manufacturer of the plane, has orders for 30.

Several other Chinese airlines have orders, but most are stale. It was expected that the program would run at least 300 airframes.

There are parts for 9 more planes ordered - some speculation is that may be the production run.


User currently onlinen797mx From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 245 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 5581 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 4):
it's missing the center window on the flight deck

Makes it look kind of Superjet-ish, don't you think?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Henry Sean


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Oleg V. Belyakov - AirTeamImages



Maybe just me then?  



Clear skies and strong tail winds.
User currently offlinerikkus67 From Canada, joined Jun 2000, 1684 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4596 times:

Quoting n797mx (Reply 11):
Makes it look kind of Superjet-ish, don't you think?

Certainly has a bit of a similarity.

Comac did a great job with modernizing and simplifying the cockpit widows. I believe I read that the size of the aircraft is roughly between the -10 and -30 DC-9 size. Emergency exits have been repositioned to forward of the engines, and the rear airstairs have been eliminated. Part of the reason for delay into production (other than low sales), has been some issues with the newly designed wing.

I believe Comac is also working with Bombardier for a larger aircraft, which will share commonality with the C Series. Whether this transpires into both a CS500 and a semi-autonomous Comac aircraft is yet to be seen.

The ARJ-21 certainly is a good looking aircraft, clearly showing is pedigree...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Weimeng


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Weimeng


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Weimeng


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Simpsonmeng


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Simpsonmeng


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Caucfly




AC.WA.CP.DL.RW.CO.WG.WJ.WN.KI.FL.SK.ACL.UA.US.F9
User currently offlineJHCRJ700 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 377 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4128 times:

Who makes the engines? Interesting looking plane. Is there any expected entry into service with a commercial carrier anytime soon? Seems like the flight test program is taking awhile.


RUSH
User currently offlineFWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3827 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (2 years 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3941 times:

Quoting JHCRJ700 (Reply 13):

Who makes the engines?

They are GE CF34-10As, though China eventually wants to develop homegrown engines (and avionics).



"Did he really need the triple bypass? Or was it the miles?"
User currently offlineADent From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1406 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3846 times:

Quoting JHCRJ700 (Reply 13):
Is there any expected entry into service with a commercial carrier anytime soon? Seems like the flight test program is taking awhile.

Per AvWek it looks like 2014 is the new entry into service date, though one agency of the Chinese still thinks late 2013. Original plans were for 2006 then 2010 after the first flight late in 2008.


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 16, posted (2 years 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3792 times:

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 2):
They purchased the Boeing/Douglas tooling

Do you have a crediable source for this, I find this very difficult to believe.



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlinebrilondon From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 4414 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (2 years 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3732 times:

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 16):

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 2):
They purchased the Boeing/Douglas tooling

Do you have a crediable source for this, I find this very difficult to believe.

It is not out of the realm of possibility that with the discontinuation of the 717, nee DC-9/MD80, why would Boeing not sell the tooling to the Russians or Chinese, the Chinese make everything these days.



Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
User currently offlinehawaiian717 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3208 posts, RR: 7
Reply 18, posted (2 years 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3588 times:

We're not talking about equipment from Long Beach being sold to China after the end of commercial jetliner production at the Douglas facility, but about equipment originally intended to be used for Chinese production of the MD-90 as part of the TrunkLiner program. Ultimately, only two MD-90s were built in China.

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...echniques-return-for-arj21-216288/


User currently offlinerikkus67 From Canada, joined Jun 2000, 1684 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (2 years 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3545 times:

Thanks for the link, hawaiian717. By the date of the article, the ARJ21 is quite a bit behind schedule. Hopefully, we will see it come to full fruition...


AC.WA.CP.DL.RW.CO.WG.WJ.WN.KI.FL.SK.ACL.UA.US.F9
User currently offliner2rho From Germany, joined Feb 2007, 2772 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (2 years 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3367 times:

With the ARJ-21, the Chinese industry is now learning that building a plane that flies is one thing, but actually certifying it (in particular to Western standards) is a whole different issue. From the little that I have read, it seems Comac has had significant documentation and traceability issues regarding various parts etc that does not allow them to be certified, even though fully built, and have had to go back to square one for their design.

But I see the ARJ-21 mainly as a learning experience for the Chinese industry; it doesn't have to be a commercial success. The lessons learned will surely be applied to the C919, etc.


User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11701 posts, RR: 60
Reply 21, posted (2 years 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3253 times:

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 16):
Do you have a crediable source for this, I find this very difficult to believe.

Yes, as hawaiian717 has kindly already cited:

Quoting hawaiian717 (Reply 18):
We're not talking about equipment from Long Beach being sold to China after the end of commercial jetliner production at the Douglas facility, but about equipment originally intended to be used for Chinese production of the MD-90 as part of the TrunkLiner program. Ultimately, only two MD-90s were built in China.

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...6288/

Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
737-300,-500,-700 Question posted Tue Sep 13 2005 07:36:09 by Swabur
Question About WN's 737-700's posted Wed Jul 20 2005 05:50:52 by FLY764
Mesaba ARJ Weight-balance Question posted Thu Jul 24 2003 15:51:51 by Boeing757/767
CRJ-700 Forward Cargo Hold Question posted Sat Feb 23 2002 06:51:37 by Flyboy80
Boeing/Renton Production Question posted Thu Nov 15 2012 15:13:38 by bigbird
Comac Building 4,000 Acre 11 Building Factory... posted Wed Nov 7 2012 06:44:11 by morrisond
US Airways Express CRJ-700/900's @ PHL? posted Tue Nov 6 2012 19:38:47 by spiritair97
Oslo Gardermoen Question posted Sun Oct 28 2012 10:18:51 by 28L28L
UA Global First Question posted Sun Oct 28 2012 03:51:34 by klwright69
The "disabled Toilet" Question. posted Tue Oct 23 2012 12:02:06 by readytotaxi