Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
787-10 Authority To Offer Coming, But Not So Soon  
User currently offlineRickNRoll From Afghanistan, joined Jan 2012, 896 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 4651 times:

Boeing says "Boeing: more work needed before launch of stretch 787".

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...26/us-boeing-idUSBRE8AP12320121126

The previous reports on the 10 seemed to indicate it's official launch was imminent. Not so much now. Both the 777X and 787-10 are going slower than expected. Any guesses as to when?

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31375 posts, RR: 85
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4516 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I'm guessing a formal launch at Paris this summer, since I do not believe there are any major air shows before than now that Asian Aerospace in March is defunct.

As to why it's going slower, if customers are most interested in efficiency instead of extra range, then Boeing needs to concentrate on empty weight savings, aerodynamic tweaks (laminar flow leading edges) and engine efficiencies (Trent 1000-TEN and GEnx1B PiP3).


User currently offlineBoeingVista From Australia, joined Jan 2009, 1584 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4481 times:

Quoting RickNRoll (Thread starter):
The previous reports on the 10 seemed to indicate it's official launch was imminent

Yes, the previous reports for the last 5 years seemed to indicate that the 787-10 launch was imminent, yet it is still not launched.

At some point the NYSE should take a stand on all of these false product launch stories that Boeing places with friendly news sources as a cynic might think all of this constant launch speculation was about supporting the BA share price.



BV
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7924 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4383 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 1):
I'm guessing a formal launch at Paris this summer, since I do not believe there are any major air shows before than now that Asian Aerospace in March is defunct.

That's my best bet. Paris Air Show is quite a place for publicity, so it would make most sense. Maybe we'll see a potential launch customer too.



Follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/phx787
User currently offlinecolumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7089 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4355 times:

Lufthansa might be in a position ordering next year, let´s see


It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineJoeCanuck From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 5478 posts, RR: 31
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 4093 times:

Quoting BoeingVista (Reply 2):

At some point the NYSE should take a stand on all of these false product launch stories that Boeing places with friendly news sources as a cynic might think all of this constant launch speculation was about supporting the BA share price.

Many, if not most, of the reports aren't actually coming from Boeing, and the ones that are, tend to be very vague. I really doubt the -10 has or will have any effect on the stock price until it actually is formally launched.



What the...?
User currently offlineswallow From Uganda, joined Jul 2007, 557 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 4014 times:

The delay of the "330-300 killer" means the old gal has some life left in her....

I guess the priorities for Boeing are:

1. Crank out 10 787's per month, and

2. Get the 789 into service

In tandem with getting the 737MAX, and 767 tanker programs up to speed.

After that unleash the R&D engineers onto the 7810 and 777X programs.

[Edited 2012-11-28 00:48:43]


The grass is greener where you water it
User currently offlineJoeCanuck From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 5478 posts, RR: 31
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3981 times:

Quoting swallow (Reply 6):

I guess the priorities for Boeing are:

In reality, there is no rush in officially launching the -10 because a delay of months or even years won't make a lick of difference to when it could possibly enter service, since the -10 is based on the -9, and the -9 hasn't even flown yet.



What the...?
User currently onlinesunrisevalley From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 5214 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3414 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 3):
That's my best bet. Paris Air Show is quite a place for publicity, so it would make most sense. Maybe we'll see a potential launch customer too

Aspire has weighed in with a further article . A point that they are making is that Boeing are most unlikely to allow airlines to switch early heavily discounted 788/9 orders to a heavily discounted 787-10. Presumably Boeing see no reason at this time to discount the 787-10 and this makes sense since as a relatively simple derivative there should be few if any unknowns at EIS.


User currently offlinedynamicsguy From Australia, joined Jul 2008, 887 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3184 times:

Quoting BoeingVista (Reply 2):
Yes, the previous reports for the last 5 years seemed to indicate that the 787-10 launch was imminent

The 787-10 being discussed now is a quite different airplane than what was discussed 5 years ago. There was also a long stretch of time in the middle when nothing was said of the 787-10 at all.


User currently offlinerheinwaldner From Switzerland, joined Jan 2008, 2286 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2805 times:

Quoting RickNRoll (Thread starter):
Any guesses as to when?

Not when but a guess why:
A straight forward stretch could have been launched a long time ago. So it's not about a straight forward stretch.

Seems that Boeing wants to keep other options open. The 781 needs to be positioned properly in their long term product strategy. Which means that their plans for the 748, 777X and even Y3 do have impact on the kind of upgrade that is going to be the optimum for the 781.


User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1831 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2497 times:

Read something about 3 axle MLG for upping the MTOW and range. How much weight would that add? There is a limit at 250t?

User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31375 posts, RR: 85
Reply 12, posted (2 years 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2329 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting rheinwaldner (Reply 10):
A straight forward stretch could have been launched a long time ago. So it's not about a straight forward stretch.

It may yet be just that.

I'd argue what has held back the launch of the 787-10 is the necessity for Boeing to get the 787-8 into "smooth" production and show that they have gained control over the production process at PAE and CHS (including the EMC and Surge Lines).

To launch (at the time) a fourth 787 model while they were still trying to screw the first airframe together or working through the testing and certification issues would have been met on this board and the investment community with catcalls and derision.

By the time of the Paris Air Show, 787 production should be at 7 per month from the FALs, most (if not all) of LN20-LN40 aircraft should have been delivered (leaving only the "terrible teens"), a few more customers should have received their first 787-8s and the first 787-9 should be in the FAL.

Announcing the 787-10 at that point makes a fair bit more sense, IMO.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
No 787-10 Due To Potential 777 Improvements posted Wed Apr 21 2010 11:19:05 by CFBFrame
787-10 Closer To Reality? posted Tue Dec 20 2005 15:38:21 by DAYflyer
Airtrain At JFK-convenient But Not So Speedy. posted Tue Dec 23 2003 00:58:06 by Mirrodie
Buzz To Offer Discounts For Not Checking Bags posted Tue May 29 2001 11:05:25 by Parra
Boeing To Offer 787-10? posted Tue May 23 2006 12:44:41 by Reggaebird
US Airlines To HAM: Why So Many In 80s But Not Now? posted Fri Apr 14 2006 23:05:15 by Kkfla737
BOS, BDL To Get Song Flts, But Not PVD So Far... posted Mon May 5 2003 17:37:20 by John
Cathay Mulls 787-10 To Replace A330s posted Fri Nov 16 2012 04:01:06 by CCA
Low Cost Fares To Spain - Not So? posted Fri Oct 19 2012 13:13:50 by asctty
787-10 EIS Moving To The Right, 777-X Up Next? posted Tue Aug 14 2012 20:59:37 by WarpSpeed