gilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2964 posts, RR: 1 Reply 2, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 12933 times:
For the last few years the airlines has been expanding, by sourcing second hand aircraft from the likes BMI, Spirit, Thomas Cook and soon to receive some from Thomson too...
This has left the airline with quite a hodgepodge of aircraft while the same types, but with different cycle rates and ages... Some of these dating back to the late 1990's, so by 2021, these will be in need of being replaced.
Even though it is argued that there is no true replacement for the 757's, Monarch seems to be doing a great job in using the A321 as a like for like replacement for them. I have noticed that Monarch have started stretching the legs of the A321's and operating them as far away as Sharm-El-Shiekh on their new scheduled services, which had previously been reserved for the 757's and A300's when operating there as a charter route...
With Monarch dropping long haul ops, and flying no further than Egypt and the Canaries, the A320 NEO or 737 Nxt-Gen type will suit the airline excellently!
Going by Monarch's previous history as quite an innovative airline and keen to adopt new aircraft types, I wonder if they could be attracted to COMAC or Bombardier C-Series if offered the right deal?
GCT64 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 1257 posts, RR: 1 Reply 3, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 12897 times:
The article also indicates that they want a fleet of a single "type" (my guess is that they really mean "A320/1" or "B738/9") and want to complete their transition to become a full LCC to compete against EZY. This change in business model is also consistent with their previous cancellation of 787s. Surely this order is likely to go to A321NEOs in the main (with perhaps some A320NEOs for thinner routes)?
gilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2964 posts, RR: 1 Reply 4, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 12846 times:
Quoting Stitch (Reply 1): So that would likely favor Airbus unless Boeing can offer better availability.
No not at all...
The airline was due to be one of the launch customers of the 787, but they only dropped the order about a year ago, due to the airline deciding to change direction as a European low cost carrier. The airline now has no intention of replacing the A300's and A330's they have like for like.
The airline was a launch customer of the 757, being the first customer outside of the USA and has also operated 737-300's and 720's.
The airline's maintenance subsidiary "Monarch Engineering", has very close links to Boeing, offering maintenance to customers with all types of Boeings and will be one of the first to offer GoldCare maintenance for the 787 outside of the USA.
I believe they will go with whoever offers them the best deal.
Wow,I didn't know that. I'm shocked. I'm so used to seeing Monarch flying long haul. Can tour operators get cheaper long haul flights with scheduled airlines? I doubt it.
Quoting GCT64 (Reply 3): This change in business model is also consistent with their previous cancellation of 787s.
Wow, I didn't know that either. I guess companies don't boast whe they cancel an aircraft order. I thought the whole idea of the 787 was to operate long thin routes profitably. Monarch bean counters must have calculated otherwise.
Whenever I've travelled with a tour operator I'm always relieved to see it's going to be a Monarch flight. I did think, however, that their A321 was little bit too cramped and uncomfortable for a 4hr 30min flight to Cyprus.
You can kill off routes with uncomfy aircraft.
and with that..cabin crew, seats for landing please.
bluesky73 From UK - England, joined Oct 2012, 246 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 11877 times:
Good news and great to see a classic, respected British airline adapt and do well especially when many others have fallen in the last few years. I've always found Monarch to be a good airline to fly with.
As much as I will be sad to see a300, 330 and 757s go and with their mix of the various acquired a32x the next gen will be very much be needed in the near future.
My money is on NEO, even go as far as to say 30 A321neo and 15 A320neo.
FlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2020 posts, RR: 3 Reply 9, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 11684 times:
Quoting gilesdavies (Reply 4): The airline was a launch customer of the 757, being the first customer outside of the USA
Not quite true, launch customers were Eastern Airlines (21 aircraft in original order) and British Airways (19 aircraft in original order). Monarch, however, were the third airline to take delivery of type with LN 15, 18 and 19 (They also took LN 56, 125, 132, 170 new as 757-2T7s).
Quoting JerseyFlyer (Reply 6): Did they not pick up some early frames ordered by BA but deemed surplus?
That was Air Europe, who took LN 14 and 34 from BA's original order of 19 aircraft. Subsequently, all other 757s ordered by Air Europe were delivered with the Boeing customer code 36 (BA) rather than S3 (Air Europe).
mon From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2012, 21 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 11312 times:
Contrary to what some people have been saying, Monarch have not pulled out of long haul and have announced no plans to do so. It is true that a combination of recession and the UK's high APD charges have greatly affected all long haul leisure travel out of the UK.
Giancavia From Vatican City, joined Feb 2010, 1291 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 10469 times:
During 2013 2x a320 and 3x a321 will join the fleet.. at the end of 2013 summer schedule the fleet should have 9x a320, 21x a321, 3x a300, 3x 757 and 2 a330's. One of the A300's is then scrapped and the last 2 in 2014 along with the 757's. Open to correction but I am sure thats right.
I believe it is, yes. I've flown MAN-BJL 5 times on 757s with TCX and FCA.
Two points: I'm 95% certain that the (current generation) A321s couldn't make it to BJL non-stop, it is one of those routes (like TATL) where the 757 really comes into its own and is unreplaceable. Also, I'd suggest that the VAST majority of people going to BJL do so on packages, and that it wouldn't fit with MON's re-emphasis as an LCC.
gilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2964 posts, RR: 1 Reply 16, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 9715 times:
Saying Monarch is dropping Long Haul ops, is badly worded on my part.
There is currently no plans to replace the A330-200's which along with the A300's, were due to be replaced with 787's. The airline does however seem to be focusing future expansion on short haul routes exclusively, or routes with the capability of single aisle aircraft.
dergay From Ireland, joined Dec 2006, 38 posts, RR: 0 Reply 17, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 9501 times:
Whatever happens, happens! However, I hope to see Monarch around for a long time yet, having flown widely with them on charters as well as scheduled flights throughout Europe and ME / North Africa. I have a lingering memory of a Monarch Captain announcing after landing 20 minuted early in DUB after a flight from FAO that: "We are delighted to have shortened your journey and do not play loud garish music to self-congratulate on having done our job!"
My money is on the 320 / 321, but I'll miss the 757 - she's some machine!
Flown on A300,A310,A318,A319,A320,A321,A330,B707,B720,B727,B737,B747,B757,B767,L382,L1011,C5,DC-3,DC8,
asctty From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2008, 117 posts, RR: 0 Reply 18, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 5767 times:
As long as they continue to develop the services on their new routes I will look forward to seeing improvements. The two wet lease 735s they used from EMA during the summer were awful. These have now been replaced I understand.
With regard to the space onboard, has anyone got any comments about how Jet2 have replaced the seats with the thin-back, non-reclining type? I have that legroom is better and that the are just as comfortable on short haul flights on both the 737 and 757.
Anyway, I wish Monarch well as long as they improve the timetable from EMA - ALC and consider MJV next year.
I work out there!
Daysleeper From UK - England, joined Dec 2009, 832 posts, RR: 1 Reply 19, posted (1 year 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4673 times:
Quoting RyanairGuru (Reply 15): Two points: I'm 95% certain that the (current generation) A321s couldn't make it to BJL non-stop, it is one of those routes (like TATL) where the 757 really comes into its own and is unreplaceable
There is almost certainly going to be a TATL capable version of the A321 NEO - Contrary to popular Anet belief the 757 is not irreplaceable.
spud757 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 307 posts, RR: 0 Reply 20, posted (1 year 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4623 times:
Will miss the MON 757. looked great in their colours, even if the leg room was the tightest of the charters compared to TOM. Will be a sad day as these birds slowly disappear from UK charter ops; at least LS and TOM seem to be planning to keep them working for a good few years now they've added winglets.
LGWflyer From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2011, 2348 posts, RR: 1 Reply 22, posted (1 year 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3377 times:
Quoting spud757 (Reply 20): Will miss the MON 757. looked great in their colours, even if the leg room was the tightest of the charters compared to TOM. Will be a sad day as these birds slowly disappear from UK charter ops; at least LS and TOM seem to be planning to keep them working for a good few years now they've added winglets.
Don't forget TCX, they still got 15 752's flying and the 2 753's with the winglets (which look great!). I don't think they will be getting rid of them all in the near future.
Fantastic looking birds, especially the 300 with winglets!
JRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4616 posts, RR: 51 Reply 23, posted (1 year 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3035 times:
Quoting RyanairGuru (Reply 15): Two points: I'm 95% certain that the (current generation) A321s couldn't make it to BJL non-stop, it is one of those routes (like TATL) where the 757 really comes into its own and is unreplaceable.
Maybe not the A320, but the 738 should certainly be able to make it from LGW!
For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
gilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2964 posts, RR: 1 Reply 24, posted (1 year 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2665 times:
I don't get some peoples hang up, with going on about how the airline will not have a direct replacement for the 757, and go on about a single route LGW/MAN to BJL, which is probably the only route in the whole of Monarch's network of routes flown my single aisle aircraft, the A321 cannot serve non-stop?!
This route is a charter flight, and the airline over the coming years is going to serve fewer and fewer charter destinations, as they focus on scheduled services in Europe and Northern Africa.
The route operates once a week, during the winter season and probably accounts for about 0.1% of the airlines ops and while Im sure it is profitable for the airline to fly the route, its not justifiable to have an exclusive aircraft that can operate this route.
When the 757's in 2014 are retired, the airline will simply have to tell tour operators that they will have to find a new carrier or for it to be operated with a techincal stop, if they require the capacity of 200+ seats.
The A320 should be able to operate this route, BMI use to fly to Freetown and this is slight further than Banjul! Also I think Strategic Air use to operate their A320's from LGW-BJL?!
Stop living in the past and get over the fact the 757 is being retired. Airlines will adapt and adjust accordingly!
FI642 From Monaco, joined Mar 2005, 1079 posts, RR: 2 Reply 25, posted (1 year 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2122 times:
Quoting gilesdavies (Reply 24): Stop living in the past and get over the fact the 757 is being retired. Airlines will adapt and adjust accordingly!
What really replaces the 752? Sad, I know it is hard to see them go. I remember when they were first being delivered to EA. We would go down to the gates just to watch them come and go. EA let me on to see the cockpit right after they started getting them. I love that bird!
I vote for the 737 family .. and I hope that is what they go with!
737MAX, Cool Planes for the Worlds Coolest Airline.