Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could LGA - LCY Work?  
User currently offlinexdlx From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 612 posts, RR: 1
Posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4063 times:

Wondering if a 1100 dep LCY-LGA in a A319 could work with return at 2100 LGA-LCY

35 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineleftyboarder From Turkey, joined Apr 2008, 693 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4055 times:

Who would operate it though? Would BA operate to LGA, where they would be an outcast?

[Edited 2012-12-03 14:45:32]

User currently onlineapodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4124 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4021 times:

It would have to be one of those modified A318's first of all and not an A319.

The other issue is the perimeter rule. Could you realistically see BA operate a SA only flight out of LGA when they have a somewhat big operation at JFK?


User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 1280 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3978 times:

It is wayyy out of perimeter.

http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gc?PATH=L...E=best&RANGE-COLOR=navy&MAP-STYLE=



You will either love or hate the airline industry. If you love it, it will get in your blood and it will never leave.
User currently offlineTWA772LR From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 1150 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3910 times:

I think it would be awesome to see that service. And it would be the most convenient for business travelers since LCY is practically in the heart of downtown London, same for LGA. But with the perimeter rule and TATL JV buddy at JFK as well as what is arguably the largest BA operation outside of LHR, I doubt it will happen soon. Can BA apply/pay some politician to lobby for an exception to the rule? Like how McCain lobbied for HP to fly from PHX to DCA?


Я говорю по-русский. :)
User currently offlineinfiniti329 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 469 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3881 times:

Quoting leftyboarder (Reply 1):
Who would operate it though? Would BA operate to LGA, where they would be an outcast?

Hypothetically speaking if something like this would happen Im pretty sure it would be AA to take care of all the airport work , similar to WS and DL in LGA.


User currently offlineFreshSide3 From United States of America, joined Nov 2012, 213 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3881 times:

It would have to be business class only, too, that goes without saying. This is a convenience flight, that can command premium bucks.....

User currently offlinePolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2047 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3882 times:

Quoting TWA772LR (Reply 4):
Can BA apply/pay some politician to lobby for an exception to the rule? Like how McCain lobbied for HP to fly from PHX to DCA?

That won't happen. There are no exceptions to the perimeter rule except DEN (because there was already a DEN-LGA flight when the rule was implemented) and any exceptions would go to US airlines first. Why would a politician help BA versus a carrier with a hub in their own home state?


User currently offlineTWA772LR From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 1150 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3816 times:

Quoting Polot (Reply 7):
Why would a politician help BA versus a carrier with a hub in their own home state?

I was just wondering if it could happen. It wouldn't surprise me to see if a politician had helped out any foreign company. I will stop there because my intent is not to hijack this thread to make it about politics.



Я говорю по-русский. :)
User currently offlinePolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2047 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3769 times:

Quoting TWA772LR (Reply 8):

I was just wondering if it could happen. It wouldn't surprise me to see if a politician had helped out any foreign company. I will stop there because my intent is not to hijack this thread to make it about politics.

Not to hijack the thread but there will be zero political support for it. The US airlines would be up in arms about it wanting to fly to LGA-LAX/SFO/SEA etc instead, and at the end of the day they have more political capital in Washington than BA.


User currently offlinexdlx From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 612 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3638 times:

The only reason would be for Business travelers.....Perimeter or not, a link between two financial capitals.
London could close business in NY on the same day! Enhancing global markets.
As stated here previously a Special Purpose route....to go to ???


User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3074 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3603 times:

Quoting TWA772LR (Reply 4):
as what is arguably the largest BA operation outside of LHR,

That's Gatwick, don't forget!


User currently offlinesteex From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 1564 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3548 times:

Quoting xdlx (Reply 10):
London could close business in NY on the same day! Enhancing global markets.

Considering the overall distance of travel, being able to fly into LGA instead of the existing LCY-JFK service would have virtually zero impact on this.

Also, for what it's worth, it's PANYNJ that would need to be convinced to allow beyond-perimeter exemptions, not the feds down in Washington.


User currently offlineytz From Canada, joined Jun 2009, 1832 posts, RR: 23
Reply 13, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3501 times:

LCY-USA would work a lot better with the CSeries (to allow for direct flights), with all-business service (only because I don't think any narrowbody can do direct from LCY with a full load of pax) and with pre-clearance at LCY. And with perimerter exemptions for LGA and DCA. Without an aircraft that can do direct to the US and without pre-clearance, the US-LCY market will always be niche and restricted to JFK via SNN.

One would think that policians and authorities in the US would support that kind of setup given the depth of the US-UK relationship.

As for perimeter rule airports like LGA and DCA, I could see it. LCY ops are sort of a separate business for BA. And with the JV, AA would probably benefit for doing nothing more than lobbying and getting the paperwork done. Imagine what a tremendous service LCY-LGA and LCY-DCA would be.

Let's see what Odyssey can cook up.


User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 1280 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3435 times:

Some points people just aren't getting...

*LGA has NO perimeter exceptions other then DEN because it is grandfathered in
*PANYNJ decides wether to allow exceptions etc....
*PANYNJ and DOT (when talking DCA) will give exceptions to US cities before international destinations, the latest example, not accepting AC's recent out of perimeter DCA request

All in all, LGA-LCY is not going to happen, at least in our lifetime.



You will either love or hate the airline industry. If you love it, it will get in your blood and it will never leave.
User currently offlineytz From Canada, joined Jun 2009, 1832 posts, RR: 23
Reply 15, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3415 times:

Quoting airliner371 (Reply 14):
Some points people just aren't getting...

*LGA has NO perimeter exceptions other then DEN because it is grandfathered in
*PANYNJ decides wether to allow exceptions etc....
*PANYNJ and DOT (when talking DCA) will give exceptions to US cities before international destinations, the latest example, not accepting AC's recent out of perimeter DCA request

All in all, LGA-LCY is not going to happen, at least in our lifetime.

Nobody is debating who gives what authorities. I think the impact of those restrictions is more germane to the discussion at hand than who imposes them.


User currently offlineYYZYYT From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 924 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2906 times:

Quoting Polot (Reply 7):
That won't happen. There are no exceptions to the perimeter rule except DEN (because there was already a DEN-LGA flight when the rule was implemented) and any exceptions would go to US airlines first. Why would a politician help BA versus a carrier with a hub in their own home state?

Could someone in the know explain the perimetre rule for an interested amatuer?

Thanks,


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21092 posts, RR: 56
Reply 17, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2789 times:

Quoting xdlx (Thread starter):
Wondering if a 1100 dep LCY-LGA in a A319 could work with return at 2100 LGA-LCY

The times wouldn't work. Too late of a departure from both airports.

Quoting YYZYYT (Reply 16):
Could someone in the know explain the perimetre rule for an interested amatuer?

No flights can serve LGA that are over 1500 miles (not nautical miles) in direct length (i.e. not accounting for the zig-zags are common to any routing over airways). The exception is flights on Saturday, which can be any length.

LGA also does not have significant customs facilities, so any international flight would have to be to (or via) a destination that has pre-clearance.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineconnies4ever From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 4066 posts, RR: 13
Reply 18, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2750 times:

Quoting ytz (Reply 13):
LCY-USA would work a lot better with the CSeries (to allow for direct flights), with all-business service (only because I don't think any narrowbody can do direct from LCY with a full load of pax) and with pre-clearance at LCY. And with perimerter exemptions for LGA and DCA. Without an aircraft that can do direct to the US and without pre-clearance, the US-LCY market will always be niche and restricted to JFK via SNN.

BBD have stated that the CS100 will be certified out of the box for n/s LCY-JFK, so it's not a lack of capability. As well, the concept for the all-J CS100 is for 44 seats, as opposed to the A318's 32 (although likely more generous size-wise). So potential revenue generation would be bigger. So I don't see either a technical or business case reason that this could not be done.

I don't see this happening for reasons amply stated above, plus since JFK would be n/s without clearing US customs at SNN, this will negate some of the advantages of arriving at JFK "domestic".

But a case might be made for LCY-DXB/JED/DOH all J, and perhaps some others. Maybe SVO/VKO. Not sure if CS100's capability could be extended to IAD/DCA and with DCA you run into the same issues as LGA.

Random thought: any potential for longer flights into HND ? There should not be a night ban at HND for CS100 due to the very quiet GTF engines.



Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
User currently onlinebrilondon From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 4057 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2718 times:

Quoting FreshSide3 (Reply 6):

It would have to be business class only, too, that goes without saying. This is a convenience flight, that can command premium bucks.....

The business class is the only class on the A318's that BA flies out of LCY to JFK. Would the runways at LGA be long enough for a full fuel load?

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 11):
Quoting TWA772LR (Reply 4):
as what is arguably the largest BA operation outside of LHR,

That's Gatwick, don't forget!

   and a number of other airports in the UK.



Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
User currently offlinesteex From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 1564 posts, RR: 9
Reply 20, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2718 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 17):
No flights can serve LGA that are over 1500 miles (not nautical miles) in direct length (i.e. not accounting for the zig-zags are common to any routing over airways). The exception is flights on Saturday, which can be any length.

LGA also does not have significant customs facilities, so any international flight would have to be to (or via) a destination that has pre-clearance.

To expand on that point, flights between LGA and DEN are also explicitly allowed for all carriers since DEN service already existed when the perimeter was instituted. Furthermore, beyond just the perimeter being lifted on Saturdays, LGA isn't even slot controlled on Saturdays - carriers are free to operate flights at any schedule they desire.


User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8090 posts, RR: 7
Reply 21, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks ago) and read 2620 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The LGA and LCY thing has been talked about lots here. There are some big differences, LGA is close to JFK but LCY is right next to Canary Wharf and on the other side of London from Heathrow. For an equivalent of LCY to exist in NYC it would have to be near the Statue of Liberty in the middle of the Hudson near Wall ST at the buttom of Manhattan. LCY to JFK is not more then 15 minutes longer then if the A318 went to LGA. IS 15 minutes worth LGA ? I will talke JFK.

User currently offlinexdlx From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 612 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks ago) and read 2582 times:

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 21):

Yep until the gate to Manhattan ride is 1h45m


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24075 posts, RR: 22
Reply 23, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2468 times:

Quoting connies4ever (Reply 18):
I don't see this happening for reasons amply stated above, plus since JFK would be n/s without clearing US customs at SNN, this will negate some of the advantages of arriving at JFK "domestic".

As far as I know, LGA does not have customs/immigration facilities for airline flights. I believe their inspection facilities are only usable by private and corporate aircraft.


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21092 posts, RR: 56
Reply 24, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2371 times:

Quoting connies4ever (Reply 18):
I don't see this happening for reasons amply stated above, plus since JFK would be n/s without clearing US customs at SNN, this will negate some of the advantages of arriving at JFK "domestic".

A dedicated business class line would make clearing customs at JFK pretty quick. And factor in the shorter flight time without the fuel stop and you've got yourself an overall much more attractive proposition.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinexdlx From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 612 posts, RR: 1
Reply 25, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2262 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 23):

From the standpoint of marketing .... This could be a "global Entry" flight only thus negating the need of FIS on arrival


User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8090 posts, RR: 7
Reply 26, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2216 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting xdlx (Reply 22):
Yep until the gate to Manhattan ride is 1h45m

BA can license the Virgin "Limo Bike" and cycle every one through traffic to Manhattan.


User currently offlineconnies4ever From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 4066 posts, RR: 13
Reply 27, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2208 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 23):
As far as I know, LGA does not have customs/immigration facilities for airline flights. I believe their inspection facilities are only usable by private and corporate aircraft.

An administrative obstacle that could be overcome. Also see Mirès comment below. I think the thrust behind this thread is: a) is it technically doable, and b) can you make a business case for it. I think the answer to both is Yes.

Quoting Mir (Reply 24):
A dedicated business class line would make clearing customs at JFK pretty quick. And factor in the shorter flight time without the fuel stop and you've got yourself an overall much more attractive proposition.

Very good point.



Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
User currently offlineytz From Canada, joined Jun 2009, 1832 posts, RR: 23
Reply 28, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 2081 times:

Quoting connies4ever (Reply 18):
BBD have stated that the CS100 will be certified out of the box for n/s LCY-JFK, so it's not a lack of capability. As well, the concept for the all-J CS100 is for 44 seats, as opposed to the A318's 32 (although likely more generous size-wise). So potential revenue generation would be bigger. So I don't see either a technical or business case reason that this could not be done.

I never said the CSeries couldn't do it. My point was that the CSeries is probably the only aircraft that fly this mission properly (non-stop).

Quoting connies4ever (Reply 18):
I don't see this happening for reasons amply stated above, plus since JFK would be n/s without clearing US customs at SNN, this will negate some of the advantages of arriving at JFK "domestic".

That was my point earlier. There needs to be preclearance at LCY and an accomodation on perimeter rules to allow LCY-DCA and LCY-LGA

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 21):
IS 15 minutes worth LGA ?

For the type of people who pay for and fly these business shuttles? Yes.

Quoting xdlx (Reply 22):
Yep until the gate to Manhattan ride is 1h45m

  

Quoting xdlx (Reply 25):
From the standpoint of marketing .... This could be a "global Entry" flight only thus negating the need of FIS on arrival

Or they could just negotiate preclearance with the Brits. Given the amount of American TATL travellers, I am surprised that hub airports in Europe don't all have terminals dedicated to US travel with preclearance CBP staff.


User currently offlineconnies4ever From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 4066 posts, RR: 13
Reply 29, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2040 times:

Quoting ytz (Reply 28):
Quoting connies4ever (Reply 18):
I don't see this happening for reasons amply stated above, plus since JFK would be n/s without clearing US customs at SNN, this will negate some of the advantages of arriving at JFK "domestic".

That was my point earlier. There needs to be preclearance at LCY and an accomodation on perimeter rules to allow LCY-DCA and LCY-LGA

Thatès a practical solution process-wise. I wonder if there would be enough traffic to justify the cost.



Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
User currently offlineytz From Canada, joined Jun 2009, 1832 posts, RR: 23
Reply 30, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1931 times:

Quoting connies4ever (Reply 29):
I wonder if there would be enough traffic to justify the cost.

Oh yes. I envision that an airline could actually have quite a solid business out of LCY serving BOS, DCA, LGA/JFK/EWR (Personally, I'd treat EWR and JFK/LGA as separate markets of sorts), PHL and maybe even MDW (not quite sure how limited the CS100 is on fuel and by LCY's runway length). I could see at least 200 pax a day. And probably closer to 400 per day with just those routes. All premium pax. Surely, the airline can afford to help the airport pay for preclearance for that many pax. It wouldn't take a huge team. Maybe 10 officers or so? Keep in mind, that many of these regular business pax probably have Global Entry. That should reduce workload quite a bit.

Given the sheer amount of government and diplomatic between London and Washington alone, I'm surprised that politicians in both countries haven't made an LCY-DCA link happen.


User currently offlineinfiniti329 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 469 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1720 times:

Quoting brilondon (Reply 19):
The business class is the only class on the A318's that BA flies out of LCY to JFK. Would the runways at LGA be long enough for a full fuel load?

Should be able to the minimum take off distance of an A318 at MTOW is 5,997 ft. Both runways are about 7,000 ft. And seeing how this A318's ZFW would be alot less because of less pax it should be able to do it no prob.


User currently offlinestarrymarkb From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2011, 127 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1623 times:

Is there room for handling more large (A318+) size aircraft at City?

User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24075 posts, RR: 22
Reply 33, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1416 times:

Quoting ytz (Reply 28):
Quoting xdlx (Reply 25):
From the standpoint of marketing .... This could be a "global Entry" flight only thus negating the need of FIS on arrival

Or they could just negotiate preclearance with the Brits. Given the amount of American TATL travellers, I am surprised that hub airports in Europe don't all have terminals dedicated to US travel with preclearance CBP staff.

Why would European airports want to make the huge investments that would be needed to handle pre-clearance? It works much better for them with the current procedures.


User currently offlineytz From Canada, joined Jun 2009, 1832 posts, RR: 23
Reply 34, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1350 times:

Quoting starrymarkb (Reply 32):

Is there room for handling more large (A318+) size aircraft at City?

They have an airport development plan in place.

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 33):
Why would European airports want to make the huge investments that would be needed to handle pre-clearance?

Not all airports. Just a few. Key hubs. It allows them to cater to far more destinations in the USA. No need to limit flights to an airport-of-entry. Surely, if DUB and SNN are justified then LHR, CDG, FRA, FCO, BRU, all have solid cases.

In any event, topic at hand. I think given the high yielding pax at LCY, I think there's a business case to be made for preclearance.


User currently offlinesteex From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 1564 posts, RR: 9
Reply 35, posted (1 year 4 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1286 times:

Quoting ytz (Reply 34):
Not all airports. Just a few. Key hubs. It allows them to cater to far more destinations in the USA. No need to limit flights to an airport-of-entry. Surely, if DUB and SNN are justified then LHR, CDG, FRA, FCO, BRU, all have solid cases.

But realistically, there are all of two airports in the USA that may be legitimate destinations from Europe and are not capable of handling an inbound international arrival - and those two airports, LGA and DCA, both have perimeters that prohibit such flights with no indication that there is political will to change that.

Also, keep in mind that DUB and SNN arguably work well BECAUSE they are not major hubs in the way of those other airports. Airports like LHR, CDG, and FRA achieve greater efficiency for their home carriers by not having any infrastructure specifically dedicated to USA departures (which must be segregated from all other gates) and largely allowing sterile international transfer without requiring any customs clearance for transit passengers.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
TUS-JFK Dead - Could ABQ-JFK Work? posted Tue May 13 2008 15:52:35 by 1337Delta764
Could An LCC Work Out In Central America? posted Tue Jun 21 2005 15:42:06 by RootsAir
Could JFK-BFL Work For B6? posted Wed Mar 16 2005 00:06:04 by Fa4b6
Could LGA Handle A 777? posted Sat Mar 27 2004 06:47:44 by Iflyatldl
Could A A340-313X Work For Continental? posted Sun Aug 26 2001 16:27:14 by Boeing757fan
Lufthansa DUS-PHL. Could It Work? posted Sun Oct 14 2012 08:21:45 by cgnnrw
Could AA Made ORD-DEL Work With 1 Stop? posted Sun Aug 26 2012 13:38:53 by AirDFW
Mini-hubs For Indian Carriers. Could It Work? posted Mon Aug 13 2012 19:56:14 by ytz
Could An A330 Base Charter Airline Work In The US? posted Sat Dec 3 2011 12:00:47 by 747400sp
PHL Hub For A Combined AA/US...could Work? posted Tue Jun 1 2010 19:31:10 by Seatback