Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Do You Think WN Has Buyers Remorse?  
User currently offlineF9animal From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 5076 posts, RR: 28
Posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 12575 times:

I have tried my best to follow the Air Tran takeover by WN. I also have noticed that there is some reductions going on in ATL. Do you think WN might have been better off without Air Tran? Or do you think it is a good thing for WN?


I Am A Different Animal!!
39 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinezippyjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 5487 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 12569 times:

Quoting F9animal (Thread starter):

From my standpoint as an FL crewmember I sure as hell hope WN made the right choice. Like any aquisition or airline merger the first couple of years could be the stuff of comedic movies. But, I hope and feel when the fod is cleared from the runway we will land on our feet and be "In Like Flint!"



I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1017 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 12437 times:

Nope. LGA, DCA, ATL, CUN, MEX, SJD, SJU, MBJ, etc... and the leg work on dozens of other potential "near-international" destinations. Reduced competition that was forcing down yields.

On another note thats probably of interest to a fan of F9, DEN-SJD will be starting soon on FL.



My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
User currently offlineLHCVG From United States of America, joined May 2009, 1600 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 12308 times:

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 2):
Nope. LGA, DCA, ATL, CUN, MEX, SJD, SJU, MBJ, etc... and the leg work on dozens of other potential "near-international" destinations. Reduced competition that was forcing down yields.

I tend to agree with usflyguy - they surely have run into more complicated hiccups than they hoped, but they got some nice things out of the deal that would have been very expensive and/or complicated to get otherwise. Whatever they don't like or want they can divest as they see fit, and then continue to soldier on as legacy WN + the good parts of FL they want to keep. As has been mentioned before, what we've seen to date indicates WN slowly digesting and assimilating FL bit by bit and then eventually they will confront the rump issues of international and the incompatible systems. But they'll get there and be a stronger carrier for it.


User currently offlineADent From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1390 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 12261 times:

The problems with the merger seem to be mostly WN - from my perspective. Whether they bought FL or not they would have to go thru the same pain to fly internationally, do real code shares, etc. So they got the immediate incentive to tackle these issues they had been avoiding for 5-10 years, at least.

On the other hand they could have done all this themselves (eventually) - are they listening to any FL people behind the scenes?

They also got a lot of gates at ATL and a bunch of 737s. And one less competitor.


User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 1441 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 12163 times:

Quoting LHCVG (Reply 3):
Quoting usflyguy (Reply 2):

I agree 100%.

Quoting ADent (Reply 4):
The problems with the merger seem to be mostly WN - from my perspective. Whether they bought FL or not they would have to go thru the same pain to fly internationally, do real code shares, etc. So they got the immediate incentive to tackle these issues they had been avoiding for 5-10 years, at least.

You are completely on par here. None of these problems are the acquisition, its just WN problems that would have come up anyway, they are just being emphasized and fixed because of the acquisition.



You will either love or hate the airline industry. If you love it, it will get in your blood and it will never leave.
User currently offlineB4REAL From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2646 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 11728 times:

One good thing here actually PRO-acquiring AirTran. Southwest only has 2 datacenters in Dallas, separated by not a far distance. They now have a datacenter in Atlanta, that's a big deal in regards to business technology resiliency; not directly air operations related. But, I am an IT pro - and for the size of their technology; that's really too close for my comfort!


B4REAL, spelled like it sounds
User currently offlinewnflyguy From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2011, 561 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 11681 times:

No I don't think WN has any remorse on buying FL.
The only real issue I think WN has had with FL merger so far is the IT issues with connection the networks with each other.
I think WN is getting everything it wanted from FL.
wnfg 



my post are my opinion only and not those of southwest airlines and or airtran airlines.
User currently offline737tdi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 894 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 11572 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting zippyjet (Reply 1):
From my standpoint as an FL crewmember I sure as hell hope WN made the right choice.

Howdy Zippyjet: Welcome to WN, if ever in DAL look me up. I work Eve. line maintenance.


User currently offlinediverdave From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 335 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 11261 times:

Quoting wnflyguy (Reply 7):
No I don't think WN has any remorse on buying FL.
The only real issue I think WN has had with FL merger so far is the IT issues with connection the networks with each other.
I think WN is getting everything it wanted from FL.
wnfg

Well said.

Now as to whether AirTran has seller's remorse, that's an entirely different question.  Wow!

David


User currently offlinebrilondon From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 4299 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 11222 times:

I don't think that they see any remorse in buying their competition. Sure, they have to reduce redundancies and not duplicate what they are doing, it is not like buying ketchup, when making a purchase of this magnitude there is so much study and discussion that when it comes to fruition, there has been much scrutiny on the effects of the purchase that they have gone way beyond buyers remorse.


Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
User currently offlineUnitedTristar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 11073 times:

Instant international and remove a major east coast competitor, plus access to some major airports in the NE, I think they got exactly what they wanted, outside of that they were not interested in making major changes so their business model (ie no fortress hubs...ATL, no 717's and no very small cities with less than daily/critical mass flights)

In sort, no I would say they are quite happy!

-m

  


User currently offlineAlnicocunife From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 166 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 11072 times:

No remorse and the Airtran baggage fees are helping eek out some profits during the integration process.

Gain: international destinations, Hawaii and a fresh perspective on airlines with Airtran employees/management?
Loss: having to pay for Delta's 717's, and no longer a being a LCC but just one of the "legacy" carriers.


User currently offlinebobloblaw From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1725 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 10575 times:

No...WN got rid of a competitor. ATL should certainly have remorse though.

User currently offlinekgaiflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 4299 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 10114 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting wnflyguy (Reply 7):
No I don't think WN has any remorse on buying FL.
The only real issue I think WN has had with FL merger so far is the IT issues with connection the networks with each other.
I think WN is getting everything it wanted from FL.

Perhaps more than they realized. FL's ability to do international runs is so useful. For instance, I was at SNA the first day of the new SNA-MEX run and saw the line out the terminal door. Additional runs to Mexico using FL might be interesting (from ABQ, ELP, AUS ?) .


User currently offlineCatiii From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 3045 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 9834 times:

Quoting ADent (Reply 4):
They also got a lot of gates at ATL and a bunch of 737s. And one less competitor.

Exactly. I believe WN was able to grow by something like 20% in one move. When you look at the relative growth of the rest of the industry vis-a-vis consolidation (UA becoming much bigger, DL, becoming much bigger, AA/US likely hooking up), for them to achieve such growth organically would have taken years.


User currently offlineRmTrice From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 36 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 9580 times:

I don't believe WN has buyers remorse at all. The regret comes in when you begin to look at the technology issues that have hindered this aquisition from the beginning: unable to book international flights, unable to code-share, etc... NW/DL's merger (one I went through as an NW employee) was very smooth because the airlines already shared a somewhat close relationship (codesharing, alliance partners). They were able to consolidate their operations very quickly. WN/F9 is a much more complicated situation because WN did not make the technology investments other airlines made so long ago. They didn't really need to according to their business strategy. The best strategy is to take their time, do their homework, and bring it all together. It's a shame it's taking so long, but it will be a positive thing for WN in the long run.

User currently offlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3535 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 9580 times:

I dont know about remorse, but it has become painfully obvious that WN cut off a bit more than they can chew with this merger.

All these years later, they still have not been integrated and customers are still confused.

I think in the end, they will be fine...but this may be one of those mergers that you look back on and ask why

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 2):
Nope. LGA, DCA, ATL, CUN, MEX, SJD, SJU, MBJ, etc... and the leg work on dozens of other potential "near-international" destinations. Reduced

But realistically, that is a handful of flights when you take out ATL. DCA and LGA were and are small operations for both airlines.

It all comes down to ATL. That is AirTrans greatest asset. When we look at ATL 10 years from now, we will know if this merger was worth it to WN.


User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 9518 times:

Quoting F9animal (Thread starter):
Do you think WN might have been better off without Air Tran?

No.

Quoting F9animal (Thread starter):
Or do you think it is a good thing for WN?

It's a great thing...Atlanta was one of the last areas WN had available to expand domestically. They could have bought AirTran, shut it down for a total loss the next day, and it would still have been good for WN. I like AirTran though, so I'm glad they didn't do that.

Tom.


User currently offlineAntoniemey From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1579 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 9491 times:

Quoting jfklganyc (Reply 17):
All these years later, they still have not been integrated and customers are still confused.

You make it sound like it's been a decade. We're talking about less than 2 years here...



Make something Idiot-proof, and the Universe will make a more inept idiot.
User currently offlinefrmrcapcadet From United States of America, joined May 2008, 1727 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 8814 times:

I think WN is smart to take as much time to get the IT right. As has been pointed out their current one was out of date, but served well. Passengers will appreciate a seamless transition or at least seamless compared to a rush job with repeated failures. Adding ETOPS, code share, (dreaded fees for extras), travel to other countries, etc. is a IT big project. From limited understanding with professionals three or four years to do a good job is not all that bad.


Buffet: the airline business...has eaten up capital...like..no other (business)
User currently offline0NEWAIR0 From United States of America, joined May 2007, 939 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 8815 times:

Quoting F9animal (Thread starter):
I have tried my best to follow the Air Tran takeover by WN. I also have noticed that there is some reductions going on in ATL. Do you think WN might have been better off without Air Tran? Or do you think it is a good thing for WN?

The ATL reduction was planned from the beginning. SWA is dismanteling AirTran and using the equipment and people as they see fit. We all knew that the merged AirTran/SWA would have a significantly smaller presence at Atlanta. That being said, I SWA does not have buyers remose and certainly would not have better off had they chose to not purchase AirTran.



"The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams."
User currently offlineFLALEFTY From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 477 posts, RR: 3
Reply 22, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 7730 times:

From my my vantage point, WN is pretty much getting what they were after in this deal:

1) They picked up FL's sweetheart deal for 737NGs.
2) They finally got reasonable access to Atlanta - an important business destination.
3) As others have pointed out, they were able to strengthen their IT, thanks to FL.
4) FL provided WN a nifty little portfolio of medium-haul international routes.
5) FL's corporate culture was as efficiency-minded as WN's corporate culture, so the integration of union contracts was much less painful.
6) WN picked up hard-to-get slots at LGA & DCA.

However,

1) WN's attempt to "wall-off" the 717s at FL rates so they could replace 735s, was not successful.
2) The jury is still out if WN's de-hubbing ATL will be in their long-term best interest.

Like all mergers, there are issues to deal with, some of which WN did not accurately anticipate (such as the proposed, 717 integration). But overall, I think WN emerges from this merger a much stronger and more competitive airline.

[Edited 2012-12-05 10:07:18]

[Edited 2012-12-05 10:09:01]

User currently offlineluvfa From United States of America, joined May 2005, 447 posts, RR: 5
Reply 23, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 7113 times:

Quoting FLALEFTY (Reply 22):
) The jury is still out if WN's de-hubbing ATL will be in their long-term best interest.

I question the term de-hubbing ATL as a WN strategy! Airtran had ATL as basically its only hub, so all flying had to connect via ATL. WN, on the other hand, has MDW, BWI etc. in the east so making ATL a little smaller was inevitable!

That said, ATL will still be important in the future once this acquisition becomes finished, (2014 and beyond), some sign I see:

-The de-emphasis of PHL as an east coast focus city, we would still have BWI, ATL

-Closing of short haul Florida service i.e. FLL-MCO, most of this was connecting traffic north. I see ATL as a connector from FL-NEand Midwest to supplement Nstop service in FLL, RSW.

-The planned opening of ATL as a crew base for pilots/FAs by 1-1-15 at the latest, per contracts, (although Im betting it opens by 2nd qtr. 2014)

As far as buyers remorse goes, this is the equivalence of buyers remorse as buying a car and having second thoughts before you even drive it home! If we re talking about regrets, lets wait 5-10 years from now until we make that decisions!


User currently offlineouboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4605 posts, RR: 23
Reply 24, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 6857 times:

Quoting Alnicocunife (Reply 12):
Loss: having to pay for Delta's 717's, and no longer a being a LCC but just one of the "legacy" carriers.

Most numbers show the 717 transaction will be a wash. The cost more so comes down to the time spent taking care of it all.

Also LCC is subjective. WN still has the lowest CASM out of all the big guys. Keep in mind too, there are a lot fewer big guys than their use to be. NW, CO, HP, etc are all gone. Many envisioned that we would see 3 large major airlines plus WN in the US. We are just one more transaction away from that being reality (for the most part, yes I know all the other little guys are still there and B6).

Quoting jfklganyc (Reply 17):
All these years later, they still have not been integrated and customers are still confused.
Quoting Antoniemey (Reply 19):
You make it sound like it's been a decade. We're talking about less than 2 years here...

This. However, I blame this on our society turning to a sense of instant gratification to be satisfied.


User currently offlineTriple7LR From United States of America, joined Sep 2012, 97 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 6871 times:

I think the big question that no one is asking is " Will the FL side of the merger still be profitable after they drop the bag fees?" I think there's a reason they continue to charge for bags at FL and its not an IT issue. Think about it. They increased the labor cost substantially and will eventually eliminate a huge revenue source, doesn't sound like good business to me.

User currently offlineluvfa From United States of America, joined May 2005, 447 posts, RR: 5
Reply 26, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6381 times:

Quoting ouboy79 (Reply 24):
This. However, I blame this on our society turning to a sense of instant gratification to be satisfied.


I guess that was the main point of my previous post!


User currently offlinesilentbob From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 2122 posts, RR: 1
Reply 27, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6462 times:

Quoting Triple7LR (Reply 25):
I think the big question that no one is asking is " Will the FL side of the merger still be profitable after they drop the bag fees?" I think there's a reason they continue to charge for bags at FL and its not an IT issue. Think about it. They increased the labor cost substantially and will eventually eliminate a huge revenue source, doesn't sound like good business to me.

FL generally had much lower fares than WN. If they can generate WN level revenue from ticket prices, they won't need to have the ancillary fees.


User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7931 posts, RR: 52
Reply 28, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6375 times:

Quoting 0NEWAIR0 (Reply 21):
The ATL reduction was planned from the beginning. SWA is dismanteling AirTran and using the equipment and people as they see fit. We all knew that the merged AirTran/SWA would have a significantly smaller presence at Atlanta.

   Just look back at the pre-merger threads. Most of us thought/knew that FL's business plan was much different than WN's and ATL didn't quite fit into WN... the reduction of many smaller markets and the buffing up of WN's usual markets was predicted and only a few thought that WN was going to expand/give DL a run for their money. I don't claim to be a business expert, but just looking at WN's business plan, the reduction of ATL was pretty much a given. I don't see how anyone is surprised about that



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 1441 posts, RR: 2
Reply 29, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6332 times:

Quoting Triple7LR (Reply 25):
I think there's a reason they continue to charge for bags at FL and its not an IT issue.

WN can charge for bag fees when ever they want. They choose to charge at FL because FL has always charged and FL isn't known for free bags and they won't advertise enough to warrant that.



You will either love or hate the airline industry. If you love it, it will get in your blood and it will never leave.
User currently offlineusairways787 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 290 posts, RR: 1
Reply 30, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 4212 times:

It'd be a little late to say "Hey, you know what, we really shouldn't have bought you" airTran brought more to the table than Southwest ever could have. As a result of the "Acquisition" a lot of airTran people lost their jobs (myself included) so they can suck it up. The way a lot of folks at FL have been treated through out the merger is just enough in itself, and believe me a lot of folks at WN are going to be receiving a wake up call. Your gravy train is over.

US787



"Pre departure walk around complete, all doors closed, ready for pushback"
User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1017 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 4157 times:

Quoting usairways787 (Reply 30):
As a result of the "Acquisition" a lot of airTran people lost their jobs (myself included) so they can suck it up.

What department did you work in? Were you not offered something else?



My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
User currently offlineJayBird From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 4057 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

No, Southwest doesn't have buyers remorse ..

Pan Am - yes, after they purchased National
USAir - yes, after they purchased PSA
American - yes, after they purchased everyone they've purchased except for Trans Caribbean

but Southwest, i don't think so ..

my 2cents  


User currently offlineouboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4605 posts, RR: 23
Reply 33, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3807 times:

Quoting usairways787 (Reply 30):

It'd be a little late to say "Hey, you know what, we really shouldn't have bought you" airTran brought more to the table than Southwest ever could have. As a result of the "Acquisition" a lot of airTran people lost their jobs (myself included) so they can suck it up.

What position did you hold? Only fair that you provide those details as well so it can properly considered. Nearly everyone has been offered a position elsewhere in the company, even those at the GA call centers that are closing. Now it can come down to having to relocate to a new city to take advantage of that opportunity, but that happens with any company. Better to have an option than none at all.

Quoting usairways787 (Reply 30):
The way a lot of folks at FL have been treated through out the merger is just enough in itself,

My experience has been nothing but positive when seeing people interact with FL employees. From flying, at FLY class at HQ, and with my friends that work in res. I'm sure there are some isolated issues here and there, but nothing nearly as messed as US/HP or UA/CO.

Quoting usairways787 (Reply 30):
and believe me a lot of folks at WN are going to be receiving a wake up call. Your gravy train is over.

I'm going to frank with this response and this is my own opinion. With the attitude I'm getting from this line, isolated from the rest of your post, your personality and negatively is definitely not something that is selected when hiring new hires in from off the street. Hopefully this is just frustration on your part for whatever you situation is, but if this is the attitude that was present every day then I don't see your future being outside of WN a bad thing. Many will say a merger like this is risky by transferring employees over without vetting them properly for the traits WN looks for. However, in every interaction I've had with an ex-FL employee I have been shown there is nothing to worry about. Of course there will be bad eggs in every batch and they all eventually work themselves out of a job.


User currently offlinesrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 34, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3453 times:

One thing to note is that when WN entered ATL, there really wasn't the "Southwest Effect" in terms of airfares that many markets that WN entered has. FL had already gotten the fares down on routes they competed with DL (and other airlines) so there wasn't much meat on that bone other than those cities FL didn't serve.

The integration of FL into WN is atypical for an airline merger in regards to the length of time before the acquired brand is phased out. The typical merger sees the acquired brand wiped away as quick as possible. Then again, the merger that created AirTran was unusual in that ValuJet changed their name to AirTran Airlines while in the process of acquiring AirTran Airways (not to mention retaining the name of the acquired airline instead of the other way around).


User currently offlinedelimit From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 1513 posts, RR: 2
Reply 35, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3228 times:

Quoting bobloblaw (Reply 13):
ATL should certainly have remorse though.

Why would ATL care?

The airport is still getting its money. I guess that Chick-Fil-A might miss the people changing planes.

If you're talking about the city, however, they're losing some jobs, but that's about it. The major part of FL's traffic was connecting.

The city may lose a destination or two, and DL's fares may bounce around a bit as WN rationalizes ATL into its network, but honestly, not much is changing in the greater scheme of things.

I don't think WN is having buyer's remorse. I think, rather, that the merger simply isn't living up to the fairly unrealistic expectations some people here had. Pretty much anyone who has watched DL and FL had told them that very little would change when the merger was discussed here. WN was never going to come into ATL and cause a major impact.


User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1017 posts, RR: 0
Reply 36, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2939 times:

Quoting srbmod (Reply 34):
The integration of FL into WN is atypical for an airline merger in regards to the length of time before the acquired brand is phased out.

Previous integrations have been between 2 carriers that are basically the same but with a different name and different logo. With FL/WN, you have two totally different carriers in what is offered from fees to onboard.



My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23148 posts, RR: 20
Reply 37, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2851 times:

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 36):
With FL/WN, you have two totally different carriers in what is offered from fees to onboard.

How is it more different than UA and CO?



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlinewjcandee From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5261 posts, RR: 23
Reply 38, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2374 times:

They did the deal to take out a lower-cost, lower-price competitor. Anything else they said is window-dressing. So it's a success.

User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1017 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2331 times:

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 37):

To start, UA/CO both have premium cabins, WN/FL do not. UA/CO had similar route networks, WN/FL did not. Assigned seating vs no assigned seating. Bag fees vs no bag fees. Contracted stations vs all WN employees.



My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Do You Think This Picture Has An Odd Look To It? posted Sun May 20 2001 13:30:22 by 757PF
Who Do You Think Has The Best Color Scheme? posted Wed Oct 6 1999 03:46:50 by ATA757
Which Airline Do You Think Has The Best Web-Site? posted Wed Oct 6 1999 02:47:58 by ATA757
Do You Think JetBlue Will Go With A Widebody Plane posted Thu Oct 4 2012 18:21:06 by doulasc
New QF Brand Image - What Do You Think? posted Sun Jul 22 2012 14:05:52 by OzGlobal
How Long Do You Think FX Will Use A306 To ORF? posted Thu Jun 14 2012 18:12:05 by 747400sp
Do You Think Flybe Will Fly From SEN Anytime Soon? posted Sat Mar 10 2012 13:10:27 by LGWflyer
Which Airlines Do You Think Will Come To LGW Next? posted Sun Oct 9 2011 18:00:19 by LGWflyer
Do You Think UA Should Create Another Elite Level? posted Fri Dec 31 2010 12:23:55 by jgw787
Hawaiian A330 Fully Painted - What Do You Think? posted Thu Mar 25 2010 15:16:14 by TeamDA