Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Less Turbulence On The 787?  
User currently offlineNDiesel From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 82 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5068 times:

Hi fellow travellers,


Some time ago I posted a thread named The Fear of Turbulence, and thank you for your amazing and extensive feedback. Your experiences were a treat to read. I'm glad to tell you that I'm finally flying happily again, having successfully completed my 8th intercontinental flight of this year.

Landing at LAX recently after a lovely flight from LHR on the amazing BA 744, I began wondering if any of you who have flown the 788 can confirm (or deny) whether or not the design of the wings dampen the effect of turbulence like Boeing claims, or whether the plane feels like any other widebody jet flying through rough weather? Although cured of my flying fears, I still heavily dislike turbulence. Would the 787 be a good choice for someone like me?

Thoughts?

(Proof of a now-cured, previously-nervous flyer: A great trip with SK earlier this year. I got invited to sit up front during landing at OSL. How often does that happen in the U.S.?)




Delta MD-11 JFK-CDG - Upon sunrise I fell in love with Aviation
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinealphaomega From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 579 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4819 times:

There is no way to say 1 aircraft will dampen turbulence more than another - all aircraft are subject to the same conditions and generally the larger the aircraft, the less of an effect (such as a Cessna 172 vs a Boeing 747 through the same airspace) but there would never be a way to prove Boeing's claim.

Quoting NDiesel (Thread starter):
(Proof of a now-cured, previously-nervous flyer: A great trip with SK earlier this year. I got invited to sit up front during landing at OSL. How often does that happen in the U.S.?)

Interesting...unless you're a direct air carrier employee, receive written permission from the flight ops department of an air carrier, an FAA inspector, ATC controller, pilot, or any other person on a very short list, this doesn't happen in the US. Lucky you! It probably really helped your fear of flying/turbulence getting to see what happens in the flight deck during flight.


User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 4490 times:

Quoting NDiesel (Thread starter):
I began wondering if any of you who have flown the 788 can confirm (or deny) whether or not the design of the wings dampen the effect of turbulence like Boeing claims

I'm not aware of any Boeing claim that it's the wing design that dampens turbulence. There is a vertical gust suppression system on the 787 that dampens turbulence through the flight controls. Here's an old, but still good, article about it:
http://www.seattlepi.com/business/ar...technology-gives-787-a-1238203.php

Quoting NDiesel (Thread starter):
or whether the plane feels like any other widebody jet flying through rough weather?

I've flown the 787 in a wide variety of conditions and it felt smooth...but there's a major caveat to that. I have no idea what it would have felt like on a different aircraft. The variance in turbulence from point to point and day to day is far wider than turbulence handling capability of various airliners. So I have no idea if I was flying in heavy turbulence and the 787 was working furiously to damp it out, or if I was just flying in light turbulence.

One thing I've noticed is that, if you're on a 787 in turbulence, the flight controls are wiggling like crazy, far faster than any pilot would move them, so the flight control system was obviously doing something with great enthusiasm.

Quoting NDiesel (Thread starter):
Although cured of my flying fears, I still heavily dislike turbulence. Would the 787 be a good choice for someone like me?

I'm not sure. I think having the big windows would help you more than anything else, honestly.

Tom.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
We Were On The 787 Dreamliner And The DreamLifter posted Sat Nov 6 2010 14:48:14 by Art at ISP
"Shoddy Workmanship" On The 787? posted Tue Jul 6 2010 19:19:29 by czbbflier
Marketing Gimmicks On The 787 And A350? posted Wed Apr 1 2009 11:43:00 by CEO@AFG
What Is The Status On The 787 posted Wed Feb 27 2008 19:11:21 by Tonytifao
Rockwell Collins IFE On The 787? posted Thu Sep 13 2007 19:55:30 by 1337Delta764
Boeing Faces Hurdles, Opportunities On The 787 posted Tue Aug 21 2007 21:57:07 by NYC777
IFE Options On The 787 posted Fri Jul 27 2007 14:41:11 by 1337Delta764
Extra Space Utilization On The 787 posted Sun Jul 15 2007 08:09:06 by Dl767captain
Information On The 787 Design. posted Tue Jun 5 2007 18:50:13 by Dimoko
Any Info On The 787 rollout party. posted Tue May 22 2007 18:51:56 by B777A340Fan
We Were On The 787 Dreamliner And The DreamLifter posted Sat Nov 6 2010 14:48:14 by Art at ISP
"Shoddy Workmanship" On The 787? posted Tue Jul 6 2010 19:19:29 by czbbflier
Marketing Gimmicks On The 787 And A350? posted Wed Apr 1 2009 11:43:00 by CEO@AFG
What Is The Status On The 787 posted Wed Feb 27 2008 19:11:21 by Tonytifao
Rockwell Collins IFE On The 787? posted Thu Sep 13 2007 19:55:30 by 1337Delta764
Boeing Faces Hurdles, Opportunities On The 787 posted Tue Aug 21 2007 21:57:07 by NYC777
IFE Options On The 787 posted Fri Jul 27 2007 14:41:11 by 1337Delta764
Extra Space Utilization On The 787 posted Sun Jul 15 2007 08:09:06 by Dl767captain