Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Does Malaysian Have So Many Liveries?  
User currently onlineDIJKKIJK From France, joined Jul 2003, 1780 posts, RR: 4
Posted (1 year 7 months 6 days ago) and read 12929 times:

They have this one

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mehmet Mustafa Celik




and this one


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Raymond Ngu



and another one for the A380


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Yvan Panas



and yet another one for the A380


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dn280



The only other airline I've known with so many liveries going around at the same time was AI post merger with IC. But why is Malaysian doing this?


Never argue with idiots. They will bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience.
30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineFuling From Australia, joined Apr 2011, 187 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days ago) and read 12902 times:

I believe the 2nd A380 livery you've posted is not complete. When finished, it will look like the 1st A380 photo.

The B772 photo is the old livery and is being phased out I think.

I could be wrong though.

[Edited 2012-12-09 03:47:12]

User currently onlineDIJKKIJK From France, joined Jul 2003, 1780 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days ago) and read 12882 times:

Quoting Fuling (Reply 1):
I believe the 2nd A380 livery you've posted is not complete. When finished, it will look like the 1st A380 photo.

It does seem complete. Here is a picture of it on a revenue flight from KUL.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Hon Kit




Never argue with idiots. They will bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience.
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 10335 posts, RR: 30
Reply 3, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days ago) and read 12874 times:

Quote:
I believe the 2nd A380 livery you've posted is not complete. When finished, it will look like the 1st A380 photo.

The livery on 9M-MND is indeed not complete but it will get Oneworld markings instead of the blue stripes.



Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe.
User currently offline777way From Pakistan, joined Dec 2005, 5716 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days ago) and read 12873 times:

They should just adopt the A380 livery fleetwide, its quite good , BTW the livery is said to be a special scheme only for the big bird, the remaining fleet will either stick with the 90s livery or the new swoosh one, though its been said the latter has been rejected and some 737s trasnferred from Fire Fly have been repainted in the 90s livery already.

The 380 livery would have been just right for Kuwait airways as it has the exact same colours.


User currently offlineFuling From Australia, joined Apr 2011, 187 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days ago) and read 12852 times:

Quoting DIJKKIJK (Reply 2):
It does seem complete. Here is a picture of it on a revenue flight from KUL

Well that is strange then. It is a wee bit dull then. Maybe the 1st MH A380 livery was just a special livery being the 1st A380 in their fleet.
Anyone else know?


User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 10335 posts, RR: 30
Reply 6, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days ago) and read 12848 times:

Quoting DIJKKIJK (Reply 2):
It does seem complete. Here is a picture of it on a revenue flight from KUL.

9M-MND does not have the blue stripes like the other 3 frames.



Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe.
User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days ago) and read 12832 times:

Quoting 777way (Reply 4):

They should just adopt the A380 livery fleetwide, its quite good , BTW the livery is said to be a special scheme only for the big bird, the remaining fleet will either stick with the 90s livery or the new swoosh one, though its been said the latter has been rejected and some 737s trasnferred from Fire Fly have been repainted in the 90s livery already.

Shame, I'd have preferred to see that "swoosh" livery on all of them, the blue stripes seem a bit too busy to me and the 90s livery is, well, very outdated.


User currently offline777way From Pakistan, joined Dec 2005, 5716 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days ago) and read 12802 times:

I dont believe in the outdated mantra of the airline industry anymore, too mnay airlines have changed their looks based on that farce for sometimes really bad new schemes, unless a livery is from 1960s then its outdated other wise all is well, I would have still liked PIA to have been in their 1976 livery with barely noticable tweaks.

[Edited 2012-12-09 04:21:14]

User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4823 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 12612 times:

1st photo (B772) is being phased out in favor of the 2nd photo (A330) & the A380 will be the only aircraft in the MH fleet to sport the blue wave livery... The 4th photo (A380) is incomplete, all MH A380s are delivered minus the cowling and fuselage wave which is applied in house in Malaysia...

EK413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineaerokiwi From New Zealand, joined Jul 2000, 2678 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 12566 times:

If it's true that they plan on operating with two liveries, it's a total dog's breakfast of a branding strategy. The core of their brand - the kite, fish thingumy - is distinctly different in the two liveries. So which is it that represents the airline?

The red and blue swooshes look just terrible in real life and MH seems to have a real issue with integrating their colours with the wing - on the 330, the red swoosh just stops altogether rather than flow over the wing/fuselage join, while on the 380, the bottom blue stripes do likewise - they just stop, rather than integrate with the wing/fuselage join.

Really amateurish efforts so far.


User currently offlineje89_w From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 2360 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 12513 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting EK413 (Reply 9):
1st photo (B772) is being phased out

It's very confusing because the former Firefly B738s were repainted into this "old" MAS livery not long ago.

[Edited 2012-12-09 05:20:15]

User currently offlinekaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12398 posts, RR: 37
Reply 12, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 12480 times:

Quoting EK413 (Reply 9):
1st photo (B772) is being phased out in favor of the 2nd photo (A330)

Yes, but they've had that livery now for at least a year and so far, none of the 777s appear to have been painted. Why is this?


User currently offline777way From Pakistan, joined Dec 2005, 5716 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 12445 times:

Quoting je89_w (Reply 11):

He means the 777 fleet is being phased out, not that 90s livery.


User currently offlineshanxz From Singapore, joined Apr 2006, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 9948 times:

The real reason is company politics. When Tengku Azmil wanted to leave his mark, the swoosh livery came about - approximately 2 years ago.

Then there was a re-shuffle and Tony Fernandes (from AirAsia) came on the Board of MH, doing widespread re-shuffles in the senior management. Out went the earlier CEO, and in came a new team (lots of ex-Westjetters too!). Many believe that Tony wanted AirAsia to be the "red" airline, and MH to be the "blue" airline from Malaysia. So out went the reds from the logo and that was the new livery on the A380.

Now that Tony Fernandes is no longer arm-twisting Blues and Reds, MH new management may revert to the original livery, or keep the current blue one. There's utter confusion, and no one really knows what's going to happen. Meanwhile, happy spotting!



Airlines are in the service business, not transport. Brand matters...
User currently offline9MMAR From Malaysia, joined Jul 2006, 2107 posts, RR: 18
Reply 15, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 9496 times:

This is the result of so many interference from so many parties and the changes of management in such a short period of time, all of which have this 'I am better than you' attitude.

This livery


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © TK



is on its way out that's for sure. All the new B738, A333 and A380 are not wearing this livery. The current B734, B744 and B772 which are wearing this scheme are on its way to be phasing out, although we could expect this livery will stay until 2014 the earliest.


This swosh livery


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Rick Schlamp



is supposed to be the new official livery until the share swap between MH and AK was proposed by the Malaysian government in August 2011.


The controversial share swap, which saw massive management reshuffle, saw the new management wanted to split MH into 2 - a longhaul airline (planned to be MH) operating all widebody aircraft (A333, A380 and a yet to be announced replacement for the existing B772) wearing this livery


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Clément Alloing



and a shorthaul airline (planned to be named Sapphire) operating all B738 fleet wearing this livery

http://jetabout.webs.com/sea/MAS/mas738n.jpg

The symbolic is that the blue and red MH featured in the earlier liveries are split to signify the creation of the 2 entities from the existing MH. As evident here, both the blue and red liveries for the longhaul and shorthaul airlines (MH and Sapphire) are identical, only differs in colour.

However, the share swap failed after massive resistance from so many parties, which saw another massive management reshuffling within the airline in just 1 year. This resulted in the red livery planned for Sapphire never took off.


The new current/management decided to keep the earlier new livery and (somehow) the all blue livery planned for the new MH which has already being applied on the A380s and stated that this livery will only be with the 6 A380. All future A333, B738 and the replacement aircraft for the B772 will/have been wearing the swosh livery.

The albino A380 9M-MND is earmarked to wear a special livery reported to be a oneworld livery following MH's election into the alliance on 1 February 2013.

So that will be the status for the time being.

Personally, I hate the swosh livery and am actually rooting for the red Sapphire livery to be the new standard livery as I think it is more of a modernized version of the original red MH livery.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Kjell Nilsson



From branding point of view, MH is indeed messed up big time. And this is just the livery, don't get me started on the corporate logo/font...


.

.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dn280



Just which one? And the kite is facing left or right?


User currently offlinePlunaCRJ From Uruguay, joined Nov 2007, 574 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 9067 times:

Just a few days ago I was wondering about what happened with MH´s apparent multiple brands. I checked the airline´s website and noticed they display the two color logo. Good, I never liked the all-blue A380 livery...

Remembering the fact that they were planning to keep distinct liveries for the fleet, and wondering what happened with that, I proceeded to check their fleet page. It´s a mess, seemingly every aircraft type graphic has a different livery; from the "original one" (747, A330, 737-400, 777), passing through the "swooshes one" (A330 "new" (?), 737-800) to the "all blue one" (A380); they all get depicted.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Then this thread shows up, what a coincidence, eh?

Personally, I don´t like at all the "all blue one": the blue shades used, and how they are combined, bothers me. And the blue.. ribbons? bands? are too massive on the 380.

I don´t like either the "swooshes one".

I do like, though, a lot, the original one. I´ve always liked it.

Quoting je89_w (Reply 11):
It's very confusing because the former Firefly B738s were repainted into this "old" MAS livery not long ago.

I would like indeed to see this livery reinstated. Or the Sapphire one. Both are much nicer than the swooshes one IMHO.

Quoting 9MMAR (Reply 15):
Personally, I hate the swoosh livery and am actually rooting for the red Sapphire livery to be the new standard livery as I think it is more of a modernized version of the original red MH livery.

You are right, I have quite a liking for the Sapphire livery. It doesn´t look bad at all. This confirms that the shades of blue is what bothers me about the "all blue" livery. In red it looks great.

The shades of red used do not clash between themselves as the blue ones used on the blue version.

I also like the connection you pointed out with the original red MH livery.

Regards,


User currently offline777way From Pakistan, joined Dec 2005, 5716 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 8294 times:

If the swoosh livery is staying why is the original one appllied to the ex-Fire fly 737s and not the swoosh one??? also the swoosh should go to MASwings their livery is awful.

User currently offlinePolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2115 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 8294 times:

Quoting PlunaCRJ (Reply 16):
Personally, I don´t like at all the "all blue one": the blue shades used, and how they are combined, bothers me. And the blue.. ribbons? bands? are too massive on the 380.

The biggest problem I have with the all blue (and the swoosh livery for that matter) is how MAS is not painting the design on the wing to body fairing. On the the 737 that is fine (as seen in most of the swoosh liveries and the red blue strip one posted earlier) because it doesn't cut off most of the design, but when you get a huge plane with a large wing to body fairing, i.e. the A380, it is jarring...


User currently offline9MMAR From Malaysia, joined Jul 2006, 2107 posts, RR: 18
Reply 19, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7935 times:

Quoting 777way (Reply 17):
If the swoosh livery is staying why is the original one appllied to the ex-Fire fly 737s and not the swoosh one??? also the swoosh should go to MASwings their livery is awful.

Originally, the swosh livery is planned to be applied only on the owned new B738 (all 9M-MX* and 9M-MS* series) all of which come with the Boeing Sky Interior. The leased B738 (all 9M-ML* series) including all ex Firefly B738 are excluded hence they were painted to the now old livery. However, beginning from the 13th leased B738 (9M-MLM), the aircraft will be on the new swosh livery.

MASwings is a sub brand of MH, focusing on a rather unglamorous niche, hence why I think a different livery is adopted for brand differentiation.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Eurospot



I don't think MASwings' livery is that bad looking.


User currently offlineTriple Seven From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 6738 times:

Quoting 9MMAR (Reply 19):

The 'swoosh' livery actually appeared with the 9th leased 738 (9M-MLI). What is puzzling is the fact that all ex Firefly's 738 reverted to the old livery including the new 9M-FFF (itself the original 9M-MLK before the current one). I'll understand if -FFD/FFE will not feature the new livery as it may be considered an odd-ball fleet and may return soon, but FFA/FFB/FFC(now MLC)/FFF?!?!


User currently offlinespud757 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 327 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 5803 times:

What a mess the livery is in terms of corporate identity and branding. Almost as bad as the BA world colours scheme on the tails.

Really don't like the MH all blue A380 livery. It's missing the red from the flag which has been a feature of the previous liveries.

Be good for MH to sort its branding out as it enters OW.


User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8439 posts, RR: 9
Reply 22, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 5769 times:

They're trying to be the Delta of the east.

User currently offlineTriple Seven From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 5658 times:

Quote:
They're trying to be the Delta of the east.

Not just trying they'll beat it! By Feb/Mar 2013 will see 5 livery:
1. Old livery
2. The 'swoosh'
3. The 'Blue'
4. Retro Red liverly of 1972-1987 (debuting Dec 13th on 738 -MXA)
5. OneWorld


User currently offlineTriple7X From Singapore, joined Dec 2012, 38 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 5520 times:

The red sapphire livery looks good  


1x Airbus A300B4-600R, 2x Airbus A330-300, 2x Boeing B777-300/-300ER, 4x Boeing 777-200/-200ER, 7x Airbus A320-200
User currently offlineSKAirbus From Norway, joined Oct 2007, 1652 posts, RR: 2
Reply 25, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 5324 times:

Virgin Atlantic is also good with multiple liveries... Three on the go at the moment!


Next Flights: LGW-SVG (738-DY), SVG-LHR (319-BA), LHR-HKG (388-BA), HKG-SYD (333-CX), SYD-HKG (333-CX), HKG-LHR (388-BA)
User currently offlinea36001 From Australia, joined Sep 2012, 164 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days ago) and read 4931 times:

Rant! What on earth does that so called livery have to do with MAS, it represents nothing! It in no way fits on the A380, I mean what's the deal behind the wing? Run out of money? Imagination more like! To me the livery looks backwards and in absolutely no way highlights the graceful lines of the A380, and the A380 needs it's graceful lines helped out IMHO. (in no way an attack on the A380, It's a great aircraft, just a little podgy).

I am a fan of the euro white with bright colours, re: QF, JAL and AF (and a bit of dirt makes it more interesting), but this? It's a mess! Come up with something imaginative, stylish and one that means something or at least is favourable to all aircraft in the fleet or better still don't try and fix something that is not broken just to "make your impression known"! Rant!  


User currently offlinePlunaCRJ From Uruguay, joined Nov 2007, 574 posts, RR: 2
Reply 27, posted (1 year 7 months 5 days ago) and read 4877 times:

Quoting 9MMAR (Reply 19):

Originally, the swosh livery is planned to be applied only on the owned new B738 (all 9M-MX* and 9M-MS* series) all of which come with the Boeing Sky Interior. The leased B738 (all 9M-ML* series) including all ex Firefly B738 are excluded hence they were painted to the now old livery. However, beginning from the 13th leased B738 (9M-MLM), the aircraft will be on the new swosh livery.

What a confusing brand.

So we´ll get distinct liveries for distinct aircraft types. The A380s get to wear the all blue livery, the new 737s the swoosh one, and everything else the old (regular?) livery.

What is the plan for the A330 fleet? Several of them have the swoosh livery.


User currently offline9MMAR From Malaysia, joined Jul 2006, 2107 posts, RR: 18
Reply 28, posted (1 year 7 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4591 times:

Quoting Triple Seven (Reply 23):
4. Retro Red liverly of 1972-1987 (debuting Dec 13th on 738 -MXA)

The picture of it has leaked at Malaysianwings, a local forum.

Quoting PlunaCRJ (Reply 27):
What is the plan for the A330 fleet? Several of them have the swoosh livery.

My reply #19 above was from the context of B738. All the new A333 have been wearing and will be wearing the swoosh.


User currently offline777way From Pakistan, joined Dec 2005, 5716 posts, RR: 4
Reply 29, posted (1 year 7 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 4165 times:

If designers were to creatively incorporate a shade or two of blue in the red version of the A380 livery and add the current blue/red wau logo on that with the full malaysiaairlines title, it might solve the livery issue depending on how good it looks.

User currently offlineYchocky From Canada, joined Jul 2009, 171 posts, RR: 0
Reply 30, posted (1 year 7 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4116 times:

The scale of the 380 works for the new livery.

But, the only MH livery in my mind:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Samuel Schneeberger



Superb.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Does Spirit Have So Many Unpainted Aircraft? posted Fri Apr 4 2003 02:04:02 by 727LOVER
Why Does Garuda Have So Many Leased Plane? posted Fri Apr 5 2002 09:09:34 by AOMlover
Why Does Japan Have So Many Dom. 747s? posted Sat Feb 16 2002 22:09:26 by PanAm747
Why Does USAir Have So Many Flights Out Of Lga? posted Wed May 16 2001 23:51:58 by Ishky15
Why Did TWA Have So Many 717 Maintenance Problems? posted Sat Jul 6 2002 22:19:53 by BR715-A1-30
Why Did USAir Have So Many Accidents? posted Sun Jun 20 1999 02:05:05 by Cedarjet
Why Does US Airways Have So Many Gates @ Ksyr? posted Tue Apr 6 2004 16:09:18 by B727
Why Did Philippine Airlines Have So Many A340's? posted Wed Oct 19 2005 04:00:12 by Lumberton
Why Did West Pac Have So Many Logo Jets posted Wed Jun 13 2001 03:36:44 by Airbus380
Why Does AC Have Two Hangars In YVR? posted Sun Sep 9 2012 18:48:44 by multimark